Share

Visitors and Hosts in Pakistan

by: Kathy Kelly, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Coffins of victims of a missile attack in Mir Ali near the Pakistan/Afghan border. (Photo: Reuters)

    In Jayne Anne Phillips's "Lark and Termite," the skies over Korea, in 1950, are described in this way:

    "The planes always come ... like planets on rotation. A timed bloodletting, with different excuses."

    The most recent plane to attack the Pakistani village of Khaisor (according to a Waziristan resident who asked me to withhold his name) came 20 days ago, on May 20, 2009. A US drone airplane fired a missile at the village at 4:30 AM, killing 14 women and children and two elders, wounding 11.

    The previous day, some travelers had come to Khaisor, and the villagers had served them a meal. "This is our custom," my friend relates. "It is our traditional way." But these travelers were members of the Taliban, and their visit was noted by US forces. It is possible they were identified through pictures taken by unmanned US drones. Although the visitors had left right after their meal, the US responded to this act of hospitality by bombing the homes of the hosts early the following morning.

    I asked my friend how families cope when a bomb suddenly blasts their home in the middle of the night. Do they have any kind of first aid available to help the wounded? "You see this," he said, pointing to the long shawl that I happened to be wearing, a customary part of every village woman's dress, "they try to use this [as a bandage] because it is all they have." I imagined the shawl rapidly soaking up the blood of a dying Pakistani man, woman or child.

    On the morning of the 20th, the other villagers had rushed to the section where the missile had hit, hoisting injured survivors onto their shoulders and carrying them across rough, hilly terrain to the nearest road (about five kilometers away from the village) where, lacking vehicles of their own and with no hope of receiving an ambulance visit, they waited for a car to stop, their only means of reaching a hospital.

    The first car they saw did stop, but its driver refused to take any of the wounded for fear that his action would be noted by an unmanned US drone and that he himself would face the same reward for his hospitality which the village had received.

    The villagers walked along the road until another car stopped and did agree to take some of the wounded to a nearby center run by the International Commission of the Red Cross.

    For three days following the attack, people collected in the village, coming in from all over the region for the funerals. My visitor told me that whether people know the villagers or not, they will come to pray. "On the cell phone you get the word," he said, "Look, this bloody thing again happened. People share the sorrow, but the anger increases. Everyone says we should get rid of the Americans."

    At the funeral, the villagers showed casings from the missile to demonstrate that it was a US missile that killed their neighbors.

    About 40 to 50 families live in the area of the village. My friend said that the people are hospitable and sturdy, tough enough to live in harsh conditions.

    Villagers have become accustomed to the drone attacks. At first, some were paralyzed with fear - but since 2001, they've endured about 70 such attacks, and drone surveillance has become a routine fact of life. Even the children can identify the drones flying overhead. "When there is a drone up above the children don't play in a group because they don't want the drone to hit them," said our visitor. The pilots of the drones, looking through monitors at their consoles in Nevada and elsewhere in the US, are more likely to mistake groups of people for their designated targets than people standing alone. Groups of children have been attacked. "The children scatter and run away, and they stop playing for some hours."

    Asked if he saw any alternatives to the fighting, my friend immediately said that the attackers - the people from the United States - should come and sit with them. "If they come and discuss and throw away the arms, I hope it will be far better than if they are hitting us and trying to bring the peace through arms. Even if the peace comes, through arms, we will never forget after 100 years, and we will take revenge."

    "Our area was the most peaceful," he continued, "but when the Army came to Afghanistan it also affected us and our area became more violent. They should come and sit with us, assess our need, they should help us get drinking water, they should give us education, they should give us loans, they should help us in agriculture."

    My friend has already organized a "jirga", or discussion, between local people and Taliban to consider how peace might come to the area. He asked the jirga members if they wanted peace and they responded, "Yes, why not? Who is such a person that they would not want peace? If the Americans stop the drones and go out from Afghanistan and if the Pakistan army stops the mess they are making in our agency, yes, we want peace."

    The US and some segments of Pakistani society want other things from these villagers. It's difficult to know what fuels the ongoing attacks, particularly when media are banned from the areas under attack.

