Share

The Rise of Single-Payer Health Care

by: David Swanson, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
Single-payer health care supporters rally in Los Angeles in April. (Photo: Getty Images)

    Health care reform plans are being drafted and passed around on both sides of Capitol Hill, but the plan with the greatest number of Congress members behind it was first introduced as a bill six years ago. With two new co-sponsors having just signed on, Congressman John Conyers's single-payer health care plan, HR 676, now has 80 Congress members supporting it.

    A House committee held a hearing on single-payer health coverage on Wednesday, and a Senate committee included single payer in a hearing on Thursday. Many opponents of single payer, including President Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, say it would be the ideal solution if it were possible.

    A single-payer or "Medicare for all" system that eliminates for-profit health insurance and simply pays for everyone's treatment by private doctors and hospitals of their choosing is also the only solution consistently favored by a majority of Americans in polls. The proposal, already in place in most of the world's wealthy nations, is raised at every health care town-hall forum that Congress members or President Obama speak at, including the one Obama held on Thursday in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

    The president always rejects single payer on the grounds that some Americans are too fond of their health insurance companies to part with them. A report by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting last week found that the corporate media still virtually bans coverage of single payer. A Senate bill being championed by Sen. Chris Dodd in place of ailing Sen. Edward Kennedy, does not include single payer (which is supported by only one US senator, Bernie Sanders). The Kennedy-Dodd bill, at least in its initial draft, does not even include a "public option," that is a Medicare-like program to exist alongside the private insurance companies. The House bill is being drafted by one current and two former co-sponsors of HR 676, Congressmen George Miller, Henry Waxman and Charles Rangel, but it avoids single payer, championing a public option instead. Other competing Senate bills are expected to complicate things further.

    The approach taken by the Kennedy-Dodd bill and considered for the House bill is, rather than eliminating health insurance companies, expanding them by making insurance mandatory and subsidizing its purchase. While this approach is favored by the insurance companies, which have been among the primary participants in White House and Congressional health care forums this year, it is not supported by other corporations that would rather not be required to provide health insurance to employees. If anything has emerged on Capitol Hill this week, it is a chaotic lack of consensus except around the idea that something must be done to address a health care system that is damaging Americans' health and economy. Whether the growing chaos opens the door to single payer remains to be seen, and that possibility appears much more real in the House than in the Senate.

    In the House, the progressive Caucus has declared that, while it would prefer single payer, it will back no bill without a public option; the Black, Hispanic and Asian caucuses have also backed a public option; and Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said that no bill without a public option will pass. This should mean that, as the debate advances, the House will be more likely to back single payer than any other solution. Or, rather, it would be if it could create laws without having to get them through the Senate as well.

    Sen. Max Baucus has taken the lead in Kennedy's absence and chaired hearings last month to which he refused to invite any supporters of single payer. Baucus had 13 people arrested for speaking up at his hearings uninvited, an action that generated more media coverage of single payer than any poll or study ever could have. One of those arrested, Dr. Margaret Flowers, is the Maryland co-chair of Physicians for a National Health Program. She was interviewed by Ed Schultz on "MSNBC," who began covering single payer in a major way. "Bill Moyer's Journal" on PBS also focused on single payer and aired interviews with three leading advocates, including Donna Smith of the California Nurses Association (CNA). Tim Carpenter of Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) was interviewed on Fox News. Even the Washington Post took note.

    Over the past few weeks, the relatively serious media attention has inspired more activism and vice versa. Senator Baucus has been surrounded by demands for single payer at town-hall forums in Montana and questioned by activists with video cameras in Washington, DC, as have health insurance executives and lobbyists.

    Congress members John Conyers, Raul Grijalva, Donna Edwards, Steve Cohen and Emanuel Cleaver, along with Carpenter of PDA and Smith and Michael Lighty of CNA met with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer to lobby for single payer. Conyers has become increasingly outspoken, and on Wednesday evening, complained of being shut out by the president and by Waxman and Rangel, promising not to let up. On June 3, Senator Baucus met with advocates of single payer and told them he was wrong to have excluded them. But he said he would continue to do so.

