Share

Now Can We Investigate?

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Columnist

photo
With new revelations about secret intelligence activities under the Bush/Cheney administration, House Democrats are calling for a formal investigation into a secret CIA program that was not disclosed to Congress. (Photo: AP)

    President Obama is in the process of losing what may be the most important argument of his young administration. The argument is not about health care, bank bailouts, the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, the environment or the auto industry, though arguments on these issues are indeed ongoing and hanging in the balance.

    No, the Obama administration is losing the argument about the past being less important than the future. They would like his government, Congress and the American people to look forward, and to leave behind as much of the past as possible. The past, in this case, is the battery of crimes, cover-ups and tyrannies unleashed by their predecessors in the Bush administration.

    The Obama administration's argument in favor of leaving the myriad abuses of the Bush administration to the dustbin of history is understandable, though hardly valid at this point. Obama and his team have a thousand and one problems to deal with in the here and now, and according to them, any attempt to quest into the past will derail all the work they have to do. They are also justifiably concerned that Republicans in Congress will try to burn down the Capitol building if Democrats even twitch in the direction of digging up the past.

    Understandable? Sure. Valid? Not by a long chalk.

    Half a dozen times since his inauguration, President Obama has seen his agenda depth-charged by a report on some nefarious activity by the previous administration. Not only have his plans and intentions been derailed by these reports - whether they be about torture, government secrecy, indefinite detention, or whatever else - he has himself become culpable for the damage done by either trying to ignore these transgressions or by adopting them himself.

    It happened again this weekend. The Obama administration has been trying to gear up for a millennial debate over health care reform, but Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney have once again gotten in the way, not once but twice. "The Bush administration authorized secret surveillance activities that still have not been made public, according to a new government report that questions the legal basis for the unprecedented anti-terrorism program," reported The Associated Press on Friday. "President George W. Bush authorized other secret intelligence activities - which have yet to become public - even as he was launching the massive warrentless wiretapping program, the summary said. It describes the entire program as the 'President's Surveillance Program.' The report describes the program as unprecedented and raises questions about the legal grounding used for its creation. It also says the intelligence agencies' continued retention and use of the information collected under the program should be carefully monitored."

    "The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agency's director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday," reported The New York Times on Sunday. "The report that Mr. Cheney was behind the decision to conceal the still-unidentified program from Congress deepened the mystery surrounding it, suggesting that the Bush administration had put a high priority on the program and its secrecy."

    Thud. Nobody is talking about health care now, or Ghana or nuclear reduction deals with the Russians. Just like that, all discussion has once again turned to the actions and activities of the Bush administration. President Obama has been acting as if only two options - ignorance or adoption - are available to deal with these Bush-era eruptions, because he does not want his presidency to become overwhelmed by the third available option: investigation and prosecution.

    Guess what? The Obama administration is already being overwhelmed, and will continue to lose ground every time another one of these wretched revelations hits the headlines, which they will, over and over again. There is more out there about Bush and Cheney's torture program. There is more out there about their indefinite detention program, about their broad policy of absolute secrecy, about how and why we invaded Iraq, about their domestic surveillance program - specifically, who got spied on in America and why - and even about exactly what happened before and on September 11.

    Let's investigate. Let's prosecute. Let's clean out the Augean stables of the Bush administration and put things right again. It's not as if the desire to do exactly that isn't already present in the body politic. A majority of Democrats and a whole passel of Americans want to see the crimes and cover-ups of the Bush administration looked into and punished with vigor.

    Some members of Congress appear poised to do just that. "House Democrats said yesterday that they expect to launch a formal investigation into a secret CIA program that was not disclosed to Congress for almost eight years, a probe that could entangle senior Bush administration officials who oversaw intelligence issues, reported The Washington Post on Sunday. "Democrats on the House intelligence committee said the inquiry would examine both the nature of the still-secret program and the decisions to keep congressional oversight committees in the dark about its existence."

