Share

US Soldier Believed Captured in Afghanistan

by: Khan Mohammad  |  Agence France-Presse

photo
A US soldier surveys a valley in Afghanistan. Taliban forces captured a US soldier in the Afghan province of Paktika, close to the Pakistan border. (Photo: AFP)

    Khost, Afghanistan - A US soldier is believed to have been captured by insurgents in Afghanistan, the military said Thursday, as a commander for a hardline Taliban faction said his militia had the trooper.

    It was believed to be the first time militants had abducted an American soldier in Afghanistan since US troops were deployed to oust the Taliban regime in 2001 and then remained to fight a growing extremist insurgency.

    "A US soldier who has been missing since June 30 from his assigned unit is believed to have been captured by militant forces," US military spokeswoman Captain Elizabeth Mathias told AFP.

    She said it was the first time an American soldier had been captured in two to three years in Iraq or Afghanistan.

    Mathias could not confirm it was the first such case for this country although other officials said they believed it was.

    "We are using all of our available resources to find him and provide for his safe return. We are not providing further details to protect the soldier's situation and well-being," she said.

    A commander of the Taliban's hardline Haqqani faction told an AFP reporter that his militia had captured a US trooper and three Afghans in the province of Paktika, which borders Pakistan.

    "One of our commanders named Mawlawi Sangin has captured a coalition soldier along with his three Afghan guards in Yousuf Khail district of Paktika province," the commander, named only Bahram, told AFP.

    "The coalition soldier has been taken to a safe place," he said.

    The militia's leaders would likely issue demands for his release, said the commander who is known to the reporter.

    "Our leaders have not decided on the fate of this soldier. They will decide on his fate and soon we will present video tapes of the coalition soldier and our demand to media," he said.

    A spokesman for the top US commander General Stanley McChrystal said the soldier was captured outside his base camp.

    "It was not that the insurgents came into base and it was overrun ... he left the base camp. At some point he was taken by insurgents," Rear Admiral Greg Smith told AFP.

    "We have high confidence that he is in the hands of insurgents."

    The soldier was only reported missing after he failed to come on duty on June 30 and was not found after a search, Smith said.

    The US military has described the Al-Qaeda-linked Haqqani network as one of the "most lethal Taliban organisations".

    In recent months the military has launched several attacks on the group, which it says operates out of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Area just across the border.

    The network is said to be behind several attacks in Kabul, including one on a five-star hotel in 2008 and the attempted assassination of President Hamid Karzai in April last year.

    The capture of the soldier comes as nearly 4,000 newly deployed US Marines launched a major operation in the province of Helmand Thursday, pushing south to take control of Taliban strongholds ahead of August 20 elections.

    Taliban and other insurgents have been behind several kidnappings in Afghanistan and have killed some of their hostages, including foreign nationals.

    There are around 56,000 US soldiers operating in Afghanistan, according to Pentagon figures, in the biggest deployment from one country helping to fight an insurgency led by the Taliban who were in government between 1996 and 2001.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I sure HOPE.. he gets

I sure HOPE.. he gets treated better than what the US.. treated their detainees.

You bring up an excellent

You bring up an excellent point: Our treatment of detainees can now be used against us. Why shouldn't he be waterboarded? Or slammed into walls? or deprived of sleep. Or should he be subject to Geneva Convention rules, when we've said the Taliban, as a non-state organization, is not? I wonder, however, if the reactionary Taliban, whose young men are taught the Quran and weapons skills only, would have the sophistication to think of the above. They'll hold him for higher gain: released detainees, or money under the table--or both. My impression of the Taliban leadership is that they are a bunch of very shrewd, ruthless, opinionated to the point of blindness of the world around them, but very clever men. We should always remember, but few do, that the Taliban was a result of our policy that precipitated the Soviet invasion and the whole project to drive the Soviets out, using the most rabidly fundamentalist Arabs and Afghans as their main striking force. And then leaving the country to its own devices, and Arabian money. But they know they can't win the war with one prisoner. So, this will just be an opportunity to swagger and maneuver.

To 17:43 — Anonymous: I

To 17:43 — Anonymous: I wonder how many thousands of other people reading this article were thinking the exact same thing.

I'm not a proponent of

I'm not a proponent of waterboarding. I believe the previous administration stretched the limits of the law to the breaking point, at best. I think they probably broke it on several fronts, from phone taps to interrogation techniques. Make no mistake, however, insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq are not bound by such nuances. Waterboarding is tame compared to fileting and individual's skin and countless other measures they've been known to employ. The Soldier is a private first class, so he's not a source of any significant intelligence for the Taliban. Thus, the benefit is primarily from the media. Whether he lives or dies, probably from a painful beheading, depends largely on what best benefits the Taliban. Although there are some unusual circumstances in this situation, one fact remains. As most of the US prepares to fire up their grills, or go to the beach, boat, or other recreational activities, the Soldier's family will have an anguished Independence Day weekend, wondering how their loved one is doing and if they will ever see him again. This is a poignant reminder that freedom is not free.

Remember, the bush

Remember, the bush administration DID NOT STOP AT WATERBOARDING, and the rest of the world knows it too. Waterboarding may be "tame" to anyone who was never waterboarded. Beheading, even painful beheading takes a minute. Waterboarding takes years. Just when you think it's over (that you're finally going to die) they do it again, and again, and again... But you're right, waterboarding IS nothing - nothing when compared to raping children in front of their parents, nothing when compared to raping children with brooms and light fixtures, nothing compared to sticking electrodes on a persons genitalia (this time not just for show). Even if waterboarding were nothing, it's only a "drop in the bucket" compared to what we actually are STILL doing to men, women, and children, regardless of whether the CIA feels obliged to let American citizens in on their dirty little secret that the rest of the world already knows.

The effectiveness of this

The effectiveness of this abduction will be in direct proportion to the amount of press it receives, and to the emotional overtones of that coverage. The Coalition's reaction to this event will tell the tale.