Share

Truthout Becomes First Online-Only News Site to Unionize

by: Maya Schenwar and Matt Renner, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
Newspaper Guild Representative Mike Burrell and Truthout Board Treasurer Steve Sugarman shake hands. (Photo: Caleb Jacobo)

    On the night of Thursday, August 27, a small group gathered in a quiet, bare room in Pacific Palisades, California, preparing to sign off on the future of an organization and spur the momentum of a movement. Though the meeting was brief and inconspicuous, it made history.

    A member of Truthout's board of directors had signed a recognition statement, granting Truthout employees membership in The Newspaper Guild/Communication Workers of America. Earlier that evening, Truthout had held the country's first "virtual card check," verifying union cards with faxed PDFs of each employee's signature. We became the first online-only news site to successfully unionize.

Joshua Jacobo.

After the official recognition of Truthout's union, Truthout Board Treasurer Steve Sugarman (left) and organizer Joshua Jacobo shake hands. (Photo: Caleb Jacobo)

    "It points to what is possible going forward," said Truthout's union representative, Shannon Duffy, of the St. Louis Newspaper Guild. "For other employee groups who are scattered around the country, this is a model that organizers may want to attempt. It made the Internet a tool of organization that it had never been before."

    Truthout's unionization was unique in that employee recruitment, meetings and strategy sessions all came in a virtual form, according to Bernie Lunzer, president of The Newspaper Guild/Communication Workers of America. The members of the Truthout organizing committee were based in New York, Sacramento, Los Angeles and Chicago, respectively.

    "We've certainly represented wire services for years that were far-flung, but we've never done any organizing where the group never saw each other or the organizers face to face," Lunzer said.

    Moreover, the virtual card check introduced a new tool to ease the process of unionizing, at a time when many workplaces are spread out over different states - or even different continents.

    "It made a theoretical practice - online card check - into a reality," said Patric Verrone, a television writer and president of the Writers Guild of America, west (WGAW), who led the historic 2007 writers' strike. "As such, it will allow for employees with many disparate locations to sign a union representation card without the expense and complications of traveling to a central location."

    Verrone served as Truthout's "third party neutral" during the card check, counting employees' union cards to verify a majority. He noted that the labor movement has paid more attention to online workers in recent years. One product of the 2007 writers' strike was that the WGAW's jurisdiction expanded to cover media made for the Internet.

    Making Online Organizing Work

    Employers of online-based employees often claim that unionization isn't feasible since there's no central location where employees can meet, according to Verrone. He also notes that, since many web sites are small start-up operations, it's easy to claim that budgetary woes make union benefits an unrealistic luxury.

Signing.

Truthout's union recognition statement is signed by Newspaper Guild Representative Mike Burrell. (Photo: Caleb Jacobo)

    However, telecommuting employees often need a union just as much as on-site workers.

    Internet-based employees share many of the same concerns that prompted workers to start unionizing in the first place, although they may look different in a virtual context, according to Lunzer. He pointed to the issue of work hours as an example of an age-old workplace problem that manifests in new forms for online workers.

    "The myth is there's this group of young, digital-savvy workers who live all day on the Internet," Lunzer said. "The truth is, all workers need a life. Online workers are beginning to say, we need to sort this out - work is a part of life we enjoy, but it's not our whole life. In a way, they're just like the textile workers in New England who worked long hours every day and didn't get Saturdays off."

    So, how does one organize a union, when there's no basement or living room to meet in, no cafeteria in which to mingle?

    We found tools like Skype and Google Documents, formerly just helpful devices that made work a little easier, to be indispensable for organizing work. We spent long hours on conference calls, "meeting" at night, each in our own living rooms, or kitchens or backyards.

    "It mostly came down to a lot of hard work," Joshua Jacobo, one of the founding members of the Truthout Organizing Committee said, adding, "The organizers worked over 80 hours a week for months in order to make this a reality and I'm thrilled that we did."

    Although we didn't share a common workspace, we shared a common philosophy and common values - the same values that inspired us to care about Truthout itself.

    "Even though the people who were organizing together never met during the process, their belief in Truthout helped them bond and trust one another," said Sari Gelzer, Truthout's newly elected unit chief. "The workers really felt this was the right direction, so they decided to take that leap."

    As Truthout's staff moves forward into contract negotiations in the coming weeks, we are venturing into barely charted territory. Only a sprinkling of web sites have ever unionized.

    "This union contract is really going to set a precedent," Gelzer said. "I look forward to seeing its impact not only on the labor movement, but also on the news industry as a whole, as it continues to transition to online publications."

    The Struggle for Card Check

    Not all workplaces enjoy the right to unionize by card check alone.

