Share

The Me-First, Forget-Everyone-Else Crowd

by: David Sirota  |  Summit Daily

photo
Rep. Frank Kratovil Jr. (D-Maryland) spoke with people protesting the Democratic health care reform effort. Demonstrators hung an effigy of Kratovil outside his district office. (Photo: Joey Gardner / Salisbury Daily Times)

    I know I should be mortified by the lobbyist-organized mobs of angry Brooks Brothers mannequins who are now making headlines by shutting down congressional town hall meetings. I know I should be despondent during this, the Khaki Pants Offensive in the Great American Health Care and Tax War. And yet, I'm euphorically repeating one word over and over again with a big grin on my face.

    Finally.

    Finally, there's no pretense. Finally, the Me-First, Forget-Everyone-Else Crowd's ugliest traits are there for all to behold.

    The group's core gripe is summarized in a letter I received that denounces a proposed surtax on the wealthy and corporations to pay for universal health care:

    "Until recently, my family was in the top 3 percent of wage earners," the affluent businessperson fumed in response to my July column on taxes. "We are in the group that pays close to 60 percent of this nation's taxes ... Think for a second how you would feel if you built a business and contributed more than your share to this country only to be treated like a pariah."

    This sob story about the persecuted rich fuels today's "Tea Parties" — and I'm sure you've heard some version of it in your community.

    I'm also fairly certain that when many of you run into the Me-First, Forget-Everyone-Else Crowd, you don't feel like confronting the faux outrage. But on the off chance you do muster the masochistic impulse to engage, here's a guide to navigating the conversation:

    What They Will Scream: We can't raise business taxes, because American businesses already pay excessively high taxes!

    What You Should Say: Here's the smallest violin in the world playing for the businesses. The Government Accountability Office reports that most U.S. corporations pay zero federal income tax. Additionally, as even the Bush Treasury Department admitted, America's effective corporate tax rate is the third lowest in the industrialized world.

    What They Will Scream: But the rich still "pay close to 60 percent of this nation's taxes!"

    What You Should Say: Such statistics refer only to the federal income tax. When considering all of "this nation's taxes" including payroll, state and local levies, the top 5 percent pay just 38.5 percent of the taxes.

    What They Will Scream: But 38.5 percent is disproportionately high! See? You've proved that the rich "contribute more than their share" of taxes!

    What You Should Say: Actually, they are paying almost exactly "their share." According to the data, the wealthiest 5 percent of America pays 38.5 percent of the total taxes precisely because they make just about that share — a whopping 36.5 percent! — of total national income. Asking these folks to pay slightly more in taxes — and still less than they did during the go-go 1990s — is hardly extreme.

    Stripped of facts, your conversation partner will soon turn to unscientific terrain, claiming it is immoral to "steal" and "redistribute" income via taxes. Of course, he will be specifically railing on "stealing" for stuff like health care, which he insists gets "redistributed" only to the undeserving and the "lazy" (a classic codeword for "minorities"). But he will also say it's OK that government sent trillions of dollars to Wall Streeters.

    And that's when you should stop wasting your breath.

    What you've discovered is that the Me-First, Forget-Everyone-Else Crowd isn't interested in fairness, empiricism or morality.

    With 22,000 of their fellow countrymen dying annually for lack of health insurance and with Warren Buffett paying a lower effective tax rate than his secretary, the Me-First, Forget-Everyone-Else Crowd is merely using the argot of fairness, empiricism and morality to hide its real motive: selfish greed.

    No argument, however rational, is going to cure these narcissists of that grotesque disease.

    ----

    David Sirota is the bestselling author of the books "Hostile Takeover" (2006) and "The Uprising" (2008).

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Let's call people "greedy"

Let's call people "greedy" if they don't want government to take their money and waste it. Good idea. But let's not mention the fact that the government has already mismanaged Medicare and it is ridiculous to imagine it will do a better job when it swallows up the rest of America's health care.

