Share

Will Obama End "War on Drugs"?

by: Sherwood Ross  |  Consortium News

photo
Inmates with substance use problems find themselves unable to get the treatment they need. (Photo: Getty Images)

    Efforts by President Obama to put an end to the nation's failed "War on Drugs" can't come an hour too soon - if that's his intent. From his actions, it's hard to know.

    Drug offenses account for about half the 200,000 Federal prison inmates behind bars, compared to just 15 percent of prisoners convicted of violent crimes involving weapons, explosives, or arson. If America leads the world with 2.3 million prisoners in all its prisons, jails, and assorted lock-ups, it is largely because we have criminalized drug addiction, not treated it.

    President Richard Nixon first declared a "War on Drugs" in 1969 to dramatize his fight against drug addiction. Nixon - who had a knack for waging wars he could not win - got the country headed down a wrong road from which it may only now be just turning around.

    Gil Kerlikowske, Obama's new head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, has renounced even the use of the phrase "War on Drugs" on grounds it favors incarceration of offenders rather than treatment. But talk is no substitute for action.

    To his credit, Obama has long appeared to be open to a fresh approach. In an address at Howard University on Sept. 28, 2007, then Sen. Obama said, "I think it's time we took a hard look at the wisdom of locking up some first time nonviolent drug users for decades."

    "We will give first-time, non-violent drug offenders a chance to serve their sentence, where appropriate, in the type of drug rehabilitation programs that have proven to work better than a prison term in changing bad behavior," he added. "So let's reform this system. Let's do what's smart. Let's do what's just."
And as prison overcrowding worsens and governors currently whine they can't balance budgets, the public might get some real relief.

    Last year, more than 700,000 of the country's 20-million pot smokers were arrested for marijuana possession, according to NORML, an advocacy lobby that works for decriminalization. Over the past decade, 5-million folks got arrested on marijuana charges, 90% of which were for "simple possession, not trafficking or sale," NORML says.

    "Regardless of whether one is a 'drug warrior' or a 'drug legalizer," writes Bob Barr in the May 25 Atlanta Journal Constitution, "it is difficult if not impossible to defend the 38-year old war on drugs as a success."

    That's because, "Illicit drugs are every bit as easy to score on America's streets and in her schools now as they were more than three decades ago. Last year, just under 84 percent of the 12th graders considered that marijuana was 'very easy' or 'fairly easy' to obtain; virtually the same as in a 1975 survey."

    What accounts for the 547 percent spurt in prison population between 1970 and 2007, Barr writes, is that "the primary focus of the federal anti-drug effort has been enforcement, interdiction and incarceration as opposed to demand reduction, prevention and treatment."

    Mary Ellen DiGiacomo, of the Action Committee For Women in Prison(ACWIP), of New Jersey, says, "There's long waiting lines to get into (substance abuse) programs, and they don't have drug treatment programs at most women's institutions. You get one therapist, one counselor you talk to but that does not constitute drug treatment."

    This may be one reason Bureau of Justice Statistics finds two out of every three released convicts within three years wind up back inside.

    As former Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke wrote in The New Republic, "There are roughly 1.8 million people arrested each year for drug law violations - 40 percent of them for marijuana possession." Schmoke called for creating more Federal drug courts where addicts "would be treated from a public health perspective" rather than a criminal one.

    Gloria Killian, of Pasadena, founder and executive director of ACWIP, estimates "Eighty percent of (the 11,600) women in California's prisons are in there for nonviolent drug offenses. Most low-level drug offenders are addicts and need treatment. It's a medical problem. It's a mental health problem."

    Oddly, foreign presidents can see the problem clearly even if many U.S. "law-and-order" politicians cannot. AP in a March 16 dispatch wrote that a report by three former Latin presidents "dubbed the war on drugs a 'complete failure.'"

    Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico, César Gaviria of Colombia, and Henrique Cardoso of Brazil, "all conservative politicians, blamed the US emphasis on criminalization for the continuing toll caused by drug trafficking, and called for an approach based on public health, including the legalization of marijuana," AP said.