    And Congress, it seems, may not be alone. "(Attorney General Eric) Holder, 58, may be on the verge of asserting his independence in a profound way," reported Newsweek on Saturday. "Four knowledgeable sources tell NEWSWEEK that he is now leaning toward appointing a prosecutor to investigate the Bush administration's brutal interrogation practices, something the president has been reluctant to do. While no final decision has been made, an announcement could come in a matter of weeks, say these sources, who decline to be identified discussing a sensitive law-enforcement matter."

    Let's get it over with, shall we?

  

»


William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." His newest book, "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation," is now available from PoliPointPress.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

We absolutely must

We absolutely must investigate and prosecute to the full extent of the law for the myriad crimes against humanity, war crimes, murder, torture, theft etc.etc. that the Bush/Cheney criminal cabal conducted in their 8 year reign of terror!!! America and the world need to see justice for the unimaginable evil these dark lords perpetrated on the millions of innocent women, children and men of Iraq and Afghanistan as well as our own troops and their families and our economy which they plundered!! No mercy for the merciless.

As a counselor, I tell

As a counselor, I tell people all the time that you cannot know where you are going unless you know where you are. And you cannot know where you are if you do not know where you've been. The same holds true for this country and its leadership. Investigating where we were in the Bush years is extremely important.

High times for high crimes,

High times for high crimes, misdemeanors and most definitely criminally prosecutable felonies. High time for Mr. Holder to get on with what is being reported, as to his leaning towards a full-blown investigation - not some wimpy congressional picnic's game of 2o Questions - and for the President to, at the very least, to get out of the way, shut his mouth about this past/future malarkey and let justice be served.

Undoing all those Executive

Undoing all those Executive orders that have trashed the Constitution and Bill of Rights would also be a move in the right direction. Why all the foot dragging? Restore Posse Comitatus (can't use federal troops against US citizens), restore Habeas Corpus (can't haul someone off to jail without an arrest warrant from a real judge - not some Homeland Security appointee operating in secret), no more illegal wiretapping, etc. WALK THE WALK MR. 'CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR'. This is why we voted for you.

Obama cannot go around the

Obama cannot go around the world trying to resuscitate our standing while the criminal actions of the Bush administration ignored. We will get nowhere if the world sees us allowing torture, and by his inaction Obama will have formally condoned it. The sooner Obama realizes this the better.

Thank you again, Mr. Pitt.

Thank you again, Mr. Pitt. It comforts me that their is somebody out there actually writing truth to power. You should be required reading for the congress and the president.

I lost my daughter, Vanessa

I lost my daughter, Vanessa Lang Langer on 9/11/2001. Since that day I have been asking (actively), waiting (not very patiently) and praying (seems futile) for this country or this world body to investigate all the myriad evidence regarding the workings of the Bush administration regarding 9/11. Not only do we face deafness on the part of mainstream media re that day, we continue hear, bit by bit, how the horrible abuses continue to impede our ability to go forward. What does forward mean? Where would we be going? Back to the bucolic wonderland of freedom and liberty? What really would it mean to investigate Bush/Cheney? What about Clinton? Herbert Walker? Ourselves? Are we afraid to find out that the supposed crimes of the Bush administration are just a line in the sand marked way too far and that we each, yes each, are culpable? I really would like to let 9/11 rest. Except for this: I know what it means to lose a daughter. I have two more children and a country and globe I deeply love and I believe our lives and souls are at stake as we move forward. Forward always means a relationship to what is left behind. Always. Let's investigate it all. But let's, too, be willing to live with the changes those findings may imply. Let's be a decent people.

You must rectify the past

You must rectify the past before you can move forward. I also hope that this doesn't turn into another round of β€œsomeone needs to pay” because that will be no different the the mistakes of then past. Hopefully the right thing will be done.

I'm disgusted by the

I'm disgusted by the Democrats' incredible wimpiness. Dianne Feinstein suggests that laws "may have been broken." Naww... ya think? Bush and his fascist cronies spent all eight years of their reign breaking as many laws as they could lay their hands on. The list is lo-o-o-o-o-ong and well-documented. It gives me a headache just to contemplate the enormity of these crimes. Taken together, what they amount to is nothing less than treason and an attempted coup d'etat on behalf of the Republican Party. If these are not prosecuted, what Obama can look forward to in the future is another fascist emperor wannabe just like Bush. It's time to put the hammer down. NOW.

