Share

Iran Admits 50 Cities Had More Votes Than Voters

by: Martin Fletcher  |  The Times UK

photo
Protests continue in Iran as reports say that more votes were recorded in 50 Iranian cities than there were voters. (Photo: Reuters)

    In 50 Iranian cities the number of votes cast in this month presidential election exceeded the number of eligible voters, the state's election watchdog admitted today.

    The surprising admission by the Guardian Council was, however, designed to undermine the claims of the defeated candidates that the vote was rigged.

    Mir Hossein Mousavi, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's main rival in the hotly-disputed election, and the other two losing candidates have claimed that the vote exceeded eligible voters in as many as 170 districts.

    Abbasali Kadkhodai, a spokesman for the council of senior clerics, told the state television channel IRIB: "Our investigation shows that the number of districts they announced is not correct. Based on our preliminary report, 50 districts face this issue."

    Mr Kadkhodaei also argued that voter turnouts of more than 100 per cent were not unusual because Iranians can cast their ballots where they want. Although it is summer in Iran and some of the cities in question are in desert areas, he suggested some voters might have gone to them on holiday.

    He also made clear that Mr Ahmadinejad's victory would not be affected even if the results in the 50 disputed districts were reversed as they account for three million votes and the official results show Mr Ahmadinejad won by a margin of 11 million.

    Mr Mousavi and the other two candidates, Mehdi Karoubi and Mohsen Rezai, have all complained to the Guardian Council of electoral fraud and have reported 646 alleged irregularities.

    The council has agreed to investigate those complaints but it is chaired by a close ally of Mr Ahmadinejad's and dominated by conservatives. The defeated candidates do not consider it impartial - especially after Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, made clear in a speech on Friday that Mr Ahmadienjad's victory would stand.

    Mr Mousavi and Mr Karoubi are demanding a fresh election. They refused an invitation to appear before the council to present their complaints on Saturday and Mr Mousavi has rejected its offer to recount a random ten per cent of the votes.

    The regime also announced today that 457 people were arrested during Saturday's running battles on the streets of Tehran. It said they had "caused insecurity, disrupted public order and clashed with police".

    At least 13 civilians died in those confrontations between pro-Mousavi demonstrators and the security forces. The prosecutor general's office in Tehran claimed that it was "unknown vandals", not the police, who opened fire on civilians.

    The protests have prompted unprecedented traffic on the micro-blogging website Twitter.com and on other social networking sites, including Facebook and YouTube, as details of planned demonstrations are shared around.

    Many of today's postings were focused on Neda Soltani, the 26-year-old woman allegedly shot by a Basiji militiaman on Saturday evening who has become a posthumous poster girl for the protests after her death was captured on video. YouTube users posted picture galleries and even a song in tribute to her today.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

A preview of what's in store

A preview of what's in store for American elections as the corporate "owners" of government tighten their control. Think it won't happen that way? Think again.

After working with elections

After working with elections in my state I can honestly say that our election process is safe and secure. It is new democracies that are used to dictatorships and in many ways still expect presidents to be dictators that have trouble with elections. I just hope Obama lets Iran settle their own problems. Their change from within is truly inspirational.

Have to agree with a

Have to agree with a previous post as well as Obama. Let Iran settle their own affairs, don't say anything, let the dust settle before making any comments. There is only one media target for Iranian hard liners, America. To take a stand now against the right wing rulers would be used as a weapon for uniting the whole of Iran or most of it. Its remarkable that the "just do the opposite of Obama" Republicans either don't get it, or do get it and are determined in their continued obstruction of the government simply because they believe, in error, that's what they should do to sound tough. This is one of the better of Obama's decisions since taking office.

I DO think President Obama

I DO think President Obama is very wise to refrain from too much commentary on this issue. After all, they ARE copying our election process in Ohio, Florida, yes Chicago, and most recently Minnesota SEAT FRANKEN! From either party we can find "shenanigans" going back decades- maybe it's just the price of a Republic? Iran, like the U.S. IS a "Republic", NOT a democracy.

Swaziland native, uprooted

Swaziland native, uprooted to a shack in Ethiopia, has this to ponder, "should I stand with the uprising or just avoid doing anything about the Iranian Green Revolution?" That's America for you, there's no longer even the pretense of asking whether we should be concerned about one particular election in Iran. Now now, there are two concerns dangling before our eager mouths. Oh, look at the dreadful way they treat their protesters! Oh, let's just covertly undermine the Iranian's authority over their people. Spies, cloak and dagger, billions of dollars for weapons...oh yes. This "Green Revolution" is being conducted by English-speaking students, the proud sons and daughters of the would-be Iranian elite class. The next step is constant arousal of sympathy for those business-class protesters in MSM (and apparently lefty-outlets) and a CIA-bankrolled coup attempt from the provines neighboring Afghanistan and Pakistan. This will be crushed, because Ahmadinejad has the support of the vastly more numerous, peasant, Farsi-speaking population.