Share

Bank Bailout Turns Out to Have Been Good Business for US

by: Kevin G. Hall  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
President Barack Obama delivers remarks about the banks paying back $68 billion of the bailout. (Photo: Reuters Pictures)

    Washington - When Congress passed the $700 billion Wall Street bailout package last fall, critics said it'd be a money loser. But when 10 banks returned $68 billion of the money on Tuesday, President Barack Obama said the government had realized a small profit.

    Did it really?

    In addition to returning the $68 billion, the 10 banks paid the government $1.8 billion in dividends on the preferred shares of stock the government owned. That translates to an annualized rate of return of about 4.64 percent on the $68 billion.

    In all, the government has received $4.5 billion from all bailout recipients, who've received $200 billion, for an annualized rate of return since Nov. 12, 2008, when the money was lent out, of 3.94 percent.

    But the government had to borrow to pay for the bailout and pay interest on those borrowings. Once the interest costs are factored in, how'd the government do?

    Not bad. The annualized rate of return of 4.64 percent on the $68 billion is well above the 2 percent interest the government was paying Monday to investors who were purchasing three-year bonds. The profit margin is even higher when measured against the interest the government is paying on a six-month bond - 0.31 percent.

    The profit gets much smaller, however, if you measure it against the interest costs on Treasury notes that mature in seven years. The interest rate on a seven-year Treasury bond stood at 3.6 percent on Monday, and 3 percent last Nov. 12. Still, whichever date you choose, the government has turned a small profit. And the money repaid ostensibly goes to knocking down the overall U.S. government debt, which also lessens the government's interest burden.

    The government stands to earn even more when it sells the stock warrants it holds in conjunction with its preferred shares in the 10 bank-holding companies that are paying their bailout. Treasury and the banks are negotiating a fair-market value for these warrants.

    Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Economy.com, thinks that the warrants issued against preferred shares of stock from all bailout recipients - not just the 10 authorized Tuesday to repay the government - are worth at least $5 billion. So for a snapshot in this point in time, the Wall Street bailout has been profitable.

    And that's before weighing the intangible question of what the costs of doing nothing might have been and the financial system had collapsed.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The author also missed the

The author also missed the fact that Billions of dollars invested into AIG, went there to pay off in full the Credit Default Swaps owed to Wall Street Firms. None of that money has been repaid. However, the bigger question that apparently everyone has forgotten about is where di Geithner spend the $2 TRILLION that he refuses to even tell Congress about.

What a bunch of hooey. I'm

What a bunch of hooey. I'm sorry, but these guys are only returning the money now, so they can avoid any government oversight. And the government oversight they are trying to avoid is nowhere near what is needed so this mess doesn't happen again. Can you believe that not one effective regulation has been put in place since this crisis began? The Waxman-Markey Climate Legislation will create an estimsted trillion dollar derivatives market--think about that for a while. $68 billion is a fraction of the 11 trillion dollars the banking industry has received through Fed manipulations outside of the stimulus package. I'm glad we got some money back, but it isn't like the economy is fixed: a million people will still be foreclosed upon, CEO salaries will remain in the stratosphere, pensions and 401 ks are still terribly devalued, and we're continuing to hemorrhage jobs. Worse still, the cretins who got us into the mess must be riding pretty high since they are able to pay back this debt with interest. I look forward to the headline "Wall Street Con Men thrown in Jail."

Nothing is false here... but

Nothing is false here... but the fact that the 10 banks paying them back were hardly in any trouble to begin with is worth noting. These banks paying them back were the ones against TARP. They didnt want gov invested in them. They had capital. It is the other banks that are worrisome.

What about the real costs of

What about the real costs of operation of the bailout as a project, not just fees and interests paid on borrowings? Why aren't those factored in? What about the rising costs of unemployment? Where are they factored in? And what about the probably shocking cost of lost opportunity, helping banks instead of helping homeowners? Where is the analysis? Accounting that leaves out the operation costs of a project and its immediate consequences isn’t very revealing…

This is nothing more than a

This is nothing more than a diversion by the Obamarama. Imagine a single one of those banks giving us a 4.64% rate on our credit cards? Try 46.4%! I'm sad to say, our new president is a fraud. There is no change, let alone "change we can believe in ".

