Share

Nine More Go to Jail for Single Payer

by: David Swanson  |  After Downing Street

photo
Protesters rally in Des Moines, Iowa, against the Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield company. (Photo: Monashaw2003 / Flickr)

    Following a pattern of civil resistance in Washington D.C. and around the country, citizens in Des Moines Iowa on Monday risked arrest to press for the creation of single-payer healthcare, the establishment of healthcare as a human right, and an end to the deadly practices of Iowa's largest health insurance company, Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield.

    Dr. Margaret Flowers, who has herself gone to jail for single-payer in our nation's capital, was on hand to speak in Des Moines. She called me with this report. Nearly a month earlier, on June 19, 2009, Des Moines Catholic Workers had delivered a letter (PDF) to Wellmark addressed to its CEO John Forsyth requesting disclosure of Wellmark's profits, salaries, benefits, denials and restrictions on care. The letter had not been acknowledged by Monday, ?nd the Catholic Workers and their allies decided to take action again.

    Thirty people arrived in the Wellmark lobby in Des Moines and asked to see Forsyth or any of the members of the board of directors or the operating officers. They were told that none were available, and instead the police arrived. Nine of the 30 refused to leave and were arrested. Flowers did not yet know what the charges will be but suspected trespassing. The nine latest supporters of single-payer to go to jail for justice are:

    Mona Shaw, Renee Espeland, Frankie Hughes (age 11), and Frank Cordaro, all from Des Moines Catholic Workers; Leonard Simmons from Massachusetts; Robert Cook; Eddie Blomer from Des Moines; Kirk Brown from Des Moines; and Chris Gaunt from Grinnell, Iowa.

    These nine and others like them around the country represent, I think, the incredible potential to energize the American public on behalf of a struggle for the basic human right of healthcare, a potential being blocked by the work of activist organizations that reach out from Washington to tell the public that single-payer is not possible, rather than reaching into Washington from outside to tell our public servants what we demand.

    Here's a blog from Digby acknowledging the reduction of the public option from where it started to next-to-nothing. It's not clear whether Digby thinks it would have been smarter to start with single-payer, in order to end up with a better compromise than what you get by initially proposing the weakest plan you'll settle for. But Digby argues that proposing single-payer from the start would not have given single-payer itself any chance of succeeding, and this is proven -- Digby says -- from the fact that the public option is having such a hard time succeeding.

    I can't prove this is wrong. Everything Digby writes is smart and to the point. But this does omit an important factor or two. Namely: single-payer turns an obscure wonkish policy mush into a clear and comprehensible civil rights issue. Even with it blacked out and shunned by the White House and astroturfing activist groups, single-payer still has people sacrificing and going to jail for it. Nobody goes to jail for a public option.* Nobody even knows what it is. Nobody will even know whether they got it if a bill is passed until experts debate the point for them -- at which point it's too late. Making healthcare a right rather than a legislative policy energizes people, and that potential has hardly been tapped and should not be written out of consideration.

    John Nichols understands this, as does Glen Ford from Black Agenda Report.

    Even defenders of a public option depict it as a step toward single-payer, while missing the potential of single-payer activism in the short term to improve the public option. So, all agree that in the long run a movement for single-payer is needed. It can begin with phone calls this week in support of these measures and with a massive presence on July 30 in Washington, D.C.

    * Note: Joe Szakos of Virginia Organizing Project went to jail this week for a public option, but nobody he'd organized went with him. His action, like that in Iowa, was protesting an insurance company, an entity that would be eliminated only by single-payer.

    Photos from the event can be seen here.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Kudos to them! It's time for

Kudos to them! It's time for this country to end the greed of the insurance companies and come in line with the rest of the civilized world!

Insurance companies and drug

Insurance companies and drug companies with their bureaucrat partners in FDA and political partners in the Congressional Committees have been the major cause of health care costs spiraling, broken health care system which making profit the primary objective. The only way out of this choke hold of power structure is massive consumer ACTIVISM.

Reading TruthOut and posting

Reading TruthOut and posting responses here is not enough. You are preaching to the choir. Become active, talk to your family friends and neighbors, write to your newspaper. Contact your congressman or senator.

Unfortunately, in view of

Unfortunately, in view of the fact that the vast majority of the Republicans and the Blue Dog Democrats have been bought off, and it would appear that the remaining Democrats have the spines of jellyfish, the only way to register is via civil disobedience. Imagine, if the French populace were being denied health care...The streets would teem with peaceful marchers, the unions would call a general strike, the farmers would park their tractors in the center of Paris, the universities would erupt. Unhappily, our docile, uninquiring population will sit back and be convinced by the nay sayers and propogandists that it is in their best interests to remain passive and let the corporatocracy determine their fate. It seems that 40% of the populationof the USA denies reality, and that another 40% is fearful that thinking will deny salvation.

I am glad to see such brave

I am glad to see such brave individuals stand up for single-payer health care. I have spent many years abroad and have friends from all over the world who are very happy with their gov't health care. We need to stop the lies that are being spread here about how bad government health care is. Even our own Medicare and VA system work well, but no one seems to pay any attention. My concern is how we will afford such a system, but something along the lines of France's system (with the option of private insured care alongside government funded care) would work quite well, I should think.

