Share

Rendezvous in Copenhagen

by: Hervé Kempf  |  Le Monde

photo
Hervé Kempf's recipe for the success of climate change negotiations: "Proclaim that we must redistribute wealth and put a ceiling on income by establishing a maximum allowable income." (Photo: Anik Messier /Flickr.com)

    Nice summer, countryside, seaside, love affairs, all is going well? Heat wave, full airplanes, highway traffic jams. The summer routine. Factories have closed? Hmm. We got a good rest. And ... now everyone is back.

    For ecology, the comeback takes the form of a countdown: In less than 100 days the Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change will open. A historical, magical, civilizational, vital rendezvous (prepare yourself for grandiloquence). Cohorts of diplomats are going to converge on Denmark in December, and, no doubt, a plethora of activists, militants, citizens - they're expecting 100,000 people!

    The goal of the hubbub: to develop the treaty that will succeed the Kyoto Protocol in order to organize the international struggle against climate change. At stake: Will the industrialized countries commit to drastically reducing their greenhouse gas emissions in exchange for emerging countries' commitment to limit their own? Report card: The negotiation is blocked. Barack Obama, tangled up in his health care reform, is unlikely to get his proposed climate law voted on before December. Suddenly, US diplomats are putting on the brakes. China and India respond: As long as you don't budge, we're not budging.

    Will this logjam be broken? We'll see. But basically, the key is not to be found in the great powers' game. Or rather, the geostrategic reading has no meaning if it neglects the division of social forces in the wealthy countries. Thus is the lock that must be opened situated at the heart of the operation of contemporary capitalism. Of course, you've heard people talk about the bonus issue. Of what is it the symptom? Of the fact that the richest people obstinately refuse to question their privileges.

    Now, if we seriously want to battle climate change, it's necessary that all of society put itself to the task. Whether we like it or not, that means a reduction in material consumption. But it's impossible for the middle classes to agree to move towards sobriety as long as the ruling classes don't agree to seriously reduce their lifestyle.

    Breaking with decades of the culture of consumption is already very difficult; it becomes unbearable if the transformation is not equitably shared. Consequently, preventing climate change presupposes a profound reconsideration of the social system. Precisely that against which the United States oligarchy is uniting - by blocking health care reform before trying to derail the climate law - but also Europe's, as the whole bonus comedy illustrates. The result: a weak diplomatic position and the stalemate of the climate negotiation.

    You want to succeed in Copenhagen? Proclaim that we must redistribute wealth and put a ceiling on income by establishing a maximum allowable income.

    --------

    Translation: Truthout French Language Editor Leslie Thatcher.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Herve Kempf nails it again.

Herve Kempf nails it again. Time to shrink the economy equitably. ProsperityForRI.org

In the U.S. It would be

In the U.S. It would be considered unpatriotic, if not down right blasphemy against the one true dollar/god - and blatantly unconstitutional to even propose a limit on material wealth. After all, the "pursuit of happiness" in America primarily means the pursuit of more money to get more stuff.

i don't think we have a

i don't think we have a chance in changing our life-style, its like asking all drug addicts to quit; go cold-turkey!! this materialistic over-consumption ways have been the key-stone of corporations rise to power. i can't imagine them give up profit driven business as usual until the doomsday is in their bedroom, now it seemed the climate-change is only at their door-step!

The maximum income idea is

The maximum income idea is very civilized. What we need is a tax system based on ability to pay. Genuinely progressive, graduated, without loopholes.

A good idea, but we will

A good idea, but we will NEVER get the rich to agree to limit their income or their power derived from their wealth. They would rather live out the "LAST DAYS" in luxury than give up their position of privilege and power and to hell with the future. They know they won't survive it anyway.

The word NEVER is a

The word NEVER is a self-fulfilling prophecy. The truth is we don't know anything for sure. But, someone has to start. If the middle class "waits" for the ruling class to change, it becomes yet another "war"...... and it's childish behavior. If the middle class taps into their intelligence, intuition and their integrity, we could make a big dent in what seems like an impossible situation. I, for one, do not believe in impossibility.