    Under current law, the process of unionization begins when at least 30 percent of workers sign blank cards from an existing union, indicating they want to join. Employers can then decide whether to recognize the union right away, or to require that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) hold a secret-ballot election. During the interim period between "card check" and election - sometimes lasting weeks or months - employers often pressure, coerce and even fire employees attempting to organize. Many unionizing efforts collapse during this period, crushed by fear and intimidation.

Patric Verrone.

WGA President Patric Verrone served as a neutral third party, confirming the virtual card check and witnessing the recognition. (Photo: Caleb Jacobo)


    However, the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), currently awaiting a vote in Congress, would alter unionization procedures, adding a "card check" requirement. It would demand that employers and the NLRB recognize a union if the majority of employees have signed cards.

    The card check provision in EFCA can be compared to the "public option" in the health care reform bill, according to Lunzer. It's a vital part of the legislation, but Congress members are under extreme pressure from business interests to cut it from the bill.

    Lunzer said it's unclear where card check stands currently.

    "Before the Senate went on recess, it looked like the card check provision was going to be removed," Lunzer said. "But the movement - from the top down - has said there is a plan to go forward, to get Employee Free Choice and not let it get watered down to the point that it is basically destroyed. There's a new dedication to getting it done."

    The Truthout unionization effort was bolstered by a commitment from our Board of Directors to abide by an organization-wide card check as the only step necessary for union recognition.

    "The Truthout Board of Directors needs to be acknowledged for their very progressive role in all this," organizer Duffy said. "The Board is a group of people that truly do live their values."

    Today, as Congress returns from recess, the labor movement's eyes are trained on EFCA. For labor-sympathetic journalists following the story, it's an anxiety-filled wait. What's at stake for us is not only the right to unionize fairly, but also the opportunity to exercise our true freedom of speech: to tell it like it is, without fear, not only on our pages but also on the job. With freedom of speech comes the power to investigate, to ask tough questions, to keep democracy going strong.

    "Journalists are inquisitive people who want to know why things are the way they are," Duffy said. "I hope to God that never goes away."

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

  

»


Maya Schenwar is Acting Executive Director of Truthout.

Matt Renner is a senior editor and Washington reporter for Truthout.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

CONGRATS, folks!!!! Glad

CONGRATS, folks!!!! Glad this finally came to pass! I am SOOOOOO with you, and though I don't miss the daily work load (and am LOVING reclaiming and growing my farm life), I miss you all. Perhaps I'll find my way back now that truthout will walk its talk!!! KUDOS and HUGS!!!!

Congratulations to Truthout

Congratulations to Truthout staff, and board. It's clear employers have rights, and equally clear employees need to be able to bargain with more than just their individual opinions. We are witnessing the upper management domination of the US economy right now, and it's a sad moment to hear of the "jobless recovery" (?!), as 20 of the top wreckless financial institutions taking billions in bailout money cut 160,000 jobs and award their top executives a combined total of $3.2 billion ("Executives at financial firms who received bailout funds get big salaries, report says", by Diane Stafford, The Kansas City Star, posted 9/1/2009) May Truthout continue to shine the light of truth on all dark corners of this land!

Whew! Historic, progressive

Whew! Historic, progressive and just a darned good news source all around. Truthout offers stories many readers would never encounter anywhere else. You know I love ya, and I wish you bold folks the best of luck in your new unionized status, going where no one has gone before as James Kirk would say. You're setting an example for other news organizations in this country and even globally.

way to go guys!!!!!!!

way to go guys!!!!!!!

Congratulations Truthout

Congratulations Truthout staff. This is exciting news and I'm eager to see the effect it will have on the work produced by writers and editors of the organization. I have read many excellent reports from Maya Schenwar, Matt Renner, Leslie Thatcher, and a variety of the regular contributing writers at Truthout and I'm certain that this unionization will continue to improve and expand the original content produced by the organization. Keep up the good work and positive organizational decisions TO... A proud supporter, Christopher Kuttruff

May your ground-breaking

May your ground-breaking union activity be a quickly followed example! Thanks so much for taking the lead.

For that, I've gotta figure

For that, I've gotta figure out how to afford a contribution to support you all. Thank you, thank you, for all you do, and thank you for doing it the "union way" going forward.

I entered a non-union

I entered a non-union warehouse in 1972 in SF. Within two months, we'd signed on with the Teamsters' Warehouse local. I might have wanted a different representation but it allowed me access to the dissident members in the union. It kept me alert to what other workers were confronting. It kept me radical. And, because I am over 70 and retired, it allows me some freedom to look at the issues more calmly than when I was on the shop floor. This is a big thing that you have done. You can't judge it, of course, for its impact. It will unfold. It won't be the way you want it unless you realize it will morph under your hand. Because we have a globe organized around rich/poor, them/us, bosses/workers ... it will come around to a class issue, eventually. So, whatever you do with your sense of how and why you came to agree, don't lose sight of the fact that it was, probably, only a part of a much bigger fight. Onward!

