Share

Why Health Care Isn't Going Away

by: t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
(Photo: Joseph Rodriguez / Gallery Stock)

    Watching the Dixiecrats supposedly impose fiscal responsibility on the "unrealistic liberals," who, in theory, would go off and provide health care to all Americans if someone didn't put a stop to them, you have to wonder if this isn't all for show.

    Speaking of shows, the mainstream media is in full-onslaught mode on health care reform now. They're going after Obama and his health care, trouble-making with everything and the kitchen sink. One more poll published today illustrating how "the public" is turning against Obama on health care reform will make an even hundred. How informative, so impressive.

    In fact there is some real news out there that mattered: A quick read of the independent press might reveal, as David Swanson reports, "Nine More Go to Jail for Single Payer". [1] These were not hooligans or persons of low moral character; they were doctors and Catholic workers, an 11-year-old child and ordinary citizens who cared enough that all Americans would be entitled to health care that they voluntarily forfeited their liberty.

    Or, as Nayla Kazzi reports, "More Americans Losing Health Insurance Every Day". [2] To wit: 46 million Americans are currently uninsured, but that the number is rising at an alarming and accelerating pace. Further, Kazzi reports that many of the uninsured are currently working.

    The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports, "Percentage of Americans With Private Health Insurance Hits 50-Year Low". [3] So, that's a drop in the percentage of insured Americans from an estimated "nearly 80% in the 1970s and early 1980s", to a 2008 estimated level, according to the CDC, of 67 percent of non-elderly Americans. That's down 2 percent in the past year alone apparently, according to the report.

    Health Care as a Wedge Issue

    If the corporate news machine isn't good for anything else, they're good at shaping public opinion in favor of corporate profits, even at the expense of the public's best interest. To be sure, Arkansas Rep. Mike Ross and his Dixiecratic associates are well aware of the facts laid out above, well aware of the toll of human suffering generated by them and just as well aware of the losses meaningful reform of the health care industry would mean to industry bottom lines.

    But how do you convince an ordinary American that health care reform that clearly stands to benefit them, at least to some extent, is something they should oppose, and oppose its advocates as well? First, you need a powerful medium. Broadcast television is a good start, commercial print media helps as well and talk radio really saturates the market fully. But you still need a wedge, an issue that divides.

    What if you could convince the majority of Americans that health care reform would actually cost them money? Well. that would sure do it; yes, it would. The reality is a bit different: The American health care industry enjoys not only the staunch protection of US lawmakers, but the enormous financial benefits that follow. The numbers are staggering. [4] These are Fortune 500 people, and they absolutely, positively intend to keep it that way. Take away the enormous profit and health care would serve no other purpose than to ease human suffering.

    So, sure, Barack Obama's popularity can be tarnished by a media onslaught and, sure, public opinion can in the same manner be panic driven to a profitably convenient conclusion. People, however, are dying and being left to die in staggering numbers as the Fortune 500 priorities are writ large by the nation's lawmakers.

    Let there be no mistake, health care isn't going away.

--------------------

    [1] http://www.truthout.org/072909B

    [2] http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/insurance_loss.html

    [3] http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-07-01-health-insurance_N.htm

    [4] http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2007/industries/Health_Care_Insurance_Managed_Care/1.html

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

I have to wonder if these

I have to wonder if these recent polls reflect Americans' opinions accurately. True, people have lost confidence in what is happening ITO the health care debate, but I suspect those sentiments are linked more to our perception that the debate is dominated by the health insurance industry. And, not that President Obama should be bending MORE to their will, but that he is not dictating to them MORE in terms of the will of the American people to a single payer system. Time and again, I have read posters stating that President Obama should be more forceful with them. I do not think this "loss of confidence" has anything to do with a trend towards the agenda set out by Republicans, but the feeling that, after coming so far with such high hopes, the industry ghouls are winning, yet again. For throughout the Presidential campaign, the war cry was "Campaign Finance Reform!" Aside the single payer/universal health care agenda. Now, the problem for the media is going along with this misinterpretation of polling data exactly the way the Republican Party hopes they will. Sorry, but this article appears to play straight into the hands of the health insurance industry's domination of America.