This is a silly idea. It

This is a silly idea. It would be good if it had any chance of happening, but it doesn't. Even most people who care about the environment are in denial about the global warming situation. Not that they deny it is happening, but they don't really understand how close we are to the point of no return. Only government can make the necessary changes happen quickly enough, but they won't. We are doomed. If you are thinking of having kids, I'd advise against it. If you have kids, I'm very, very sorry for them.

It may well be that we are

It may well be that we are here on earth as agents of entropy. It is against the second law of thermodynamics that life on this planet has concentrated energy in the form of coal, oil and what have you (with apologies to TheOilDrum.) We and our social organizations are exquisitely designed to burn things - something no other animal can do. Denmark in December should be a blast but solutions by humans, rich, poor or in the middle, are not to be expected - it is just not in our DNA.

What An Amazing Coincidence

What An Amazing Coincidence - Consider the far- fetched possibility of simultaneous *Environmental *Financial *Terrorist & *Pandemic* Emergencies. What they have in common is that their promoted solutions - every single one - entail the dismantling of the Bill of Rights and a steady march toward Corporate (i.e., Fascist) Military Dictatorship - in a Green costume. We, the suckers, once again are bamboozled by the International Banking Elite - a handful of the extraordinarily wealthy - who have almost managed to close the trap. The grand problems in the headlines are the result of Grand Theater, not science, not nature (except human), and not 'the final failure of free market economy'. Note that all of the 'progressive' solutions (I have now shucked that meaningless label, myself) lead to the efficiency, environmental stewardship, social equality and freedom that characterized the centralized governmental power of the Soviet Union, Communist China, and Nazi Germany. To dig past the propaganda, visit icecap.us and also, watch the BBC Documentary: The Great Global Warming Swindle. 'Deniers'? - the long and growing list of dissenting scientists - who outright dismiss the CO2 theory of Global Warmng - is now overwhelming, and the question to ask is how come your news sources are not reporting the truth, but rather promoting 'the science is settled'? Why is your news source not reporting that the proposed 'carbon credit' based international fiat currency is the ultimate fraud, in the service of this tiny elite, in their most audacious gambit in turn this beautiful planet into a global serfdom? Ask questions, question your assumptions - and don't be such a sucker.

"Environmental Science

"Environmental Science Major": A goodly portion of what you say has merit, until you do some kind of intellectual back-flip to equate "progressive" solutions to many of these world-wide woes with corporate-military-totalitarianism. Laissez-faire, untrammeled dog-eat-dog capitalism is merely one of the roots of all evil; rabid consumerism-on-credit, cavalier disregard for the impact of such on the natural environment, antisocial individualism, 'private property as sacred', might-makes-right, ends-justify-means, and social Darwinism also qualify for residence in Pandora's Box, along with war-mongering-to-promote-prosperity, full employment, population control, democracy and economic advancement. I would encourage you to follow your own advice in the last line of your post.

"Robert Walkers" Thank you

"Robert Walkers" Thank you for your comment. I contend that the 'rabid consumerism on credit' that you refer to is precisely the result of the centrally controlled private banking system that we have and that Thomas Jefferson so carefully warned against. I assert that the management of the economy by a secret cabal with a cartel on the very creation of money, and no operational oversight whatsoever by our Congress, is the most predatory engine of the evils you list. As a result, we are now a bankrupt nation with a debt that will linger for generartions. The disregard for the environment is not the result of capitalism, it is the result of our court system not functioning due to the partisanship in the appointment of judges - all of this has roots in our corrupt banking system, which controls both parties.

Guys! Guys! Guys! Do you

Guys! Guys! Guys! Do you not know a fake when one clutters up TruthOut? The poster calling himself (herself) "Environmental Science Major" is nothing of the kind (probably a failed interior decorator). Nevertheless, your replies are to The Phony are edifying.