Truthout, this is great

Truthout, this is great news. I used to be a Guild member; it's a good group. This gives you more muscle. You were good before; you'll be better now. Good, better, and I look forward to the best. Thanks. Peace!

Yes, congratulations to

Yes, congratulations to Truthout.org staff and respects to management for upholding the principles to which Truthout.org aspires to. As a union organizer, who has also organized for rights on the job, I commend both sides to an issue that can sometimes be conflicting, but at the end, it's what makes sense.

Good for you! You have my

Good for you! You have my respect.

EXCELLENT!~!! so proud of

EXCELLENT!~!! so proud of you! rock on!

Bravo/Brava Perfect for

Bravo/Brava Perfect for Labor Day.

"granting Truthout employees

"granting Truthout employees membership" Congrats, but the employer does not "grant" the employees the right to join a union. The employer will (or will not) recognize the union and bargain (or not). There have been many employers that have had employees join a union, but fail to bargain in good faith. Now it's up to the employer to do the right thing and bargain in good faith.

Right on!

Right on!

Congratulations,

Congratulations, Truthouters, and welcome to No. 47!

Congratulations on doing the

Congratulations on doing the right thing!! These are tough times for non-profits and you need all of the support you can get to make sure that workers are getting what they need. I'm ready to donate! Happy Labor Day

How many non-profit

How many non-profit organizations are unionized and what is the point?

I extend my sincere

I extend my sincere congratulations! In an age of rampant Libertarianism on the left, it is not easy to unionize, much less even want to. To the future and one tiny step closer to a General Strike against fascism! –(Jill Bains)

Good going. I assume the

Good going. I assume the pace of begging messages with pick up in proportion to the additional liabilities just assumed as the quality declines. And that you are prepared to cease to exist when the technological change required to continue requires change or eliminate a few job descriptions and work rules at which time your noble union will strike in a petulant denial of reality. I will never forget how (in the 1960's) a local San Francisco free distribution newspaper went out of business because the union would not compromise on workforce reduction or modification of the operation required to operate profitably. I will also not forget the heated campaign to retain firemen on trains a practice know as featherbedding. Or how the linotype operator monopoly became irrelevant as computer technology revolutionized the print industry. I know full well what the origins of the union movement were, how viciously the workers were exploited and maltreated by robber baron capitialists of the era. I also know how there are examples today in the USA that harken back (see Frontline on McWane steel and its Dickenisan business practices and overflowing file of OSHA complaints) to that era of satanic mills and head busting anti-union tactics. But I also know that in the real economic world every worker in every industry cannot get a pay raise every year. I also know that business is compelled to change, adopt new technology, and change the workplace in order to survive and that union bureaucracy (and managements) committed to the adversarial tradition of labor relations in the USA make that extremely difficult and will always proceed to kill the goose that lays the golden egg rather than accommodate reality on any reasonable terms in a timely manner. I also will not forget that the big unions serve their own officers far better than their membership and have an ample track record of sleaze and corruption (especially the Teamsters and their partner of choice, the Mafia). Also that few strikes, at least in recent times, have brought any net benefit to the membership, and usually cost them money that will never be recovered. Big business may deserve unions as retribution for crimes committed (notwithstanding Milton Friedman's blanket defense of workers "voting with their feet"), but let us not delude ourselves into thinking unionization is a universal unqualified good or that the cost of powerful unions can be far more than the dues they extract from the members and paid by more than greedy stockholders and executives. Good luck, you will need it.

What a huge step forward.

What a huge step forward. The future of indi news is in your hands. I trust you.

I am glad that such an open

I am glad that such an open organization is now also unionized.I pray for happy future of the Truthout

Wow. I'm so please for you

Wow. I'm so pleased for you all. I have told our story here many times, but need to answer Interested Observer. For us, the union was a miracle. Until the health care debacle, I had no idea what people pay for private health insurance. I just read a post from a retired couple who pay $1260/month for their insurance, for 70% debatable coverage, annual deductibles are $1500 - EACH! My retired husband has a lifetime free membership in the IBEW Local 266. The amount we spend on medical bills is still very little. Throughout his life, our health insurance is FREE. If he dies before me, I might have to pay $160/month to keep it. With his (safe) pension I CAN. We pay about $300 bucks 4 times a year for our present brand scrips (generics only have to meet 66% medication standards). We can go to any doctor we want (the best), any hospital - I've used Barrows Neurological and the Mayo Clinic in the past without even having a precert. I have lupus; without this medical I would likely have died. Yup, in America I would die, whereas in Canada and Britain it would be treated without much fanfare. My husband works part-time as a contractor for his former company. He always gets the same pay that the employees get, including overtime (time & 1/2/double time/triple time). He always got very good raises, bonuses, promotions, free schooling, masses of sick/vacation time, with health/dental/optical insurance that covered mental health as well. If he had a gripe, the union fought for him (he didn't). When he became Union Steward, he won. He refused to take frivolous grievances. I am pro-Union and loud about it. My kids will probably never have it so good because of the attitudes towards unions. Sure, they need a better structure for smaller companies, but it's always work, work to improve a good thing.

