Share

Baucus: "No Idea" How He'll Vote on Sotomayor

by: J. Taylor Rushing  |  The Hill

photo
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (left) and ranking member Charles Grassley (right). (Photo: Ken Cedeno / Bloomberg News)

    Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said Thursday he hasn't made up his mind on whether he will vote to confirm Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

    Baucus this summer has infuriated liberals on and off Capitol Hill by working to strike a deal with Republicans on healthcare reform. A "no" vote on Sotomayor would be adding fuel to the left's fire at the Finance Committee chairman.

    Baucus on Thursday twice told The Hill he is undecided on next week's floor vote on Sotomayor.

    "I have no idea," Baucus said. "I haven't paid any attention and I haven't announced ... I've been so busy with healthcare. It's under consideration. I'll certainly know when I vote, but right now I can't tell you."

    The National Rifle Association (NRA) has come out against Sotomayor, stating it will factor the vote into its legislative scorecard because the group feels the nominee would curb gun rights.

    Baucus had an A rating from the NRA in 2008, as did two other Senate Democrats who ran last year: Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Mark Warner of Virginia.

    Johnson supports Sotomayor's nomination.

    Warner told The Hill on Thursday he intends to support Sotomayor - and that he was "very disappointed" in the gun lobby. Warner also said he is not worried that Sotomayor will restrict the rights of gun owners.

    "I'm very disappointed. [NRA seems] to be going beyond their Second Amendment issues, particularly when I think the judge's positions on those issues are still fairly open," Warner said. "I trust in her judgment and temperament. I think the NRA at some point has gone beyond its mission, and are perhaps allowing themselves to get hijacked by those who are in the extreme."

    The NRA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    A Baucus "no" vote against President Barack Obama's high-court nominee would attract national headlines. It would also create a politically awkward situation with the White House as it is trying to prod Baucus to produce a healthcare reform bill.

    Liberal groups are incensed at Baucus for his refusal to embrace the so-called public option in revamping the nation's healthcare system. Democracy for America and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee are running ads against Baucus in Montana on the issue.

    Baucus voted to confirm John Roberts, President George W. Bush's nominee for chief justice. He later voted against now-Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

    Fellow Democrat Jon Tester of Montana said he also has traditionally received NRA support, while noting that he will support Sotomayor.

    Tester said he pressed Sotomayor on gun-rights issues during his private meeting with her and, like Warner, feels comfortable with the nominee.

    "I think she'll be fine on gun rights. I asked about some of her past cases, and I just think she's going to be fine," Tester said.

    Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), who has an A rating from the NRA, on Thursday announced his support of Sotomayor. Other Republicans who say they will vote yes on her nomination are: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Richard Lugar (Ind.), Mel Martinez (Fla.) and Olympia Snowe (Maine).

    In a letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) last week, the NRA cited two controversial decisions in Sotomayor's past: Maloney v. Cuomo, in which she ruled the Second Amendment did not apply to state and local governments, and United States v. Sanchez-Villar, in which she found that gun ownership is not a fundamental right.

    "We believe any individual who does not agree that the Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right and who does not respect our God-given right of self-defense should not serve on any court, much less the highest court in the land," the NRA's letter reads.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Its time for Baucus to go.

Its time for Baucus to go. He's been an obstructionist against any progressive bills that have come up. He works for the republicans and wears the mark on his forehead. The people in Baucus's district need to recall him and now.

When will our

When will our "representatives" in Congress realize that they represent the People, not special interest groups? When will they ever learn that receiving huge contributions from these groups taints their view of the world, and that they get further and further away from the reality of the real People? How is it that Mr. Baucus who has been bought by the health insurance companies is allowed to make decisions about healthcare reform? And how is it that a US Senator cannot pay attention to Supreme Court hearings, when the rest of the country does?

I'm a Montana Democrat who

I'm a Montana Democrat who won't vote for Max again.

1) I would advocate putting

1) I would advocate putting the NRA rabid gun-nuts on the list of terrorist organizations and imprisoning their executive members at Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib. 2) Baucus needs to be stripped of his chair and seniority in the Senate, and along with LIEberman, voted out of office at the next election. The NRA is as bad as the Israeli lobby in hijacking public policy for their own narrow and warped interests -- they have NO concern for the best interests of the nation.

It's time for the thugs who

It's time for the thugs who run the NRA to decide if they are Americans or gun running terrorists. It's time for them to give up their automatic and semi-automatic weapons of mass destruction. And it's well past time for our elected representatives to show some spine.

Max Baucus, making all of us

Max Baucus, making all of us proud of his leadership and proud that he is an American and proud that he is a Democrat. Wow, I am just so proud of that guy. (Can I get a cut of the contributions he is getting from Big Money Medicine? Can I be one of his staffers? Oh please, oh please? I, like him, see a golden opportunity here.)

Baucus is waiting to see how

Baucus is waiting to see how much flak he will get from either side before he casts his vote. He's a whore -- so what else is new?

Take a little time and

Take a little time and lookup the medical reports on Montana, they are appalling! So obviously he is not concerned about his constituency.

What's wrong with this

What's wrong with this man? Baucus is a shill for corporate interests besides being an opportunist with no moral stance. The people of Montana had best send him to pasture!

Where did "We the People"

Where did "We the People" get the (anachronistic) notion that our "representatives" in Congress [are supposed to] represent the People, not special interest groups? Representing special interests is far more profitable than representing the people and goes back a long way -- check this out: http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-lob2.htm. Or read a little Roman history...

So let's give him FLAK!

So let's give him FLAK!

Max's reelection is more

Max's reelection is more than five years away. Until then, as a Montanan who voted for Max last year, I intend to join with others to make Max very uncomfortable in his own home state. For ever.

Max Baucus may have no idea

Max Baucus may have no idea how he'll vote on Sotomayor, but the American people know how they'd vote on him.

Baucus, just go to the

Baucus, just go to the Republican party. You should be in the Democrat party.

Baucus is a Republican,

Baucus is a Republican, strip him of his chairmanship(s), bar him from all Democratic caucuses. And if he is a typical Democrat, then disband the party!

What we need is a

What we need is a progressive Democrat to run against Baucus on his next re-up, so there is an actual choice for Montana. This guy has been bought and sold, let's show big pharma and big healthco and other "contributors" that they wasted their money. Pay to play is not the American way, at least not while there are still patriots out here.