Why the Gang of Six Is Deciding Health Care for Three Hundred Million of Us
Friday 21 August 2009
by: Robert Reich | Robert Reich's Blog

Sen. Charles Grassley, a member of the "gang of six." (Photo: AP)
Last night, the so-called "gang of six" -- three Republican and three Democratic senators on the Senate Finance Committee -- met by conference call and, according to Senator Max Baucus, the committee's chair, reaffirmed their commitment "toward a bipartisan health-care reform bill" (read: less coverage and no public insurance option). The Washington Post reports that the senators shared tales from their home states, where some have been besieged by protesters angry about a potential government takeover of the nation's health care system.
It's come down to these six senators. The House has reported a bill as has another Senate committee, but all eyes are fixed on Senate Finance -- and on these three Dems and three Republicans, in particular. But who, exactly, anointed these six to decide the fate of the nation's health care?
I don't get it. Of the three Republicans in the gang, the senior senator is Charles Grassley. In recent weeks Grassley has refused to debunk the rumor that the House's health-care bill will spawn "death panels," empowered to decide whether the sick and old get to live or die. At an Iowa town meeting last Tuesday Grassley called the President and Speaker Nancy Pelosi "intellectually dishonest" for claiming the opposite. On Thursday Grassley told the Washington Post that Congress should scale back its efforts to overhaul health care in the wake of intense anger at town hall meetings. But -- wait -- the anger is largely about distortions such as the "death panels" that Grassley refuses to debunk.
This week on Fox News Grassley termed the House bill "the Pelosi Bill," and called it "a government takeover of heath care, exploding the deficit because it's not paid for and it's got high taxes in it."
I really don't get it. We have a Democratic president in the White House. Democrats control sixty votes in the Senate, enough to overcome a filibuster. It is possible to pass health care legislation through the Senate with 51 votes (that's what George W. Bush did with his tax cut plan). Democrats control the House. The Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is a tough lady. She has said there will be no health care reform bill without a public option.
So why does the fate of health care rest in Grassley's hands?
It's not even as if the gang represents America. The three Dems on the gang are from Montana, New Mexico, and North Dakota -- states that together account for just over 1 percent of Americans. The three Republicans are from Maine, Wyoming, and Iowa, which together account for 1.6 percent of the American population.
So, I repeat: Why has it come down to these six? Who anointed them? Apparently, the White House. At least that's what I'm repeatedly being told by sources both on the Hill and in the Administration. "The Finance Committee is where the action is. They'll tee-up the final bill," says someone who should know.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.




Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Next time Obama can run on
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 18:12 β Henst (not verified)'So, I repeat: Why has it
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 18:43 β Anonymous (not verified)I agree with Mr. Reich. How
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 19:09 β Lakshmi (not verified)It has been so long since we
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 19:31 β Giverny (not verified)More evidence how
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 19:49 β Steve Haag (not verified)Democrats may control 60% of
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 20:00 β Anonymous (not verified)What I do not get is health
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 21:05 β Anonymous (not verified)Open letter to the
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 22:58 β Anonymous (not verified)President Obama and his
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 23:28 β Regina (not verified)Good article that deserves
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 23:58 β Duke (not verified)Send $$$ to their
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 00:10 β Anonymous (not verified)Seems to me Cheney is still
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 00:16 β Anonymous (not verified)The Corporatecans and the
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 00:22 β Rico (not verified)Obama needs to stop scaring
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 02:07 β Anonymous (not verified)During the Presidential
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 02:37 β Anonymous (not verified)Abolish the Senate Now!
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 03:30 β Jruss (not verified)Universal Health Care=
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 06:58 β Anonymous (not verified)From NM, I can tell you,
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 16:15 β Anonarcmous (not verified)Bipartisanism is a
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 17:32 β Anonymous (not verified)Apparently the Obama
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 18:36 β Anonymous (not verified)$$$ VS HUMANS...get it right
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 18:49 β Anonymous (not verified)As many Greens say, The
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 20:12 β greg gerritt (not verified)Have to agree with a
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 01:13 β Anonymous (not verified)Congress should simply pass
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 06:25 β Anonymous (not verified)