Share

House Democrats Unveil Health Care Overhaul

by: Alex Wayne  |  Congressional Quarterly

photo
Health insurance would be mandatory under a plan released on Tuesday by House Democrats. (Photo: Mandel Ngan / Getty Images)

    The health care overhaul under development by House Democrats would subsidize insurance premiums for families earning as much as four times the poverty level, while expanding Medicaid and improving its payments to health providers.

    Staff of the three House committees with jurisdiction over the emerging bill - Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, and Education and Labor - have compiled a three-page outline of the legislation, which they call a "tri-committee" proposal. The plan would require individuals to obtain insurance and employers to help pay for it, and would create a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insurers, according to the outline.

    Leaders of the three committees briefed the full House Democratic Caucus on their outline Tuesday. "We will continue to seek input and work closely with our colleagues, outside stakeholders, and the administration and are on track to introduce legislation shortly, the trio said. "We anticipate committee action on health reform in the coming weeks, with legislation on the House floor prior to the August district work period."

    The plan would make major changes to Medicare, including replacing a much-criticized formula for determining physician payment rates. The formula has required cuts in doctor's rates most years since 2000, forcing Congress to intervene to block the cuts under pressure from physicians. The outline calls the formula "flawed," but replacing it to avoid the annual payment cuts will cost billions of dollars a year.

    The legislation would eliminate "overpayments" to Medicare Advantage plans, which are operated by private insurers. President Obama has called for lower payments to the plans, which are paid on average about 13 percent more per beneficiary than traditional Medicare costs.

    The House plan would expand Medicaid "for the most vulnerable, low- income populations" and increase its payment rates to providers, the outline says, but without specifics. Many doctors will not accept Medicaid patients because of the program's notoriously low payment rates.

    Across the Capitol, where the Finance Committee and Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee are drafting the Senate's health care overhaul, HELP Chairman Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., has proposed expanding Medicaid to cover families earning as much as 1.5 times the poverty level, or about $33,000 for a family of four.

    Few Clues on Taxes, Savings

    The House outline does not include specific proposals to raise money for a health overhaul, and it is not clear how House Democrats will pay for their legislation. Many of them are leery of an option under consideration in the Senate - taxing some employer-sponsored health benefits. The outline suggests that provisions aimed at controlling the growth of health care costs will "generate savings for reform and fiscal sustainability," but the provisions are not explained.

    Many Democrats, including Obama, have hoped that measures to reduce the growth of health care costs - currently increasing about 7 percent per year - will produce money that can be used to expand insurance coverage. But they have had difficulty convincing Congress' official budget scorekeeper, the Congressional Budget Office, that meaningful savings from such measures can be applied to a health overhaul.

    The House Democratic plan would reorganize the private insurance market, creating a national Health Insurance Exchange where individuals or employers could obtain coverage, including from a government-run "public plan" if they wish. States would have the option of creating their own exchanges, instead of participating in the national exchange. Insurers would be prohibited from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions and could not charge higher premiums based on gender, health status or occupation. Premiums would be higher for older people, but the increase would be limited.

    The plan would cap out-of-pocket spending by patients to prevent bankruptcies due to medical costs. Some studies suggest that more than half of all personal bankruptcies are due to medical bills.

    An independent advisory board would recommend different benefit packages for insurance plans, with more expensive plans offering increased benefits.

    The senior Republicans on the three committees sent the chairmen letters Tuesday asking for hearings on the Democratic plan, focused on whether it would cause people to lose their coverage, limit their choices of doctors and treatments, or raise costs for families and employers.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

More Democratic sleight of

More Democratic sleight of hand, bait-and-switch? Few details with many industry buzzwords, not good. Single payer healthcare is the ONLY plan in existence that would actually save money, allowing more people to be covered. It will be most interesting to see the details of how Democrats shepard the writing of the "public plan" as they consult with their "colleagues", and how much more heavily weighted the healthcare pot o' gold is tilted toward the status quo. "Capping out-of-pocket spending" sounds like it was written verbatim from health insurers' script. This will most likely be imo the straw that breaks the camel's back, dripping as it is with health industry verbiage and influence, signalling for all that Democrats have no higher moral ground than anyone in Congress, and as many as possible must be replaced with representatives of the American people.

The main question is will we

The main question is will we get a viable public plan? A mandate without a public option is simply turning the government into a collection agency for the health insurance industry. How can it be constitutional for the government to take money out of my pocket and turn it over to a for-profit company?

Here we go again-"

Here we go again-" mandatory" health insurance. Another attack on your personal freedom and another privacy invasion. What the hell is wrong with these people? A voluntary public option available to everyone will solve the problem of insurance coverage.

Single-payer activists,

Single-payer activists, which means basically people who think that we should have a more sane way of doing healthcare in this country, have been excluded from the discussions of alternatives, with only the institutional players at the table. No one is speaking for the obvious and only workable plan- single payer. Health care is a human right, as is recognized in all other advanced economies. We’re tired of private insurance greed, and 100s of millions of dollars paid out to Congress by HMOs, big pharma and med tech to prevent this obvious solution.No more Blue Cross’s double crosses. No more Aetna or CIGNA profit takers. We want guaranteed health care. We don't want to have to fight over eligibility, and over preexisting conditions at times when we are gravely ill. We want to see our doctors when we need them. We don't want to have to mortgage our lives to get needed health care. We’re tired of private insurance greed. Medicare and medicaid are working very well, saving dollars and limiting needless overhead. No system is perfect, but single payer is light years better than what's next. We can't accept less.

DEMAND A MORE & BETTER

DEMAND A MORE & BETTER PLAN... DEMAND NON-PROFIT HEALTH CARE REFORM what is before us now is a mockery of the the political system entire. we can do better... we can and should be asking the politicals why this sham dressed up as reform? this is not what we elected you to deliver... send it back and get it right!

There is NO PUBLIC DABATE

There is NO PUBLIC DABATE over all this... No Real Effort on the Part of the Administration to keep us WELL INFORMED on proposed Health Care Legislation... There are just News Releases from the standard Corporate-Owned Media '''NEWS'''... ... WHO in a position to know, understand and clearly explain will inform the American People without bias exactly what proposed legislation really says and does..? C-Span..?... The Daily Show..?... Where do the American People go besides brief, edited, for-profit News Reports or the actual and overly complicated legalese of legislative proposals for real, informative information on all this? ... Where is Obama's promise to keep US all INFORMED on legislation..?.. Because, even if its just me in the whole world alone who believes this--- I think '''INFORMED''' means that just about ANYONE should be able to CLEARLY UNDERSTAND what they are being INFORMED of, including stuff about complicated Legislation.... Don't you..?... Because if there is one thing I am absolutely sure of, its that a LARGE percentage of our Elected Representatives of the American People actually think its really their job to do Corporate America's Bidding... or is it better described as --- GLOBAL Corporate America's Bidding... ?

Subsidized health

Subsidized health insurance? What does that mean? Our taxes get paid directly to for profit insurers so we don't have to pay as much in premiums? Meanwhile people like the CEO of BCBS North Carolina take home $3.2 million a year. Only in the USA are blood sucking leeches a major cost of health care. Single payer now!