"Take away the enormous

"Take away the enormous profit and health care would serve no other purpose than to ease human suffering." That's what health care use to do, before "insurance" was invented. And the article points out that corporations are defining the debate, instead of the American people. Know who's gonna win that one...

$$$ vs human...single payer

$$$ vs human...single payer now! the 9 going to jail is really the heart of what needs to happen; people need to protest, be arrested etc. whatever it takes to force the truth out and wake people up to the fact that we need to be out there creating a ruckus to push back against the corporate lobby and entrenched money machine politics. single payer is the only truly human way to solve the healthcare madness. in our modern society healthcare should be a not-for-profit human right and the people who enter that particular profession should do it because they want to help people, not make big bucks end of story. i believe the way this debate has taken shape truly shows a most disgusting sickness at the heart of this great nation, and that would be: everything is for $$$ and $$$ comes first even above human dignity and human life. it is cynicism, nihilism and ignorance writ large.

I have a decent health plan,

I have a decent health plan, I guess. One of those that costs more every year inspite of the best efforts of my union to control costs... Recently I was injured at work due to unsafe working conditions. Our state workers comp. insurance, SAIF, has decided that my primary care physician and the chiropractor I have been working with are not 'allowed' to continue treatment. This is because they are not 'members' of the Managed Care Organization that SAIF 'enrolled' me in. Basically, best I can figure is that the 'claims adjuster' for SAIF has decided that my two medical professionals are not providing the appropriate care... Why these 'claims adjusters' even have jobs and are allowed to engage in making decisions about my medical care is an immoral travesty, but not to Republicans or Blue Dogs... The system is sooo broke, yet we have working, functional models in many other modern countries. Perhaps this is the problem- the US is not yet a 'modern' civilized country. :)

Actually, on the rather

Actually, on the rather disgusting "News Hour" last night, even Nancy Pelosi appears to be "getting it." She noted that one poll showed that respondents did not approve of the public option by a slim majority. HOWEVER...when they were told it would cost less than the current disaster, approval shot back up to 59%. So yes, MANY in the media are lying. Even the "News Hour" had a recent interview featuring....Dodd as the defender of the public option (not my first pick), a repugnican Senator...and then from the House, a repugnican and a bluedog. Yeah. Fair and balanced. Media get HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY from insurance companies and pharma. They're not just shaping public view, their covering their assets. In any OTHER society, that is called corruption. Not even worthy of the description of "propaganda." The oligarchs rule in our Coprotocracy.

I had the temerity to

I had the temerity to criticize the Wall Street Journal poll on their website. My comment was quickly removed. As far as I can tell, none of the anti-Obama and anti-healthcare-reform comments have been similarly deleted, no matter how insulting or obnoxious.

Maybe it isn't going away,

Maybe it isn't going away, and maybe that's a good or a bad thing. I only know that the bill on the table right now is unacceptable. Why not read the argument - both sides of it? http://blog.flecksoflife.com/

Corporate "personhood" is at

Corporate "personhood" is at fault here. Overturn that ruling (Santa Clara County v. So. Pac. RR) and let's get back on track with HUMAN rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - rather than corporate profit.

Ger your facts right. Mike

Ger your facts right. Mike Ross is from Arkansas, not Alabama. Arkansas is WEST of the Mississippi, Alabama EAST of it. Ark has a long Democratic tradition (although youΒ΄d think Senators like Lincoln and Pryor and Congressmen like Ross were raving Republicans), Ala is a Republican stronghold. Checking facts, even not so important ones, lends credibility to a story.

The polls are bogus, the

The polls are bogus, the statisticians say. The questions are asked, do you strongly support or strongly object. The middle ground is not covered. We are being led to believe that healthcare reform aint going to happen. Fight back!

The problem with this, and

The problem with this, and so many other problems facing us, is that the American public is stupid. And the news isn't. The corporations in charge make sure that no real facts get in the way--not that it seems to matter since most Americans don't seem to care about facts in the first place. That's why we have the birthers. That's why old people think health care reform includes euthanasia. I read the paragraph that supposedly covers euthanasia and it says no such thing. But it occurred to me that I understood it because I'm smarter than average. Ordinarily we'd expect the news to explain the real meaning, but TV is more about entertainment than information.

