Share

Sotomayor Looks Headed for Confirmation

by: Andrew Quinn  |  Reuters

photo
US Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor replies to a question during her final day of testimony before the US Senate Judiciary Committee. (Photo: Reuters)

    Washington - President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick Sonia Sotomayor appeared headed for confirmation as Senate hearings wound up on Thursday, but critics planned one last showdown over a controversial race ruling.

    Sotomayor, poised to become the first Hispanic justice on the top U.S. court, appeared for a fourth day before the Senate Judiciary Committee where she has coolly parried Republican attempts to depict her as unfit for the lifetime job.

    The committee's Democratic chairman Senator Patrick Leahy said there was little doubt she would be approved by the full Democratic-controlled Senate and take her seat when the nine-member court hears its next case in September.

    And the ranking Republican on the committee, Senator Jeff Sessions, said Republicans would not seek to block the confirmation vote, expected in the next several weeks.

    "I look forward to you getting that vote before we recess in August," Sessions said.

    Critics have focused on the 55-year-old appeals court judge's attitudes toward race, with Republicans hammering at Sotomayor for comments in which she said a "wise Latina' might be a better judge than a white man.

    On Thursday, as the issue came up again, she said she was sorry for the controversy. "I regret that I have offended some of you ... I believe my life demonstrates that that was not my intent."

    Sotomayor has also come under fire for upholding a lower court ruling which permitted the city of New Haven, Connecticut to junk firefighter exam results which did not produce enough qualified minority candidates.

    White firefighters who scored well on the test complained they were being discriminated against, and the Supreme Court later overturned Sotomayor's ruling, saying it could open the door to new types of racial quota systems.

    "It's an important decision and it can have far reaching implications," Republican Senator John Kyl said on Thursday, opening the final round of questions.

    One of the chief plaintiffs in that case, Frank Ricci, was expected to testify as a witness later on Thursday, a moment of drama in the proceedings which could stretch into Friday.

    "Good Chance" at the Job

    Sotomayor has followed precedent by deflecting questions about her position on divisive issues, including abortion, gun rights and gay marriage, saying it was not appropriate to comment as these might come before her on the court.

    Despite the grilling, Democrats and Republicans say it is almost certain that Sotomayor will be confirmed on the court, where she will replace retired Justice David Souter as one of four liberals facing five conservative justices.

    Leahy introduced for the record a letter of support from former President Bill Clinton, who hailed the "unique" contributions of a woman he had appointed to the appellate bench in 1998.

    Republican Senator Charles Grassley said the sparring over Sotomayor's appointment, which divided along partisan lines despite Obama's hopes of building bipartisan bridges, was a sign of battles to come over the judicial branch of the U.S. government.

    "Republicans on one side, Democrats on the other, seem to be asking different questions," Grassley said. "In the last 10 years, there's been a change in the environment here that is influencing that."

    Democrats were hopeful that Sotomayor's long legal resume and competent performance in the hearings had persuaded a number of Republicans to back her.

    "I think she will get a substantial number of Republican votes," said Senator Richard Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate responsible for maintaining the party's vote tallies.

    --------

    (Additional reporting by Richard Cowan; editing by David Storey)

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Yes, any woman, any race,

Yes, any woman, any race, could make a better call than many white men. Our testosterone driven wars between the privileged (man) generally white and the underprivileged (man) generally of color has been a disaster since man has decided he was divine! Considering that women were/are often locked away from societal decisions, religious opinion and the fate of our species, man has little experience in the real world. Women will probably understand her statement more than men do. How does one explain a pebble to a rock when he is convinced that all life is sand beneath his feet? Please, let me say that many men of many roads are actually learning about and respecting women. These men and the changes in their attitude are fresh air to moldy corrupt disease. Most of the women that do not understand the above statements are yet brainwashed, insecure and without purpose except to shine his trophied halo. I'll give her a chance, we are after all, only human...(pun...)

She must have passed the

She must have passed the jointly drafted GOP-Dem standards for "sufficiently friendly to corporate domination" test. Roberts, Alito, Thomas & Scalia passed it w/flying colors. Forget abortion, what matters is: will you protect the rights of corporations to whatever they want or not?

Pat Buchanan's hysterical

Pat Buchanan's hysterical (that's a loaded word!)* rants on MSNBC are proof of Sotomayor's superior qualifications for Justice of the Supreme Court. Among other comments in the course of his meltdown, he claimed superiority on the part of (paraphrased here) the Europeans who settled here and built this country. Rachel Maddow should have asked him who he thought had "settled" Puerto Rico (hint: in which continent is Spain located?) *Hysterical is a loaded word for its derivation from the Greek word for woman. As if men are uniformly calm, cool, and collected.......