I don't get it. We give out

I don't get it. We give out 700 billion and get 68 billion in return. Where is the profit? I read this article aghast. I guess truthout has to print 'both sides' but this is ridiculous.

"Worse still, the cretins

"Worse still, the cretins who got us into the mess must be riding pretty high since they are able to pay back this debt with interest." They steal the money and manage to hang on to it without penalty ... who are you calling a cretin?

I guess this means that Wall

I guess this means that Wall St. financial criminal conduct, greed, is good despite the world wide hardship is has caused.Until usury laws are reinstated for banks and that the CORPORATE WELFARE KINGS are taken off the dole through the Federal deficit, borrowed monies of taxpayers, which is then doled ouit to the CORPORATE WELFARE KINGS with the principal and interest paid by individual taxpayers the Wall St. and their brought and paid for bribed Politicians, campaign contributions, will continue this profit making bailout enterprise although it seems a bit complicated for the end result.

The idea this is a good

The idea this is a good investment seems part of a corporate disinformation campaign, and complete nonsense: 1) the banks are lending our own money back to us, and the real cost will be inflation; 2) the bailout is not $700 billion but $11.4 TRILLION, according to Bloomberg News, when you factor in all programs including the Fed; 3) $68 billion paid back is next to nothing, less than about one-half a percent; 4) given the Banks' situation, taxpayers got crumbs for their investment.

This bailout defies the

This bailout defies the basic principles of economics that the neoliberals worked so hard to promote - the idea that banks and businesses that are inefficient are supposed to fail and make way for more efficient ones. Ironically, such disciples of Friedman and Rand were too ideologically deluded to see that they had broken their own theories that cause the supposed optimum economic effect (which I highly doubt is true). Either way, this bailout should never have been done. I highly doubt that any of these banks were "too big to fail". And if they are, why are there not any anti-monopoly or competition laws that ensure that prevent such banks from becoming "too big to fail"?

Good article. It's not

Good article. It's not helpful to demand that Obama be each our own personal messiah. Wall Street put a gun to our head, and some well-meaning polticians took huge political risks and were accused of throwing out money left and right, and at least on this specific set of decisions: lending money to the banks rather than buying out toxic debts, the Democrat's solution, was a hell of a lot better than any alternatives that were actually possible. Attacking small successes isn't going to get us to bigger successes.

So we got back less than 10%

So we got back less than 10% of the TARP money, the gov't gets to keep the dividends on the interest and you're already hailing bailing out these crooks as a success? It never should've come to this, in the first place. That's like saying when someone sets fire to their house and then you having to use your neighbor's hose to put out the fire is a feelgood story. Let's remember one thing, people: Too many of us are too quick to forget the S&L scandal of 20 years ago and what the gov't had to do in response. And the original TARP could have a sequel, since it authorizes the Treasury Secretary the latitude to buy up another $700 billion in debt. And executives are the same the world over, across epochs in time. They loot their companies, loot the gov't and then loot the taxpayer. Let's not forget that they loaned out only a tiny percentage of that money to qualified wouldbe borrowers looking to free up some liquidity, which was the biggest reason for the bank bailout. So TARP was good business for whom, exactly, Mr. Hall?

ANother point that was

ANother point that was missed in this, the banksters wealth and power, the political influence of the criminals that created so much misery for millions, it all remains intact with the bailout. Money funneled directly from the TARP into the (effective) effort to defeat real welfare reform. That is much more destructive than simply the bottom line, which is bad enough

Good for Wall Street and

Good for Wall Street and Washington but Main street is still drowning!

The TARP is actually

The TARP is actually working. The banks are beginning to recover and return the TARP. That's really good news.

Difficult to feel good about

Difficult to feel good about TARP: a twisted, fascist-style transfer of wealth to politically-connected people at the top of a wrecklessly speculative, unsustainable orgy of greed taking place in a pit of other people's money. To write this article one would have to be delusional. The unregulated privatization of gain, and the socialization of the uncomprehendible loss in this case is an unprecedented money and power grab, that illustrates the unethical, and probably illegal alliance of our government representatives and their corporate paymasters. A more ironic article would be difficult to conceive, and it seems to me Mr. Hall likely believes what he is writing. Amazing.

Of the trillions of dollars

Of the trillions of dollars sent to bailout banks, $68 billion comes back, and Obama proclaims a profit! Check the math again, Mr. President.