If that is way you want go

If that is way you want go good luck, but with my blogsite I wil lnot be doing the some thing.

Congratulations for taking

Congratulations for taking this progressive step. I don't know if it will win you any more US readers, but you are certainly keeping this UK one!

To Truthout workers: I am a

To Truthout workers: I am a union man (retired proofreader) and I am delighted to hear the good news. I will share my pleasure by sending more money each month.

Heartiest

Heartiest congratulations!!!!!!And thanks for giving all of us a chance to speak.

THIS IS WHY I READ YOU EVERY

THIS IS WHY I READ YOU EVERY DAY AND DONATE ON A REGULAR BASIS. KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK. YOU MAKE US ALL PROUD! JD

Makes me proud to be a

Makes me proud to be a monthly contributor to TruthOut! Congratulations for upholding the principals of a workforce afforded integrity, respect and (hopefully) a living wage!

Yay!!!!

Yay!!!!

Congratulations in

Congratulations in solidarity from a representative of the National Union of Journalists new media sector in the UK.

I've never donated before

I've never donated before now but this will be the reason.

What a wonderful way to

What a wonderful way to celebrate Labor Day! This is tremendous news. Congratulations. And, bravo for living your values and creating a positive example of progress and change for all of us. Miss you all. TRUTH OUT!

I've always wondered why

I've always wondered why electricians charge so much money for their services, and now thanks to Eilish, I know. Your union is lucky that the service they unionize cannot be exported abroad but IMO that is nothing to be proud about. It also illustrates what is wrong with unions. Here's one small consequence. I recently looked into installing a tankless hot water system but I gave up the idea not because of the cost of the system or the plumber to install, it but rather the cost of the electrician! I ask you, how much growth and prosperity that is so desperately needed in this country are being prevented by your excessive benefits and free life time membership?

Groundbreaking.To say

Groundbreaking.To say congratulations is an understatement.

Does this now make

Does this now make truthout.org partisan? Seems those lines in the sand HAVE a long reach! The back end is always the same.

Congratulations to you all!

Congratulations to you all!

Congratulations to all of

Congratulations to all of us! Thank you. I'll contribute all I can afford to support this important action. Snar

Congratulations! this is

Congratulations! this is wonderful news; I'm frustrated I'm so broke right now, because I really want to go make a celebratory contribution, but I'll be sending one along on my next payday!

Contratulations to all!! We

Contratulations to all!! We must practice what we preach. Best wishes, PapΓ‘ Kokopelli

Thanks for the

Thanks for the communications union lead. I've been through so much shady business down in south florida (right to jerk state) it's crazy. Deregulation destroyed so much.

Interesting take on this. I

Interesting take on this. I find it quite amusing that a first ever website is unionized. In fact, I find it quite unlikely that website union will ever compete in the internet for survival. Only to delay the inevitability of its demise. And besides all of the reporting is not done from Truthout but instead is taken from other news agency and claiming it as their own. How amusing. I do not really agree to form an union since UNIONS are ONLY for factories,farms, and other production facilities. Ultimately, that is what I believe in. To extend unionization to other sectors which includes journalism is just not going to cut it at all. I simply fail to see the so called ' historic achievement' or ' one giant leap for progressive movement'. We are living in a deflationary economy. Everyone must realize that not only wages will decline but also and hopefully prices will decline with it. ( that is until the Federal Reserve stops doing QE or corporations forced to move their price ceilings at a more affordable amount for us). An union website is just the wrong way to go for. I am hoping that the owners of Trouthout realize what they are in for.

I am the AngryMan. This

I am the AngryMan. This brings tears to my eyes, quite literally. Maybe there is hope after all. I am so joyful to learn of this great milestone. May peace and prosperity be with all of you ... always.

You mean, you weren't

You mean, you weren't already????

I am a disabled man, living

I am a disabled man, living on a fixed income, and residing in public housing. This news brings joy to my heart and I would like to share my good feelings by sending you a small contribution. Would somebody tell me where to send it?

