Share

Big Health Firms Underpay Claims

by: Fawn Johnson  |  The Wall Street Journal

photo
Large health insurers across the country have been using a faulty database which resulted in millions of valid insurance claims being underpaid. (Photo: iStockphoto)

    Congressional investigators have discovered that large health insurers in every region of the country are relying on faulty databases to underpay millions of valid insurance claims.

    In a report released Wednesday, the Senate Commerce Committee said insurance companies nationwide have failed to provide consumers with accurate or understandable information about how they calculate "reasonable" or "customary" charges for out-of-network care.

    Insurers also signed contracts prohibiting them from disclosing information about the databases to consumers or doctors, the report said.

    The flawed databases are owned by Ingenix Inc., a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group Inc. UnitedHealth recently settled with the New York attorney general's office to resolve charges that Ingenix drew up billing rates that underpaid hospitals and doctors for out-of-network care.

    Patients had to make up the difference. It is unclear how much they have overpaid over the years.

    An Ingenix spokeswoman said the company stands by the integrity of its databases. The two databases in question by the committee represent less than 2% of Ingenix's overall business. Ingenix also said it doesn't set actual rates for health procedures.

    Other insurers that purchased Ingenix data in New York - Aetna Inc., CIGNA Corp., and Wellpoint Inc. among them - also paid into the settlement. Under that agreement, the insurers will help pay for and then use a new not-for-profit research entity that will help determine prices for out-of-network care.

    Commerce Committee Chairman John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., launched the committee investigation in March, in the wake of the UnitedHealth settlement.

    Committee oversight staffers sought data from 18 large insurers that didn't participate in the New York settlement, including American International Group Inc., Humana Group Inc., the Kaiser Foundation Group, several Blue Cross Blue Shield units, and UnumProvident Corp.

    Together with the New York investigation, the committee's findings represent roughly two-thirds of the health-insurance market.

    The Ingenix databases represent "the great black box of the health-care industry," according to one health-care CEO quoted in the report. Ingenix also is the only commercial source of such data.

    Providers and patients have suspected for years that insurers were underpaying for out-of-network care, but they haven't been able to prove it.

    Committee investigators found that Ingenix developed its payment models based on claims data provided by its customers, the insurance companies.

    A committee aide said those companies sometimes would "scrub" the data sent to Ingenix - throwing out outlying high costs. Ingenix then would use questionable statistical models to come to its own rate estimates.

    The committee's report comes at a critical moment in Congress, as lawmakers are struggling to craft a massive overhaul to the health-care system designed to cover some 45 million uninsured Americans.

    In addition to chairing the Commerce Committee, Sen. Rockefeller also chairs the health subcommittee of the Finance Committee, one of two key Senate panels negotiating the health-care bill.

    He hopes to insert into the health-care bill language creating some type of independent evaluator that can certify that health claims are evaluated properly.

    In the meantime, Commerce Committee investigators likely will continue to drill down into individual companies' practices to understand how they arrive at certain claims rates. The committee also could look into smaller regional insurance carriers to see if they, too, are using faulty data.

    Republicans and other champions of private-sector insurers have long argued that making health care more consumer-friendly would drive down costs because patients could "shop around" for the best care.

    But Sen. Rockefeller and other health-policy experts argue that the lack of information in the private health-insurance market has made competition and informed consumer choice almost impossible.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The Republican's never seem

The Republican's never seem to get it. Who can "shop around" for health care? It's impossible. I tried to get prices for an MRI scan but no provider could give me that information. And even if you could compare prices for, say, heart bypass surgery, would you pick your surgeon based on the cheapest price? Not likely!! The "free market" mantra of the Republicans just doesn't work for health care. A public insurance plan, like Medicare, has to be an option for true health care reform.

16% of GDP and rising --

16% of GDP and rising -- that's the cost of health care. In Britain and France, health care is only 8% of GDP and people there get better care. If the Congress doesn't pass real health care, including a public plan, they should lose their Government health care. If they had to buy their insurance privately they would sing a different tune.

"Free market" capitalism

"Free market" capitalism requires open access to information on which to make an informed choice. That may have worked well three centuries ago when a farmer could independently evaluate the condition of a cow, but it does not work at all now under most conditions. It certainly does not work in health care, which a service, not an industry. Industries produce something tangible; services do not. Isn't it high time we understood the difference and challenged that entire line of reasoning? We don't want the cheapest health care; we want the most effective health care. We have neither.

Surprise surprise!

Surprise surprise!

The "choice" we have now

The "choice" we have now under private insurers is to get screwed or to get screwed.

What really amaze me is how

What really amaze me is how some Republicans that are regulars workers therefore also suffering the consequences of this evil system, still believe the panacea of "free market" applied on health care, when how some guy made on this forum, the point is exactly that, you can't "shop" around, simply because this system doesn't allow to do it, so how are you going to compare if nobody gives you prices? what it is evident is that somehow a wise Republican strategist found the real panacea for controlling the minds of the less given people: fear, it is almost the same topic for any topic the same (energy, stock market...), and this people react every time on the same response. Obama is getting with this issue the real test for seeing if it is a real Progressive that cares for the people or simply a visionary that want to thank everybody.