    However, on Wednesday, the Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee in the House, Chaired by Congressman Robert Andrews, held a serious hearing on the topic of single payer, with four of the five witnesses favoring a single-payer system, and Conyers was one of the four.

    After the hearing and a briefing, Stephen Spitz of PDA told me, "Some of us met with Congressman Conyers in his office when he suddenly said: 'Let's go to Nancy Pelosi's office.' Off we went and, after talking to an aide of the speaker, we talked with Speaker Pelosi in her office in the US Capitol. She said she is for single payer and encouraged us to keep on doing what we were doing. She said that single payer cannot pass this year in the Congress. She said she was fighting to get a meaningful public option. Congressman Conyers asked her to let him (and experts he would bring) conduct a briefing before the entire House Democratic caucus on HR 676."

    The next day, on Thursday, the Senate provided a stark contrast. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing with possibly a record number of panelists, one of whom, Dr. Flowers, favored single payer. Senator Dodd, chairing in place of the absent Kennedy, opened by remarking that he'd never seen a panel so large and that he at first thought the panel was the audience. While hearings often include as many as six witnesses, this one included two panels with a total of 24 speakers. The first panel, with 15 speakers, began with Flowers's very brief statement, followed by 14 other prepared statements, none of them responding to Flowers.

    Flowers began by indicating that she spoke for a majority of Americans. No one ever challenged that claim. Flowers criticized the idea of a uniquely American market solution as a delusion that has failed for 40 years. She said that health care in the United States is rationed right now ("rationing" being one of the dangers of "government health care" warned about by the sole witness against single payer on Wednesday). Congressman Dennis Kucinich had made the same point on Wednesday. The threats of wait time and denial of care are here under the current system. In what other industrialized nation, Flowers asked, do people hold bake sales to pay for their health care? In what other industrialized nation do millions of people go bankrupt because of medical bills? None of the following 14 speakers or any of the senators in the room answered these questions. In fact, they directed more criticism at the Kennedy-Dodd bill.

    Randel Johnson, vice president of the US Chamber of Commerce, warned that employer mandates could force companies to go out of business. William Dennis of the National Federation of Independent Business claimed to be concerned that employer mandates would hurt low-wage employees. There were no low-wage employees on the panel.

    Dr. Samantha Rosman of the American Medical Association (AMA) spoke against any public option. She did not provide arguments against it so much as announce that the AMA would not accept it. President Obama has said that a public option must be included. He is scheduled to speak to the AMA on Monday.

    Other panelists included right-wing think tankers and the CEO of a supermarket chain, who advocated urging employees to take better care of themselves. Two panelists other than Flowers were not from the usual crowd. They were Gerald Shea of the AFL-CIO and Dennis Rivera of SEIU, both leaders of labor unions that have backed HR 676 in the past and whose members overwhelmingly favor single payer. The AFL-CIO does not have a clear position now. Rose Ann DeMoro, vice president of the AFL-CIO, was part of the meeting with Baucus and advocates single payer. Shea mentioned that unions have always favored single payer, but he moved immediately to discussing the details of Dodd's plan, favoring a public option and employer mandates, but opposing taxing employees for health insurance payments made by employers. Rivera, too, favored a public option.

    The panel was followed by a lengthy question-and-answer period. For a long time no senators asked Flowers any questions. Finally, she grabbed a microphone and asked to speak. She responded to a discussion of preventive care by pointing out that when the goal of health coverage is not profit, an incentive is created to keep people healthy since doing so saves the public money.

    Sen. Barbara Mikulski later asked Flowers why a public option isn't good enough. Flowers said that one problem is that insurance companies will cherry-pick the healthiest patients and leave the sickest to the public program. More importantly, Flowers argued, much of the waste in the current arrangement is due to the fragmentation of the coverage system into 1,300 different companies, requiring hospitals to employ staff to interface with them. Adding a public option would only make this worse, Flowers said, not fix it.

