Share

Baucus Releases Health Care Blueprint With No Public Option

by: David Lightman  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, (D-Montana) at meeting with President Obama to discuss health care reform. (Photo: The Official White House Photostream)

    Washington - Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus unveiled on Wednesday an $856 billion plan to overhaul the nation's health care system that includes taxes on high-end insurance policies and incentives to create health care co-ops around the nation, but not the public option that President Barack Obama has sought.

    The Montana Democrat has been trying for months to create a bipartisan consensus on health care restructuring, but he finally grew frustrated and released his own blueprint. His committee, the last of five congressional panels to consider health care, is scheduled to write legislation starting next week.

    It will work from the 16-page outline that Baucus released Wednesday, which he called a "balanced, commonsense package that ensures quality, affordable coverage and doesn't add a dime to the deficit."

    Its highlight is the creation of co-ops. "These plans can operate at the state, regional or national level to serve as nonprofit, member-run health plans to compete in the reformed non-group and small group markets," Baucus' plan says.

    He'd spend $6 billion in federal money to get them started and meet solvency requirements.

    Supporters of co-ops maintain that negotiating rates collectively with hospitals, doctors and other providers would reduce costs. However, Obama and many lawmakers, particularly congressional Democrats, would prefer a government-run program that competes with the private sector.

    Baucus, however, has said - and most of his colleagues have agreed - that a "public option" couldn't pass the Senate.

    Baucus said he'd pay for his plan primarily by reducing Medicare costs - a proposal similar to those in other major bills in Congress - and by imposing a nondeductible excise tax of 35 percent on insurance companies and plan administrators for any health insurance plan that charges more than $8,000 for individuals and $21,000 for families.

    The tax would be imposed on the premiums above the threshold amounts. It would begin in 2013, and would be indexed for inflation.

    Independent analysts have questioned whether enough Medicare savings can be found to make up for the kind of price tag Baucus is discussing.

    His plan also would require insurers to cover everyone, regardless of health status. There would be "limited variation in premium rates" for tobacco use, age and family composition.

    Most people who don't carry health insurance would pay penalties for not obtaining coverage.

    Baucus aims to make buying it easier by creating health insurance exchanges, via Web portals that would show consumers all the available coverage within their ZIP codes. Advocates think that making it easier for consumers to compare policies would help lower prices.

    People wouldn't have to give up the insurance they now have, and plans would be able to continue offering the coverage that they do now to those who already have it.

    The health insurance market would see four categories for benefits: bronze, silver, gold and platinum.

    No policies could be issued that didn't comply with the requirements of at least one category. All policies would have to provide primary care and cover preventive services, emergency services, medical and surgical care, physician services, hospitalization, outpatient services, day surgery and related anesthesia, diagnostic imaging and screenings, maternity and newborn care, pediatric services, prescription drugs, radiation and chemotherapy, and mental health and substance abuse services.

    No lifetime limits could be set.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Tossing Us a Bone. Talk

Tossing Us a Bone. Talk about a sellout! Who is Max Baucus and how in God's name has he got the power to determine the outcome of this very critical issue? The senator of a state with less than a million population is deciding whether a nation of 300 million get single-payer insurance. How much more of this outrage can we tolerate? It speaks to the legitimacy of the Senate as representative of American opinion. I find it outrageous that this "upper house" consisting of (mostly) multi-millionaire white males exerts the amount of control that it does. Also outrageous, the very idea of issuing fines to people who can't afford health insurance. Senator Baucus (and most of the members of that elite body) have no concept of the reality endured by millions of hard-working, often luckless, Americans. If this legislation passes, Baucus, Grassley and the others will get an earful from us. The trend these days is that more people are losing their jobs and their health care coverage. This proposed legislation is an insult and disgrace to our nation.

$3 million in insurance

$3 million in insurance industry bribe money to Mr. Baucus increases profits by forcing people to buy unaffordable, woefully inadequate insurance, and means that many people in this country will continue to suffer and die needlessly. A public option can't pass the Senate, eh? What more proof does anyone need that 'the will of the people' is irrelevant? The profit motive is still firmly in place, and care will still be rationed based on (in)ability to pay. How is this a good plan for anyone except Congress' corporate masters?

