Share

Reagan Didn't Do It

by: Robert Scheer  |  Truthdig

photo
A statue of former President Ronald Reagan is displayed in the Rotunda of the US Capitol. (Photo: Getty Images)

    How could Paul Krugman, winner of the Nobel Prize in economics and author of generally excellent columns in The New York Times, get it so wrong? His column last Sunday-"Reagan Did It"-which stated that "the prime villains behind the mess we're in were Reagan and his circle of advisers," is perverse in shifting blame from the obvious villains closer at hand.

    It is disingenuous to ignore the fact that the derivatives scams at the heart of the economic meltdown didn't exist in President Reagan's time. The huge expansion in collateralized mortgage and other debt, the bubble that burst, was the direct result of enabling deregulatory legislation pushed through during the Clinton years.

    Ronald Reagan's signing off on legislation easing mortgage requirements back in 1982 pales in comparison to the damage wrought 15 years later by a cabal of powerful Democrats and Republicans who enabled the wave of newfangled financial gimmicks that resulted in the economic collapse.

    Reagan didn't do it, but Clinton-era Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, now a top economic adviser in the Obama White House, did. They, along with then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and Republican congressional leaders James Leach and Phil Gramm, blocked any effective regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives that turned into the toxic assets now being paid for with tax dollars.

    Reagan signed legislation making it easier for people to obtain mortgages with lower down payments, but as long as the banks that made those loans expected to have to carry them for 30 years they did the due diligence needed to qualify creditworthy applicants. The problem occurred only when that mortgage debt could be aggregated and sold as securities to others in an unregulated market.

    The growth in that unregulated OTC market alarmed Brooksley Born, the Clinton-appointed head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and she dared propose that her agency regulate that market. The destruction of the government career of the heroic and prescient Born was accomplished when the wrath of the old boys club descended upon her. All five of the above mentioned men sprang into action, condemning Born's proposals as threatening the "legal certainty" of the OTC market and the world's financial stability.

    They won the day with the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which put the OTC derivatives beyond the reach of any government agency or existing law. It was a license to steal, and that is just what occurred. Between 1998 and 2008, the notational value of the OTC derivatives market grew from $72 trillion to a whopping $684 trillion. That is the iceberg that our ship of state has encountered, and it began to form on Bill Clinton's watch, not Reagan's.

    How can Krugman ignore the wreckage wrought during the Clinton years by the gang of five? Rubin, who convinced President Clinton to end the New Deal restrictions on the merger of financial entities, went on to help run the too-big-to-fail Citigroup into the ground. Gramm became a top officer at the nefarious UBS bank. Greenspan's epitaph should be his statement to Congress in July 1998 that "regulation of derivatives transactions that are privately negotiated by professionals is unnecessary." That same week Summers assured banking lobbyists that the Clinton administration was committed to preventing government regulation of swaps and other derivatives trading.

    Then-Rep. Leach, as chairman of the powerful House Banking Committee, codified that concern in legislation to prevent the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or anyone else from regulating the OTC derivatives, and American Banker magazine reported that the legislation "sponsored by Chairman Jim Leach is most popular with the financial services industry because it would provide so-called legal certainty for swaps transactions. . "

    Legal certainty for swaps-meaning the insurance policies of the sort that AIG sold for collateralized debt obligations without looking too carefully into what was being insured and, more important, without putting aside reserves to back up the policies in the case of defaults-is what caused the once respectable company to eventually be taken over by the U.S. government at a cost of $185 billion to taxpayers.

    Leach, an author of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allowed banks like Citigroup to become too big to fail, is now a member of the board of directors of ProPublica, which bills itself as "a non-profit newsroom producing journalism in the public interest." Leach serves as the chair of a prize jury that ProPublica has created to honor "outstanding investigative work by governmental groups," and perhaps he will grant one retrospectively to Brooksley Born and the federal commission she ran so brilliantly before Leach and his buddies destroyed her.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Is anyone considering the

Is anyone considering the "trickle down economics" that may underlie the whole financial debacle? Perhaps Krugman is right but ought to go a bit deeper to the underlying theoretical position: give money to the wealthy classes and they will grease the wheels of the economy...didn't work that way. They bought houses and stashed funds overseas, etc. This in no way belittles the later "dealers" who furthered those base economics.

People trying to understand

People trying to understand Ronald Reagan's effect on political/economic culture should read Haynes Johnson's book: Sleepwalking Through History: America in the Reagan Years. It shows that Reagan did not understand American political institutions and policies (such as parity price supports) and had trouble paying attention to such things. He specialized in catchy slogans such as "morningin America" and "evil empire" and military spending and tax cuts for the rich.

