Share

US Job Losses Spike in June, Dampen Recovery Hopes

by: David Lawder  |  Reuters

photo
Anthony Solis looks at job postings in Riverside, California, this week. (Photo: Francis Specker / Bloomberg News)

    Washington - U.S. employers cut far more jobs than expected last month and the unemployment rate hit a nearly 26-year high of 9.5 percent, underscoring the likelihood of a long and slow recovery from recession.

    The loss of 467,000 jobs reported by the Labor Department on Thursday was 100,000 more than Wall Street economists had expected and was spread widely across economic sectors.

    The economy has lost 6.5 million nonfarm jobs since the recession began in December 2007 and the unemployment rate has nearly doubled in that time.

    "It looks like the economy was still losing substantial momentum as the second quarter came to a close. This report is weak across the board," said William Sullivan, chief economist at the JVB Financial Group in Boca Raton, Florida.

    The Dow Jones industrial average fell 2.0 percent as investors worried that the data darkened the recovery outlook.

    A later report of a stronger-than-expected increase in U.S. factory orders for May failed to restore confidence.

    Prices for U.S. Treasury debt, normally seen as a safe bet during hard times, rose and the dollar fell against the Japanese yen, considered a haven for investors.

    Also on Thursday, data showed unemployment in the 16-nation euro zone rose to a 10-year high of 9.5 percent in May.

    America's June jobless rate of 9.5 percent was up from 9.4 percent in May and was the highest since a matching rate in August 1983. Analysts had expected it to rise to 9.6 percent.

    Monthly job losses peaked in January at 741,000 and had decreased each month since then until June, an indication that the pace of the economy's deterioration had been slowing.

    The unemployment rate has continued to rise.

    Since the recession started in December 2007, U.S. payroll employment has dropped by a total of 6.5 million.

    The Labor Department revised figures for April and May to show a net 8,000 fewer jobs were lost in those months than previously reported. The May job losses were revised downward to 322,000, while April losses were revised upward to 519,000.

    "The only saving grace is that the decline in payrolls may not be as large as we saw at the start of the year," JVB's Sullivan said.

    Signs of Hope

    A separate report, however, offered some hope that pressure on the labor market was starting to fade.

    The Labor Department said first-time claims for state unemployment insurance benefits fell to 614,000 in the week ended June 27 from an upwardly revised 630,000 the prior week.

    In another hopeful sign, the number of people still on jobless aid rolls after claiming an initial week of aid fell to just over 6.70 million in the week to June 20 from an upwardly revised 6.76 million a week earlier, only the third week this year that "continued claims" had dropped.

    Separately, the Commerce Department reported that orders for U.S. manufactured goods in May rose 1.2 percent, their largest increase in nearly a year, beating analysts' median forecast for a 0.8 percent rise.

    Non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft, considered a measure of manufacturing activity, rose 4.7 percent in May following a 3.5 percent fall in April.

    Services Sectors Hit Hard

    While June's job losses were spread across all sectors, the steepest decline was in services, which fell 244,000 after a 107,000 drop in May. Professional and business services lost 118,000 jobs, while government employment fell 52,000.

    Manufacturing was one of the few areas to show a smaller drop in June, down 136,000 after a 156,000 fall in May.

    --------

    (Additional reporting by John Parry in New York; Editing by James Dalgleish)

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Alternative plans are needed

Alternative plans are needed and have been needed for some time now. Start with the assumption that economic decline is related to environmental friction. The EU has an almost identical unemployment rate as the US, view this as an indicator of even environmental friction effecting mature economies. Look at the free lunch Nature handed out for the entire industrial age and which is now gone. There is no need for a revolution which will simply raise upper class ire and have them send soldiers to attack the people, that is, their own parents, friends, and siblings, for they will do it, as they always have. Instead, build a replacement for corporate consumerism that is based on fun, family, friends, cooperation, and the plain and simple understanding that quality of life can grow forever and is a suitable goal to replace the primitive caveman quest for ever greater quantity of stuff and its accompanying pollution. Forget the important people. It's normal, everyday people that do the real doing.

The ubiquity of human

The ubiquity of human resourcefulness isn't the question, so much as how we each choose to direct it. Were everyone to more naturally work for the betterment of the whole, there would be less extremes of haves and have nots. I think we get lost in this presumed idea of everyone having a job and racing to see who can amass the most stuff. The irony is that humans don't really need that much. The US standard of living is way beyond basic necessity. Clinging to optional excess seems a false standard of happiness.

The misguided $700B+

The misguided $700B+ "stimulus" legislation has already crapped out: these figures are far worse than the ones the White House warned us about if we DIDN'T pass the bill- but it was passed, and still unemployment soars? Instead of creating jobs, interest rates were bumped up, the dollar slid... and it didn't help anybody get any work. Much of this is due to the fact that Obama's agenda has mortified almost every machine of job-and-growth creation in the country. The Democrats had to insist and tax-n-spend, rather than a tax holiday for six months... can you imagine how things would be doing with a $700B tax cut instead? And the One couldn't deliver the type of "temporary, targeted, and timely" bill that he promised for weeks. Irregardless of his beautified image in the press, Obama lacks the the political stature to control Pelosi and Reid... who hit the trough hard, while bickering like siblings. But the lack of GOP co-conspirators exposed Obama politically... this legislation now looks to be a huge gamble. And when all this pork-n-welfare fails to generate any real economic gains... the Democrats could face a bloodbath in 2010. One could make the argument that Obama knows his legacy will be in tatters by 2012, and could care less how much damage his radical programs do to the economy.... and is ramming through as much of his far-left agenda as he can before the day comes when people cringe at the mere mention of his name Sure seems like it.

It's all very nice to go on

It's all very nice to go on about how we can do without. However, if we don't have money to pay for rent or mortgage, if we don't have money to pay for property taxes, if we don't have money to buy necessities (I defy you to grow or raise everything you need for survival), then we become desperate. I own my home free and clear; I grow as much as I possibly can for my own use; I heat largely with wood and solar, and I don't buy goods unless I need them. However, my SS check wouldn't cover even those necessities. I certainly can't support my unemployed daughters or son with it. Unfortunately none of the three would like to farm our land, or maybe they could support me. My point is: maybe somewhere down the road our economy can be changed so that people CAN support themselves with very little, but IT'S NOT HAPPENING NOW! Or maybe it is: maybe people are so doing without that there is no demand for goods and services, hence the continued layoffs and rising unemployment. So, in the meantime, 9.5% unemployment is bad. It shows that corporations are getting more desperate, since they're laying off so many more workers. It's also bad because there doesn't seem to be any reflection of the touted stimulus program in these figures, or, things are even worse than we realized. Some "commentators" are saying we need a second stimulus plan. Unfortunately, the dollar is already falling against the Euro and the Yen, because of all the "money" the US is creating out of thin air to stimulate the economy that's still not responding to the first stimulus. That means it will be very difficult to find the money for a second go-round, because we can't just keep on creating more money. We will face a run on the dollar if we do; then we might as well forgeddaboutit.

I think the common

I think the common denominator is electricity. What would happen should it be forever turned off. Let nature provide the power. As an electrician I now see how the man made generation of power has left most of us even more powerless.