Share

Who's Behind the Attacks on a Health Care Overhaul?

by: Margaret Talev  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
An opponent to health care reform holds a sign. (Photo: Jessica Rinaldi / Reuters Pictures)

    Washington - Much of the money and strategy behind the so-called grassroots groups organizing opposition to the Democrats' health care plans comes from conservative political consultants, professional organizers and millionaires, some of whom hold financial stakes in the outcome.

    If President Barack Obama and Congress extend health insurance coverage to millions of uninsured Americans, raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for it, and limit insurers' discretion on who they cover and what they charge, that could pinch these opponents.

    Most of them say they oppose big government in principle. Despite Obama's assurances to the contrary, many of them insist that the Democrats' legislation is but the first step toward creation of a single-payer system, where the federal government hires the doctors, approves treatments, sets the rules and imperils profit.

    These opposition groups appear to have spent at least $10 million so far on ads attacking the Democrats' plans. Still, supporters of a health care overhaul have outspent opponents by more than 2-to-1 so far, according to Evan Tracey of the Campaign Media Analysis Group, which tracks ad spending. Supporters include drug makers angling for their own protections, unions, the American Medical Association and AARP, the seniors' lobby. Supporters announced this week that they intend to spend $150 million promoting an overhaul.

    The opposition groups' names sound catchy and populist: Patients First. Patients United. Americans for Prosperity. Conservatives for Patients' Rights. FreedomWorks. 60 Plus. Club for Growth.

    Here's who's behind them:

    Conservatives for Patients' Rights is led by health care entrepreneur Rick Scott, the co-founder of Solantic urgent care walk-in centers, which he's spread across Florida and is looking to expand. While 80 percent of its patients have at least some insurance, Solantic also bills itself as an alternative to emergency-room care and a resource for patients with no insurance.

    Scott left his job as CEO of the Columbia/HCA hospitals during a federal Medicare fraud probe in 1997 that led to a historic $1.7 billion settlement. He wasn't prosecuted and got a golden parachute.

    Solantic's growth, Scott said in a telephone interview, is due in part to the trend in which "deductibles and co-payments are going up. As that happens, more people want us."

    Scott said he wasn't concerned that the Democrats' proposed revisions would undercut his business: "It's irrelevant to us." Instead, he said he opposes the Democrats' plans because he doesn't believe that government involvement will contain health care costs. He sees it killing off the best private insurance plans and ultimately leading to a single-payer system, which he predicted would lead to waiting lists and denial of treatments.

    Scott said he supports some government intervention - such as preventing insurers from dumping sick patients. Those who can't afford coverage on their own should get vouchers or tax credits, he said.

    FreedomWorks, which has been advocating against the overhaul but has not launched TV ads, is chaired by Dick Armey, the former Republican majority leader of the House of Representatives from Texas.

    But also noteworthy are the group's other backers and board members. They include billionaire flat-tax proponent and former GOP presidential candidate Steve Forbes; Richard J. Stephenson, who founded Cancer Treatment Centers of America, which offers alternative as well as standard therapies, sometimes not covered by insurance; and Frank M. Sands, Sr., chief executive officer of an investment management firm whose offerings include a Healthcare Leaders portfolio.

    "They're on our board because they support lower taxes, less government and more freedom," said FreedomWorks spokesman Adam Brandon.

    Matt Kibbe, the chief executive officer of FreedomWorks, said its members believe that "the government is already way too involved in the nation's health care system" and that government is to blame for health-cost inflation.

    Kibbe acknowledged that private insurance is out of reach for many small businesses and individuals, but he contended that can be dealt with without creating a government-managed exchange. Like Scott, he expressed concern that more government interference would lead to a single-payer system, which would "inevitably" impose rationing of treatments to contain costs.

    Patients First and Patients United are creations of a larger group called Americans for Prosperity. AFP's Web site describes a grassroots organization with more than 700,000 members that advocates "for public policies that champion the principles of entrepreneurship and fiscal and regulatory restraint."

    It was started by billionaire David Koch, of the Koch Industries oil family, one of the country's top donors to conservative, free-market causes. The foundation's board includes Art Pope, a former North Carolina legislator also involved in conservative causes, whose family owns hundreds of discount stores.

    Tim Phillips, AFP's president, is a former Republican congressional staffer who helped former Christian Coalition executive director Ralph Reed start up the consulting firm Century Strategies in the 1990s. Clients paid the firm to build Christian grassroots support for various business causes. That included work for since-convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

    The group, along with FreedomWorks, was involved in promoting the anti-tax "tea parties" earlier this year. AFP also is organizing a campaign "exposing the ballooning costs of global warming hysteria."

