Share

When Will The Recovery Begin? Never.

by: Robert Reich  |  Robert Reich's Blog

photo
With economic anxiety running high, consumers are staying at home. (Photo: Megan Ann / flickr)

    The so-called "green shoots" of recovery are turning brown in the scorching summer sun. In fact, the whole debate about when and how a recovery will begin is wrongly framed. On one side are the V-shapers who look back at prior recessions and conclude that the faster an economy drops, the faster it gets back on track. And because this economy fell off a cliff late last fall, they expect it to roar to life early next year. Hence the V shape.

    Unfortunately, V-shapers are looking back at the wrong recessions. Focus on those that started with the bursting of a giant speculative bubble and you see slow recoveries. The reason is asset values at bottom are so low that investor confidence returns only gradually.

    That's where the more sober U-shapers come in. They predict a more gradual recovery, as investors slowly tiptoe back into the market.

    Personally, I don't buy into either camp. In a recession this deep, recovery doesn't depend on investors. It depends on consumers who, after all, are 70 percent of the U.S. economy. And this time consumers got really whacked. Until consumers start spending again, you can forget any recovery, V or U shaped.

    Problem is, consumers won't start spending until they have money in their pockets and feel reasonably secure. But they don't have the money, and it's hard to see where it will come from. They can't borrow. Their homes are worth a fraction of what they were before, so say goodbye to home equity loans and refinancings. One out of ten home owners is under water -- owing more on their homes than their homes are worth. Unemployment continues to rise, and number of hours at work continues to drop. Those who can are saving. Those who can't are hunkering down, as they must.

    Eventually consumers will replace cars and appliances and other stuff that wears out, but a recovery can't be built on replacements. Don't expect businesses to invest much more without lots of consumers hankering after lots of new stuff. And don't rely on exports. The global economy is contracting.

    My prediction, then? Not a V, not a U. But an X. This economy can't get back on track because the track we were on for years -- featuring flat or declining median wages, mounting consumer debt, and widening insecurity, not to mention increasing carbon in the atmosphere -- simply cannot be sustained.

    The X marks a brand new track -- a new economy. What will it look like? Nobody knows. All we know is the current economy can't "recover" because it can't go back to where it was before the crash. So instead of asking when the recovery will start, we should be asking when and how the new economy will begin. More on this to come.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

time to go back and watch

time to go back and watch Mad Max again

It seems to me that this

It seems to me that this completely new way of relating to the world economically, and by extension socially, is actually part and parcel of the "transformation" that so many indigenous (and other) prophecies tie to 2012. Changing the way we relate to each other and the Earth certainly could mark a watershed moment in our collective evolution. 2012 doesn't have to mean the End of Times; just the end of illusion.

Robert Reich puts his finger

Robert Reich puts his finger nicely on the fundamental problem. He knows about Hegel's dialectic. In this case it is about the continuous divergence of inflation and mean wages. According to Hegel's dialectic this can proceed for a while without major economic disturbances but eventually a point in time is reached when the roof caves in. In my opinion that happened in mid-2008. The housing bubble burst? That was not the cause but it made the cave-in worse than it might have been otherwise. Recovery is not possible until mean wages have caught up with inflation as it did during and shortly after WW2.

America is run by the Cult

America is run by the Cult of Money, and its leaders are empowered by the scared masses of the Cult of Ignoring Everything Inconvenient. Science disproves your ancient books? Ignore science. The environment is imploding? Ignore critters. Politicians are beyond corrupt? Just so long as they don't get caught with the mistress it's ok. We're going to hell in a handbasket? Admire the fine craftsmenship of said handbasket.

Here's to creating a new

Here's to creating a new economy!

