Share

Greedy Banks

by:   |  Le Monde | Editorial

photo
French Economy, Industry and Employment Minister Christine Lagarde told London's Financial Times, "I think it is an absolute disgrace that guaranteed bonuses of several years could still be paid, or that some people are thinking of reinstating the old ways of compensating with insufficient relationship between compensation and lasting performance and risk management." (Photo: AP)

    Pretending that nothing had happened.... As though the global crisis they provoked weren't daily dragging along with it its cortège of social dramas, human tragedies and economic routs, banks are reviving yesterday's practices. The practices of a pre-crisis world. In the United States, investment bank Goldman Sachs is shamelessly preparing to fund an envelope of some $20 billion to devote to coming bonuses, or the sum the G-8 allocates to combating hunger in the world!

    As though in the good old days, when, with complete impunity, they cooked up their little deals sheltered from the real world, the banks are reviving their guaranteed bonuses, intended to compensate bankers for their significant risk-taking, even as their original profits transform themselves into colossal losses. While the crisis is going to deepen the gap between rich and poor even further, these bonuses for greed are profoundly shocking. "Excess and one-upmanship," is the formula Ariane Obolensky, director general for the French Banking Federation, used in the July 22 La Tribune, excess and one-upmanship proscribed in France, thanks to the code on variable compensation adopted in the beginning of the year, but which exist elsewhere in Europe.

    Christine Lagarde did not mince her words in the Financial Times of July 22: "I think it is an absolute disgrace that guaranteed bonuses of several years could still be paid, or that some people are thinking of reinstating the old ways of compensating with insufficient relationship between compensation and lasting performance and risk management." The [French] minister of the economy is in step with Barack Obama, who, on July 20, pronounced his own stern judgment: "You don't get the sense," he said, "that folks on Wall Street feel any remorse for taking all these risks; you don't get a sense that there's been a change of culture and behavior as a consequence of what has happened."

    Less than four months ago, during the G-20 in London at the beginning of April, all the planet's great and powerful pledged to never allow the financial sphere to get the upper hand over the state ever again. They promised and swore: the crisis would be redemptive. It would supply new tools to regulate a world that had become insane. The post-crisis world would be completely different from the pre-crisis world. "Alas," says Mrs. Lagarde, "the 'old ways' are returning. They increase inequalities; they are dangerous for the economy as a whole; they arouse incomprehension and anger. They must cease."

    --------

    Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The Entire Fractional

The Entire Fractional Reserve Banking System is at the root of the corruption that has by now transferred immense wealth and power to a very few people in this world. It is in the realm of of the obscure that we are most easily conned. This continues today in the Federal Reserve Bank - a private corporation started and owned by the biggest and oldest banking interests in the world - it is time to audit the Federal Reserve Bank and expose the total corruption that has impoverished our once great Nation - and it must be done before we collapse totally. Support HR 1207 to audit the FRB - call your rep today.

If we have no control over

If we have no control over these people let's have our money back. This entire industry is an ungrateful brother-in-law and it's time to throw him out of the house.

Seems like Barack Obama is

Seems like Barack Obama is intent on overseeing an even bigger upward transfer of wealth than did his predecessor. Why aren't irate New Yorkers sitting in and occupying Goldman Sachs offices? Personally, I won't deal with banks -- I belong to a credit union. I've eschewed the stock market in favor of peer-to-peer lending (and it gives me a better return!). Cut up your credit cards! Families who've lost your homes to foreclosure, go camp out in front of the White House! JUST SAY NO!