    But the duty these villagers were bombed for carrying out, this time, was hospitality. Strangers come to your home and you feed them. During my visit here in Pakistan, soon to end, I've been shown profound respect and hospitality, although I've come here from the land of an enemy, from a country that brings terrifying robotic planes here, constantly surveilling and routinely killing from the skies in a manner reminiscent of science fiction. The drones are a daily fact of life here, brought by visitors; US bombs are now part of their sky: new planets on rotation.

    Here, the enlightened West now stands for mechanized death from the skies, "a timed bloodletting with different excuses." Yesterday, the "excuse" our visitor described, the rationale for incinerating women, children and elders, was a mere act of hospitality - the extreme, obligatory hospitality shown to friends and enemies alike in this part of the world.

    I'm soon to leave Pakistan and its targeted regions. Last week, US envoy Richard Holbrooke and a small delegation left after a short visit. It's likely that US generals and advisers will continue to shuttle back and forth between the US and Pakistan.

    All who come from the US are guests here.

    How do we hope to be treated?

    --------

    Kathy Kelly (kathy@vcnv.org) co-coordinates Voices for Creative Nonviolence (www.vcnv.org). Along with Dan Pearson, Gene Stoltzfus and Razia Ahmad, Kathy is part of a Voices delegation to Pakistan due back in the US on June 13.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Obama--Gates--Clinton:

Obama--Gates--Clinton: criminals all.

So sad. We truly have

So sad. We truly have become the bearers of weapons of mass destruction.

This is so truly sad,

This is so truly sad, especially in light of the plain fact that on November 4th, 2008, the American people gave Washington a clear mandate - END THE WARS! The people sent to Washington on that day have clearly ignored their mandate. Of course, if the wars end, Halliburton, GE, General Dynamics, Northrup-Grumann, Raytheon, Carlyle, and a host of others, will lose money. The boys on the Beltway cannot let that happen. There's too much money to be made!

The news story says, "the

The news story says, "the visitors had left right after their meal ...". It is very significant. Apparently, the US forces have been working in collaboration with the Pakistanis, although the latter have been making a pretense of protesting against the "violation" of their "territory" by US. My reading is that Pakistan, as has been their wont, get prior information from US forces that an attack on Taliban or other terrorists is coming, and then they inform their partners: the Taliban or other terrorists. It has happened earlier, for example even during the Clinton regime. As a result, the Taliban or other terrorists are pre-warned and escape before the US attack takes place. Then the so-called "innocent" civilians die in the attack, and Pakistan cries "Murder Most Foul!". The Americans are suckers.

Is there a more cowardly act

Is there a more cowardly act than bombing people 8,000 mile away on the basis of "intelligence" and what they see on a screen. Is there any better example of a cold-blooded terrorist than the bomber who remains in complete safety and comfort while he kills and maims others? The only worse people are those who arrange such things to happen.

What is there to say? I was

What is there to say? I was reading in the Bible last night a poem by Isaiah. One line said how awful and sad things are, but a footnote by the translator said that in the Hebrew the line was just a single word: Oy! I don't know the Pashtun for Oy, but what else can you say?

This was a mistake, not done

This was a mistake, not done on purpose. The drone controllers mistakenly thought the Taliban were still there. This is called the Fog of War. It was not done with malice. And the military regrets it, because they know that every time they make a mistake like this, they make more enemies. The new commander for Iraq is Special Operations, more in line with winning the hearts and minds of the people, and based on his experience, we should see a fall off of incidents like this. Less airstrikes to begin with, and those that are done will usually be controlled by a live person at the scene, who will be less likely to make such a mistake. Yes, this is a terrible war, but we shouldn't just leave at let the Taliban take over again. It does not jibe with progressive thought to allow them to take over, with their violence against women, arbitrary punishment for not following their extreme version of Islam. Even listening to music is against their rules! Civilian casualties happen in every war. Most of the French civilian casualties of WWII were from aerial bombing of German targets in France. This does not excuse the mistake, but mistakes are made in combat.

Why do so many who slam Bush

Why do so many who slam Bush (deservedly), Cheney (way deservedly) and Obama (too soon to tell) not also take after the Pentagon? The enablers of the Military-Industrial complex? The Officer Class, including the Joint Chiefs?