You are right, Reagan didn't

You are right, Reagan didn't do it. He didn't have the slightest idea what was going on. If you think that securitization and trading of derivatives was post Reagan, you are mistaken. The post Reagan event was, the unfettered exploitation of these "synthetic", derivative instruments (assets) as a means to transfer wealth to a select few. So, what else is new....? CDSs are yesterdays news, what's the score today...? Best regards, Econolicious

Krugman's Nobel is

Krugman's Nobel is Meaningless - Check it out - the so called "Nobel" prize in Economics was created and funded by Swiss Bankers and had nothing to do with Alfred Nobel's Foundation. To be precise, it is "The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2008" that he was awarded. The International Bankers - who now have almost dictatorial power over the entire Earth, were very clever long ago, creating this BS prize to confuse us, and generously investing in University Economics Departments to ensconce Keynesian economics into intellectual culture to do their bidding. For a reality test, see how these idiots' forecasts have done for any poor jerk who made investment decisions based on them - make sure to account for real price inflation as you have observed it. Don't be a sucker - and call your rep to demand support of HR 1207 to audit the Federal Reserve Bank.

No, Sheer has it all wrong.

No, Sheer has it all wrong. Human behavior has both proximate and ultimate explanations. The proximate causes of the meltdown are, as he indicates, the "newfangled gimmicks" that did not exist in Reagan's time. However, the ultimate cause was the Reaganauts' deregulatory zeal. Reagan and his minions created the environment where derivatives and other gimmicks could evolve. Without Reagan's demolition of Eisenhower-era Republicanism, the mortgage and banking crises could never have occurred.

Reagan (with a supporting

Reagan (with a supporting cast of Thatcher in the UK and Mulroney in Canada) started the deregulation, privatisation, and globalisation that underpinned the more recent excesses of CDOs, CDSs etc. Scheer has it completely wrong this time.

Kidding, right? There was

Kidding, right? There was a time this country took a wrong turn and that was Reagan's time. Granted no one ever got us back on track so there are other villans.

Not only did Clinton

Not only did Clinton perpetuate this, so did Bush--right up to the crash. A Google search will show various transcripts of Bush pushing this agenda at HUD and other places promoting the need of easing legislation for the poor to the American-way. What this tells me, it's not Democrats or Republicans at blame for these are simply two sides of the same coin. It says we should toss the coin aside and look at the hand flipping the coin.

Agree w/gchick:post-Reagan,

Agree w/gchick:post-Reagan, OBVIOUSLY was no longer Reagan, but subsequent administration that--Reps bullied[think Cheney,Gingrich, Limbaurgh,etc]into adopting the original Reagan mindset--total deregulation, making profits from selling off the country, ´worst 10 words of english language´, etc--& were effective for some 30+yrs time because only the original ´profits´ were apparent & not the damage being caused [GM]. The cautious were laughed at, dismissed and demised. Finally totally unfettered during Bush2000-8,´THE ECONOMY IS GOING GANGBUSTERS´ they completes Reagan´s job begun with all the tools and new weaponry now available. & Mccain was to continue on.

Picky, picky, picky. What

Picky, picky, picky. What Reagan did and also Clinton was to appoint and keep Alan Greenspan as head of the FED! This is what took the ship over the cliff. Secondly the SEC in 2004 took the cap off leveraging for the five major Wall Street Investment banks so that they could leverage 30-40 to one creating the high-wire act with MBS and CDO's. Perhaps I should be writing for Truthout. Few if any people mention that the Investment banks and other Financial gamblers worked "off balance sheet". We still don't know what happened with the banks other than they hold tons of worthless MBS junk. Scheer shouldn't jump on Krugman when Scheer only understands about 10% of the picture. Scheer is right that Rubin and Summers pushed the deregulation, Summers testified for the CFMA. But the real "shadow government" that runs the world does it through the FED. Alan Greenspan appointed by Reagan, conspired with Clinton and sold us out with Bush is the place to look for the bodies. Bernanke continues the Greenspan lies and polices for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street.

Sheer and Krugman both have

Sheer and Krugman both have a piece of the truth. And it ain't just Reagan and Bush and Paul Volcker who are to blame. The finger of blame points as well to the Congress, and most of its members past and present. They bought the Friedmanly "free-market" blather and went along with all the programs that were part of it and cut taxes for the wealthy and the obscenely wealthy, and created scores of tax dodges for them. Then they repealed usury laws and the credit card companies lent trillions of dollars and anyone who said "look out" was shouted down and denounced as a doomsayer. Things won't change as long as we keep voting for Republilcans and Democrats.