Let's have a little honesy

Let's have a little honesy here, dear Blue Dog Democrats and anti-anything-Obama Republicans. Let's remind the public of the generous government-sponsored health care packages available our elected "public servants" in Washington. But then,β€œWe’ve got ours. Who cares about the rest of the country?” What about those health welfare entitlements that include no waiting period, right to choose a plan, payment by taxpayers, US, of 75% of the cost, along with their own pharmacy and emergency care, X-rays, etc., right there in the Capitol. Sweet! Maybe the elected officials who say they want to protect our interests should practice some honesty instead of hyprocisy? And maybe it's time for us to tell them what we think of their nasty, me-first, party-first behavior? They have been elected to SERVE the public, NOT to serve their own re-election aspirations.

My Dad retired from

My Dad retired from Caterpillar Tractor Co., and thought he had health insurance for life, but just last month he was told he had reached his 'lifetime cap.' So now, he's on Medicare. Nobody asked how he had voted for the past 30 years - Republican. This happens to hundreds of people every day. We already have a "public option," and insurance companies are weeding out anyone who is actually ill and forcing the government to pay for whatever care is available in their area. We already have "rationing" - the insurance company you are covered by decides what doctors you can see and what treatment you will get. We already have delays that can and do cost lives. And, we have a system that forces Doctors to waste much of their time and energy on paperwork - not from all the government, but much of it from the HMOs and PPOs. Lets make the radical changes we must to get Americans healthy and back to work producing something better than stacks of paper. I lived with "socialized medicine" when I was in the Army, and then when I lived in Europe. It may not be perfect, but it sure beats the endless fund-raisers for kids with cancer, accident victims, etc., etc. I'm so sick of seeing Americans beg, and wondering if I will be in the same position.

Preamble We the People of

Preamble We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish the Constitution of the United States of America. PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE. THAT INCLUDES HEALTH-CARE FOR ALL OF WE THE PEOPLE!!! All United States Senators and Representatives took a Oath to uphold the Constitution, so DO your Duty to our Country and let the upholding begin.

Some accurate assessment

Some accurate assessment points all around, all stated independently, with no unity other than a vaporous recognition that the corporate state is the problem. Well the only thing we can do in such a situation is organize and fight back! We have over 100 million people in this country who are either uninsured or underinsured (what's the obsession with 46 million?!) The fact is if you get seriously ill and haven't paid enough "dues", you may find yourself without coverage, and that's everyone with health insurance. Now is the time to make an effort to pass a single payer system, or something so close it's difficult to tell the difference, RATHER THAN "reform" that is difficult to tell the difference from the status quo. The bottom line is who's going to win: corporate health insurance or the American people? There will be only one winner, People.

The Wall Street Journal ran

The Wall Street Journal ran an article ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124890178435291341.html#articleTabs%3Darticle ) on Thursday headlined: "Support Slips for Health Plan: Obama Push Faces Growing Doubts in Poll." The full WSJ/NBC poll questionnaire was presented for reader input, and readers could see the results from the public sample. In response to Question 5, "From what you've heard about Obama's health-care plan, do you think his plan is a good idea or a bad idea?" the spread in the public sample was 36% Good idea / 42% Bad idea / 17% No Opinion / 5% Not sure. Question #5 was, "Now I am going to tell you more about the health-care plan that President Obama supports, and please tell me whether you would favor or oppose it. 'The plan requires that health insurance companies cover people with pre-existing medical conditions. It also requires all but the smallest employers to provide health coverage for their employees, or pay a percentage of their payroll to help fund coverage for the uninsured. Families and individuals with lower- and middle-incomes would receive tax credits to help them afford insurance coverage. Some of the funding for this plan would come from raising taxes on wealthier Americans.' Do you favor or oppose this plan?" The response to Question 6 from the public sample was 56% Favor / 38% Oppose / 3% Depends / 3% Not sure. Two points: This is a clear case of biased reporting by WSJ in the guise of objective article. The article focused on the response to Question 5 with only a brief mention of Question 6 response and the qualifier that the information given had not mentioned a public insurance option. The responses to Questions 5 and 6 tell me a couple of things. (1) The public in general is poorly informed and what information people do have about the plan under consideration is being heavily colored by anti-health-reform reporting and advertising. (2) When given even a brief description of what is really being considered, the public remains strongly in favor.

Who said "fair and balanced"

Who said "fair and balanced" is a good thing? Fair, yes. "Balanced" essentially means if I say the world is round, they dig up someone to say it's flat. Let's please lose that term, which that national atrocity Fox News tries to drill into people's skulls.