I am very glad for you and

I am very glad for you and glad for what this represents. I am proud to be a contributor to Truthout. However, while not wanting to take anything away from your accomplishment, I can't agree that even "in a way, [you're] just like the textile workers..." No. It is a great thing that people with jobs like yours can enjoy the benefits of unionization, and I don't wish the horrible old days of those textile mills on anyone, but they had a lot more to contend with. Best wishes.

No matter How Lame some

No matter How Lame some reporter is the rest will have to share the wealth to pay em any how. Good luck with that. We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us. I'm sure that your reporters will remain objective - a rather socialistically objective at that.

Great news! I hope other

Great news! I hope other equally progressive blogs do the same - Huffington Post or Truth Dig, for example. And can you take thi cyberunion a step further, making contributing readers members, too? Why not?

Kudos ... More important

Kudos ... More important than the novelty of the virtual card check is the willingness of Truthout to honor the staff's right to respect and dignity at work! And in America it's veeerrrryyyy rare!

I don't get it. Why would

I don't get it. Why would truthout employees unionize? We're they treated badly? Underpaid and overworked? Not paid overtime? Dismissed without cause. If truthout is a progressive and fair-minded employer what need is there for a union? Seems kind of redundant.

To the person who wondered

To the person who wondered what was the point of a non-profit unionizing: the very first unionized workplace I worked at was a non-profit. Why did we unionize? Because management was being unfair, non-profit or not. I'm not saying truthout's management was being unfair, but I believe everyone should have a union in their workplace, fair wages and fair treatment. And that includes workers in the third world. As to the person who responded to Eilish: the electrician who comes to your house is usually self-employed and not a union member. Like other self-employed people he has over-head and no guarantee of 8 hours of work. Indeed, his day is broken up by travel time. Any self-employed tradesperson has to take all that into account. That is why he charges $50 an hour. My partner was a member of IBEW (in Canada) before retiring. He got about $25 an hour as an industrial electrician. That isn't all that much for the skills he had or the training he'd gone through (he was a journeyman) but it was a hell of a lot better than what he was getting before he was in the union. Electricians are not just labourers.

To 23:49, thanks to

To 23:49, thanks to responding to both of my posts! Obviously I don't know much about unions. The only place I ever worked that was unionized was the university I graduated from in 1970. Certainly unions have their role in curbing the insatiable greed constantly demonstrated by capitalists, but how does that figure in a non-profit situation? You suggested that non-profits can also treat workers unfairly but that, I think, depends on your point of view. Non-profit company's ability to meet the pay role is usually tenuous at best (clearly that's the case at Truthout) so I think unionization will not contribute to it's continued existence and I still wonder why they decided to follow that path. Perhaps they are just trying to walk the talk.

This is funny. I can't wait

This is funny. I can't wait for the picket lines to go up because the lattes aren't being delivered in a timely manner.

Is it right to unionize when

Is it right to unionize when you are living off the public's generosity?

First of all I FAIL to

First of all I FAIL to recognize why the SUDDEN need of having an union. Second of all, you guys are not being abused by an employer much less seeing a workplace injury. The purpose of a UNION is ONLY for people WHO are EMPLOYED in a DANGEROUS environment in order to achieve some value for the company and for the economy as a whole. I find it REALLY disturbing that this has to appear as a 'great accomplishment' for all of us. I do not see HOW an internet website needs an union. Its like some sort of joke. I expected a far better quality and balance of having multiple views instead of just showing one view. I am not going to renew my subscription after this not because I oppose the 'union' but a website such as Truthout needs an union? It does not make ANY sense whatsoever even twisting the definition of what an actual union is all about. I had high expectations from this website looks like I was quite mistaken in that assessment.

Huh? An online website

Huh? An online website union? I thought unions were only for blue collared workers and not for people like you? Hrm, you journalists have not worked in the heavy industries besides ahh typing an online paper? AHH of course I conveniently forgot maybe that carpal tunnel syndrome from all of that typing is the main cause of 'heavy' duty work from your employer correct? Anyways its pointless for any website to have an 'union'. Laughable. You guys really need to get down and dirty if you want a true union not a sissy type of union that complains that your back hurts or that your morning donuts and coffee is not in your office.... and I do not see any abuse from your employer as well. Sheesh, you guys are giving us 'unions' a really bad name. I do not want this type of union at all......

Congrats! As a member of

Congrats! As a member of the UFCW Local 135 (grocery) I would call it to your attention because I'm a UNION MEMBER,( listen-up UNION-BASHER A-HOLES who never worked a union job but think you know everything) this week I was scheduled 9am-6pm, followed by night crew stocking at 2am, which I don't mind because I am payed well WITH BENEFITS, but the bookkeeper caught the error of MINIMUM 10 HRS BETWEEN SHIFTS. I was entitled to time+1/2 for those 2 hrs (with only 8 hrs between shifts). This is what we owe to the UFCW, Teamsters, and ALL the other unions who have supported us for decades!

