Share

Afghanistan: Massive US Offensive Targets Taliban Heartland

by:   |  BBC News

photo
A Marine took up a combat position Thursday in southern Afghanistan during Operation Khanjar, an American-led offensive. (Photo: Joe Raedle / Getty Images)

    As the US launches a major offensive in Helmand where the Taliban insurgency is at its fiercest, the BBC's Caroline Wyatt assess the tactics and dangers involved in such an operation.

    The US Marines say Operation Khanjar, or Strike of the Sword, will be decisive.

    It is intended to seize almost the entire lower Helmand River valley, which remains the heartland of the Taliban insurgency in Helmand and a major poppy-producing area for the production of opium, which helps fund the insurgency.

    US commanders hope this offensive will help turn the tide in the current stalemate against the Taliban. The aim of this major operation is to "clear, hold and build" in areas under Taliban influence ahead of Afghanistan's presidential elections this August.

    They want to stabilise the province and offer enough long-term security to allow the Afghans to build up their own civil governance, while Isaf forces train the Afghan police and Afghan National Army who will eventually take over full responsibility for ensuring Afghanistan's security.

    The US Marines are part of the 10,000 - 12,000 US forces flooding into southern Afghanistan, with a total of 17,000 extra American troops sent into Afghanistan by the new US administration.

    Re-energised campaign

    Their tactics are likely to be similar to those used in British military operations in Helmand, but on a far larger scale. The UK currently has around 9,000 forces in Helmand.

    The new US commander of Isaf, former special operations chief General Stanley McChrystal, has told commanders that he wants a shift away from conventional operations to counter-insurgency aimed at winning over Afghan civilians.

    His mantra is to "protect the people" - civilian casualties caused by Isaf military operations seen as one of the most counter-productive aspects of the campaign so far.

    Isaf staff in Kabul say that General McChrystal has already re- energised the campaign, bringing a new sense of focus across the 42 Nato allies' military, diplomatic and economic efforts in Afghanistan.

    The hope is also that if US and other Nato forces are seen as clearly winning the military battle against the insurgents, middle and lower- ranking Taliban leaders and fighters are more likely to defect back to the Afghan government's side, with American and British sources in Kabul convinced that the US troop surge is already unsettling the Taliban leadership.

    Explosives Danger

    This American offensive follows smaller British offensive operations further north in Helmand Province, including Panther's Claw, which took back control of Babaji and the surrounding areas north of Lashkar Gah from the Taliban.

    Around 350 troops from the Black Watch, the 3rd Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland, launched the attack on 19 June in one of the UK military's biggest co-ordinated air operations of modern times.

    One of the main dangers to US and UK forces remains the Taliban's increasing use of improvised explosive devices (IED) - the cause of most of the recent British fatalities.

    While detection rates are improving - British sources say their forces are now finding over half the IEDs before they are laid - they remain difficult to combat.

    The Taliban are also increasing the amount of explosives used in their roadside bombs as British forces switch to more heavily-armoured vehicles.

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

If we did not know that the

If we did not know that the American Empire is fighting in Afghanistan solely in order to line the pockets of the defense industry, you'd have to conclude that they are completely insane. The idea that a foreign occupation will succeed in the Graveyard of Empire is even more flawed than the nutty theories that prompted the unsuccessful occupation of Viet Nam. If the "insurgents" were smart, they'd all line up and surrender, thereby qualifying for post-war aid and development funding from the goofy entity that has become the American Empire.

Nothing like perpetual war

Nothing like perpetual war to keep us all breathlessly ever awaiting and wondering what's going to happen next. Were we not to have the constant backdrop of war, what would we do with this elixir of nervous anticipations?

Cut to plan B: The Great

Cut to plan B: The Great Land Grab...Doesn't it occur to anyone but me that the 'new' strategy of take & hold is being applied right where the N-S pipeline is supposed to run...the Helmand river valley? Plan A, to set up a strong central (puppet) govnt & let them take, deliver & secure the pipeline right-of-way has failed so we'll have to steal the land ourselves...the moral of this sad story is "never send an n-word to do a whiteman's job"... (Lord Carnarvan) Also, I'm damned tired of hearing about how the insurgents fade away to blend in with the local population ...that's what the Brits used to say about the rebels in the North American colonies...the insurgents ARE the local population. the grunt on the ground figures this out soon enough, hence free-fire zones & the necessity of the massacre to subdue the reluctant locals. points the pundits seem to ignore. bahh. I feel sick to my stomach.

What we are witnessing is

What we are witnessing is the initial stages in the creation of a Taliban-Pashtoon state in the region and the demise of Pakistan as a secular state. The US government in its rush to provide profits for international oil and gas companies has greatly destabilized the region and in the long run this will be the most costly war in American history. If the people of Iran get to vote, in the US delayed referendum, for the immediate withdrawal of American forces, the result will be that the US forces will stay and any pretext of supporting democracy and the interests of the Iraqi people will be swept away. Obama is pursuing foreign policy in exactly the same manner as John McCain would be doing had he been elected, and there has been no change from the neo-con led approach of George Bush.