    The ill-starred drug war has filled American prisons to bursting. In Chicago, some prisoners are sleeping on the floor, the John Howard Assn. reports. At the California Institution for Women, in Corona, designed for 800-900, Killian says, "last year they ran at double capacity at all times." The recreation rooms have been filled up with beds and "the auditorium has been used as a dormitory."

    Calling our prisons "overcrowded" and "ill-managed," Sen. Jim Webb, D-Virginia, wrote in Parade magazine: "Drug offenders, most of them passive users or minor dealers, are swamping our prisons." Webb said 47.5 percent of all the drug arrests in 2007 were for marijuana offenses.

    What's more, "nearly 60 percent of the people in state prisons serving time for a drug offense had no history of violence or of any significant selling activity. Indeed, four out of five drug arrests were for possession of illegal substances, while only one in five was for sales," Webb noted. And, "Three-quarters of the drug offenders in our state prisons were there for nonviolent or purely drug offenses."

    Webb is the Senate's champion of prison reform because, he says, we are "locking up too many people who do not belong in jail." He introduced a bill in March to create a blue-ribbon panel to review criminal justice policies and recommend reforms within 18 months.

    President Nixon created such a task force but when the Shafer Report (after former Pennsylvania Governor Raymond Shafer) concluded in 1972 that "neither the marijuana user nor the drug itself can be said to constitute a danger to public safety" and urged the government to stop penalizing pot smokers for personal use or distribution, Nixon simply ignored it.

    Taxpayers are shelling out $68 billion annually for prisons, much of it winding up in the pockets of private contractors.

    As author Andrew Bosworth explained in "Dissident Voice," "Inmates have become the raw material for a prison-industrial complex, shoring up perpetual profits for McJails. Corporate prisons are paid on a per-prisoner/per day basis, and thus they lobby hard for longer mandatory sentences. Inmates also provide cheap labor, and they are about to become, once again, guinea pigs for pharmaceutical trials. All of this signals the conversion of people into valuable 'bio-mass.'"

    Or as DiGiacomo bluntly put it, "The prison-industrial complex wants people to keep going to prison because that's how they make their billions."

    Bosworth adds, "Prisons provide jobs to rural and small town Americans who would otherwise be unemployed. These workers and their families represent votes, especially in the South, where electoral majorities are White and electoral minorities are Black." In a rare insight he argues, "The drug war is, in large part, a race war by other means."

    Indeed, Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates that 32 percent of black males will be imprisoned in their lifetime as against 17 percent of Hispanic males and 5.9 percent of white males.

    The Obama administration, AP reported, "signaled today (March 16th) that it was ready to repudiate the prohibition and 'war on drugs' approach of previous presidents, and steer policy towards prevention and 'harm reduction' strategies favored by Europe."

    Radley Balko, senior editor of Reason magazine, however, doubts Obama's intentions. He wrote in The Daily Beast of April 16: "As he leaves on a trip to Mexico, the president looks poised to continue the same ruinous drug policies and the same failing tactics in the war on drugs."

    Balko said U.S. funding of Mexican crackdowns on drug cartels "often ratchet up the level of violence, as the elimination of one major drug distributor provokes those who remain to war over his territory." Balko noted that marijuana makes up 60 to 70 percent of the Mexican drug trade and "lifting prohibitions on it in the United States would eradicate a major source of funds for the cartels."

    Since 2006, Balko notes, more than 10,000 Mexicans have been murdered "as a direct consequence of the drug trade." That figure, by the by, is roughly twice the number of U.S. soldiers and contractors killed in Iraq since President Bush launched his ill-starred aggression.

    Balko charged that Obama has morphed "from a thoughtful drug-war critic to a typical Beltway drug warrior." He said while Obama never supported legalization, the drug reform community rallied behind his candidacy "because in the past he has taken thoughtful, nuanced positions on the issue."