Whew! If this is what they

Whew! If this is what they consider to be a reasonable, effective, fair, balanced, affordable, user-friendly healthcare plan, then they should be sent back to to their primordial caves to think it over for another million years or so. If this is what the US Senate wants to foist onto US citizens, then I know very well that my Senators (both Democrats) will not find my vote in the next election. Such drooling nonsense I have never heard of before in my long life.

Baucus Caucus is a corrupt

Baucus Caucus is a corrupt crowd. Montanans! Do the rest of the country a favor, show up a hundred thousand strong in Helena in front of Max's office and chant: Medicare for all! Medicare for all!

More psuedo-reform. It's

More psuedo-reform. It's like suggesting a root canal for a terminal cancer patient. I'm have not interest in mandated over-priced "catastrophic plans", which is a huge give-away to the insurance companies without offering real coverage. After my last experience with the "health" insurance companies, I don't want to contribute anything to THEIR BOTTOM LINE!

It is amazing that a

It is amazing that a voluntary 'public option" has so much opposition, but an invasive plan to force citizens to purchase something they may neither want or need, via an "insurance mandate" gets barely a peep. The Baucus plan doesn't provide affordable medical care, but it certainly rewards the health insurance and pharmacutical industries, who wrote the bill. The mandate will be complicated and expensive to enforce, and will be universally disliked by voters. Republicans, who will not vote for the Baucus bill, will certainly use it to defeat Democrats in the next election.

Interestingly, the

Interestingly, the Republicans in the gang of six--Enzi, Grassley, and Snowe--indicate they will not vote for it. Enzi and Grassley oppose it because they are founding members of the party of NO; Snowe opposes it because it's too weak.

This bill is the worst of the worst: a mandate without any guarantee of affordability.

HR 676 is worth reading. See

HR 676 is worth reading. See what comprehensive health insurance coverage for all United States residents looks like ..... easy read ..... 30 pages.

its a sad day in america! i

its a sad day in america! i dont know what to say except its over we lost and the crazies now run this goverment. only thing to do is jump ship and go to Europe at least there is some sensibility over there.

The 35% excise tax on

The 35% excise tax on insurance companies is funny as well as terrible. It is clear the object of the bill is not to reduce health care costs for the public if it includes a 35% tax on obligatory insurance policies. We have a non-functional Senate unfortunately which likes to shovel money to bankers and wars while avoiding taxing the rich. The rest of us will not only being paying for our care with a plan "which doesn't add a dime to the deficits" but will be paying an additional 35% tax on this care (for all but the threshold level) to help with the money for the bankers and the wars. It doesn't include the single payer public option which surveys showed a majority of the public favored because "a public option couldn't pass the Senate" which has to be elected by the people who favor a "public option". Truly disfunctional.

Doesn't anyone notice that

Doesn't anyone notice that the bill that came out of this far-too-powerful-for-its-representation, run by legally-bribed politicians, committee basically puts into black and white precisely the provisions MOST FEARED by all the protesters? This is just another "See? We told you 'they' would force you to buy insurance and punish you if you don't" moment. Baucus is giving the teabaggers their fears on a silver platter.

A perfect example of how

A perfect example of how someone can be bought with funding from Big Medicine. The PEOPLE need single payer health care, the nightmare of the established, for-profit "providers." Graft is graft. Bribery should not be allowed. People should be enraged by these actions of our "representatives."

September 17, 2009. I

September 17, 2009. I thought prostitution was illegal in both Montana and D.C. Evidently not. So I propose we get up a co-op and offer Baucus Ten Million Cash to change his mind and offer what the American public wants: freedom to have a public plan to compete with the bloated profit insurance companies now dominating our markets. As for the Death panels: The real β€˜Norma > Rae' just died. She had brain cancer - > and her insurance company refused treatment until it was too late.

It's really very simple! We

It's really very simple! We can always count on their sound judgment. If the insurance companies back it then reject it!

2 words: We're screwed. Even

2 words: We're screwed. Even more than we were before. As a type 1 diabetic (fortunately in good health) I see no other choice but not to comply if they foist this mandatory purchase of pretend insurance on us. I have insurance now though my husbands work, but the deductible is so high that everything gets paid out of pocket anyway, and with a 50/50 chance of being dropped if I needed really expensive care, what is the point of paying the premiums? If this goes through it's time for lots of old fashioned civil disobedience. I suggest everyone stop paying any premiums until they get this single payer, public option thing right. So take me to jail! At least there's some form of health care in there!