Not only is investigation

Not only is investigation necessary to throw some real fear into those contemplating the same crimes in the future, it's the law and in no way optional as our "constitutional scholar" President seems to believe. NOT investigating is covering up. NOT investigating when it is your legal duty is becoming an accomplice. NOT investigating is opening the door for more of the same. NOT investigating is clearly an impeachable offense because it is in direct opposition to the President's oath of office where he swears to uphold the constitution and the laws of this nation. NOT investigating allows our nation to sink even deeper into the abyss of Fascism we now find ourselves mired within. If we are to reclaim what was once ours we MUST INVESTIGATE and punish those responsible for crimes to the fullest extent of the law. That's what the blind lady with the scales represents: equal justice for all. And it's a very, very good idea.

Let's not stop with the last

Let's not stop with the last 8 years. Go after Clinton and Albright for Bosnia; Kissinger for Chile; Negroponte for Central America; & Obama himself for NOT stopping this countries aggressions, etc., etc., etc.. "The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do." - Samuel P. Huntington PS - If our gov't was so wonderful, you wouldn't see so many "Anonymous" posts.

Convoy of Death is a 2002

Convoy of Death is a 2002 account by Irish documentary filmmaker Jamie Doran about war crimes committed on alleged Taliban fighters in November, 2001, at Mazar - e - Sharif, Afghanistan after they had surrendered to Northern Alliance fighters after the siege of Kunduz. Eyewitnesses claimed that Taliban prisoners were transported in containers for several days, some of them suffocating and others dying when the containers were fired upon "in order to make holes for the air to get in." It was alleged that US military or CIA agents were present.[1] [2] Doran claims that mass graves of thousands of victims were found by the United Nations.[3] The International Committee of the Red Cross also investigated the incident.[4] [1] "U.S. Soldiers Watched Massacre of Taliban - Filmmaker". Reuters. 12-18-2002. http://www.photius.com/rogue_nations/taliban.html. [2] "Afghan Massacre Haunts Pentagon". The Guardian. 09-14-2002.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/sep/14/afghanistan.lukeharding [3] "As possible Afghan war-crimes evidence removed, U.S. silent". McClatchy Newspapers. 12-11-2008. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/336/story/57649.html. [4] "More Evidence of U.S. War Crimes in Afghanistan". World Socialist Web Site. 12-13-2001. Afghan Massacre - Convoy of death - part 1 through 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vbmCRImZR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SeetAGy3KI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3Awmgw4Abg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co8euyiAeYY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N91xjlIQRE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLBsh1Fj8VM

Too bad Obama doesn't

Too bad Obama doesn't operate like Bush. Bush's policies and practices were insane, but he and Cheney did what they wanted without fear of offending the opposing party. Obama is a consensus builder and a weak leader. As others have noted, Obama cannot legally ignore the misdeeds of the Bush cabal. The only way we will regain a semblance of our national soul is a public recounting of what was done supposedly in the interest of national security. Let the investigations begin!

Investigating Bush/Cheney

Investigating Bush/Cheney should not have to be the top priority of the Obama administration. We do need to stay focused on the issues that our administration is pursuing. If partisanship in Congress is such a cancer, I think it might be politically ill-advised for Obama et al to pursue this. However, having said that, can the citizenry open an investigation against Bush/Cheney crimes as a class-action suit? Wouldn't a case submitted by the people be much more effective than one led by the opposing party? With so many Petitions circulating the internet/facebook, etc., where is the one supporting a class actions suit against the President-- or is there something that I don't know about the law that states otherwise? http://statehoodhawaii.org

I saw a beautiful woman with

I saw a beautiful woman with bandaged eyes standing on the steps of a marble temple. Great multitudes passed in front of her, lifting their faces to her imploringly. In her left hand she held a sword. She was brandishing the sword, sometimes striking a child, again a laborer, again a slinking woman, again a lunatic. In her right hand she held a scale; into the scale pieces of gold were tossed by those who dodged the strokes of the sword. A man in a black gown read from a manuscript: "She is no respecter of persons." Then a youth wearing a red cap leaped to her side and snatched away the bandage. And lo, the lashes had been eaten away from the oozy eye-lids; the eye-balls were seared with a milky mucus; the madness of a dying soul was written on her face -- but the multitude saw why she wore the bandage.