    In an interview, AFP's Phillips said that he couldn't think of anyone on his board with a direct financial stake in the health care industry. "It's more freedom-based," he said. "They have a deep interest in protecting economic freedoms." He also said that no one in his organization believes that more government involvement in health care will lead to reduced costs for taxpayers.

    By Labor Day, he said, his group will have organized 600 rallies on health care.

    "Americans are looking at these rallies that are happening and the town-hall turnouts, and they say, 'No one group out of thin air could do that,'" Phillips said. "The American people can see through the attacks on the other side, where they try to vilify these groups as being corporate groups or front groups. They're believing it is in fact a broad groundswell.

    "We're out here saying the truth, which is costs are going to go up and quality is going to go down. And what's the other side saying? 'Oh, these are front groups, these are all rich people.' The attack route's not going to work. It's not so far."

    Two other grassroots groups have financed ads targeting peoples' fears that more government involvement would hurt seniors and hasten end-of-life decisions.

    One of them, Club for Growth, which advocates lower taxes, is led by president Chris Chocola, a former Republican congressman from Indiana who lost his re-election bid in 2006. Club for Growth this week announced a $1.2 million ad campaign against a health care overhaul, to run in North Dakota, Colorado, Arkansas and Nevada.

    The other, 60 Plus Association, is a conservative senior advocacy group that wants to abolish the estate tax. Singer Pat Boone is the group's national spokesman. Chairman Jim Martin started the group in 1992 with fund-raising help from conservative direct mail guru Richard Viguerie. It spent $1.5 million on TV ads opposing a healthcare overhaul in the last week.

    Martin declined to identify his major donors. In 2006, he acknowledged that his group was getting funding from the pharmaceutical industry. But this year, pharmaceutical companies lead the spending spree on behalf of a health care overhaul.

    "The shoe's on the other foot," Martin said. "They've gotten in bed with the White House."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Wasn't Obama a community

Wasn't Obama a community organizer? What's so bad about groups organizing themselves? Leftist financiers like Soros are just as unsavory to those on the right as various right-wing funding sources are to those on the left. Moreover, the opposition to government-run health care runs very deep, and it's dishonest to pretend it's just a special interest, unless half the country could be called a special interest.

Groups promoting Obama's

Groups promoting Obama's plan are outspending those detracting by nearly three to one.

First, we have to get rid of

First, we have to get rid of all the corporate lackeys in gov't(that would be nearly all of the congress, senate and those in the White House). Second, we need to demolish the "military-industrial" complex. Then we will be able to have universal, single-payer health care that would actually be good for EVERYONE. Without doing the first two steps, the third will never happen. As for the skyrocketing cost of health care, once the insurance companies are out of the picture and everyone in the health care industry gets out because they can't get rich anymore, we will be left with true caregivers. Oh, by the way, I don't have health insurance. I can't afford to pay for the insurance and then turn around and pay a deductible. Fortunately, I am a veteran and I go to the VA for health care. They found a 70% clogged artery in my heart one day, and the next I was in getting a stent installed. No waiting. Funny thing though, the VA is gov't run. Who would have guessed.

"Grassroots"- what a lie!

"Grassroots"- what a lie! The propaganda mills funded by the wealthiest in America have NOT "sprung up." They have been well thought out and planned and bank rolled in response to the election of America's first African American president. Anyone who pretends otherwise is lying.

It is typical that those

It is typical that those profiting from health care would also be in favor of financial support of those without the means to pay. This is very understandable because that money will rapidly find its way into their bank accounts. Not only that, but the increase in demand for health services will also inevitably drive prices up (the old supply and demand rule). The ONLY way this nation will ever improve the health of the people and keep itself from going broke at the same time is to remove the profit motive. The profit motive, within reason, is fine but when the suffering and death of millions are in the balance, we must demand a single payer system!

Who's behind these attacks

Who's behind these attacks on Government Healthcare? Citizens like myself who do not want a Government HMO run by politicians in the pockets of Lobbyists, that's who.

What a crock! I have

What a crock! I have participated and this is a grass roots movement. Everyone involved that I have spoken with is passionately against big government in general and government control of health care in particular. Obama has lied to the public so many times that his "assurance" that it is positive reform holds no credibility. This is another typical liberal spin. Why do liberals always seem to think that if someone disagrees with them that there is a "big business" or "rich people" conspiracy behind it? Are liberals really that narcissistic?

