Opinion

Franklin Roosevelt, a Nation Turns Its Lonely Eyes to You

by: Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Franklin Delano Roosevelt. (Photo: macslegalhistory.com)

    We thirst for leadership, vision, someone who can speak to us in a way that refuses to avert its eyes from the crisis but shines a light of truth upon the problem, then offers hope and possible solutions.

    If this is indeed an economic 9/11, as some have suggested, we need that voice now. Right now. And so far it has yet to be heard. Not from McCain, or Obama, or President Bush.

    After September 11, 2001, the President stood on a pile of debris with a megaphone and said that the whole world could hear the rescue workers and shared their grief. Soon, words of sorrow degenerated into bumper sticker rhetoric: Axis of Evil, Wanted Dead or Alive, Mission Accomplished. Nor, at a time when people were ready to do whatever needed to be done, was there a call for national sacrifice. Instead, the President invoked not poets or statesman past, but variations on a tee-shirt slogan: when the going gets tough, the tough go shopping.

    Over the last two weeks, he has been seen infrequently and when he has spoken his words have rung false. This Harvard MBA speaks Economics as though he were phonetically reading a foreign language.

    The President has seemed underinformed, disconnected and not, you should excuse the word, invested. In his address to the nation Wednesday evening, he said that the government was blameless for the financial crisis; it had done what it was supposed to do but had been victimized by overseas lenders, greedy banks and Americans taking on more credit than they could carry. And as he has done too often before, he tried to make us afraid.

    "The government's top economic experts warn that without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic, and a distressing scenario would unfold." President Bush said. "More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically. And if you own a business or a farm, you would find it harder and more expensive to get credit. More businesses would close their doors, and millions of Americans could lose their jobs."

    Contrast what he had to say with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he was sworn into office for the first time, in 1933, during the Great Depression. Rather than foster anxiety and panic, FDR proclaimed, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself," despite the fact that 13 million were unemployed, nine million had lost their savings and a quarter of the banks had closed. Wages had plummeted 60 percent. "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" is the phrase that everyone remembers, but here's a little more of what FDR had to say:

    "This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure, as it has endured, will revive and will prosper ...

    "In such a spirit on my part and on yours we face our common difficulties. They concern, thank God, only material things. Values have shrunk to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen; government of all kinds is faced by serious curtailment of income ... More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment ...

    "The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of that restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit ... If I read the temper of our people correctly, we now realize, as we have never realized before, our interdependence on each other; that we can not merely take, but we must give as well."

    Idealism and truth-telling intersected in FDR's speech. There was no equivocation, no pass-the-buck. But as decades passed, the belief in government as an instrument to advance the common good was rejected. Ronald Reagan became President, proclaimed that government was not the solution but the problem, and joked that, "The 10 most dangerous words in the English language are, "Hi, I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help."

    Now, like a last-minute, battlefield conversion, the White House has rediscovered the value of government as backstop - not to relieve the misery of the people but the agonized indigestion of financial institutions suffering morbid obesity because they ate too much at the big shot banquet.

    In these bailouts, there is no altruism but cynicism, the same attitude that scorns the Constitution and tramples civil liberties, that uses national tragedy to advance an unrelated global agenda, that doesn't give a damn as it tries to game and subvert the electoral process because deep down it fundamentally disdains democracy. Winning isn't everything; it's the only thing.

    We need solutions, not sound bites or pandering. We need inspiration and hope, not spin or cant. The way things are going, we may have to find it within ourselves. But in the next five weeks, if one of the candidates can discover how to articulate that hope without pandering, can define our national trauma and tell us how to try to make it better without terrifying us, can give us something to believe in without false expectations, he will be our next President.

    --------

    Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday nights on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.

»


Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday nights on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

I almost didn't read this,

I almost didn't read this, but tripped over it several times today until I stumbled on that segment from FDR. As I read, I started to imagine the strong voice with the rhythmic cadence that I've heard for years whenever FDR was propagandized on TV. What a revelation to have heard the certainty of his reason so loud and clear. A total calm came over me as I realized that at one time our nation was lead by a man who knew how to appeal to our best instincts. There is still hope that it can happen again.

This is an excellent moving

This is an excellent moving summary of the import of what must have been a very moving radio address; indeed we do need leadership like this. Unfortunately, the entire country is different, not just its leaders. How many people would listen to such an address today? How many people would be moved, compared to a sound-bite laden tirade from Limbaugh or a Fox News "analyst"? Among the more famous and incisive "word bites" in English is: "We have met the enemy, and he is us." (Thanks Walt Kelly) There are all too few people in this country who want to an articulate challenge, and I disagree with the author's conclusion that the candidate who can offer it will win in November. The majority of the undecided voters are not mentally able to embrace such a challenge. That is the fault primarily of our educational system, which has not succeeded in counterbalancing the effects of the forces of popular culture which take us on the path of least resistance. And if those of us who care want to win, we have to devote our efforts to restoring that balance.

As others have noted, this

As others have noted, this the speech FDR gave "after" he was elected. Perhaps Obama has been advised to temper his rhetoric until he is elected for fear that white-bread USA will be intimidated by an angry black man. I am banking on Obama taking the gloves off when he is elected, rolling up his sleeves and getting down to the hard work necessary to set our own house in order. There needs to be a reckoning and those responsible need to be called to account for their actions. Once more... "The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization." and we are left to clean up the mess.