& not forget

& not forget GREENSPAN!!--Reagan appointee--continued his work until just a few years ago.

Scheer is right to point out

Scheer is right to point out that the "Gang of Five" are proximately responsible, but gchick has an important point too. The hyperindividualist, anti-regulation, "free market" ideology energetically propagated under Reagan bears a heavy responsibility for what has happened since. Yes, the deregulation under RR was fairly timid compared to Gramm-Leach-Bliley. But Reaganism, the US-branded version of neoloiberalism, created the climate in which the drive to deregulate financial markets was pretty much irresistible within the elite.

I have to agree with Scheer

I have to agree with Scheer and the important point that he is making: that corporatist Democrats share in the responsibility for the current debacle.We need to make the Democratic Party the party of the people again. My fear about Obama is that with his choice of Geithner and Summers to top posts he is only planning on tweaking the system and has bought into the outlook of the economic elitists.

One correction, Reagan

One correction, Reagan wasn't responsible for the "Morning in America" phrase, that was Hal Riney, the ad great of San Francisco who delivered all of Reagan's campaign work. It's all in the advertising.

They're BOTH right (Krugman

They're BOTH right (Krugman and Scheer). As a previous commentator observed, Reagan paved the way: Reagonomics was the Big Lie--it was a giant con to rationalize excusing the rich from paying taxes. "Sleepwalking Through History" is right... and Reagan was Chief Hypnotist. The golden tongued orator who put us to sleep, convinced us that down was up--and that it was "morning in America." Pure hubris... but it got votes: people prefer comforting lies to inconvenient truths. In reality it was TWILIGHT in America, and it will be a miracle if we don't soon see NIGHTTIME in America--as do all empires, in their overextension militarily and economically. It was Hunter Thompson, not Reagan, who called it right: "Big darkness soon come." He saw the ugly seeds of our self-undoing, but happy-talk FEELS better, and Reagan was the master of it, acting the role of genial grandfather of the country, while in reality serving the super rich and screwing everyone else. God bless Obama, but I fear it's too late to reverse all the crap that's gone down since the Kennedy assasination. In a democracy, alas, people DO get the government they deserve... and we have allowed the corporations, and those that serve them, to take over the government, and run this country into the ground, serving only their short-term, unenlightened self interest.

Krugman is NOT wrong. Reagan

Krugman is NOT wrong. Reagan opened the door for the current situation and appointed the people like Greenspan who have been instrumental in laying the current economic crisis. The busck doesn't stop with derivitive and hedgefund criminals, the buck stops at the top. Reagan's administration set the tone and with the anti-regulatory FAITH they promoted, the dye was cast. Squabbling over minutiae and while missing the broader point is counter productive. Scheer could have simply built upon or amplified what Krug was correct in pointing out.

I think that Mr. Scheer

I think that Mr. Scheer missed the point of Dr. Krugman's article. When I read it, I didn't get the idea that he was saying that everything that happened recently was Reagan's doing. I got the impression that he said that Reagan started the ball rolling down the hill until the present avalanche occurred. Reagan was the one that started the whole deregulation, government is the problem mindset, which, as Mr. Scheer states, is the reason for our present predicament. That Clinton and the Republicans were the ones who furthered the Reagan agenda is certainly true enough and they need to admit their responsibility for their actions, (like that might ever happen) but I think Dr. Krugman's point is valid. Until Reagan we didn't have the idea that people should be allowed to do whatever they wanted free of interference to make money. After him, that idea was given the same place as Holy Writ.

If one had to pick a moment

If one had to pick a moment when the philosophy about the role of government and its relationship with people and business set on the path that ultimately brought us this disaster, then one would have to pick Reagan. We are still in the "Reagan era" of government, after all. Clinton and a bunch of other Democrats bought the Reagan cool-aide and deserve a lot of blame. The Reagan mind-set is still prevalent today.

Ronald Reagan was the free

Ronald Reagan was the free market know nothing guru who told us that greed is good. The business world, in his view, would never cheat, lie or steal. He forgot that they were Republicans, and I hate to give that title to that wretched self-serving party. Reagan unleashed the greed and the rest, as they say, is history.

At the death of Ronald

At the death of Ronald Reagan a few years back, I remember my late husband and myself saying to each other-- "Why is everyone crying? Don't they remember what Ronald Reagan did to tear down this country?" Finally someone (Krugman) DID get it right. And out loud too! Bravo!!