    Balko charged campaigner Obama also pushed to revitalize the so-called Byrne Grant, which ties Federal aid to local police based on the number of their drug arrests, encouraging them to prowl for low-level offenders.

    And while candidate Obama pledged to end Bush's raids on medical marijuana patient caregivers', President Obama's Drug Enforcement Administration raided a medical marijuana dispensary, raising questions of just where the White House stands.

    On the other hand, the Drug Policy Alliance Network(DPAN), which seeks alternatives to the War on Drugs, notes "The official White House website now calls for elimination both the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity and promoting AIDS prevention by lifting the federal ban on funding syringe access programs. That's a remarkable change from the last eight years."

    A real change in drug policy could save the country billions.

    Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron has pointed out: "Prohibition is a drain on the public purse. Federal, state and local governments spend roughly $44 billion per year to enforce drug prohibition. These same governments forego roughly $33 billion per year in tax revenue they could collect from legalized drugs, assuming these were taxed at rates similar to those on alcohol and tobacco. Under prohibition, these revenues accrue to traffickers as increased profits."

    Miron told CNN, "Prohibition of drugs corrupts politicians and law enforcement by putting police, prosecutors, judges and politicians in the position to threaten the profits of an illicit trade. This is why bribery, threats and kidnapping are common for prohibited industries but rare otherwise. Mexico's recent history illustrates this dramatically."

    If Obama balks on marijuana reform he will be going against a strong-flowing tide of public opinion which favors a more tolerant approach. Allen St. Pierre, executive director of NORML, recently pointed out there are 36 marijuana bills pending in 24 states calling for legalization, de-criminalization, and medical marijuana. "Not all the bills will make it," he says, "but they are a sign of change."

    By legalizing drugs, the way the country legalized alcohol in the Thirties, the government could deal a sharp blow to the drug cartels just as it did to Al Capone and other organized crime moonshiners that supplied the speakeasies.

    Plus, legalization could reduce our swollen prison populations at a big savings to taxpayers. At the same time, it would free up police manpower to battle violent crime, not pot smokers.

    Finally, and most important, it could set free hundreds of thousands of men and women who do not belong behind bars. When it comes to decriminalizing marijuana, Americans seemingly are ready for real change - not chump change.

    --------

    Sherwood Ross formerly worked for The Chicago Daily News and other major dailies and as a columnist for wire services. He currently runs a public relations firm for "worthy causes." Reach him at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

It isn't likely to happen as

It isn't likely to happen as long as the corporations can contribute unlimited amounts of money to politicians to keep the laws as they are, lining the pockets of the ultra rich with no thought to the consequences for the rest of us.

I agree with Eric Rogers'

I agree with Eric Rogers' comment below - as long as profits are being made through current policies, there will be no change. This is also the reason why we are unlikely to see an end to war - there are too many people making huge profits from it. In a more evolved world, we would have enough breadth of vision not to allow any profiteering from death and human misery. It's profit that stands as the dark shadow behind politics, not the other way around - if we want to get to the root of it all, this is it. Greed is destroying our world and it's becoming more and more difficult to stop it because more people are becoming dependent on having things remain just as they are.

The Dutch are shutting 8

The Dutch are shutting 8 jails as not enough crininals coming through, NRC Handelsblatt reports. Mainly due to pot being legal, yes.

A wise approach to US

A wise approach to US "drugs" policy would include immediate release for all jailed or imprisoned non-violent users, restoration of their full civil rights including voting, simultaneous creation of public health and treatment programs large enough to treat the user-populations, and job-training and placement programs to aid the newly-freed and on-the-street user-populations. Chances of these actions being taken? Nil. Corporate "law enforcement" and "corrections" industries have no interest in reducing, much less curing, this problem.