Crimes are crimes and a

Crimes are crimes and a whitewash is a whitewash. Let's find out all the crimes done by these people -- how can we choose NOT to do this??? "They are also justifiably concerned that Republicans in Congress will try to burn down the Capitol building if Democrats even twitch in the direction of digging up the past." -- I say, "LET IT BURN IF THAT IS WHAT IT TAKES TO SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE ARE A NATION OF LAWS AND THAT OUR PRESIDENT AND HIS CABINET ARE HONORABLE AND HONEST PEOPLE. We can no longer tolerate lies and secrecy and the violation of the laws by elected evil doers and pretend like it really doesn't matter. It matters greatly.

The nature of politics --

The nature of politics -- and maturity -- is that you choose the best option you can achieve. Does anybody out there want to put some serious money on the likelihood of Bush or Cheney or any of the main characters ever doing the perp walk? We can investigate them till hell freezes and they're ice-skating on it, but what will we learn that we don't already know? We have a choice, folks. We can play good-guys-versus-bad-guys or we can get some decent environmental and healthcare legislation. Cheney is a kamikazi. He has nothing to lose, but if we let him he can render ineffective the most talented progressive politician in two generations. He must be laughing himself to death.

Good idea to let

Good idea to let investigations start with intrepid reporters. Get as many facts, as much documentation as posible out into the public. If the major media has been bought and is blind, where is the independent and alternative media? Make use of the Freedom of Information Act, do some digging and interviewing, and connect those dots. Don't wait for the politicos; they always have their own personal agendas that may or may not coincide with the common weal.

I believe that Cheney, Bush,

I believe that Cheney, Bush, and their accomplices will be investigated and indicted and brought to justice. I am glad that our president is taking his time and leaving it to others to decide if there is evidence of wrong-doing. I'm sure that such evidence is plentiful, and that we will eventually have justice. I also think that Obama is right to step out of the way, and let congress and the AG sort this mess out for now. Prosecuting Cheney on day one of the Obama administration would have been like checking people's ticket stubs when the theatre is on fire. Let Obama put out a few fires and get his (and our) agenda moving, while some brilliant, outraged people make a careful case that will be able to convict these criminals.

You're not going to change a

You're not going to change a single Republican's vote in 1012 by deamonizing their beloved Bush and Cheney. I'm about as liberal as they come, but have to disagree with this article and many of the comments about it. Putting the previous administration on trial for various misdeeds, as bad as they may have been, is self-defeating and a distraction that we don't need right now. It's last thing on my list of critical issues and legislation. It may even play into Republican hands by delaying important legislation they don't like. And if some of the headlines are a distraction now, just think what they will be if Congress undertakes months and months of hearings. It will move every important issue off the front page. It makes the President and Congress look petty and doesn't gain any political points with voters either. And all his mia copa revelation about torture will incite Muslim extremists even further.

Now, now, little people, if

Now, now, little people, if I let you investigate & get some idea of what was really going on (like it'll be a surprise to many people), the next thing you know you'll be wanting impeachment proceedings, and prosecutions. Important people might suffer if you little people get what you want.

β€œHe who controls the

β€œHe who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.” George Orwell

do as i say not as i do...

do as i say not as i do... its about time that a full investigation into crimes committed in our name be accounted for, these people we're OUR elected representatives and if they superseded their authority in a scare tactic of fear and loathing in order to push the political envelope that Bush43 was a WAR LEADER in order to garner more votes and secure a 2nd term... we need to look at that and prosecute those responsible... Dick Cheney needs to be investigated on treason charges wrt the Plame affair and Karl rove needs to answer almost all his manipulations he made while occupying an office in the white house... history demands we get the facts right and unbiased... we can't let fear and loathing dictate our political processes anymore... we are a nation of laws and we need our laws enforced not abdicated in order to secure a 2nd term! ...thousands if not millions died during their time in power and we want a full public accounting of the numbers that were killed in our name... i hate having blood on my hands especially if it was brutal and unwarranted fear mongering in order to get and secure votes!