Has Truthout's

Has Truthout's Management/Owner(s) joined the National Chamber of Commerce, or the National Association of Manufacturers, to learn how to hire strikebreakers (scabs) if necessary? Or how to put the pressure on Union Workers to make them really, really sorry they ever joined a Union? Has the Worker's Union formed an alliance with the Pixel Delivery Union (a Member of the Teamster's Union) to make sure if management gives them any trouble they can shut down the whole Web? In other words, have both Management and The Workers of Truthout thought this whole thing through yet? Or are we going to be observers of typical Labor/Management strife for some indefinite period? And if you take your squabbles public, who is going to write Management's perspective? Will they be breaking the Union's agreement if they attempt to post it on Truthout? And will the Truthout Worker's Union be the first online Union to form a picket line? And how will they do that? What if they decide on a 'Sit-In Demonstration'? Who will know?

A new union is very good

A new union is very good news whether there is a pressing issue or not because it adds democracy and accountability into the workplace

I thought that unions were

I thought that unions were only for factory workers and not for this kind of environment? Is your employers exploiting you guys? Why have one when it is a bit silly that you also have donations like from us as well? And how come this is beneficial to you guys? I just do not think an union does fit the profile for your type of website your utilizing. And I think that a non-profit organization is ill suited to have one as well. Its just kind of weird having an union of this type. I guess having all types of unions can be good but then again we are living in the 21st century and not the industrial age where abuse were far more prominent than today. Anyways I am still confused about this decision. Will wait to see what comes out of this.

@anonymous - re:

@anonymous - re: non-profits. You do understand that not for profit doesn't necessarily mean they're wholesome and good. For example, executive pay is not "profit", it's a business cost. Many executives of non-profit companies pay themselves ridiculous amounts of money and their workers a pittance. This has nothing to do with a tenuous ability to pay and everything to do with the same kind of greed you get elsewhere. Now, I'm not, in any way, trying to suggest that this is the case in Truthout.org, but it is the case elsewhere. Also, unionising provides workers with the ability form a parallel structure within a workplace and an alternative way of relating to management. It's not just about pay, it's not just about health and safety - it's about not having to deal one on one with the management if you don't want to - instead you can bring your union rep, or have issues dealt with collectively.

Ahh good finally I was

Ahh good finally I was waiting for this! Good work on taking the initiative on the for front of worker's rights! Eventually you can KICK your employers and become a true website that is DEVOTED to workers and not to ANY employer. I have high regards for Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Evo Morales, FARC's Alfonso Cano, and many many others will be FAR better off without HAVING any employer! I will be willing to give my donations for ANYTHING to kick off these capitalists and ASSIST you guys for taking over the upper management and your employers as well! Good luck!

As a member of the US

As a member of the US socialist party I applaud you for taking a first step in achieving greater equality and less equality for the management! In fact a good quote can be of a guiding light from the great Karl Marx himself: 'Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks. ' And finally one more quote from him as well and this one I really do like it a lot it is not intended as an insult but for the goodness it brings with it: 'Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries, unite! '

That also reminds me what

That also reminds me what happens to non-union Truthout employees if they do not want to become apart of the union? Will they be forced to be an union worker even if their is philosophical and political differences? Can it be possible that non-union workers be discriminated from Truthout union workers? Will union workers be able to dissent and respected for their opinions and not strong-arm them? Sorry about all of the questions since I still register my mind that unions equal to factory workers and not this type of union. Its definitely unique no doubt about that, but hopefully I am not so shortsighted on this topic since I am well aware of some of the posters here that seem to be knee-jerked responses on both sides of the aisles rather than writing a thought provoking response with skepticism.

As a union member myself, I

As a union member myself, I want to point out that unions aren't just for factory workers. Teachers are in unions. Pilots are in unions. Bank tellers are in unions. Actors are in a union. My favorite rock band is in a union. Reporters and editors are in unions. T.V. weathermen are in unions. Thousands of people in media - on-air and behind the scenes - are in unions. There are so many different occupations in unions that they cannot all be listed here It's important to note that not everybody organizes for the same reason. Sure, wages are often one reason - but there are other reasons, as well. Having a voice on the job is one, being able to demand respect is another. In many workplaces in this society, workers are not often considered when decisions are being made (I'm not saying that was the case at Truthout). And please - do not automatically assume that having an organized workforce will have a negative impact on Truthout's bottom line. The opposite just might be true. Unions often are able to provide benefit plans to their members (as well as the management) at a savings and that would be good news for any employer! It's also possible that, by becoming a unionined workforce, more (union) people will learn of this courageous website and become subscribers and donors. And, if that occurs, those new supporters will read all the great stories here and support those other progressive and worthwhile causes too . I say, "Way to go!"