Good, solid arguments by

Good, solid arguments by Sirota. Hopefully, the MFFEEC's behavior will be blatant enough to turn off the normally invisible intelligent swing voter; Time will tell, but I'm not holding my breath.

Point well made. Another

Point well made. Another example of the me first crowd would be all those rabble rousers that go to the town hall meetings who are on medicaire and want to stop government run health care. My question to them is: So you want to give up your medicaire and get private insurance? The me first crowd is not just selfish, they are downright dangerous.

Another thing the me-first

Another thing the me-first people forget is that they built their big, rich companies with the help of the infrastructure here: roads, public schools, communication and energy lines, and based on the freedom and protection we enjoy, paid for by (yes!) taxes.

Dear Anonymous "greedy": Do

Dear Anonymous "greedy": Do you have a dog in this race? Are you really so ecstatic about your own health insurance coverage - or is it just that it has never been tested and found wanting! When you reach 65 will you refuse to sign up for Medicare? Is anyone you know on Medicare a victim of our mismanaged system? I don't hear any of my senior friends complaining about anything but the Bush-donut-hole.

Let's call people

Let's call people "greedy" Sat, 08/08/2009 - 17:29 — Anonymous Says "government has already mismanaged Medicare". I wonder on what facts he bases that sweeping statement? If he gave his name or some suggestion that he is an authority, we might give him some credit. Practicing surgery in a midwest town I was always happy to receive payments from Medicare. Now, at 86, I am on the other side, a certain amount is deducted from my SS check for which the major part of my medical bills are paid. I do have supplemental insurance but there I experienced a major insurance Co. cutting short my contract without notifying me and by sheer luck the date of the doctor's bill that made me aware of lack of insurance was accepted by another insurer or I would have been without supplemental for a year. Having practiced in the Army, in a foreign Mission Hospital, paid hospital staff here, 15 as a surgeon and a final 8years in industrial medicine, I have come to the conclusion that universal care under a one payer system is the only way medical care will be fairly distributed.

I think the Internet is

I think the Internet is building a much faster information feedback shedding light on the powers and systems that be. Good when we can see things for what they really are. Now, let's face the fact we're all "greedy" and "self serving" to some extent or other. The gaining of advantage is pretty natural to most individuals of every species. Perhaps we're beginning to see the limits of personal advantage when it lacks regard for for its own negative impacts. Or maybe the cosmic play will continue to serve up all manner of strange characters attempting to seize power or fight against it. Squabbling seems to be a great pastime.

Thanks for the handy essay

Thanks for the handy essay and to all the commentators at the end! My 88 yr. old mother loves Medicare. My late father had no problem with his VA coverage. My cousin was thrilled that her late mother had Medicare coverage during her long illness. My Sen. Lisa Murkowski got great medical care for her recent leg injury. Those people I know who are not covered are living in anxiety, in debt, in fear of the future. I want my money's worth from the government taxation! Stop war and start health coverage!

We need more opinions, which

We need more opinions, which include front line facts, from those such as Howard. The Modern Medicine Man needs to open their eyes and realize they would be much more appreciated should they practice what they love to do. It may also enhance their own personal wellbeing. Guess for most MONRY is the 'end all'(no pun intended).

"The group's core gripe is

"The group's core gripe is summarized in a letter I received that denounces a proposed surtax on the wealthy and corporations to pay for universal health care... " FACT: What is being proposed by the bills coming out of Congressional committees is NOT Universal Health Care. It is a mix of MANDATORY INSURANCE and inadequate coverage for the poorest among us. Truly Universal _Single-payer_ Health Care would NOT COST AS MUCH as what is being proposed by Congress BECAUSE IT WOULD ELIMINATE THE GREEDY INSURANCE COMPANIES FROM HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH OUR HEALTH CARE!!!! Universal Single-payer Health Care would cover EVERY person in the United States and could be payed for by all the money being wasted by the current insurance system, which is inadequate for millions of Americans. It would not require ANY new taxes. The Congressional Budget Office has never done a cost analysis of Universal Single-payer, because they KNOW that it would expose the GREED in our current system of non-coverage.