    Sen. Jeff Bingaman tried to claim he had found a consensus among most of the panelists on various points, acknowledging that he was excluding Flowers. The fact that 14 of the 15 panelists represented a smaller portion of the public than the one panelist alone did not seem to matter.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders, who supports single payer, asked Flowers to expand on why single payer is the best plan and then proceeded to criticize another panelist, the CEO of Aetna, for denying people health care.

    While the Senate has a long way to go, even just to measure up to the House, single-payer advocates are encouraged by the progress this week. Katie Robbins of Healthcare-NOW! called Wednesday's and Thursday's hearings "measurable successes of the groundswell of support for a just, equitable system based on single-payer financing."

    "However," said Robbins, "the conversation is just beginning. We demand full hearings on single payer in the Senate, the House Ways and Means Committee, and the Energy and Commerce Committee. In addition, a fair scoring of single-payer legislation must be included in the Congressional Budget Office's report on health care reform."

    Kevin Zeese of Prosperity Agenda emailed me from Thursday's Senate hearing: "The multi-player advocates are divided. Bitterly so over mandates, paying for their plans and whether to have a public plan to compete. The senate is trying to fix the equivalent of a broken egg. It cannot be done. But they all have their heads in the sand and their hand in the till. Single payer is making progress. More people know single payer is right than admit it. It will win the day but they will pursue the wrong paths until they run into the dead end."

    A single-payer rally is planned for Friday, June 26, at 6:00 PM in front of Union Station in Washington, DC. Those likely to show up often speak about their struggle as one for basic human rights. Those who imagine the single-payer movement might go away often speak about health care reform in terms of "political feasibility" and "focus group message testing." Perhaps the growing success of the push for single payer is not so surprising.

    -------

    David Swanson is the author of the upcoming book "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union," by Seven Stories Press. You can preorder it at http://tinyurl.com/daybreakbook.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Why is Baucus, clearly a

Why is Baucus, clearly a corrupt politician, allowed to have a veto on the entire health care policy process? If you read closely, the "public option" is actually, officially the "screw the public option" Where does Senator Bonehead get off intimating that single payer will be as "badly" administered as the post office? I haven't lost a letter in 50 years! The health insurance industry is a criminal cartel. It needs to be broken up, its assets seized, its officers jailed.

HR676 takes the profit, the

HR676 takes the profit, the business out of healthcare and gives Americans everywhere their human right to medical care when they are sick. All we have to do is fight for our human right...the politicians will not respect our human right unless we do. Strange but true.

A voluntary public option is

A voluntary public option is the way to go. Problems with "single-payer": 1. Privacy invasion. A system like this will certainly include a "national health ID card" with information collected from some intrusive form. The card may include "biometrics" and other controls. This will be a civil liberties nightmare. Over time the use of this information will expand. Look at the "Social Security" number and how its use has expanded. 2. Freedom of choice; every person has a right to choose his or her doctor and medical treatment. By the same logic, a person has the right to choose their method of medical insurance. "Single-payer" eliminates any other option. Yes, it is true that a large number of people don't have a choice. A voluntary public plan will provide this. It seems that many supporters of single-payer are true ideologues. They don't think practically; they don't understand how intrusive and grasping government is. "Safeguards"...? Please; these didn't work during the Bush/Cheney regime. Bottom line: the choice MUST be the individual's.

Let's go if we can to the

Let's go if we can to the rally on June 26. What would happen if 1 million of us showed up?

Much of the U.S. Congress

Much of the U.S. Congress has been bought and sold by the U.S. medical-industrial complex. so look for a lot of members of Congress giving "principled" opposition to single-payer health insurance. Look for a lot of FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) being thrown about on this issue, especially from the neoconservative right-wing. FOX NEWS HO-O! If members of Congress know that the voters will hold them accountable for working against their best interests, enough of them may start singing a different tune.

Speaker says that single

Speaker says that single payer is the ideal solution but it's not possible. We probably couldn't get to the moon either under her vision. The reason "it's not possible" is that the Senators do not wish to vote for it. Sen. Merkley (OR) also favors it. They may like to endorse it, but they can't afford it. (I'm refering to their personal campaign finances, not the Federal budget).