In the several places that

In the several places that this article has appeared, and indeed in Reich's on blog posting, many writing in comment have suggested that Reich's "new economy" implies that we should or will be doing "this" or "that". What those same writers fail to understand is that any attempt to divine future direction or to prepare for an unknown future economy is impossible. What will happen is too complex and too fraught with multiple variations at multiple decision points. Without the past to guide us and with a strong fear of the unknown, breakdown in civil order is highly likely ... unless we firmly believe that the only way we can individually survive is to work collectively. I do not think that most people realize how very perilous our current predicament just is. I am not, however, optimistic about a soft transition to the new economy.

I love the title of the

I love the title of the article. Concise and utterly true.

Mr Reich refers to a new

Mr Reich refers to a new economy but doesn't know what it would look like. I suggest he chech out David Korten's new book AGENDA For A NEW ECONOMY:From PHANTOM EWALTH t0 REAL WEALTH. David has a clear idea what must be done. His latest book is a follow-on of his The Great Turning:From Empire to Earth Community. Both of Korten's books are interesting reading.

It took about 35 years for

It took about 35 years for the U.S. to get to this point (utter financial greed & illusion). It'll take a long time for a transformation to take place...not to mention the effect of the new Internet-based economy. Yep, those Websites really employ lots of people.

Robert Reich speaks

Robert Reich speaks courageously about what no one in the administration wants to discuss. The reason we are hearing about U's and V shaped recessions is because the economists fear the self-fulfilling prophecy--if they tell us how bad it really is then maybe it won't get worse--but he's right --it's going to get worse because there is no hope since few have jobs and the few that do are working longer and harder for less pay and no health care.Who has money left to buy anything?

"Not until they have money

"Not until they have money in their pockets and feel secure". So Robert, why aren't you suggesting that we have a national minimum wage with and automatic cost of living built into it? That's money immediatly spent and a future of some increase. Some states do it, why not make all of them do it?

I live in a funny little

I live in a funny little bubble. People from other places warn me when I set out to travel, "This isn't Portland!" Here, loads of interesting people from left to right knew dead-0n this thing was coming. The lefties even acknowledged they ought to be recruiting at gun shows, because, "We don't know from guns." So, we have had many alternative-currency groups, trading groups, a Peak Oil group that has been meeting for years, permaculture groups, green groups, rebuilding groups, City Repair, ReCode, DePave, transition groups--no kidding it goes on and on. I was part of a community garden until a neighbor sprayed stuff I can't get near. Now I'm part of a Ron Paul garden (talk about herding cats) where a 90-something decided we needed fertilizer on everything, oh well. The usual suspects are madly determining they want to give more money to the IMF. Meanwhile, U.S. people will roll their eyes, in some places, and figure out how to trade their too-much-stuff for somebody else's, for novelty and entertainment's sake. Government hands money to relatives and cronies. It has always done this--just look back at Mencken, Will Rogers, and Mark Twain. Politicians have always cheated on their spouses and on everybody else, while promising the Big Rock Candy Mountain. But this time, rank-and-file House members seem to be as curious as ordinary people about where sensational sums have been heisted to. While the powers that be in the Senate have baldly denied the disclosure the people want, I just don't think you can hide ticks this full forever. The curtain just isn't big enough to hide these wizards. Body parts are going to start sticking out on this one. We won't get the lost money back. Rank-and-file people will just have to invent and create more and different values. The newest jewelry should be made out of multi-colored beans, brown rice, and solar cells. If no dollars or traders are to be found, at least you can cook up your necklace and talk on your phone about it, so long as you live in the latest coppiced, diverse food forest, with all the swales, dinosaur kale, Omega-3-laying chickens, and rocket stoves with the warm benches to sit your weary butts on after a day of picking medicinal and culinary herbs. Certain herbs reduce methane from the beans, if you live in a gentrified neighborhood. If you live in a gated, rent-controlled place, you might be able to dispense with the herbs. The only gated neighborhood I know of here is low-income. Rich people tend to be kind of boring.

Fascinating observations.