Sure, we will always put

Sure, we will always put ourselves first in line. It's the Christian thing to do, right? Get ours and then share with the unfortunate rabble,. maybe?

Yes, I'm happy with my

Yes, I'm happy with my health insurance, as are 81% of Americans according to a Washington Post / ABC poll. Google "medicare waste fraud abuse" for details on that subject.

In the 1980's I worked for a

In the 1980's I worked for a time going door to door in the suburbs trying to drum up support for universal healthcare. In the more well to do trimmed lawn communities the majority of responses I got was 'I have mine and why should I care or have to pay for someone else's'? I thought that to be a ridiculous argument for the fact that in such a situation no one is alone in paying for it and it benefits everyone including the one making the statement. Of course it isn't going to be a perfect system but how could what we currently have with the majority of americans being underinsured or being driven into unmanageable debts be anywhere near as bad as what they're claiming it 'might' be? Moreover what kind of paranoid selfish negative thinking does that reveal on their part to prefer our current situation where insurance companies and big pharmas making billions in profits by denying people and overcharging rather than atleast to try to create a solution that would benefit most americans and not just the top 10%? They'd rather now act all indignant about us threatening the profits of companies that could care less about them...bullying and shouting down all discussion... than be more interested in how we can (together) stop sky rocketing healthcare costs in a way that benefits everyone. Is it our nature as americans to shoot ourselves in the foot over imagined evils than working together to find a solution? I really hope not.

To the ´affluent

To the ´affluent businessperson´: be very gqrateful for all the taxes & generosity of those that have gone before you to provide a working country of opportunities & possibilities--the roads are safe, the water is clean so it has not killed you or your children within their first few years of life, there is an adequate food supply so you could be free to go to school & not have to provide for your family, the hospital might really work for you...WHAT do you tell the vet who has lost 1/3 her/his body for this country?? What you want is to join all the 3rd world countries--have many wealthy with no care for the population. The closest is south, I am sure CarlosSlim Helu, the wealthiest man in the world, will welcome you in Mexico.

Why create any society at

Why create any society at all, when we can have dog eat dog, and the law of the jungle? Then, those who are more powerful can get fat on the suffering and mortality of the weak... wait a minute, isn't that what the Republicans and Blue Dogs of the Jungle want?

Only one cure for the

Only one cure for the greedy, selfish and crazy: The American Public Care Trust Fund. All Americans, top to bottom - $40/month, (=$10 billion/month,) for walk in, get treated, sign something, walk out universal health care. We invest the $10 billion/quarter w/Buffet, who earned $3.3 billion on $10 billion last quarter, gives us another $12 billion/year. That's nearly $150 billion/year, more than enough to provide 'free' health care to all Americans... for the price of 4 packs of smokes in NYC per month. Then, the answer to the greedy, selfish and crazy is: we all pay the same, we all get treated the same. What's the problem? Plus, employers are out of the HC picture altogether - a savings of $1-3000 per employee per year! (Though most will happily cover the $40/month anyway, as it'll be a cheap thank you.)

". Yes, I'm happy with my

". Yes, I'm happy with my health insurance, as are 81% of Americans according to a Washington Post / ABC poll. " Hey Mr "Happy"...aka 'anonymous'...In 2008 47 million americans were uninsured according to the US Census Bureau. That's the 15% that you don't seem to care about.. do you really think they're happy with that? And should we as americans be satisfied with that statistic?

Where have "moral values"

Where have "moral values" gone? All religions teach something like "do unto others as you would have them do to you." So, whatever happened to the "moral" politicians? When it comes to a system that allows everyone to have health care, what happened to their moral values? I guess that was their other face.