The health care industry

The health care industry would like the equivalent of Medicare part D - they set the price, the government pays. We can not afford simply to have the taxpayer subsidize health care premiums for low and middle income Americans. Too much of our GDP goes to healthcare. Only with single-payer offers significant cost savings.

Where does Senator Bonehead

Where does Senator Bonehead get off intimating that single payer will be as "badly" administered as the post office? I haven't lost a letter in 50 years! The health insurance industry is a criminal cartel. It needs to be broken up, its assets seized, its officers jailed. " Me too. I have been marveling at the fact that I get allll my mail and "they" get all my checks in the mail on time. Max Baucus has been there too long by now. Now that he had "accepted" so much payola from the Med-Ind-Complex, he can't be counted on to be honest and sincere, he is bought and paid for and this shows it clearly. The gall of the man. Montanans won't keep him in office if he blocks 676. They need health-care...they have brains...they have elections...go Montana!

It is beginning to happen.

It is beginning to happen. Single payer system is finally being recognized as the only system that will fix our broken system. $400 BILLION dollars each year is going to insurance companies administering the program, not to health care. Put it directly to health care and everyone can be taken care of. I never joined the AMA and I am particularly proud of that at this time, as they weigh in against the single payer system which a majority of doctors want.

Private money in politics

Private money in politics will trump public pressure every time. Single payer health care is still a long way off.

America wakes up and says no

America wakes up and says no to corporate greed! Get them out of health care and from buying our legislators and policies that hurt Americans and only help the bottom line! It's a free market...if you can't keep up GO UNDER!!! A revolution is at hand...We the People take our country back from those who lie, steal and cheat to make a profit at our expense! Single payer is the first step. Why are we giving the Communist Chinese so much money so we can buy plastic crap at Wal-Mart? Do we really want to give them all the wealth?!

There will be a street

There will be a street demonstration in favor of single-payer health coverage in Tacoma, WA on Monday 6/29/09, at 1019 Pacific Ave. from 3:00 until 6:00 P.M. This is the office for the Democratic Representative for the 6th CD of Washington State. Also, Senate offices are across the street.

It is truly rich. The poor

It is truly rich. The poor folk can't afford health insurance ergo -- they don't want health insurance. But of course, everyone would like to be cared for if they are in need. Meanwhile the "health insurance" companies are bankrupting American businesses. But we can't afford single payer health care. Perhaps the rich folks would not get as good care. Yea, right! The rich folks will take care of themselves. You can be sure of that.

Single payer is likened to

Single payer is likened to Medicare which is not a single payer. I sit here with a request from my private insurance company that provides me with supplemental insurance for my original Medicare policy. They need to pay the 20 percent that the government will not pay for services rendered. The fee the government settles upon is significantly lower than that the provider billed. If I did not have supplemental insurance at $170 per month, now for more than 16 years, I doubt any physician or healthcare facility would provide me with care. I am participating in a double payer health care insurance that refuses to give me an annual physical as an ounce of prevention. Let’s get real with our terminology and the truth about payments from the government and the insurance industry with substantive out of pocket costs by original Medicare subscribers.

Single Payer is the only

Single Payer is the only proposal that guarantees people the right to choose their own doctor and hospital, and to decide on treatment with no interference between doctor and patient - unlike the present meddling by insurance companies in the name of profit. The public option allows no possibility of controlling costs - the insurance companies would make it into a "Plan D" like nightmare, or insist on subsidies as they are now getting with their "Advantage Plans". They will cherry-pick the most profitable persons, and leave the expensive ones to the government to finance, as is being done now. We would be paying taxes on employer-provided health insurance. Say, the insurance payment by the employer is around the average $1,000 per month. If an employee is in the 25% tax bracket, that means the employee would have another $250 deducted from his pay each month. It is no way to help the economy - and no way to treat people. The mandate requested by the insurers is nothing more than a bailout of another name. We DON'T need them. Why pay further hundreds of billions of dollars keeping them afloat. Give us a break! Pass single payer. We CAN make them do it.