It seems to me the simple

It seems to me the simple fact is that health care for profit-- the decision to let people suffer and die because insufficient profit can be made from their situation--is the moral equivalent of slavery. The civilized world has decided that slavery is immoral, and most of the civilized world has also decided that making a profit from the frailty of human existence is also immoral. The people who are 'defending' the American system understand this. But, like Preston Brooks attacking Charles Sumner on the floor of the senate in 1856, they are enraged by the trap they find themselves in. Trying to serve two masters. Thus has it ever been.

It's time for a

It's time for a Constitutional Amendment. We need to write a short law with the words "quality," and "healthcare," and "right." And then this short-worded law must be pushed immediately through both houses of Congress, and ratified by every state legislature. If it is a very short written law, it would have a chance of passing and being upheld in courts. The term "centrist" has been used too often to portray a fring of right-wing radicals, or people in the pay of the large insurance companies; therefore, the only way to truly bring the real centrist view into light is to show that most Americans want a healthcare plan that is not run by those same murdering insurance companies who have created the mess we are now in. The words "single payer" might not be needed in Constitutional law, or even in legislation, but would you let known murderers hold your baby in their hands? This is the reason it resonates with people right now.

"...was protesting an

"...was protesting an insurance company, an entity that would be eliminated only by single-payer." So, let's eliminate them. They are the reason health care costs so friggin' much in the first place.

Obama's communications

Obama's communications suggest that he wants to save money and cover everyone, but admittedly, none of his plans will accomplish that. Β He's spending all of his political capital arguing for something nobody really wants, AND he's facing the full brunt of conservative resistance. At least if he was using the bully pulpit for a single payer system he would have genuine support.Β 

We don't need a

We don't need a Constitutional amendment. We don't need a new law. When society decides that something is a human right, it BECOMES a human right. Documents are meant to guide, not strangle. When the framers penned "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness," they approved its broadness because NO ONE can foretell the future, and society changes over time - else women would not have the vote, and African Americans would not have their freedom. If we decide healthcare is a human right, and we say so, loud and clear, in ever-growing numbers, it will become so. Unless, of course, the Supreme Court decides that a health insurer - a company - would be mortally hurt by such a decision. After all, companies are people, too. Or didn't you know that? Check it out: Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, the 1886 Supreme Court decision granting corporations the same rights as living persons under the Fourteenth Amendment. If we need anything, it would be retraction of that decision.

I emailed 2 lawyers...one

I emailed 2 lawyers...one related...one a friend. They post bail and rep me and I'll do the perp walk for single payer. Think Million Man March, Civil Rights DC rally, 1970's anti-war rally in DC. That's what it will take to get their attention. IT IS A HUMAN RIGHT! Free health care equals a free healthy society!

All of us need not only to

All of us need not only to rally friends, family, neighbors, co-workers and everyone else we can stir up to demand health care as a human right (I believe there is a UN Declaration of Human Rights that includes that, and the US is signatory). We all need to register our preference for single-payer, universal access health coverage to President Obama at http://whitehouse.gov/contact .

We need to insist that every

We need to insist that every American gets the same government health care package that Senators and Representatives get. That's all.

It is time to reframe the

It is time to reframe the entire 'healthcare debate'. Instead of trying to pass an 1100 page nightmare bill which in no way will reduce costs for the average person in the US or provide affordable health care for all, we the citizens should engage in a massive advertising campaign through Truthout or Move On showing that the elegant single payer Conyer bill. HB-676 of 11 pages would accomplish the task and could be implemented over a very short time by phasing in Medicare to various uninsured age groups until the system was fully in place. HH-676 contains means for raising additional revenues during the initial start up phase. A simple chart showing a comparison of overall costs and benefits to the American people between private insurance and government insurance would startle the electorate to demand action from the wishy washy democrats in congress. This is a watershed issue and if not acted upon in the best interests of the people, it will bring down the Obama presidency and the democratic party for years to come and cause massive civic unrest for the next decade, Forget writing letters and engaging in a discussion that are lost on our representative and take our case directly to the public with simple and easy to understand facts about the proposals in congress. We as a unified group of progressive democrats must insist the HB-676 with th Amensments be voted out of committee and moved to the full house for final debate and passage and table the present bill under discussion. The proposed ad should have the signatures of all prominent persons who support this effort, If 100 million persons would kick in 1-5 dollars each, nothing could stop the enactment of single payer. The program would be administered by the government and be implemented by private industry as Medicare is today. No one would be denied coverage and treatment and everybody gains in our society. May your collective endeavors lead to peace and prosperity.

This is al getting too

This is al getting too confusing. I was defending the public option but now I'm thinking that President Obama should just get in front of the cameras and say, since everybody is having such a difficult time with Public Option healthcare reform, you know what, I decided that I will not sign a healthcare reform bill if it is not Single Payer" period. We the people need to have a real pow-wow and stop being asleep in front of the big screen and rally in front of the insurance companies and our reps.