Joe Hill didn't mention that

Joe Hill didn't mention that baseball players making 10,000,000 a year. He mentioned actors, some of which make 20,000,000 a picture. I guess its all relative. I was making eleven dollars an hour at a job for 8 years and was fired when they thought I was at the center of some organizing talk.

oh I forgot about how about

oh I forgot about how about the NBA? NFL? how about unions for pharmacists? or a union for bankers? even a union for CEOs and upper management? or a union for Congress? how about a union for small business? how about a union for white collared workers? how about even having an union for EVERYTHING! yeah that's the ANSWER to this Depression! I kind of like the idea of passing a House Resolution that has all of the benefits of becoming an union!!!

The whole idea behind unions

The whole idea behind unions is that, by bandng together, workers can secure more rights in the workplace. You mention the big paychecks that an actor can earn. Well, for every actor pulling in $20M a film, there's a thousand struggling to get by; thankful for their Screen Actors Guild benefits. And, as far as professional athletes are concerned, while they are in a so-called union, they don't bargain collectively. They are represented by agents and have individual contracts. You mention CEOs. Let me tell ya, CEOs already HAVE contracts - and their contracts contain very generous clauses which provide things like golden parachutes. I don't see anything wrong with letting working stiffs have a contract too - Lord knows they're the ones that could use a little protection.

i was a member of the

i was a member of the Newspaper Guild at the Cleveland Plain Dealer - hope they better represent u then they did us.

Unionization is okay, but

Unionization is okay, but why no new stories in 5 days? Nothing going on in the world outside the new Truthout union?

You are continuously begging

You are continuously begging for money , just wait until the union starts making unreasonable demands , this is the beginning of the end for you as it was for the auto industry . Salary and "benefits" of about $ 80.00 an hour for unskilled assembly line employees is obscene , the stupid, greedy unions brought on their own well deserved demise . Truthout , "with deepest sympathy "

To: I don't get it. I

To: I don't get it. I agree with you. Unions are not a universal symbol of justice and fair-play or the rights of the people. They are a Faustian bargain with the forces of a rapacious capitalism that forced them into existence in the 19th century, forces that can still be found today (McWane steel for one, the agricultural industry for another). Anyone who has had their pay confiscated for dues against their will, lost pay for a strike that will never be made up in their lifetime, and watched their "guardians" fatten themselves in the same style as those same capitalists (and corrupt lawmakers) while flaunting it openly already know this. Anyone who has lost a job because of union inflexibility in the face of economic and technical change already knows this. It is worse than redundant, it is a political position that confuses the exploitation and fighting of the past with progressive values. I hope they derive great personal satisfaction from paying their union dues because that is likely the only real benefit they will ever get.

To the above post from 17:51

To the above post from 17:51 I will say these two words to you : THANK YOU! Finally an unspoken truth that was deeply hidden in quite a few comments that are being made on this article. In fact I would like to add a few things to his post for further enlightenment from my angle as well. The once called unions of the past versus the ones of today are totally different. The past unions made TRUE progress in having laws like 'worker's compensation, worker safety and rights, and work related laws and regulation all came from having better humility for the overall individual. The concept of the 'union' has changed so much to the point that unions have merely become another entity that is UNWILLING to be flexible in the face of economic changes and ALWAYS based on FEAR of losing its power base NOT based on facts, statistics, and mathematics of the company itself. Without having a knowledgeable background in economics, finance, or even basic accounting these unions have just become the very same horrors that they themselves continue to supposedly avail themselves : management cronyism. Unions ONLY control the COST of the company itself but not the MARKET COST of the overall industry. Unions of the past were so much more than of today cause of the laws that were past contained vital outlines of respect,individuality, and empowerment to each worker. When such laws were past for worker rights the concept of the UNION is NO LONGER needed! Thus your so called '21st century' union DOES NOT EXIST because of these laws that were set in stone to prevent employers and managers from abusing the employee. The ONLY unions that are needed are in second and third-world countries that have not developed their laws and regulations thus exploited for the benefit of the top. ( i.e. India, China, Indonesia, Vietnam, Kenya, Congo, etc. NOT the United States) More laws that are passed within the US will only FURTHER create additional cost per worker. We already have ready made laws and all we needed to do is to enforce it! A union of today does not make sense in the 21st century!

bravo my union brothers and

bravo my union brothers and sisters. congratulations it really says something about truthout that they readily agreed to go union.in essence they put their money where their mouth is. independent 1776 you don:t know what your talking about. do you know that doctors in nj unionized 5 yrs ago. i am a union rep and i dare you to name any work group in the us today that does not need representation! with the strangle hold cos have over their employees and the destruction that little georgie bush did to the nlrb its reached critical mass. so get your facts straight and if you aren:t retired or own your own business you may need a union too!

