Share

Blue Cross Takes Invasive Action to Cut North Carolina State Employees' Health Costs

by: Sue Sturgis  |  Facing South

Health Care for America Now protesters.
Health Care for America Now protesters. (Photo: ProgressOhio / Flickr)

    Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina holds a near-monopoly over the state's health insurance market, controlling 72.5% of all individual and employer-provided health insurance.

    It also holds a no-bid contract to insure state employees - a contract that came under criticism recently after a state audit found the company's administrative expenses were almost $40 million more than expected. Because of how the contract was structured, the state was required to reimburse BCBSNC for all administrative costs but did not have a right to an explanation of those costs from the company.

    Last month the House Committee on Energy and Commerce requested BCBSNC data [pdf] on executive compensation and administrative expenses from 2003 through 2008. Company CEO Bob Greczyn earned $4 million in 2008.

    After receiving a $250 million bailout from the state of this past spring, North Carolina's cash-strapped state employee health plan has reworked its contract with BCBSNC to give it greater oversight of administrative costs.

    Meanwhile, the insurer has proposed draconian measures to cut the costs of covering state employees - including random testing of beneficiaries and their dependents for nicotine and excess body fat, WRAL reports:

     The tobacco program, which will begin next July, will require smokers to quit or get into a cessation program if they want to keep the "standard plan" that requires patients to pay for 20 percent of a doctor bill after copayments and deductibles. Otherwise, the portion rises to 30 percent....

     Starting in July 2011, enrollees with a body mass index - a weight-height ratio that determines whether a person is considered overweight - below 40 can stay in the more generous plan. The standard becomes 35 in July 2012.

    The State Employees Association of North Carolina objects to the proposals, with a spokesperson telling WRAL that the random testing is an invasion of privacy and the forced move to more expensive insurance a form of discrimination. SEANC says efforts to encourage state employees to get healthier should be done through incentives, not punishment.

    At the same time BCBSNC is proposing draconian measures to cut the costs of covering state employees, it's been an outspoken opponent of health insurance reform proposals that include a public option to compete with private insurers - a stance that's drawing criticism.

    Today Health Care for America Now - a national grassroots campaign working for health insurance reform - is holding a protest outside BCBSNC's headquarters in Chapel Hill, N.C. The action will call on the company to let doctors determine patients' needs, stop denying or dropping coverage due to a pre-existing medical condition and scrap all policies that reward its employees for denying care and rejecting claims.

    The protesters will also call on BCBSNC to refrain from using its resources to oppose the health insurance reform proposals being considered by Congress.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

And to think that many

And to think that many people were worried that the GOVERNMENT might invade their privacy. Now, not only do the health insurers want to get between you and your doctor, they're ready to dictate your lifestyle, also.

2009 and beyond "cost

2009 and beyond "cost cutting" means what 2008 and before was called "denial of benefits".

Isn't this why the McCarren

Isn't this why the McCarren Ferguson Act exempting insurance companies from federal anti-trust laws should be repealed?

If a government plan tried

If a government plan tried to reduce benefits for smokers and overweight people, there would be hell to pay. Where is the uproar about this? I haven't seen it in the mainstream media.