Share

Washington Post Cancels Lobbyist Event Amid Uproar

by: Mike Allen and Michael Calderone  |  Politico

photo
Washington Post Publisher and Chief Executive Officer Katharine Weymouth. (Photo: Annie Leibovitz / Vogue)

    Washington Post Publisher and Chief Executive Officer Katharine Weymouth said today she was cancelling plans for an exclusive "salon" at her home where, for as much as $250,000, the Post offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to "those powerful few": Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and even the paper's own reporters and editors.

    The astonishing offer was detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he felt it was a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its "health care reporting and editorial staff."

    With the newsroom in an uproar after POLITICO reported the solicitation, Weymouth and Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli both said they were not aware of the flier.

    "This should never have happened," Weymouth told Post media reporter Howard Kurtz. "The fliers got out and weren't vetted. They didn't represent at all what we were attempting to do. We're not going to do any dinners that would impugn the integrity of the newsroom."

    Brauchli told Kurtz he was "appalled" by the plan."It suggests that access to Washington Post journalists was available for purchase," Brauchli told Kurtz. The proposal "promises we would suspend our usual skeptical questioning because it appears to offer, in exchange for sponsorships, the good name of The Washington Post."

    Earlier this morning, Brauchili said in a staffwide e-mail that the newsroom would not participate in the first of the planned events - a dinner scheduled July 21 at the home of Katharine Weymouth. Brauchli,was named on the flier as one of the "Hosts and Discussion Leaders."

    The offer - which essentially turns a news organization into a facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters - was a new sign of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.

    And it's a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The Washington Post for its ethical practices.

    "Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate," says the one-page flier. "Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth.... Bring your organization's CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders."

    Kris Coratti, communications director of Washington Post Media, a division of The Washington Post Company, said: "The flier circulated this morning came out of a business division for conferences and events, and the newsroom was unaware of such communication. It went out before it was properly vetted, and this draft does not represent what the company's vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers.

    "As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this. We do believe there is an opportunity to have a conferences and events business, and that The Post should be leading these conversations in Washington, big or small, while maintaining journalistic integrity. The newsroom will participate where appropriate."

    In his e-mail to the newsroom, labeled "Newsroom Independence," Brauchli wrote: "Colleagues, A flyer was distributed this week offering an 'underwriting opportunity' for a dinner on health care reform, in which the news department had been asked to participate. The language in the flyer and the description of the event preclude our participation.

    "We will not participate in events where promises are made that in exchange for money The Post will offer access to newsroom personnel or will refrain from confrontational questioning. Our independence from advertisers or sponsors is inviolable. There is a long tradition of news organizations hosting conferences and events, and we believe The Post, including the newsroom, can do these things in ways that are consistent with our values."

    The flier says: "Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typically on the guest list of 20 or less...."

    Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters' CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 β€šΓ„ΒΆ Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done.... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m. ...

    "Washington Post Salons are extensions of The Washington Post brand of journalistic inquiry into the issues, a unique opportunity for stakeholders to hear and be heard," the flier says. "At the core is a critical topic of our day. Dinner and a volley of ideas unfold in an evening of intelligent, news-driven and off-the-record conversation.... By bringing together those powerful few in business and policy-making who are forwarding, legislating and reporting on the issues, Washington Post Salons give life to the debate. Be at this nexus of business and policy with your underwriting of Washington Post Salons."

    The first "Salon" was titled "Health-Care Reform: Better or Worse for Americans? The reform and funding debate."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

This unquestionably takes

This unquestionably takes propaganda promotion to a whole new level of prostitution! Given that this had to be approved by the current Publisher & CEO, whether "vetted" by others or not, the proposal speaks volumes re: journalistic ethics (few to NONE) extant at the paper, and renders henceforth, in my perception at least, anything published by WaPo totally worthless and suspect. I knew the paper was pretty much an establishment mouthpiece, but had thought the newsroom was insulated from that to some degree. Now, the truth is out! It is even more disturbing that the instigators of this debacle obviously were bent on facilitating direct influence on government policies by vested interests out of sight, behind exclusive closed doors. This, to me, represents corruption of the most vile sort. Perhaps I am/have been naive, but this is blatant subversion of representative government at its worst, and I would not have expected it from such a (formerly) respected institution.

So that main stream media is

So that main stream media is in the pocket of corporations is not news. Thankfully, there is Truthout and other outlets. When even those involved are becoming disgusted with the process, this could mean that the free press will swing back to really being free.