Way to go. I hope your

Way to go. I hope your example inspires others to do the same. We need strong unions - especially at the grass-roots level - if we're serious about attaining economic and social justice.

TO: oh I forgot about

TO: oh I forgot about (18:49) Pharmacists DO (or did) have a union, at least in San Francisco. My father belonged to it, for all the good that did. Attempts to organize white collar workers are on-going with varying degrees of success, succeeding mostly in moribund places where few have done an honest days work in years like the railroad (this I know from direct evidence, however the offices in question where rolled up and consolidated into more productive areas years ago, with permanent job losses in at least two cities. Today they would probably be rolled offshore with everyone outside the head office losing). I am glad no one ever put over a computer programmers union (the railroad one sucked in the programmers) anywhere near where I worked. It will not prevent off-shoring and software development is a problematic enough field without union work rules further gumming it up. SD is quite able to gum itself up without help, as the record of many millions of lost dollars in both public and private sectors will attest (just for two I cite: State of California vs Tandem, and the Cosmos project in WA state). The most acidly ironic example I know is some DOCTORS (of the lofty AMA that looks down on so many of the economic realities of hoi polloi, including paying medical bills) working in an HMO who began to feel the weight of a bonus driven management's thumb (the common destiny of most workers) on them and had a remarkably rapid change of heart. Still unions are a Faustian bargain, as I noted above, not bricks in the road to Utopia. An occasionally necessary evil, less evil than direct government control (most of the time, do not forget the Teamsters tough love separation from their Mafia cronies), but never an optimal solution, at least not for long. The solution lies in a change in human nature tantamount to the replacement of homo sapiens with a better species. One can conceive of better and equally effective motives (and I do not mean religious or ideological) than the profit motive, but not for homo sapiens in the real world. Don't hold your breath and do not try to make it happen. We have been there and there are fields filled with bodies and wretched economic results to show for it. We must make do with our Faustian bargains in a supervised, occasionally regulated,but not centrally controlled, market economy.

Excelsior, my Brave TruthOut

Excelsior, my Brave TruthOut Wranglers! A swift glance up the comments shows that many just don't get that Solidarity is America's only salvation. Far more chimed in with hearty congrats; permit me to add mine: YOUUUUUU ROOOOOOOCK!!!!!! - Frances in CA, 3rd Generation American Labor; 7th Generation American Revolution.

I agree with Glen. If

I agree with Glen. If Truthout is a progressive and far minded employer, what need is there for a union? I have assumed this is so, which is why I have supported and donated to Truthout, as well as being intensely interested in the information they make available. However, I see no need for "congratulations" on this one, and even while reading through the "comments", it seems that we are assuming that unions always bring benefits to their members. I recall Hoffa and the teamsters only too well. Let's hope that the Truthout union will not come to this.

I too have agreed with Glenn

I too have agreed with Glenn and to 20:20 as well. Is it a bit unusual that a progressive site such as Truthout really needs an union? If your employer is just as progressive as you people would why the necessity of creating one? I always wanted to hear the incentives and disincentives of being in a union. All these comments does not bring up the real ugly side of becoming an union. In fact all of these praises does not advance the causes of why the sudden need of creating an union. Maybe I am missing the point but I thought that this website would like to have some debate on this issue first and foremost before going headlong into this.

I'd like to know more about

I'd like to know more about your Board and how you got to this point..It is sad that every month Ash would be be begging and pleading for more contributions and he was getting a salary of $180K. Which I understand the Board has reduced.

Uh ho ... Arianna H. better

Uh ho ... Arianna H. better watch out. You guys/gals ROCK! So proud f you, so happy at the news. Congratulations!

what no debate on forming an

what no debate on forming an union? Is this just a moot response from Truthout that in order to survive it needs an union? I thought that truthout was all progressive including the higher ups? I don't understand why the need of having an union in a non-profit organization that needs funding from not only from donations but also from investors as well as receiving grants from the government. Oh well if we all need a union we might as well declare another constitutional addition to the original Bill of Rights......

Who is in the bargaining

Who is in the bargaining unit? I'm curious to know if everyone listed in your "About" page is in the union, and what percentage of folks in the bargaining unit voted for the union. As to the debate... Forming a union in an already "fair workplace" makes sense. Even if at the current moment you are being treated fairly, that could change. And being part of a union gives you the right to have a say in making important decisions. Too often "progressives" fall victim to right-wing, corporate, anti-union propaganda saying that workers are better off without a union. Let the workers decide! I hope that Truthout workers will build their union in a way that guarantees direct democracy, complete transparency, and full participation.