Share

AMA President: Group Open to Government-Funded Insurance

by:   |  CNN

photo
President Obama addressing the American Medical Association in June. (Photo: Getty Images)

    The new president of the American Medical Association, which represents the interests of the nation's doctors, said Wednesday the group is open to a government-funded health insurance option for people without coverage.

    Dr. J. James Rohack told CNN that the AMA supports an "American model" that includes both "a private system and a public system, working together."

    In May, the AMA told a Senate committee it did not support a government-sponsored public health insurance option.

    "The AMA does not believe that creating a public health insurance option … is the best way to expand health insurance coverage and lower costs across the health care system," the organization wrote, explaining that a public insurance plan could lead to "an explosion of costs that would need to be absorbed by taxpayers."

    Rohack, who recently became AMA president, suggested Wednesday that the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program available to Congress members and other federal employees could be expanded as a public option. That would avoid having to create a new program from scratch, he said.

    "If it's good enough for Congress, why shouldn't it be good enough for individuals who don't have health insurance provided by their employers?" Rohack said.

    He said AMA opposed expanding Medicare coverage for senior citizens into a broader general public plan, noting that the plan is "going broke" and fails to cover the costs of participating doctors.

    His comments come as President Barack Obama increases pressure on Congress to push through a comprehensive bill to reform the nation's ailing health care system this year.

    Obama told a town hall meeting on health care Wednesday that the rising costs of health care threatened the economy and were unsustainable. He also noted that health-related industries including drug companies were now acknowledging the need for reform.

    Rohack called 2009 "the year we need to have affordable health insurance coverage for all Americans."

    He said a reformed system must include access for everyone, the freedom to choose your doctor, and the freedom for doctors to provide the best possible care.

    Rohack also called for efficiency measures such as electronic record-keeping to reduce administrative costs, as well as protection for doctors from excessive malpractice lawsuits.

    The 162-year-old AMA has about 250,000 members, including practicing physicians along with medical students and retired doctors. Overall, there are more than 900,000 doctors in the United States.

    Obama recently delivered a major health care policy speech at the AMA's annual meeting in Chicago.

    --------

    CNN's Elizabeth Cohen contributed to this story

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The AMA represents the

The AMA represents the interests of 19% of the nation's doctors. It is an organization which really represents the interests of 100% of the nation's insurance companies and those doctors friendly to the insurance companies. It should be abolished.

Government-backed health

Government-backed health insurance programs for those "not covered" is cherry-picking proposed as national policy. No!

The AMA being against any

The AMA being against any kind of change in healthcare insurance makes them look like they're money hungry businessmen, not the honored physicians we want them to be..this is PR -- Somewhere along the line, they have to realize as providers that the care will be given. If they don't get on board and have a voice at the table, they'll have to settle for what they get.. which is incredibly shortsighted for a group of people who have studied so hard for so long ...

As a retired physician I am

As a retired physician I am totally taken aback by the statement 'that the AMA represents the nations doctors". The AMA has never represented the 'nations' doctors In the period starting in 1950 when I started my practice, until now, only a small minority of physicians joiined. Somehow, the naive media is implanting in the mind of the public that the AMA is something more than a lobbyingt organization for the pharmaceutical, insurance, medical appliance industries and a group of predominately wealthy medical specialists. The educational function is minor (most of us attended our speciality society meetings and read our journals), it has no disciplinary function. The AMA fought the creation of social security, medicare, and other progressive legislation. During the 1930 the Journal of the AMA was one of two publications in the USA that promulgated the Nazi pseudoscience of eugenics. PLEASE, do not associate the majority of dedicated, honest physicians with the AMA.

Ah.. The medical version of

Ah.. The medical version of SPECTER. No gold, no care, you die. Problem solved. We are free to choose any Dr. Goldfinger we like. The Republican ultimate neutron bomb. Only the non-wealthy die. You might make millions as an M.D., but how do you sleep at night? Oops, I forgot, you get to attend med school only after the proper excision of your heart and soul. Greed is all ya' need. A little psychopathy doesn't hurt either.

Of course the AMA is going

Of course the AMA is going to be for a government sponsored insurance program for people "who don't have coverage!" They'd rather be paid than not! The would rather let the tax payer pay them if no one else will. The real issue is: when will the AMA acknowledge the Insurance Industry has poisoned healthcare and needs to be purged from that sphere of operation?