My property taxes just

My property taxes just increased because my local school district will pay 8% more for health insurance this year. This was the only line item that increased in the budget and increased despite the fact that the number of employees decreased. I just shopped car insurance. Most of my coverage is for medical expenses for me and others. Likewise, my home owner's insurance covers medical expenses incurred from property related accidents. I have to believe that a single-payer system would reduce all of these costs to me, but no other plan under consideration is projected to reduce costs at all, as far as I can see. If people understood the drag that these companies are on our personal and national economies, for producing nothing of value, they would insist on single-payer.

I don't think the American

I don't think the American public has a chance of getting health care reform if it's packaged as us vs. them. Corporations know well the cost of providing health insurance to their employees. So to say that they must lose so that the people can win doesn't make sense. In actuality, government, the people, and the private sector have a vested interest in controlling health care costs. As the higher prices of health care work themselves into the prices of goods and services, it becomes clear that delivering health care efficiently is vital to the economy. The stock market rallied when Obama AMA-approved plan came before Congress. Don't think that capitalists aren't aware of the higher premiums--the desire to cut costs and lift profits actually works in favor of health care reform, as does the notion of keeping workers healthy. I wouldn't confuse lowering the number of insured with improving health care. The two goals overlap, but predicating all reform on universal coverage just delays a response to a worsening crisis.

Doesn't good health pertain

Doesn't good health pertain to the pursuit of happiness? And therefore an unalienable right? Are we happier when healthy or when sick? Do the health insurance companies make anyone happy? I don't think so. I'm beginning to think that the health insurance companies may be violating the unalienable rights of all U.S. citizens. Particularly when it comes to gouging and denying us claims.

Yes, the public is turning

Yes, the public is turning against Obama. Forget the polls, forget what you perceive as the MSM bias, and go read the comments at many of the left-of-center websites and blogs...many people who supported Obama feel like he's a big disappointment. Not just on healthcare!

Take all elected officials

Take all elected officials off government run health care. Make them go out and find their own private policies. 75% of them will not qualify because of pre-existing conditions. Lets see how they like it when they too have to wake up every morning hoping they don't get sick or have an accident. If the Republicans and Blue Dog Dems. think what we have now is good enough, then let them have it. Single Payer now.

Want health care reform of

Want health care reform of substance and of justice and of efficaciousness? Then listen to my broken record: We need NOW a ten million patient march on Washington led by one hundred thousand patients in wheel chairs. Well?

Insurance costs are running

Insurance costs are running away to bankrupty many. A long time republican, 60 year old voting lady from Orange County, CA made the papers by having a pre-existing condition and losing her health insurance due to premium gouging by the insurance company because it was either that or pay the rent. Withholding care to this woman is the same as charging you $25 (that you don't have) for a gallon of gasoline in the middle of a hot desert when you run out. You will slowly die. This is America? http://www.ocregister.com/articles/health-insurance-coverage-2488925-percent-carter?ref=patrick.net

The case for health care is

The case for health care is simply THAT IT IS NEEDED. Their is no health care industry in the USA, just a health insurance industry, although there are health care professionals, workers and providers who operate at the behest of the health insurers. As for the Blue Dog who oppose health care it is the citizens of those states who most need it and whom are also the most ignorant and gullible people in this country. To be ignorant and to know it is enlightened. To be ignorant and not know it makes people gullible and easily manipulated. The Blue Dog like it this way. The Blue Dog Democrats actually fare better with a Republican president because they can be bribed easily to vote with Republicans.

If the American people had

If the American people had not allowed themselves to be baptized in the Church of the Holy Profit, they would not be deluded into thinking that the basic human right to health care was a commodity appropriate for someone's making a profit from. Not-for-profit Insurance is socialism at its best: pooling the resources of the community for the occasional needs of the individual. For-profit insurance is an abomination, feeding off the community to enrich the very few.

Why have insurance when

Why have insurance when insurance companies can decide what treatments they will pay for or not as this post at Fri, 07/31/2009 - 07:17 β€” Joe the Injured Worker wrote. Should there be no decision this weeks from now until Congress comes back we the people need to hound our Congress people especially if they are Republicans or Blue Dogs. From what I understand, Progressive Democrats will not vote for a diluted public option bill and I'm with them on that. This next week I'm supporting single-payer all the way by calling my reps and sending email and signing petitions. In September if this has not been resolved, I may even want to go to Washington DC and sit my rear end in front of Congress.

I recently came across your

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. Betty http://smallpet.info