It seems as if Baucus has

It seems as if Baucus has chosen all the worst elements of a health care "reform" and now pretends that this is the way to cut health care costs. He includes fines for anyone who does not sign up, yet does little to insure that insurers--who are being handed a big new market--will do anything much to cut their "costs" (which include unconscionable overheads of very overpaid executives). A coop, even a national one, is no real threat to insurers: Blue Cross/Blue Shield started out as a coop. If the Democrats don't pass a health care bill that includes a public option, and a better way to pay for health care than this, then this political system has got to go! That would prove that it is so constituted that it can't do anything right, can't represent the needs or desires of its constituents, and is hobbled by special interests with deep pockets, which obviously include big pharma, insurance, and for profit hospitals.

I'd be laughing if this plan

I'd be laughing if this plan didn't make me feel so sick.

This is called "throwing the

This is called "throwing the public a bone" (a bone with a viral disease). Instead of giving those that need help true aid, they will penalize them if they can't afford this new bonanza to the insurance companies and don't forget the pharmaceutical companies. Watch the stocks in these industries skyrocket as the big guys register bigger profits. Those of us that lost our money in the last Wall Street debacle will not benefit. This is a bill that will divide the classes and drive the middle class further away from the possibility for the once possible American dream.

Sold out by the Democrats

Sold out by the Democrats again! Having a 2-party republic largely controlled by corporate America has turned the USA into a country that is rapidly crossing the line into a fascist state. The shift has slowed its rate in terms of movement to the extreme right, but we have a Democratic controlled White House and US Congress that is still doing the biding of big business. We do not need a recovery but rather a revolution in this country.

Sen. Max Bogus, what a joke.

Sen. Max Bogus, what a joke. When he announced his proposed legislation was he wearing a suit covered with the logos of sponsors (like a NASCAR driver) so we can be clear on the bribes applied? The main question now is: how many days before he takes a highly-paid position with the health care industry? Maybe his wife or other family members are holding a place until he moves over to the big new job with CIGNA.

Good article, "2 words" you

Good article, "2 words" you have a good point. Everyone not pay the mandatory insurance and go directly to jail. Are they serious, boy they sure are good enough to get free health care from us, but not likely to give in return!

Just heard Sen Boehner talk

Just heard Sen Boehner talk about 'fear of government healthcare takeover,' like we do not hear this about Medicare & don't the insurance $Bceos control & takeover healthcare to our detriment?? He says 'we have the best healthcare in the world'--speak for yourself Senator as recipient & enjoyer of 1payer healthcare from now on till your death.Denied to your fellow americans who pay his healthcare costs by their taxes.

Great article! This is a big

Great article! This is a big issue! Shouldn't we the people vote on such a big issue?

I'll say it again--We don't

I'll say it again--We don't need health CARE reform, we need health INSURANCE REFORM. When are our legislators gonna wake up?

I am 62, have three chronic

I am 62, have three chronic illnesses and need all of my health care. I currently pay $876. out of pocket for my health plan, plus co-pays, and make less than $28,000. a year. Now I find out that I will be taxed 35% on my premiums, because I'll need a "premier health plan." I am furious. People who have chronic illnesses have to pay more for healthcare than everyone else already. Now we're gonna be taxed because we're too sick. Sickening.

Baucus... what a sell out...

Baucus... what a sell out... Yes... we do need healthcare reform... Sorry DorthyK, but your idea of insurance reform is just passing the buck to the next generation yet again... the single desk option is the only sane proposal to come down the pipe and... if we need a 2 tier healthcare system then by all means lets have at it but the basics of healthcare needs to be addressed now...

Everything they do is for

Everything they do is for the corporations. Just like clunkers for cash wasn't for citizens it was for the auto industry. This is for the insurance companies. To force us to buy insurance, nothing else. It's all a lie. Open wide!

What B.S.!!! Everything all

What B.S.!!! Everything all politicians do or propose is for the corporations period. Doesn't matter whether they are Democrat or Republican. This is an attempt to move us to one world government.