I'd like the rest of the

I'd like the rest of the country have what I have -single payer, i.e., Medicare. It's intereting that that obstructive body, the U.S. Senate has an excellent health care plan, federally paid for, which is - single payer!

I am sick of the greed and

I am sick of the greed and self serving of our public servants and their sugar daddies. We bailed out the banks and now they raise interest rates and charge 6% interest for traveler's checks that we used to get free. Now we have a health care system that is so profit motivated there is no room for preventative treatments. We should be at the forefront on health care. Aren't we boasted as the most affluent and ideal country in the world? A capitalistic society should be able to support its citizen's health and education. It looks as if we are falling way behind and nobody is going to do anything to change it because the big guys like it the way it is.

We had a "Health care ,not

We had a "Health care ,not Warfare" demonstration in Tulsa last weekend.We actually got a little press coverage because Reggie...one of the injured first responders Michael Moore introduced us to in 'Sicko".Reggie said Sen (Dr) Coburn would not help her bec that was a "New York Problem".

The health care donut hole

The health care donut hole folks, that's what we're gonna get, fried, glazed, oily, and (are you surprised?), bad for your health!

Thanks to TRUTHOUT and David

Thanks to TRUTHOUT and David Swanson for this article. I was unable to understand why press coverage for a program supported by a majority of Americans was so poor. (Thank you, Bill Moyers, for being the exception!) I was unaware of the virtual ban on coverage discussed in your linked article. The excellent website for Physicians for a National Health Program (www.pnhp.org) should be carefully reviewed by everyone. Its FAQs are like a primer on this subject. Everyone opposed to single payer says it is "too expensive" and "too complicated." PNHP explains that it would be much less expensive, and can be adopted more easily than many of the proposed alternatives. It also explains why a public-private mixture can't succeed. I am hopeful that someone will publish a list of contributions received by every member of the Senate and House from the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries. This information would help all of us see why single payer is being ignored.

It mystifies me that such

It mystifies me that such conflicts of interest among our representatives are so prevalent that we can't properly respond. We are like abused children, either desensitized to or in denial about what is happening to our country in their greedy hands. The realization is coming, however. I wonder what the fallout will look like...

Insurance is no assurance of

Insurance is no assurance of health. Delete the word "Insurance" from "Health Insurance" and what remains is what everybody wants: Health.

I still do not understand

I still do not understand why it has not been put on a national ballot for the voters/citizens to decide?? Obviously our esteemed members of congress and the senate are being swayed by "lobbyists"... I find that appalling and not in the best interest of the "real" people of "We, The people". (Of which I know with certainty was in our founding fathers ideologies, otherwise the simple preamble that set the frame for the US Constitution would not have mentioned "General Welfare").

Rally at Union Station in

Rally at Union Station in Washington, D.C. on June 26th, at 6 p.m. FOR SINGLE PAYER. This is our chance to have our voices heard. Two bills for Single Payer: H.R. 676 sponsored by Rep. John Conyers S.703 sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders Call and ask your members of congress to co-sponsor the bills, and if not, ask them why not, and remember their stance at the next election. For more information: http://www.pnhp.org http://PDAmerica.org http://standwithdrdean.com

Amen! - to the previous post!

Amen! - to the previous post!

Healthcare that actually

Healthcare that actually saves money is preventative care. Instead of the "gimme a pill and fix me" medical model, what about diet? Exercise? From what I have read about the European style/model, it is heavily weighted toward preventing illnesses. Please note the the US Chamber of Commerce is working mighty hard to defeat any health care alternatives that do not support the current crap that we have.

Single payer, single payer.

Single payer, single payer. All I hear is single payer. Well, let me tell you, it's not going to be single payer. Nance Pillosi Next time someone like Merkley says single payer isn't possible, the next question should be why not? And if it's some lame "not politically feasible," why not? Why not? If not now then when? If not today, then why make your promises?

One of the things Baucus

One of the things Baucus wants to avoid is a fair scoring by the CBO of single payer, esp. in these times. That would make all the representatives and senators accountable. The question: why not the most cost effective option could be asked.