Where is the representative

Where is the representative for "we the people" on such an important question? Where do we get $25000 to send someone? Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done.... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m. ... Keep the riffraff out! Pardon me!

What could Weymouth have

What could Weymouth have been thinking, and what were her compliant underlings who distributed this chaff thinking about their reputations and that of their Newspaper ? We must look for that lady and her aides to fired summarily, so that the integrity of the "newsroom" be supported. If we can't trust the Washington Post .... and I don't want to finish that sentence. Ben Bradley where are you ?

This is the saddest story,

This is the saddest story, the decline and fall of journalism, the fall of the WashPost. Truth is stranger than fiction. A life-long devotee of the WP, Jan Ryan

This is really what the

This is really what the founding fathers (note no caps) thought of as "freedom of the press". Good for the Washington Post, at least they have the balls to show where the money and the power are. Voters and tax-payers be damned, this is a New America.

Y U should support & donate

Y U should support & donate to truthout ...

Weymouth and Brauchli will

Weymouth and Brauchli will have to resign immediately. Otherwise, the WP has lost its integrity.

And you expected WHAT?

And you expected WHAT? Another Scam brought to you by the Cronies that Blessed us with such Fruitful Indulgence as J Edgar Hoover, G H W bush CIA, Dubya bush NSA, & other Great Favorites! America can't be 'W'rong unless it's Reich!

Ya' get what ya' naively ask

Ya' get what ya' naively ask for. No judgment, ya' just get what ya' ask for.

Sad, just sad. I know the

Sad, just sad. I know the Washington Post has been struggling, but this sort of thing could kill it. They need a new CEO who will know the difference between integrity and whatever it is these powers that be tried to do. Better that the Washington Post die an honorable death than to reduce itself to the fawning to special interests of the Washington Times or the New York Post. Shame! Shame!!

The WaPo lost their

The WaPo lost their integrity when they hired Kristol and fired Froomkin. This does not surprise me at all. There is no way to put lipstick on this pig.

(typos corrected) Well

(typos corrected) Well folks, this truly is the last straw. We thought that that right wing jerk who bought up all the nation's "Examiner's" was beyond the pale (his pushers push the things on every transit rider from coast to coast), but now what we might have feared to fear turns out to be true, the so called 'quality' newspapers are noooooz-papers too!

This for me me is too sad to

This for me me is too sad to expand on, but I'll say this, all of this is because of the results of the 2000 elections and we didn't storm the streets to protest!! America the beautiful, once.

One has to think this wasn't

One has to think this wasn't a new idea, maybe just taken to a higher level. No wonder us shmucks out here in the countryside, even in Cambridge MA where I live, can't get a word in edgewise, what with such cozy media-lobbyist-bureaucrat-politician conversation drowning out our voices. This is as bad as the bankers on Wall Street. The first time I was aware of the disconnect was when the inside-the-Beltway crowd told us that the whole country was talking about Clinton and Lewinsky and we weren't until they told us we were so many times that we were that we finally did have to pay attention. Disgusting, appalling, scary. No democracy.

And, I thought that

And, I thought that prostitution was illegal.

Face it, We the People were

Face it, We the People were sold out years ago. It has been a sham and a shame ever since.

Democracy has become an

Democracy has become an illusion. The press, once the institution which reported on the corruption of power, now arranges a cozy event for the power brokers to meet! Isn't that akin to a judge inviting jury members to his/her house to meet up with the the defense attorney? Where are the ethics? This is extremely troubling.

Love the picture

Love the picture accompanying this article! If the publisher were to recline a little further I suppose it would reveal her stiletto heels! Are there truly no journalists left?

This is a further blow to

This is a further blow to the credibility of the Post. I never trusted this venerable cathedral of the American journalism. Its editorial and information have mostly been lopsided, the β€œnews” opinionated and orphaned of facts. But what can anybody expect from the mainstream media that has abandoned the role of informing for the profit making? And people are awakening to the fact that the ethic profit maker is more and compromised.

Katharine Weymouth should

Katharine Weymouth should resign, or be forced to, plain and simple. I think this is one newspaper that deserves to go down, and I don't necessarily buy their position - there must have been a reason for someone to believe this was OK.

The Washington Post salon

The Washington Post salon sounds like the corporate media's idea of a town hall meeting. Once again the corporate media has exposed itself as the Ministry of Propaganda for big business and the US government it has controlled for so long. The corporate media should be allowed to die a natural death--from greed.

"Vetted". There is no such

"Vetted". There is no such word. Who is this nit-wit? Obviously Republican. Obviously morally and mentally-challenged.