Fascinating observations. But does getting back on the economic fast track mean also going back to a hyper-consumerist economy, where production is oriented toward efficiently producing more and more useless junk items which more and more consumers must be persuaded to buy? Will the trash heaps of obsolete toys grow ever larger even as the U or the V trends upward? Whether the recovery is V-shaped or U-shaped, this is one possible end-point. Do we really want that kind of end-point? Or is there a more sane way, a way that does not consume the planet yet gets everybody taken care of in a humane and dignified manner? Think about it.

We cannot have the wasteful

We cannot have the wasteful high-spending consumerist economy we used to have. We're running out of natural resources and we cannot grab them overseas as we used to do with economic imperialism. We need to learn to be happy with a less wasteful way of life. We need an equalitarian society. Political democracy is not possible without economic democracy. We need a tax system based on ability to pay and a real floor of economic security for all. The very wealthy do not need five ten million dollar houses plus cars and boats. The working poor do need one decent house.

We are at the mercy of

We are at the mercy of unfettered capitalism. We can't determine our own fate because we eviscerated the only institution that serves the people - our federal government. What's left of it simply does the bidding of those at the top. Let us not fool ourselves. Those at the top are in charge, and they don't care about us except as workers, and they don't care whose workers they employ. So I agree with Mr. Reich. It's a new economy, and we have absolutely no say in our future. Ironically, most Americans still fear and loathe the government, which only exacerbates the situation. There is absolutely nothing to prevent corporate America from abandoning us altogether, and employing cheaper labor from billions of others around the world who will work for far less than we will. Our standard of living could plummet until it reaches a global equilibrium. Our government no longer represents us. Indeed, it no longer is us - it is corporate America.

Reading between the lines I

Reading between the lines I fear the "new economy" also brings with it a reduction in overall consumers for the whole thing to properly reset. The massive chaos of the first half of the twentieth century definitely had the effected the order of the second half of the same century. History shows that at every economic "new economy" the elite land upright most of the time. Recent history had one hiccup to this, the French Revolution. Once in a while the King gets it's head chopped off. This time around the Kings are disguised and morphed so as not to be beheaded. Or so they think. Unfortunately, history shows anarchy "chaos" must ensue before "order" once again prevails. Most times though the history has been lost to the masses and the elite either rewrite or make up the new history. We will be very hard pressed as a collective to learn from lessons should that be the case. Time will not tell, for we whom are experiencing this will not be around to witness.

Be of good cheer people, for

Be of good cheer people, for the reasons that so many have posted here. Change is acommin' big change! We will all end up where we deserve to be, so keep going to those cat herding meetings, Jade Queen! Everything we work out with each other makes us less divided and more likely to end up in a place where we run our own lives and have intimate community ties once more. Many, many people have seen this coming for a long, long time. We came here at this time to be part of it all. The oligarchs have lost because they will miss out on all the joy and beauty we are about to create. It is time to let go of the old thinking and find our place in a more natural community. There will be some turmoil, but no more than we are already accustomed to in our crazy society, so relax. We will know we are through the worst when there is less violence (and advertising!) everywhere. Remember recent times when we just naturally cooperated without thought of ourselves, but looked out for each other: The New York City blackout, the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, and more; all these were times when we could have gone violent nuts and hurt each other, but we didn't. We will look out for each other, and we will get through this time to create the "new economy" and reclaim our world for peace and justice.

Unions drove the great

Unions drove the great economic growth that occurred in the 1950's and 1960's. Unions that insured that workers received a fair percentage of corporate profits. The last 30 years we have seen attacks by the elite on the unions and on workers with the result being wages at a third of what they would otherwise be and even most manufacturing jobs shipped overseas, and often using taxpayer money to do so. Since Reagan we have been moving to a fascist state that is closer to Brazil and Mexico and now has little resemblance to a democracy. The USA is now a perfect example of what happens when corporations are first given the rights of citizens and then given super legal rights to loot, pollute, maim, and even kill with impunity.

If unions are in charge of

If unions are in charge of this "new economy", we're all in trouble. I've never seen any union that could do anything efficiently.