Quick, call Mr. Gorbachev -

Quick, call Mr. Gorbachev - one of the few men in the world who can tell us what happens when you try to save a doomed empire. How can Congress reform itself, how the Democrats? Obama has a point - if you roll up the past eight years, you roll up the US. Didn't Al Gore and the Democrats go along with being cheated out of the presidency in Florida? Investigate the crimes of the past by all means, but remember that the criminals where the leaders including Congress, which made the US a criminal organization. Can you really face up to that? And to its inescapable conclusion - dissolving the United States very much as Yeltsin dissolved the Soviet Union?! Pete Edler, member Swedish Writers Union, Stockholm

We like to think of our

We like to think of our elected ones as standing on they're own. Fat chance! The past is the power on which the present stands! I like to forget the flat tire and head down the road totally oblivious too! How come the GOP didn't squeal when we wasted time, energy and money investigating Mr. Clinton's little personal lie? We need a new book - FROM HYPE TO HYPOCRISY, AN OVER VIEW OF THE GOP!

I agree with all. Bringing

I agree with all. Bringing back the rule of law and justice must be a top priority. BUT: As President Obama is dealing with the catastrophic assault on this country by the previous administration he is severely limited by three factors. First: The damage and destruction to our most sacred institutions is so severe and so widespread that he must perform triage. Selecting which horror perpetrated by Cheney-Bush must be mind boggling. Second: The Progressive "majority" in congress is a myth. Republicans are consistently joined by "conservative" Blue Dog and Clinton "New" Democrats to oppose any and all progress toward what the people of this country thought we got in the last election. And Third: Moat Americans are suffering from the vague awareness that they have been made party to incredible acts of evil. They really would like it all to go away quietly. The President has an uphill fight on everything. He is limited, (Like Abraham Lincoln) to partial, cautious steps. I would have put torture and war crimes as top priority, but , like Lincoln who couldn't make emancipation his top priority and had to compromise to keep the country together, Obama has to dance on a very thin, very high wire.

Please Google and read

Please Google and read Americas charges against King George as a preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Does any of it look familiar? Its so similar its scary.

Patience, folks. Let Obama

Patience, folks. Let Obama address some of the other pressing problems in the country, and let the evidence mount until demands for an investigation spread beyond progressive ranks and are heard from the great mass of mostly-apathetic "middle of the road" Americans. An investigation will paralyze Congress and the media for months, halting progress on anything else, which the nation can ill afford right now. It will also embolden the loonies on the far right. That'll happen regardless, but the majority opposing them needs to be strong and solid, so they're shut down without their message falling on any even slightly sympathetic ears.

As we speak, the corporate

As we speak, the corporate news media (e.g. the AP) is painting this as Democrats against the CIA for going after al-Qaida. Not the American people for going after bush for torturing thousands of people, not the American people going after bush for lying to us continually to create a state-funded but privately owned oil empire. No, we get reports that the CIA was just doing its job protecting American citizens. Were they protecting us from our own Constitution? Who will protect us from the CIA?

Last year a very senior U.N.

Last year a very senior U.N. official delivered a speech on problems between America and the rest of the world saying that to Americans "that's history" means "forget it" while to all of the rest of the world it means "that's important". In Britain and Canada after Word War I, Armistice Day saw large signs everywhere saying "LEST WE FORGET". In the 30's a study showed only liberals disapproved of Hitler. During World War II there was heated debate over requiring "unconditional" surrender. At the time the left prevailed. The radical liberals succeeded in getting the Nuremberg trials where Prosecutor Jackson opened with the statement the intent of the trials was to lay down an historical record so that future generations would learn not to become victims of the arrogance of power corrupting. Nothing was learned. If U.S. policy is to become moving forward and not looking back then we owe an apology to Hitler, his minions, and their families for what we did at Nuremberg and for supporting the Israelis in their attempts to find and prosecute Concentration Camp Nazis.