" Most of them say they

" Most of them say they oppose big government in principle. Despite Obama's assurances to the contrary, many of them insist that the Democrats' legislation is but the first step toward creation of a single-payer system, where the federal government hires the doctors, approves treatments, sets the rules and imperils profit." "Oppose big government" is code for "Oppose a government large enough to take care of the people's--not the corporations--basic needs". It's o.k. though for a government just large enough if not to flush down your sink then big enough to spend billions on endless war while slashing the takes of those most to gain by these wars. Finally, dear hypocrites, Single payer does not involve the government hiring the doctors and dictating treatment--but you think the insurance profiteers are better equipped to determine treatment than the doctors? Throw in a few outright lies into the mix to confuse the people who refuse to think and--voila'--more profits for you you scoundrels.

I am firmly opposed to any

I am firmly opposed to any settlement which does not include asingle payer option - "Medicaire for all" is how I look upon the solution. Nancy Pelosi actually brought my doctor's daughter, Sarah Wildman, before Congress to speak regarding the utter failure of the private health insurers to actually provide health care. In her article entitled "The $22,000 Baby" Sarah chronicles her denial of health care coverage after the birth of her baby. This denial ceased once the company understood that Sarah was publishing an article based on the health insurance companies denials. We Americans work very hard all our lives to provide for ourselves and our families. All of us should reap the benefits of topnotch health care with no private insurance companies dictating what we may or may not do with our health care.

Who's behind the attacks?

Who's behind the attacks? Insurance vampires.

I am an American living in

I am an American living in Canada. I get much more for my health care dollar in Canada than I do in America. Americans advocating "no change" may be earnest, but I feel they are misguided. Single payer health care is more economical and provides more coverage to more people. It is true everywhere else in the world. Why not in America? I find it strange the corporate mantra is "bigger is better" when it is applied to corporations like banks and insurance companies, but when it comes to government "bigger is bad". The argument should work both ways. In Canada, healthcare is delivered the same as in the states, except everyone has the same insurance company. As a consequence, there are not endless forms to fill out when you go see a doctor and you can s see any doctor you want. All i do is walk into the facility of my choice and show my card. My parents (in America) have have endless horror stories about problems with their healthcare. the American system rations healthcare and stifles choice much more than in Canada. I don't understand it. WAKE UP AMERICA! YOU'RE GETTING SCREWED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANIES!

The Conservatives say Obama

The Conservatives say Obama has lied? About what? Is it a lie like: "Sadam was behind 911", or "We don't torture"! I can't think of a time in recent memory when the conservatives have made an accurate statement about a major public policy. good Americans are being misled by conservative manipulation.

Government Defense - NO we

Government Defense - NO we can't!! (Yes we do)

With all the moaning about

With all the moaning about controlling costs, why is no one asking the trillion dollar question? If "reform" includes the requirement that insurance companies insure everyone and cover all treatments and drop no one from coverage, How will they pay for that and still make their obscene profits? Run bake sales? Or maybe raise premiums and force the government into ever larger subsidies for low income people?

You folks who are opposed to

You folks who are opposed to Government run health care, don't believe all the lies the people opposed to a Single Payer plan are telling you. Just think of MEDICARE. IT IS A SINGLE PAYER PLAN AND IT WORKS! I don't know of anyone on Medicare who would give it up for coverage under a for-profit insurance company.....even if they didn't have to pay for it. The for-profit INSURANCE companies are the ones who DEPRIVE us of treatment and cancel our insurance when whey don't want pay for costly treatments. The opponents to the Obama plan are liers and deceivers. I WANT MEDICARE FOR ALL!

Conflicts of Interest at the

Conflicts of Interest at the FDA still poison the outcome - whether the bill is passed or not. Had this reform included the dismantling of the conflicts of interests that have allowed junk science to dominate what passes for medicine in this country we would have gotten somewhere - regardless of who pays for it. But Obama and Hillary both got big bucks from big pharma and that's why all the focus will be on how it gets paid for instead of what is being paid for. We get miserably bad care here - not for lack of money, but for lack of true science - most of the cost of health care would be eliminated by educating people about diet and vitamins and minerals without big Agra, big Pharma having a hand in the recommendations. Stop eating sugar and msg - we're all addicts. Get more vitamin D, selenium, iodine. Ban GMO foods, fluoride in drinking water, aspartame, etc. Those masses of people showing up for care - most of it is because they were poisoned by what passes for food here.

The fact that conservatives

The fact that conservatives have to resort to scare tactics and outright lies should tell you that they know they can't prevail based on rational facts and ideas. So they persuade gullible citizens to do their dirty work. Conservatives have been on the wrong side of every major social issue since slavery ---- women's rights, desegregation, social security, Medicare, financial deregulations (for it, of course), voting rights --- and history will prove they're wrong about health care/insurance reform, too.