Share

Jimmy Carter to Meet Hamas Leaders After Criticizing Israeli Prime Minister

by: Rory McCarthy  |  The Guardian UK

photo
Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad shakes hands with former President Jimmy Carter. After saying Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu raised new obstacles to peace, Carter announced he will travel to Gaza to meet with Hamas leaders. (Photo: Getty Images)

Former US president to travel to Gaza. Netanyahu raised new obstacles to peace, Carter says.

    Jerusalem - The former US president Jimmy Carter will visit Gaza for a rare meeting with senior Hamas officials following his criticism of a key speech by Israel's prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, on Sunday night.

    Carter, who has been in Israel and the occupied West Bank over the past week, will be one of the most senior western figures to meet the Hamas leadership in Gaza in recent years. He is expected to meet, among other Hamas officials, Ismail Haniyeh, the former Palestinian prime minister.

    Last month in Damascus he met Khaled Meshal, the head of the Hamas political bureau and the group's effective leader. Carter has been meeting Israeli officials and travelled to a Jewish settlement on the West Bank at the weekend as part of his private diplomatic efforts. His visits are not always welcomed by the Israeli government, which has been angered by his meetings in recent years with Hamas.

    On Sunday Carter criticised a policy speech given by Netanyahu, in which the Israeli prime minister, responding to weeks of pressure from Washington, gave carefully worded approval for a future Palestinian state under strict conditions, but insisted "normal lives" should continue in Jewish settlements in east Jerusalem and the West Bank.

    "My opinion is he raised many new obstacles to peace that had not existed under previous prime ministers," Carter said during a visit to the Knesset in Jerusalem.

    "He still apparently insists on expansion of existing settlements, he demands that the Palestinians and the Arabs recognise Israel as a Jewish state, although 20% of its citizens here are not Jews. This is a new demand."

    But Carter said he had encountered even greater differences with the former Israeli prime minister, Menachem Begin, and had still managed to broker a peace deal between Israel and Egypt.

    In an interview today on US television, Netanyahu said he wanted to reduce the differences between his government and Barack Obama on settlements.

    "President Obama and I are trying to reach a common understanding on this," Netanyahu said. "I think we'll find some common ground."

    The White House described his speech as "an important step forward" and the EU said it was "a step in the right direction", although plans to upgrade trade relations between Israel and Europe remain frozen.

    But Palestinian officials were dismayed and called on the international community to challenge Israel.

    "The international community should confront this policy, through which Netanyahu wants to kill off any chance for peace," said Yasser Abed Rabbo, an adviser to the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas.

    He said Netanyahu should be pressed to accept the 2003 US road map, which he notably did not mention in his speech. Nor did he mention the Arab peace initiative, under which the Arab countries offered full diplomatic recognition of Israel in return for a Palestinian state on land occupied by Israel in 1967, with a capital in east Jerusalem and an agreed solution to the fate of Palestinian refugees.

    Instead, Netanyahu's vision of a Palestinian state was one that was demilitarised, with no army, and with strict border controls and no military agreements with other states. It would not have a capital in east Jerusalem, and no Palestinian refugees who fled or were forced from their homes in 1948 would be allowed to return to what is now Israel. He did not talk of removing settlements, now home to nearly 500,000 Jewish Israelis in east Jerusalem and the West Bank. Netanyahu also insisted the Palestinians recognise Israel as a Jewish state.

    In Cairo, Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian president, said recognising Israel as a Jewish state effectively meant ruling out any return of Palestinian refugees and "increases the complexity of the matter and aborts the chance for peace".

    Within Israel, reaction to Netanyahu's speech was mixed. Some among his rightwing coalition were angry that he even mentioned a Palestinian state, others were encouraged by it.

    Most, however, said the future would be determined by actions taken on the ground.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

At last someone from the US

At last someone from the US is doing something sensible in talking to Hamas. Well done, ex-Pres Carter! One begins to wonder if Netanyahu really wants peace or is content to keep the status quo so long as the US subsidy of $-billions continues. As it showed in Gaza, Israel has the American-supplied military might to crush any signs of resistance to the illegal occupation of land and total disregard for Human Rights. Why should they want anything different as long as they receive the regular handouts from American taxpayer? Compared with the devastating and unopposed attack on Gaza, the puny rocket attacks by Hamas are pin-pricks and provide Netanyahu and Co with justification for their intransigence. The old saying: "He who pays the piper calls the tune" applies here and the Israel government of Netanyahu should be TOLD what is to happen.

I believe private action

I believe private action against apartheid in South Africa is what finally undermined it. It will probably have to follow the same path in Israel. Unequal treatment based on ethnicity is not sustainable in the modern world. It is an old-world way that appears to care little about justice, merit, the health of the planet or anything wider than narrow sectarian wealth. I most deliberately did not mention the word safety. Safety has nothing to do with narrow sectarian advantage. Israel will come under increasing international pressure, not least from American Jews horrified by what they saw in Gaza. The Israeli equivalents to Cheney will answer to history, as will Cheney. They have time to repent, but if they are going to do it in this life, they had better get busy.

The only substantial

The only substantial movement forward toward peace in the Middle East in my lifetime was the Middle East Peace Accords under then President Jimmy Carter. Carter's book, Peace, Not Apartheid is required reading for anyone who wants to understand the true nature of the problem in this troubled region. I urge all people of good will who wish to see peace come to the Middle East to see the problems of the Palestinian people in light of South Africa's oppression of its majority population. American economic pressure helped shine a light on the injustice of Apartheid and to help overthrow it ultimately. Today, 52 nations still to do recognize the existence of Israel as a legitimate state. As King Abdullah II recently said on Meet the Press, "All roads do lead to Jerusalem"

Actions speak louder than

Actions speak louder than words and it should be clear by now that the extreme Zionists who lead Israel do not want peace, they want land, and they want all of it. I have heard Israelis say this flat out, "The land is ours, it is all ours." I suppose they think that peace can be shoved down Palestinian throats once Israel controls all the land but true peace will not come that way, I daresay. This is a dark time for Israel, an era that future generations will look upon not with pride.

If any of your readers want

If any of your readers want to understand (the maps are quite revealing) how the Israelis have since '48 pretended to negotiate while ignoring commitments made during "peace" negotiations, meanwhile continuing to change the "facts on the ground ", viz., land and water grabs,which make peace unattainable, go to any of Edward Said's writings. One in particular, "From Oslo to Iraq" is quite revealing. It is a true tragedy for both peoples because history shows such injustice hasn't and won't work.

American tax payer dollars

American tax payer dollars should pay for peace not war.