Both Scheer & Krugman are

Both Scheer & Krugman are correct, but incomplete. Anonymous @ 16:11 "Picky, picky..." is onto at least a partial explanation, but the real foundation for our present troubles was laid at least as far back as the 19th Century, with the unfettered rise of laissez-faire capitalism PLUS the American ruling class's delusions of empire. Formation of the Fed was only one step along the road toward absolute control of the world's resources, and the subjugation of the vast majority of the world's population. The current mess is the result of too many Americans becoming at least nominally too well-off, so the "uppity" middle classes needed to be brought to heel. As usual, the bankers/financiers and their criminal cronies win -- everyone else loses.

We the people are getting

We the people are getting what we deserve. We put people like Besh, Cheney and Reagan in office and then are surprised at the results. Why not Rash Limbaugh for president and Donald Duck for V.P?

Reagan attacked the economy

Reagan attacked the economy of Jimmy Carter in an economic downturn mostly not of his making. Reagan beat Carter over the head with the 'huge' national debt saying he had a better way but in short order ran that debt up five-fold. I agree that Clinton contributed to our current situation but we had a surplus by the end of his tenure. Reaganomics set this whole thing in motion. I think Greenspan's retirement came when he saw this mess coming down the pike and wanted to get as far away from it as possible. He even got a book out before the bomb dropped that he used to help cover his butt. When the floodgates were opened to unsupported homeownership, so-called 'equity' built up companies such as GM. When the bottom fell out of real estate, so did 'equity' purchasing. That's why we are here now. Oh and don't forget cross-bordering/off-shoring jobs to cheap globalism.

Blaming President Clinton

Blaming President Clinton for buying into Reagan's philosophy, while not blaming Bush Jr. for Reagan's philosophy on steroids is a familiar tactic. It kind of reminds me of the whole blame Nancy Pelosi for Bush's war crimes frenzy. It begs the question, when will bush's worshipers finally take responsibility for the facts that: BUSH WAS IN OFFICE FOR THE 8 YEARS BEFORE THE COLLAPSE, BUSH WAS IN OFFICE DURING 9-11, BUSH WAS IN OFFICE DURING THE TIME WHEN "SOMEONE" ORDERED PEOPLE TO BE TORTURED, BUSH WAS IN OFFICE WHEN "SOMEONE" CAME UP WITH THE INSULTS TO THE CONSTITUTION COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS "THE PATRIOT ACT", DEREGULATION IS THE CAUSE OF OUR CURRENT MESS AND IS THE REPUBLICAN MANTRA, PHIL GRAHAM WROTE THE BILL THAT BEGAN THE DEREGULATION SPECIFICALLY. Democrats are mainly guilty of not standing up for their own constituents, but caving in to Republican manipulation. Democrats have been in the White House for all of 12 of the last 40 years before this January, yet they seem to be the only place the buck ever stops. My apologies for the screaming caps. I couldn't help myself.

Normally I think Scheer does

Normally I think Scheer does a good job, even though I do not always agree. But I read the Krugman piece. It was not about the specifics of derivatives, but about reduced oversight and transparency started during Reagan. Plus Reagan supporting a few wars, reduction in corporate and wealthy taxes, increased military spending the the resultant debt that reduces government options. So while it may be derivatives were a specific piece of legislation Clinton signed, the the reason derivatives became so problematical was no oversight from the Bush government. And derivatives grew at 5.1% PER MONTH compounded after 9/11. This was all in Bush's court. We will spend at least a generation undoing the problems Reagan/Bush/Bush gave us. As Reagan said - government is the problem , then set about making government the problem.

I never believed Reagan.

I never believed Reagan. About anything. "The Sandinistas are the moral equivalent of the Founding Fathers." Preposterous. The whole thing in the Oliver North/Pindexter/Bush cabal was about drugs. Reagan didn't have a clue.

Yo, rowland- it was

Yo, rowland- it was allegedly "the Contras" who were "the moral equivalent of the Founding Fathers". The Sandino loyalists were the anti-Somoza revolutionaries that "we" wanted stopped. The "whole thing" that you refer to was about MONEY- from drugs (or wherever) to pay off the Israelis for the weapons that the Iranians needed in order to fight against our "ally", Saddam Hussein... and foreign policy will never be the same, after That escapade... ^..^

Mr. Scheer needs to bone up

Mr. Scheer needs to bone up on his history. No one including Krugman lets Clinton off the hook for passing the bogus deregulation that created the house of cards, even though he was held hostage to get a budget passed by a Republican ruled Congress. During Christmas week no less. BUT these hokey derivates have been round for a long time. Uh from the Regan years. Seems to me he needs to read "Liar's Poker by Michael Lewis. Here is a link worth viewing. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2009/06/07/gps.michael.lewis.int.cnn