Share

Fake News Gets Real

by: Thomas Mucha  |  GlobalPost

photo
Stephen Colbert traveled to Camp Victory in Baghdad, Iraq, for his Comedy Central television program. Colbert is seen here having his head shaved by Gen. Raymond Odierno, commander of the Multinational Corps, Iraq, during taping of the first of four shows. (Photo: Steve Manuel / AP)

    "The Daily Show" and "The Colbert Report" target Iran, Iraq, and the rest of the world.

    It's been a fascinating few weeks for global news - the real kind, of course - but also for the fake stuff.

    I'm referring to "The Daily Show" and "The Colbert Report," which sent correspondents and producers to locales where comedy shows don't normally operate: Iran and Iraq. Along the way, these two Comedy Central commercial properties cooked up plenty of laughs. But they also produced some insightful - and certainly entertaining - coverage of these two complex and important global stories.

    If Wolf Blitzer isn't quaking in his beard, he should be.

    These foreign forays produced powerful storytelling that illustrates how intelligence and humor, when mixed with a little ground truth, can add depth to very serious matters. It also demonstrates how fake news is, indisputably, a power on the global media stage. As an added bonus it was yet another funny and scathing attack on the pompous earnestness that typifies much of the mainstream media: You know you're in trouble if you can be so brutally, and effortlessly, parodied.

    Let's start with Iran, where The Daily Show began with a simple idea, but then got much more than it was expecting.

    To cover the country's presidential election, Daily Show host and executive producer Jon Stewart sent "senior foreign correspondent" Jason Jones and producer Tim Greenberg to Tehran for two weeks (the trip followed Jones' last Daily Show piece, "End Times," which savaged the New York Times and went viral on the web).

    Armed with official journalist visas granted by the Iranian government, Jones and Greenberg traveled to Tehran to tell jokes, but also to poke fun at American conceptions of Iran as "evil."

    In full parody mode, they titled their series "Behind the Veil: Minarets of Menace," and produced an animated introduction filled with ominous Middle Eastern music, and featuring a preening and heroic Jones scampering through the desert. It's the kind of cable TV flash-and-dash that Anderson Cooper would kill for.

    Media-mocking humor is rampant throughout the reports: there's Jones dressed as the stereotypical foreign correspondent - requisite facial stubble, khaki reporter's vest and dark sunglasses, a Persian scarf draped roguishly around his neck.

    There are bumbling interactions with the usual media suspects in Iran, including former foreign minister Ebrahim Yazdi, reformist cleric Mohammad Ali Abtahi, and Newsweek journalist Maziar Bahari, to whom Jones speaks Arabic instead of Farsi.

    There are also street interviews with "seething" Iranians where Jones tries, and fails, to make them say how much they hate America. On the contrary: upon learning of Jones' Daily Show connections, one smiling and stylish young man launches into a killer impersonation of Stewart's staccato George W. Bush. "Heh, heh, heh .... heh heh heh."

    The coup de grace comes when Jones visits a Tehran home complete with a happy and clearly prosperous couple, two bubbly kids, flat-screen TVs and a Wii gaming console. "You have a beautiful cave," Jones says, handing the young daughter a carton of Marlboro Reds to "earn their trust."

    Yes, the joke here is on the American audience.

    Iranians are normal. They wear Dolce & Gabbana and Diesel, play video games and produce rap music. They know more about American geography and history than many Americans (one elderly man ticks off U.S. presidents in reverse order - "Bush, Clinton, Bush the father, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon" - juxtaposed, naturally, with an American in Times Square who can't answer the question, "Name a country in the Middle East that begins with I-R-A-N.") The satire is funny. It is also devastatingly effective.

    But as the events in Tehran darkened (Jones and Greenberg left Iran before the serious violence began), the tone of the coverage changed.

    A later piece points out that Yazdi, Abtahi and Bahari ("the Axis of Evil's Axis of Evil") had been detained by authorities. The reports filled with the grainy and visceral YouTube videos culled from Andrew Sullivan or Nico Pitney's running coverage of the uprising. And the final report leaves the humor behind altogether:

    "As I watch what's happening there now," Jones says, "I know that somewhere in that sea of faces are the same people I had met, people who were gracious enough to take me into their homes, and schools, and coffee shops, people who indulged my asinine questions, people I hope will be safe and not be harmed or arrested for the simple act of wearing green and wanting a voice."

    Do the millions of Americans who watched this series (or, more likely, internet video clips of it) have a better understanding of what's happening inside Iran? Do they now have a stronger sense of daily life there? Do they now know more about the things that unite, rather than divide, the people of these two countries? And did they have fun watching it?

