Fight for the Public Option
Monday 17 August 2009
by: Marc Ash, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Shem Walker Leto receives dental care from a volunteer dental hygienist, Marie
Ekins, at the massive Free Clinic at the Forum in Los Angeles on August 11.
(Photo: Genaro Molina / The Los Angeles Times)
As August comes to a close, one of the most important debates in American history will come to a point of decision making. Will Americans have the option to support their own health care system if they choose?
It will not only be important as a political precedent or as policy statement; it will be a landmark moment socially. Will we as Americans care for Americans in illness and need? The conflict could not be more stark, the stakes any higher.
The horror of the drowning of New Orleans played out in media images before a disbelieving nation. The enormity of what we were seeing a rational mind had to view as an anomaly, an aberration. An entire US city left to die with more than adequate resources standing by to have saved so many lives? Why? How could this be? But in places like Wise County, Virginia, and Inglewood, California, scenes hauntingly reminiscent of crowds at the New Orleans Superdome, new crowds of uninsured Americans, desperately hoping for services, thronged to open air or poorly sanitized mass clinics, hoping for any chance at health care, any chance to receive medical attention.
What we need is not "change"; we need tradition. An American tradition of fortitude and caring. It can no longer be the responsibility of the corporations or the government; the community must lead. The time has come to fight for the public health care option.
The dialog must be broad enough and creative enough to include moderate conservatives and religious conservatives as well. Moderate conservatives have been pushed to the margins too long, their voices cowed along with liberals. If the conservative movement is to recover, it must be prepared to re-embrace social responsibility.
Not since Eisenhower's warning of the perils of an increasingly powerful "military-industrial-complex" in his 1961 farewell speech, has moderate conservatism really held the moral high ground. There is an overnight political resurrection to be realized if moderate conservatives can be rallied to act for public health care. Religious conservatives are, in fact, already on the move, scheduling what are being called prayer vigils in cities across the country.
Conversely, a newly revitalized Democratic majority stands to squander the political capital they gained in the past two elections by reneging on their promise to bring about meaningful progress on health care reform. There is a notion often floated that any bill passed on health care will pass as progress, as reform. But it will not. The large health care conglomerates are corrupt and ruthlessly so. Legislation that allows those policies to continue must not be allowed to go unchallenged.
When Hillary Clinton mounted a meaningful attempt at health care reform in the early '90s, the health care industry and their political allies on Capitol Hill were quick to point to her defeat as the final nail in her political coffin and the coffin of public health care. It wasn't dead, however, it was just buried under a Bush. Low and behold, both Hillary Clinton and public health care have risen again.
The reason that public health care will not go away is that it's bigger than politics, bigger than policy and bigger than financial profit. There are tens of millions uninsured and more than half the population paying, but receiving substandard care. The problem is gigantic and growing rapidly.
The time has come to say no. It must be said clearly and directly at all times in all places. Any health care legislation that does not include a public option is a fraud. There are members of Congress who are committed to preserving the public option; they need all the support they can get.
This is a fight whose time has come.



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
I have lived in England and
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 16:47 β Anonymous (not verified)Here's the choice: Medicare
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 17:12 β Larry Furman (not verified)Sad to say, but the
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 17:14 β Madison (not verified)I'm very disappointed that
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 17:15 β Nicholas Racz (not verified)When President Obama
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 18:01 β Jennifer (not verified)Unfortunately, America is a
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 18:17 β Peter (not verified)"Me first" is RIGHT!!! The
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 19:01 β Anonymous (not verified)I don't get it. Why drop
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 19:01 β Don (not verified)Now is the time to call
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 19:10 β radline9 (not verified)As an American (a dual
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 19:31 β HUGH MAGEE (not verified)The "public option" that was
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 19:44 β drlisa (not verified)Ash writes: "There is an
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 20:07 β Eric (not verified)Why are private insurance
Mon, 08/17/2009 - 23:36 β Anonymous (not verified)What could be worse than a
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 03:53 β Joan (not verified)Perhaps it's time for progressives to start making the kind of noise the dittoheads do. Only this time we demand single payer. No more mister nice guy.
Single payer. Don't settle
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 07:16 β Johnny Canuck (not verified)Medicare for all who want
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 13:00 β Anonymous (not verified)I don't understand why many
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 14:18 β hark (not verified)Is it possible to OUTSOURCE
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 16:14 β Anonymous (not verified)Single-payer. Irony of
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 20:50 β NYCartist (not verified)My wife is a doctor and I'm
Wed, 08/19/2009 - 01:47 β Clem (not verified)drlisa, I couldn't have said
Wed, 08/19/2009 - 04:03 β Jimbo (not verified)I believe a 'public option'
Wed, 08/19/2009 - 07:07 β JSD (not verified)Forget the public option.
Wed, 08/19/2009 - 20:53 β mysterioso (not verified)@hark. Note that at least
Thu, 08/20/2009 - 02:08 β Natasha (not verified)Single payer outline: 1.
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 03:06 β Anonymous (not verified)Let those who profit pay. It
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 23:29 β vincent gormley (not verified)We need to own this debate.
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 04:47 β Anonymous (not verified)The Policy-Speak Disaster for Health Care
by: George Lakoff, t r u t h o u t | Perspective