Members of both parties

Members of both parties claim they want to be law abiding, they want to preserve the constituion, they want justice and liberty for all. Well the opportunity may be upon us. To know our past would be refreshing. To remain forever benighted seems like Mission Accomplished!

For all those people who

For all those people who think we should "just get on with it" and forget about Bush & Co. war crimes and crimes against humanity - I have just one question for you: The next time you, or your family, or someone you care deeply about, is victimized in some way - large or small, will you settle for having the local prosecutor say, "Oh, well, that's in the past. You really can't expect us to spend money on *that* can you??? You really just need to get over it." Somehow I doubt it. Laws MUST be applied to EVERYONE, or else there truly are no laws. Perhaps you might also want to consider the fact of how casually you are depriving literally millions of people outside the US of any justice... Let's just talk about Iraq, their country was invaded upon the pretext which was clearly a complete lie with the real intention to be securing the oil fields for Big Oil (which is poised to happen as we speak), over a million people have been killed outright, millions more displaced, the entire population exposed to depleted uranium (google the birth defects *that* causes). We've become "America, the gift that just keeps on taking and taking and taking some more." Because we can. These, and so much more, are the crimes committed ostensibly on our behalf - how can any one of us look a non-American in the eye and not bear the weight of the guilt from those acts? The only way is to indict, prosecute, and convict these criminals: George W. Bush Dick Cheney Dick Rumsfeld Condaleeza Rice John Yoo David Addington along with all the rest... It truly is the very least we can do.

Why do so many of you think

Why do so many of you think that Obama should show his hand so early? Obama is entirely determined to see Cheney, Bush, et al, investigated and prosecuted. He himself can't lead that charge publicly, but as more and more comes out from independent sources, a critical mass of evidence will tip the scales, removing much of the political resistance and getting the vast majority behind the legal case. Holder's indication that he might move is NOT in spite of Obama. Do you think that they don't have private conversations? This won't play out in headlines and public pronouncements. Obama is a great student of history, politics, and law. A lot is going on that is not being spoken of; Obama, by his supposed reluctance, is giving the traitors the rope to hang themselves. So, Will Pitt, nobody is stopping the people of the United States from investigating - the very fact that this new revelation has come out says that we, through a variety of channels, are doing just that and have been all along.

Like Don Quixote fighting

Like Don Quixote fighting the windmills, somebody needs a reality check. A lot of the comments are really talking about revenge and retribution. Face reality -- Bush & Cheney will never "hang" for their misdeeds, no matter how many people would like to see them pay. It will never happen. Never. All you can do is embarrass them (like they would care) and actual punishment isn't even legally possible. This urge to get even (or show how moral we liberals are) is the same mistake liberals have made before. Grow up!!

Read the Constitution

Read the Constitution (Article II, Sec. 4). Impeachment and conviction by Congress is the ONLY legal remedy to actually punish a President or Vice President -- and that has to be done while they're IN OFFICE. And immunity laws are such that you can NOT try them after they're out of office for any official acts either. Congress can't do it and no private citizen can sue. Think about it, if citizen's could sue the President (in or out of office), every President we ever had would have been sued by somebody who didn't like their actions. Get real folks!!!! It ain't gonna happen.

Bush is beyond reach. But

Bush is beyond reach. But the others? From Gonzales to Rove to the mignons at the CIA & FBI there are a lot of people out there that legally CAN be prosecuted and should be! The fine line Obama is walking is what he got elected for : finding the corect moment of balance when politically it will be most assured that a conviction will result if charges - well substantiated - are brought against senior menmbers of the Bush junta. Talk about tightrope walk...I wouldn't want to be in his shoes!

Mr. Pitt would have Mr.