Now the insurance and drug

Now the insurance and drug companies and their shills are screaming bloody murder that they are being 'excluded' from presenting their side of the argument, while single payor advocates have been systematically left out of the process. Just more smoke sceen to cover up the fact that Congress is bought and paid for, and nothing that might effect real change is going to be allowed to happen. We need to vote out every incumbent that refuses to support real change, ie. single payor.

Can someone verify the June

Can someone verify the June 26th rally for single payer? Who is organizing it? Here's another rally (maybe part of 2 days of ralllying?) SINGLE PAYER RALLY, June 25th, Washington, DC

Join us on Thursday, June 25, 2009 for The Great American Sickout, a National Rally for Health Care For All Now. Congress is acting. They haven't been listening to us.

 Congress needs to hear a LOUD voice NOW. 1 Million People Shouting, "Health Care For ALL. Not Some. Not Most. ALL."

 Where: Washington DC, gather at the Washington Monument on the National Mall

 When: June 25, 2009, 10:00 a.m.

 Take the day off of work, BE THERE. Tell Congress in person, join Together.
 More information here: http://www.1payer.net/action-alerts/washington-rally.html

"Those who make peaceful

"Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable." John F. Kennedy

We need to throw Baucus out

We need to throw Baucus out if he keeps this up.

I agree with the above

I agree with the above comment. "Let the voters decide" and bypass the Legislators who have boldly said that "we know the people want single payer, but Congress doesn't'. Aren't the people the ones Congress is supposed to be representing. Didn't the people vote the Congress into office?

Obama is failing a major

Obama is failing a major test, instead of being a strong leader for health care for all, he is conducting himself as a stealth mercenary for the for profit insurance cartel.

It's bad enough that private

It's bad enough that private insurance companies allow only the most healthy among us to be included in their plans; wow, thanks, you're allowing me to spend over $4000/ year for a service I rarely use, and hopefully never use. But they have also bought and paid for our Congressional representatives to publicly say they oppose an affordable, commonsense national health plan. Disgusting! And unacceptable. Everyone knows politicians obstruct progress on behalf of their biggest campaign donors. But we're not talking about solar panels and logging here, we're talking about our ability to access healthcare when we need it most, just like our elected representatives do. It seems Congress has already declared healthcare a basic right in it's heavy subsidizing of childhood vaccinations. Now we have to "intervene" and get them past their addiction to corporate propaganda. I would prefer to spend my tax dollars on an affordable and adequate single payer health plan that covers everyone, than I would for subsidies to insurance corporations. One more thing: the so-called "public option" is a scam if it is administered by the same broken system we have now, and President Obama should be ashamed for clinging to this mirage after advocating early-on for a single payer plan.

Clarification! We want

Clarification! We want freedom of choice in Healthcare, not choice in Health Insurance. We only care about how and when we get to see a doctor, not what kind of card we get to keep in our wallet. Single-Payer is the only healthcare system PROVEN to work in other civilized, industrialized countries. In the US, we do not have a Healthcare System so much as a Health Market that has led to many not having access to Healthcare, and filing bankruptcy due to medical bills. No other industrialized nation has this kind of problem because they all have a Healthcare System, not a Healthcare Market.

I think that President Obama

I think that President Obama never actually supported single payer option during his campaign.

We need two important ideas

We need two important ideas for the people to go forward and have a free democracy, single payer health coverage and tax payer supported elections. No more profit motivated health care insurance corp. schemes. No more pay to play payoffs through lobbyists to our representatives. I voted for Obama, but it looks like he has already sold us out. If it continues, the only chance we have are a peoples third party to eliminate the cancer that the current both parties have effected our country with. Has anybody noticed that democracy and freedom in the world is vanishing more and more each day.

of course its out of the

of course its out of the question both obama and pelosi have both taken bribes er i mean campaign contributions and this won't happen. long live facsism! er i mean democracy !