So good that discussion of

So good that discussion of the "drug war" has come front and center. Thank you, Sherwood Ross, for your efforts in this direction. Interesting that it is our "allies" in Latin America who have termed the war a failure. Certainly, they have suffered the most from heavily armed police-our foreign aid (tax money) for armaments- with little regulation or oversight. Please, let us begin to rewrite the myth that "private business is more efficient." Private business is efficient at one thing, slurping up funds from the public trough. God knows what happens in private prisons now-a-days. At least prior to the privatization phenomenon, when it was revealed that prisoners or mental patients were brutalized in public institutions, a scandal resulted; culprits were identified and lost their jobs, the public, for a time, was more vigilant and indignant at the way their taxes were being spent. Private prisons have no public oversight, but it's still our tax money at work, paying for god-knows-what, but for sure, not to improve human life.

Prohibition inflates the

Prohibition inflates the value of certain substances. The inflated value of prohibited substances results in competitive violence. Legalize substances just as the lethal substance alcohol is legal. Judge people by their actions and behavior, not by what is in their blood and urine. Prohibition is a political act, not a scientific necessity. How can alcohol,a lethal substance, be legal and ubiquitous, while cannabis, a substance with no toxic dose, is prohibited? Is this rational? Is this based on the best scientific evidence? The "war on drugs" is a corrupt and pathetic scam foisted on the American people. Who benefits besides the prison industrial complex, the DEA and police? Why the tobacco, alcohol and pharmaceutical pushers who lobby to continue the "drug war" to protect their turf.

well I am sorry to burst

well I am sorry to burst "bubbles" lol ..but there is never going to be an end to drugs. I know it's not something people like to hear but come on.. be realistic .. you can no more stop people from smoking pot than you can tell them which religion they "must " follow. :) .. I'm an American that lives in NL... the whole pot thing was at first - pretty *gasp* shocking but not really.. I have only ever seen 1 person in ten years.. who was obviously stoned. For that matter, I think I've never seen a drunk person here lol not that they don't drink or party but ... they are a bit more responsible maybe ? I don't know. .. America is way behind times- so busy trying to "control " everyone .. not paying attention to the other side of the coin. - It's funny.. they care whether someone smokes a joint and not about getting raped.. *gasp* ..how seriously mucked up is that ? More worried about someone smoking a joint than say - feeding their family... or well yea you get the point hehe.. It's not really funny though.. personally my roots - are in the states.. my whole family lives in the states.. and that is a really scary thing - considering for me it's like looking in on a "Looking glass" .. the government has put their people in a bubble - and that my friends is not freedom.. that was more shocking for me to realize, then the idea that pot is legal here.

Keep the pressure on the

Keep the pressure on the system. Keep writing reports like this and keep demanding change.

The drug prohibition

The drug prohibition business is too big to fail. Watch for bailout. A century and a quarter ago drug addiction was known in foreign medical journals as: "American disease". Buck Duke created a market for ready-made cigarettes by doping Lucky Strikes. The Federal Government got into the drug control business through what many lawyers tell me was, from a Constitutional perspective, the ultimate act of judicial activism. The Court was told that Negroes were the principal drug users and that drugs led them to rape white women. Thus, Federal control of drugs was essential for public safety.

Good article. Thanks.

Good article. Thanks. Encouraging to hear that 24 states have a total of 36 marijuana bills pending. So much seems to come down to sheer momentum. Once a thing is set into play and grows and establishes steady payoffs, it resists being taken out. It maximizes its own perpetuation. What's odd about so much of what's happening lately with banking, government, military/industrial, auto industry, Real Estate... is that the underlying motives for their own perpetuity often seem petty, not well thought out, not inclusive or much interested in how they impact the greater whole over the long run. Rather, they seem defensive, self serving, bogus and grabbing for gain in the short run while minimizing responsibility over the long run. This seems surprisingly childish, given that these are generated by the most powerful among us. It's a conundrum to me that such powerful people can be so narrow minded.

I work in a methadone clinic

I work in a methadone clinic with heroin addicts. Drugs are not a legal issues they are a health issue! He is the catch: think of all the lawyers, judges, corrections officers, and police undercover officers they might be put out of work. Or the entire privatized prison system developed to house the poor and unemployed who use drugs and cannot afford private legal counsel.