Mr. Pitt would have Mr. Obama drive into political quicksand that would suck the life out of his entire agenda. It's an open secret in Washington that senior Republicans have a strategy to start a political firestorm if so much as one Bush-era terrorist interrogator is prosecuted: They will celebrate that man as a patriotic defender of our freedom, and vilify Obama as unfit to protect the country. They will unleash the full force of the right-wing attack machine on him at all levels, as they did at Obama over Monica Lewinsky. But the main purpose of doing so will be to blow away any hope that the Obama Administration has to talk about anything else in the mainstream media, so that in the long run, Obama is depicted as unable to deliver on what he was elected to do. Oblivious to this, Pitt is saying that we''re all going to obsess about Bush's abuses anyway, why not just get on with it? What he doesn't realize is that by nationally obsessing about Bush, we'll bury Obama and produce another president like Bush in 2013. Which is exactly what the right-wing wants.

To the people who say The

To the people who say The President should continue standing as a roadblock to investigations into cheney's crimes because the Republicans will go into attack mode, have you ever seen Republicans NOT in attack mode? They whine like the minority when they are the majority, all the while getting EVERYTHING they want. They act like the majority when they are in the minority, knowing that Democrats will cave in every time they show their teeth. HERE'S AN IDEA: WHY DON'T WE START ACTING LIKE WE STAND FOR SOMETHING? THEN MAYBE THEY'LL FEAR US GOING INTO ATTACK MODE AS WELL. They called The President an un-american terrorist before the election. It helped him win by a landslide. What would Vince Lombardi think of you guys?! Snap out of it and get ready to fight!

To Pete Edler, member

To Pete Edler, member Swedish Writers Union, Stockholm who basically says we may have to burn down the barn to get rid of the rats. (Quick, call Mr. Gorbachev) Quite honestly, I wouldn't mind starting completely over with this country. Living in this country is like living with a cheating spouse. Things will never get better until the lies and deception and resulting fallout are dealt with, one way or another. If we have to have a meltdown, bring it on. I hope the Green Party emerges victorious and that we come out of it with a government more like those of more civilized European nations.

"Revelation" of the latest

"Revelation" of the latest but surely not last pogrom, er, program of the the Bush Administration, the so-called assassination squad secreted from Congress shrieks of the necessity to confront the past and the present to align ourselves correctly in the future. I feel that like Tony Blair, Obama may have a gun to his head in some manner by the past administration/corporate gatekeepers to urge his "focus on the future." If 9/11 was an inside job wouldn't you be pissed at all that unnecessary airport waiting time since? Oh, and other stuff too.

"Convoy of Death" - have you

"Convoy of Death" - have you read Ahmed Rashid's "Taliban"? The convoy of death was being driven by Abdul Rashid Dostum, a particularly nasty Afghan war lord. The CIA may have been in the back of the bus, but it was the Uzbeki and the few Hazara fighters left from earlier Taliban slaughter of that ethnic group, which originated from in and around Mazar-e-Sharif, that exacted retribution from the Taliban theocratic mafia. Life as usual in Afghanistan. There is enough to hang around the neck of the US Bush mafia without dragging this one in too.

Full disclosure. All that

Full disclosure. All that was done effects us all directly. We are not pawns, this is not Nazi Germany. We have the right to know the truth... how, why, and who. Then we can decide who’s right or wrong, good and bad. Investigate and prosecute where appropriate. PS- to β€˜out west’: I do not think Obama is a weak leader. I think he is intelligent and I’m hoping very moral. We do not need another dictator. I should hope he is doing the best he can until we vote out the rest of the republicans and republican democrats, hopefully starting in 2010. And β€˜Austin Loomis’: Beautiful analogy, Justice has been ill for a long time now. Unless we revive justice, all other efforts are futile, including healthcare.

I would prefer spending

I would prefer spending taxpayer money on investigations (congressional and private) into the illegal activities of all office holders (past and present) rather than to give more to the Wall St. parasites... the bulls^*t wars... and any further funding for the CIA and Homeland Security. Even if these lowlifes never do jail time or have to make any reparations, I want it documented for the world (and future Americans) that they are/were dishonorable and disgraceful .... and that WE are not afraid to publicly denounce them. P.S. If they do get to go into the penal system or lose their ill-gotten fortunes, ALL THE BETTER.

If I ever commit a capital

If I ever commit a capital offense, my legal defense will be to ask the judge to toss out the suit in the interests of looking forward. After all, my trial will simply bog down the system when there are so many other things going on.