    Mission accomplished.

    The Colbert Report, which earlier this month broadcast a week of shows from Saddam Hussein's former Al Faw Palace in Baghdad, was equally impressive in its foreign coverage - not least for pulling off the technical feat of producing five 30 minute programs from a war zone 5,200 miles from its studios in Manhattan.

    (For a fascinating take about how they did it, including landing interviews with President Obama and U.S. Commanding General in Iraq Ray Odierno, check out this Terry Gross interview with The Colbert Report's executive producer and head writer Allison Silverman).

    So why transplant an entire comedy show into difficult, even dangerous, conditions? To correct yet another shortcoming of the mainstream media, of course: Iraq had fallen off the news map. Here's how Colbert explained it in the June 6 edition of Newsweek, for which he was the magazine's guest editor:

    "I hadn't seen it in the media for a while, and when I don't see something, I assume it's vanished forever, like in that terrifying game peekaboo. We stopped seeing much coverage of the Iraq war back in September when the economy tanked, and I just figured the insurgents were wiped out because they were heavily invested in Lehman Brothers."

    Funny, of course. But Colbert's Baghdad caper was also smart, courageous, and culturally relevant (the media-savvy President Obama doesn't play along with a dangerous comedian like Colbert unless there's a political upside).

    Clips of the Baghdad shows quickly flooded YouTube, Hulu, Facebook, Twitter, as well as the mainstream media (The New York Times, Baltimore Sun, Time, Newsweek and others covered it). And so, like Jones in Iran, Colbert's mission was also accomplished.

    No, this is not journalism. And neither Colbert nor his Daily Show counterparts make that claim.

    But in an increasingly global media landscape where satire bleeds into analysis and where hope meets the brutality of a Basij baton, fake news is playing an increasingly important role - particularly on the internet, where hundreds of thousands of people download, watch and share these clips each day.

    Love it or hate it, millions of people are paying attention to fake news across America and the world.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Television is programming

Television is programming you. Haven't had a television for 25 years. It's part of the brainwashers' way of controlling your mind, taking your time, and planting subliminals. Bill Moyers might be the one exception. Colbert and Stewart are amusing, and that's about all they are. The only real journalism you'll find, it's not on television. It's Amy Goodman on democracynow. Kill your television and stop being programmed.

Fake elections--U.S. and

Fake elections--U.S. and Iranian people have serious issues in common. The will to interact among the peoples is strong. I hope the internet has good enough capillaries to allow continued communication. Posturing congresspeople do not help anything. I wish they would cut it out, not that the world believes they represent rank-and-file U.S. people.

Fake stuff? I wish you

Fake stuff? I wish you hadn't told me. Those are the only news programs I EVER watch. I thought they were the only serious (yet entertaining) news programs on TV. The other "real" news programs seem comical and really full of fake news to me. Am I missing something?

Marvelous article and

Marvelous article and equally marvelous commentary to this point. == I too refuse to watch televsion. My reasons are a bit less philosophical - it is simply easier to sleep well and deeply without watching tv. It's even in the language "falling asleep in front of the TV" pretty much makes the point. As George Carlin said: "It's called 'The American Dream' because you have to be asleep to believe in it." == Naturally, the only problem with this article is that the irony is too subtle: comedy only works [is funny] when rooted in reality. "News" only works [makes money] when rooted in fantasy - "Manifest Destiny", "Bringing Democracy to _____", "Free Market Capitalism" and "having a personal relationship with god". News not funny - not real == I'm about to take early retirement, I've lost some close friends to the grave recently and my cat's not doing too well. It seems obvious to me now that life at the end is a tragedy because of the loss of promise. Life as lived is comedy - as we observe the working out of that promise. Life is more than messy - IT'S FUNNY. If you can't laugh at what's going on, it probably means the joke's on you.

The basic definition and

The basic definition and justification for nation is defense of a people. So it makes sense nations are in the business of finding enemies to defend themselves from. Meanwhile, the citizens within all these nations seem rather similar in wanting things like family and home and getting along with each other. It would be nice if we could get rid of nations and just have people getting along with each other.

Yup. I too haven't watched

Yup. I too haven't watched TV since the Nixon impeachment hearings. However I did see five or so minutes of a cartoon with a maniacal child and a cynical dog (redundant- sorry). Oh yeah, some person's post asked for simple words. Cynic=dog. During this TV exposure I heard the only reference to The Disney Chair of History at Cambridge. This is huge. Really. Depending on one's view of genocide. All mainstream media is irrelevant with, as another post points out, Amy Goodman's Democracy Now exception.

Imagine!

Imagine!