Share

How Did 100,000,000 Women Disappear?

by: Nicole Baute  |  The Toronto Star

photo
Researchers are attempting to account for women in the developing world who have died as a result of violence, discrimination and neglect. (Photo: Reuters)

    Two researchers crunching population statistics have confirmed an unsettling reality. Siwan Anderson and Debraj Ray noticed the ratio of women to men in developing regions and in some cultures is suspiciously below the norm.

    In India, China and sub-Saharan Africa, millions upon millions of women are missing. They are not lost, but dead: victims of violence, discrimination and neglect.

    A University of British Columbia economist is amongst those trying to find them - not the women themselves, who are long gone, but their numbers and ages, which paint a sad and startling picture of gender discrimination in the developing world.

    The term "missing women" was coined in 1990, when Indian economist Amartya Sen calculated a shocking figure. In parts of Asia and Africa, he wrote in The New York Review of Books, 100 million women who should be alive are not, because of unequal access to medical care, food and social services. These are excess deaths: women "missing" above and beyond natural mortality rates, compared to their male counterparts.

    Women who are dead because their lives were undervalued.

    Around the world boys outnumber girls at birth, but in countries where women and men receive equal care, women have proved hardier and more resistant to disease, and thus live longer. In most of Asia and North Africa, however, Sen found that women die with startlingly higher frequency.

    His research began a flutter of activity in academic circles and by 2005, the United Nations produced a much higher estimate for how many women could be "missing": 200 million.

    From her office at the University of British Columbia, economics professor Siwan Anderson has been crunching numbers to try and understand why so many women are dying. "If you're interested in gender discrimination, it's really one of the starkest measures of discrimination, because it's women who should be alive, but aren't," she says.

    The 40-year-old researcher recently co-authored a paper with New York University's Debraj Ray, focusing on figures from China, India and sub-Saharan Africa for the year 2000. What they discovered flew in the face of existing literature and commonly held beliefs about the missing women phenomenon.

    "Previously, people had thought that they (the missing women) were all at the very early stages of life, prenatal or just after, so before four years old," Anderson says. "But what we found is that the majority are actually later." Female infanticide has been endemic in India and China for some time, which she says led researchers to assume that it was the source of all the missing women. But the truth is much more complicated.

    Once she and Ray broke down the numbers by age group, they found that the majority of excess female deaths came later in life: 66 per cent in India, 55 per cent in China and 83 per cent in sub-Saharan Africa.

    One of their colleagues in the economics department at the University of British Columbia says this finding is striking, and points the way for future research and advocacy.

    "Why would there be excess mortality of, let's say, 45-year-old women versus 45-year-old men?" asks economics professor Kevin Milligan. "And what they find is ... they have the same set of diseases, they just seem to die more frequently. The explanation that seems most consistent with that is differential access to health care. And so that's a really striking finding."

    Anderson says that lack of health care is likely a big part of the problem, but that there are numerous cultural and social factors at play that can be difficult to pinpoint.

    In their "elementary accounting exercise" published this February, Anderson and Ray began to plot the causes of excess death in 2000 by age group, and produced some interesting figures.

    In sub-Saharan Africa, the dominant source of missing women was HIV and AIDS, the cause of more than 600,000 excess female deaths each year.

    In China, Anderson says, most of the 141,000 excess female deaths by injury were suicides, making China the only place in the world where women are more likely than men to kill themselves, often by eating pesticides used for crops.

    And in India, a category called "injuries" yielded ominously high figures: 86,000 excess deaths in the age group 15-29 in 2000 alone. Anderson has done extensive research in India, and says the numbers beg the question of exactly how many deaths were so-called "kitchen fires" - often used to mask dowry-related killings, the result of a new bride being tortured by her new family until her parents pay their debts.

    Contrary to what you might expect, Anderson says, dowry prices have not dropped off with improvements in education in India. Instead, they have gotten worse, with educated brides and their families willing to pay even more for high-quality grooms.

    Anderson says dowry payments can be six times a family's annual wealth - an excruciating price, especially for poor villagers. The implications of this hefty sum trickle down to the first moments of a child's life. While conducting recent field work in India, Anderson asked villagers about selective abortions and found them open about the fact that they use ultrasound to determine the baby's gender and help them decide whether or not to keep it.

    "They see no other options," she says. "They really cannot afford to have a daughter."

    Future research will delve deeper, seeking answers to questions such as: How often are men given mosquito nets to protect themselves from malaria, but not women? How many women die because they are not taken to the hospital when they are sick?

    Anderson is using data gathered primarily from the World Bank, the United Nations and the World Health Organization, but admits that getting the figures can be a huge challenge. In sub-Saharan Africa, for example, many deaths go undocumented, and in India, it is virtually impossible to know how many "unintentional" deaths are actually dowry killings, because they are not accurately reported to the authorities.

    It is also difficult to separate direct gender discrimination from biological, social, environmental, behavioural and economic factors. That will be part of the task as Anderson works on calculating missing women by region in India, and isolating gender discrimination from other factors that might contribute to uneven male-to-female ratios.

