Share

Ain't Nothing Centrist About Them

by: Katrina Vanden Heuvel  |  The Nation

photo
Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, speaks with reporters. (Photo: Getty Images)

    At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about everything they can to cripple real health care reform.

    So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or "moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?

    In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in a recent op-ed repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a "can't-do" view of government.

    All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition [who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how "centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.

    Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal-- in rightly blasting the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".

    The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and "centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.

    As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political Brain, told me: "The average American, according to all available data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan and Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."

    How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists" are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative brethren.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Someone please name all the

Someone please name all the names of each and every politician who is standing in the way of our reaching the goal of affordable health care for all. Obviously their goal is to pander for votes or financial self-aggrandizement rather than to support the President in his efforts. They are traitors to their country and must be voted out.

How much money are these

How much money are these bought and paid for whores getting from Big Pharma and the Medical institutions? I wouldn't be amazed if these crooks also voted for the bank bailout fiasco and more money for wars that are unpopular. If we can pay for this crap we should have the best public healthcare program in the world. The government in this country does not support the voters but is in office at the voters expense.

Name names. That got us out

Name names. That got us out of Vietnam: the detailed voting records of every person in Congress. It took research... not just protests: protesters handed out research flyers while we marched against the war in Vietnam. People read about bombs stuffed into plastic toys, and many other things... Also: I notice that some blogs (thankfully not Truthout) have a lot of neo-con posts. The neo-con posts go up immediately, but others are either delayed or will not go up, due to list-server problems. The neo-cons may own some of the companies such as Disqus who allow people to put posts on the internet. This is important, because the "healthcare debate" is happening on many fronts, but if the 72 percent majority are shut out of the debate, it will look like the "centrist" (i.e., not centrist but small minority neo-cons) are actually winning. On top of everybody needing to talk about issues, we still have most of the big media owned by a tiny fraction of very conservative people, and they can also spin who gets to say what.

Wikipedia refers to them as

Wikipedia refers to them as "moderate" also. (Someone should edit that page.) A listing all 52 members is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Dog_Coalition Follow links to their official gov't pages and FAX or phone them with your outrage.

Keep all of them in session

Keep all of them in session until Single Payer healthcare is a reality for all citizens of this country. We need real change and we need it NOW, not NOT.

in response to 15:20 Health

in response to 15:20 Health care companies gave the congressional candidates about $170,000,000 in 2007 and 2008. None of these crooks are immune from somehow being bought.

"Blue Dogs", let's call them

"Blue Dogs", let's call them what they really are, red and they are not dogs there just "dogging" the process trying to preventing what Americans need and want. The more appropriate term is RBANs (Republicans By Another Name). Seems appropriate since the RBANs act as if their future is so bright that they've got to wear shades to prevent them from seeing what the lack of affordable health care is doing to the families of Americans. Take the "dogs" to the pound and have them put up for adoption, I'm sure a nice Repubicon will give them a nice home among the lobbyists and "insurance" execs.

"Labels" are how Americans

"Labels" are how Americans think. Right, Left, Moderate, Conservative, Liberal, Black, White, etc., etc.. Americans don't seem to have the intellect anymore to think for themselves, so they just listen to labels and pick which one they like best.

THIS CONGRESS WILL NEVER

THIS CONGRESS WILL NEVER PASS ANY MEANINGFUL legislation. They are UTTERLY corrupt. I think OUR president IS a good man and wants to help the country. IT WILL TAKE TIME TO REMOVE ALL THE CRIMINALS FROM OFFICE AND THE TRAITORS from the CIA and Pentagon. Incumbent demolican senators are NO BETTER than their repuglicrat partners in crime. VOTE OUT all these rascals preferably IN THE 2010 PRIMARIES, and try to find candidates worthy of our trust and maybe, just maybe, America can start to work again.

So-called "moderates" are

So-called "moderates" are coldly obstructionist as they kowtow to the criminal insurance lobby. Obama's humanitarian effort to provide basic health care for citizens is being characterized by the propaganda machine as "radical," much the same as Iran's election protestors are being called "radical." The Big Lie is vibrant, pervasive, and ultimately destructive in real, flesh-and-blood terms.

So glad Katrina said it --

So glad Katrina said it -- it's exactly what I thought when I heard the report on NPR yesterday. The only way these guys would be considered "centrist is if you consider the entire political spectrum as consisting of Democrats on the left half and Republicans on the right half, in which case the politicians in question would be at the rightmost edge of the left half, i.e., the "center". On the other hand, if you consider the full spectrum of political philosophies (even just in the US, where it's narrower and more skewed to the right than most countries), both the Dems and the Republicans are far to the right. Write NPR and let them know what you think of their biased coverage. (On the other hand, they did finally pronounce the words "single payer" on the radio a few days ago!).

The Blue dogs are

The Blue dogs are objectively are rightists, but then so are those who support Obama's eviscerated 'public option.' "So why does the media keep ceding them the label of 'centrist' or 'moderate' as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?" The fly in the ointment here is that Blue Dogs are indeed representative of mainstream values because American mainstream values are essentially rightest. When it comes to health care the true centrist option is full blown, uncompromising single payer. Most Americans, reactionary to the core, are still uneasy with 'single payer,' associating it with the dreaded shibboleth 'Socialism.'Real progressive left health care reform would mandate complete expropriation of the insurance companies, and the elimination of ALL private insurance options based on ability to buy better private medical care leveraged on personal wealth. Real reform would mandate only one modality, where Bill Gates would be entitled to the same health care as the homeless beggar.Once that ideology is throughly mandated then the nation can begin the project of insuring the highest, most exigent standards for all.

I have a project for someone

I have a project for someone who can access the research and has the technical and design know-how to do this: Make a chart, a MATRIX, of members of congress and the senate. Find out how much each individual was given by health insurers, big pharma, etc. Then find out how they vote, or are voting on healthcare issues. Put the two together with some kind of shading (light to dark, the more saturated, the more money a member has taken from health insurers and big pharma. We need to make it plain as can be (graphically) why certain people are voting the way they are.

The 'Blue Dogs' are just

The 'Blue Dogs' are just 'mo'betta, bought an' sold, sorta republicon, Dems. I heard a radio person call Max Baucus a liberal! Oh so very, very, not!

I don't know about you, but

I don't know about you, but if my dog was blue I'd bury him.