Single payer is the way to

Single payer is the way to go. When are they going to get it? Thank you to those who are posting about the demonstration in Washington D.C. I think there needs to be better publicity about such events, perhaps posted on websites for various groups, and how it's scheduled/calendared around the country. I recently missed one in my area, only to read about it a day or two later in the newspaper. I would have attended if I knew about it. I have written my representatives, but at present, I have received a letter that they may be throwing people off the state plan, so I am afraid to write to my representatives again. I am afraid myself and my child will losing our health coverage. I am afraid they will retaliate. Also, right now, we need to see a doctor and I am afraid to use the coverage because they may throw off people who cost them more money. (They haven't decided yet how they are going to keep or lose people.) If I lived in Baucus' state, I would NEVER VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN. I think these Congressional representatives should spend a day or two worrying about whether or not they or their children can even use their coverage or are going to lose it.

Here's a question, can

Here's a question, can someone answer it? If a public option goes through and enough people dump the insurance companies and go with the public option, wouldn't that push the way forward to single payer?

Instead of permitting our

Instead of permitting our congress critters to decide what they're willing to allow us, let's start demanding they give themselves the identical "plan" and see what they endorse under those conditions.

By any true logic or

By any true logic or empirical test, Single Payer is the ONLY health care approach that is truly universal, and--by removal of profiteering--unquestionably the most economical. Are we to be denied the one rational choice because our politicians are too enslaved by insurance company greed and power? Or because our rightly beloved and honorable president is failing to live up to his own ideals? The impending tragedy is monstrous--and unless public outcry wins out--irreversible.

"Yes, Dorothy, something is

"Yes, Dorothy, something is wrong with your tv set. As I satirized in another post, we will be "sold down the river" in New New Orleans on all of this. The "public option" if it is in the "package" will be like "public broadcasting", replace every occurrence of "public" with "pharma" or "petroleum" and you will see the real picture!" Maybe you can help the rest of us in Oz who aren't quite as smart as you. I support single payer. Single payer, as it is for MOST Americans, is in MY best interests. But I am not understanding the opposition to a public plan, a public plan insisted upon by President Obama in face of opposition by Republicans, the insurance industry, etc. It seems to me that, a public plan, would be a step closer towards single payer. So, if you or someone else could do so. That is, connect the dots even moreso. Courteously. (That is, you're not speaking to little girls with aprons and Totos. But American families.) Anyone? Really and truly asking. Thank you.

A public sector of doctors

A public sector of doctors would be refreshing. Let's keep the momentum going for single payer. I know there are folks out there -- the very wealthy -- who love the insurance companies and don't mind paying them, love their expensive private doctors and don't mind paying them. I'm wondering if public attorneys can't provide a parallel lesson for doctors. There have always been public prosecutors. Public defenders were born when it became obvious that justice was not served without them. Although some P.Ds "meet and plead" their clients, earning a bad reputation, many are very devoted attorneys who work hard for clients, aren't in it for the big bucks, and care about justice. Those who can afford it pay private attorneys, but as a former public defender, I know that many of us did a far superior job to some of those in the private sector who charged big bucks for what we knew was sloppy service. Why are public sector doctors any more "socialistic" than public sector attorneys?

Kathleen Sebelius said

Kathleen Sebelius said unequivocally on NPR this morning that single payer is DEAD.

Single payer. Chutzpah for

Single payer. Chutzpah for members of Congress, who have great health care to play "stupid". Amy Goodman, DemocracyNow has pointed out articles listing how much money some members of the Senate have received from health care, drug and related groups. It reminds me of Noam Chomsky's phrase, "the democracy gap" - the gap between what the public wants (single payer health care, in this instance) and what the politicians/government want to do.

Sign this petition for

Sign this petition for single payer being circulated by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Senator Sanders introduced the Senate version of H.R. 676. http://sanders.senate.gov/petitions/index.cfm?uid=7fd59f2e-88e1-477a-8eaf-762a5b050809

Let's boycott the healthcare

Let's boycott the healthcare insurance companies. I pay $1300 per month. If 1 million folks who do the same do a boycott that would be $1 billion per month hit to the health care insurance companies. After 2 months their stock price would be zilch. Within a year at $1 billion per month loss the companies and the lobbyists would be gone.