A friend and I attended one

A friend and I attended one of the congressional health care mob scenes yesterday for Rep. Emmannuel Cleaver of Kansas City, MO, even though we're from Lawrence, Kansas. We're both supporters of H.R. 676, as is Rep. Cleaver. The place was complete chaos. There were several things that struck me, foremost was the almost complete ignorance of health care issues by almost everyone there, and I especially include the Obama supporters in that list. Secondly, I was struck by the predominance of those already on Medicare and Veterans. both groups have been scared spitless by the Rush Limbaugh bit, but I also have to blame the Administration for claiming that they're going to cut back on Medicare to pay for "reform" and such idiot trial balloons as trying to get veterans to use their own insurance first. Now, I know that we're paying billions a year to underwrite Medicare Advantage and Part D, but this isn't the message that seniors are getting. Finally, I cannot support any program that keeps the insurance companies going when we could have a single payer system that would cover everyone for almost everything and still save $350 Billion a year. H.R.676!

I can't help but get into

I can't help but get into this. I am a Canadian and grew up in the province that started medicare. It works well for all the people not a select few. Facts don't lie: 1) My mother had breast cancer and her doctor diagnosed it early. She received treatment immediately and lived to the ripe age of 89. Furthermore, when she was in her 70's, her other breast was diagnosed with cancer and she received treatment thus giving her an extra 19 years to live. It didn't cost her anything because the health care system took care of it. 2) A friend of mine had prostate cancer. Age late 60's. His doctor immediately sent him to the specialist who gave him three options. He was able to choose the one he felt was least intrusive for him and he was treated and is now 70 and in healthy condition. No fees, no denials, but well taken care of. 3) I have never had any problems seeing a doctor and nobody has ever told me which doctor I have to see. Further, I have even been able to see another doctor for a second opinion. No denial, no hassle, no extra costs. 4) A child can be born without having to pay any humongous fees. 5) My friend's mother was dying from kidney cancer and she was taken care of in the hospital without having to pay any fees. This is what I call health care 6) There are many more stories like this where people have been taken care of expeditiously without any denial. This is not socialism- this is common sense. A civilized christian society should look after its citizens and through taxes have a just redistribution of income so that those who are unfortunate can also have opportunities as well as the more fortunate. However, it seems that those in America who scream the loudest about values and invoke God and Jesus as their saviour are the least Christian and are the most greedy vultures on this planet. They and their ilk who would deny universal health care to their fellowman so that they can drive their gas guzzlers are nothing more than buzzards circling in the air to sweep down on their prey. These are the CEO's of big pharma, health insurance companies and some of the white senior citizens who already have their health care but want to deny others their right to equal health care. It's amazing and what a shame that lies can be told and people buy into the BS from right wing wingnuts who should have been discredited a long time ago.

It has always been an

It has always been an oxymoron to say the wealthy are over-taxed. You cannot be wealthy and over taxed- just not possible. You cannot live in an 8000 sq foot home with 3 high end cars and say you are over-taxed. Also if you were able to calculate taxes paid as a percentage of wealth, a very different picture emerges. The top 20% of Americans have over 92% of the national wealth (http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html), the top 1% have over 42% of the wealth. So if equality in taxes were really the issue, the wealthy would be paying about 7.5% more of the total taxes. the top 20% would be paying almost all of the taxes. And this was Ron Reagan who let the rich and corporations out of paying for America, essentially an act of treason. The deficit reflects this completely - the 11 (or 15) trillion is the net debt the wealthy and corporations escaped paying in the last 29 years. And yet they still complain.

Yeah, maybe I'd be happy

Yeah, maybe I'd be happy with my health insurance too, that is, if I had some. Trouble is, the last thirty years it's become acceptable to say, 'what, my tax dollars going to support your (or your kids') education/housing/doctor visit/decent meal/whatever? No way!' Can we ever get past the 'I've got mine, the heck with you' mentality?