    When asked what can be done to combat such deep-seated inequality, Anderson pauses. Even when governments outlaw root causes, such as the Indian dowry system, violence persists, she says. "It's too embedded in the system in their world."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Shocking to see that high of

Shocking to see that high of a number I knew there were differences but wow. One would think with the technology at hand today .. how the world has supposed to have progressed so much.. this number does not show it.. what I see is a very big gap between the wealthy ( getting more rich ) and the poor becoming even more down trodden. So tell me again .. exactly why people slave over their jobs for the few crumbs tossed at them? I am near to expecting to see one day in the news something along this line: POVERTY.. is a CRIME.. any persons below this income please report to your local police station for proper processing.. : can you tell I'm fed up with Government, leaders and pretty much anyone in authority ? :) Or perhaps it will go something like this one day: FEMALES.. are not allowed on buses, taxis, they cannot drink from public fountains, be in public alone AT ALL EVER.., they cannot teach, hold any office, defiantly should not vote.and.. well yea you get the picture. This whole world needs to change.. it is a sick twisted place.

in china the girls are

in china the girls are disposed of sadly by parents who can not afford the tax imposed.

In the US there are quite a

In the US there are quite a few people who think it's just fine for a woman to be raped and/or to have the resulting pregnancy threaten her physical and/or mental health yet she should not be able to choose to terminate the pregnancy nor have access to the "morning after" pill. Can't remember the last time I heard of a man being told he couldn't have a vascetomy or Viagra or siring as many children as he wished. It's much worse elsewhere, still a ways to go i the US

Many women go into

Many women go into prostitution to feed themselves or their families. They are not counted by their families or their census even though they make more money than their brothers. They are often murdered or die by AIDS. If prostitution were legal these women would be counted and more cared for.

Hi Anonymous, your day dream

Hi Anonymous, your day dream or nightmare, I should say, sounds like "The Handmaiden's Tale", Now that is one scary book. During the Bush years it was even more frightening.

I'd like to get my hands on

I'd like to get my hands on that study. But to say that it raised eyebrows because of the novelty of its approach perplexes me : in 1980 something I read a book available in most bookstores (I was in Kona Hi, at the time so...) titled " the War Against Women" authored by... I forget the name. In it the writer fact sheet in hand shows (as an example) how the arabian gulf countries stopped giving birth data to the U.N. because, precisely, according to all ethnographic projections they would have been an extraordinary biological phenomenon in that the figures reported through the years showed always an equal number of male and female births...implying that the reason there were more adult boys was because of the natural 'superiority' of the male...But I'm glad that the interest in this has been revived! Maybe 100 mill is under the real mark?

Emancipate women for the

Emancipate women for the sake of humanity. When women have control over their own bodies and their own lives, their family planning and their own education, there is hope for our collective human culture. Where women are denied even the basic right to survive, our species and our collective cultures are in a rapid death spiral. Emancipate women, Emancipate the world.

Let's not forget the

Let's not forget the thousands of women who die in childbirth! Often it comes from young girls who are married off too young and are physically incapable of normal childbirth. It also comes from the lack of medical care in rural areas, especially if the woman needs a C section or other more advanced care. The lives of the women are not considered; only the desires of their "husbands" (captors).

If they are using the

If they are using the western ratio of women to men as the "norm", they may be overestimating the "missing women". In the U.S. we value women's lives far more than men's. 94% of all workplace deaths are men. Women access health care at twice the rate of men. Far less federal funding goes to male specific medical issues than to women's issues. We have many special institutes for women's health and very few for men. Men are more often murdered, but we have special acts for women victims. Men die in the military at rates far in excess of their percentage in the population and in the military. Men's life expectancy is five to six years less on average than women's (a century ago it was one year less). I have no doubt that there are many "missing women" in the developing world and I want to know why and how to stop the problem. We also need to "find" the "missing men" in the developed world.

I'm about as pro-choice as

I'm about as pro-choice as they come but I think it's preposterous to charge, as one poster did (Wed, 06/10/2009 - 01:14 β€” Anonymous) that: "In the US there are quite a few people who think it's just fine for a woman to be raped and/or to have the resulting pregnancy threaten her physical and/or mental health yet she should not be able to choose to terminate the pregnancy nor have access to the "morning after" pill. " 'Quite a few' vague and, I suppose, relative to overall population size. But I've never heard anyone say that "it's just fine for a women to be raped ... yet she should not be able to choose to terminate her pregnancy." I've heard a lot of people who say that despite how awful rape is, it is nonetheless impermissible for a woman to abort the fetus that results from rape. I disagree strongly with this position. But I don't think one furthers one's position on this issue by painting one's opponents as not decrying rape. This same poster (Wed, 06/10/2009 - 01:14 β€” Anonymous) went on to say: "Can't remember the last time I heard of a man being told he couldn't have a vascetomy or Viagra or siring as many children as he wished." But, of course, a vasectomy is not an abortion and it does not terminate fetal life. If we're going make comparisons that don't beg the very question that is at the core of the disagreement, then the equivalent of a vasectomy is a tubal ligation. And, I can't remember the last time I heard of a woman being told that she can't have a tubal ligation. Viagra is a drug to treat a physical dysfunction. It permits a man with ED to experience normal sexual intercourse. It is not analogous to an abortion. And the only analogy to a morning after pill is that it is a pill that is taken orally. And for the benefit this poster, who can't remember when s/he's heard of a man being told he can't sire "as many children as he wished", I would recommend a visit to this web page: . Then the poster will be able to remember when s/he has heard of this. I agree, though, that there is "still a ways to go in the US". But the ways to go is largely along the lines indicated by the first poster (Fri, 06/12/2009 - 01:53 β€” WI).