Our Congress is about to

Our Congress is about to approve Bush's 700+ bailout package. Remember this is the same Congress who took impeachment hearings for the high crimes of the Bush/Cheney administration off the table. I hope the U.S. electorate will now consider 3rd party leadership alternatives.

Friends, it is not yet too

Friends, it is not yet too late to actualize the ideals and principles writ down in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution. Perhaps rephrasing them into modern language would make it easier for many to grasp: WE are the source of all true government. WE have the right to change it when it violates our freedoms. Please re-read and ponder the Declaration. It is a critical time for us- or this grand experiment will surely die.WE must speak up and act: me, you, and you and you...now.

Trickle down economics was

Trickle down economics was invented by the BASE of Reagan, Daddy Bush and "W" who likes fundraising better than working - let Dick do the dirty work. None of them were leaders but front men for their Base. This bailout is more of the same. Why did we really go into Iraq and why doesn't McCain and the GOP base want it to never end and why are we in debt out the ass? Because THE GOVERNMENT functions and some funny stuff the government shouldn't be doing under Bush/Cheney are now performed by contractors making BIG bucks and wanting no oversight. Just pay the bills and shut up. On Sept 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfelt said that the Defense Dept couldn't account for 25% or 2.3 TRILLION Dollars in transactions Shocked? that was 7 years ago and how much BIG money has poured into defense since? The ODNI revealed in May that 70% of the Intelligence budget now goes to contractors. Do you think those big companies want these good times (for them) to end?

Please, please check out

Please, please check out Dennis Kucinich's Main Street Recovery Plan at http://kucinich.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2444&Itemid=1. It's a shame that this thoughtful and courageous man is deemed too "extreme" to win the Democratic presidential nomination.

Thank you, Michael Winship,

Thank you, Michael Winship, for giving voice to a yearning that is 45 years wanting...we have not been a stable nation since the assassinations of 1963 and 1968. Since then, we have lost our compass and wandered in collective trauma as our collective disociation gradually mutated into an armored narcissism. In the end, we are left with this deep feeling of unsafety, which evokes very primal fears and results in very superficial attempts (self-medications, such as material consumption) to help ourselves feel things will be OK. We desperately need truth today, and I hope one of the candidates will find the courage to speak it.

While it is true that FDR

While it is true that FDR offered some hope in the form of following his path --we have come to learn it was a false hope and distracted the US people away from learning to take things into their own hands. As the stakes for US imperialism became higher after WWII, the process of 'scaring the life out of us' began. There are no knights on horses (white or otherwise) since whoever supposedly speaks for us -- just doesn't- and so many people can't seem to get it into their heads that the corporate state is our enemy. All we have is ourselves --and we are so panicked and distrustful of each other we have lost the ability to organize ourselves around our felt needs and come together. Sure, if we were effective some would get bought out, some would be terrorized and others would be killed with the approval of the state. That is really the worst that could happen. So is it better to live with blinders on our collective knees?

Michael, In September of

Michael, In September of 1932, I'm certain that many observers would have said the same of Franklin D. Roosevelt---that he didn't seem fully committed to leading a fundamental change in the economic and political order. If anything, his positions and platform were relatively conservative (balanced budget, etc.) because, like most presidential candidates, he wanted to win. Because only when you win, can you then actually lead and make policy changes. Barack Obama hasn't won yet. And I plan to do everything I can to help him win. We have an opportunity with Obama to do great things for the country and put our ship of state in the right direction. To equate the current campaigns of McCain and Obama and argue that neither one is sufficiently different from Bush can only help McCain and hurt Obama. There's no absolute guarantee that Obama will do what is needed to make things substantially better in our country. But there is an absolute guarantee that McCain will continue the conservative, pro-corporate, Republican policies we've suffered with for the past 8 years. Don't help McCain by confusing people. Obama is infinitely better and we should do everything we can to elect him this November.

Dear Michael Winship --

Dear Michael Winship -- thank you for reminding us what leadership means, and what a leader might say in the kind of economic situation we face together now. Based on what I heard last night, I agree that we have yet to hear leadership speaking. My only hope, and it is admittedly a slim one, is that, in situations like ours, leadership may be forged over time, and in the need to act as events unfold. Teri Harrison

Clearly, this

Clearly, this economic"crisis" is just another way for the administration to further it's project of bankrupting the government. Why would the administration want this to happen, you ask? In order to eliminate social programs. Start a "war", give tax cuts, bail out numerous corporations in many different types of business, borrow with abandon from foreign governments, then throw your hands up and declare that the government is broke and the only solution is to eliminate Social Security, Medicare, financial aid to the states and revert back to a time before the New Deal when there were no safeguards to the taxpayer. Are we ready to go down that road again?

"There was no equivocation,

"There was no equivocation, no pass-the-buck. But as decades passed, the belief in government as an instrument to advance the common good was rejected. Ronald Reagan became President, proclaimed that government was not the solution but the problem, and joked that, "The 10 most dangerous words in the English language are, "Hi, I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help." Is this really what was intended by: Government of the people, by the people, and for the people?

'MaN'...ahhh...'SiR'... j'YoU

'MaN'...ahhh...'SiR'... j'YoU...'HaVe' Got 'tHaDt'... 'NaiLLLeD'...!!!RiGHt!!! 'A'-MeN. ];@~ HeRez'sss...'an' OLD '?PoeM?'... FroM: WiLLiaM ButLeR Yeatz... For...j'You`ALL to !'PoNDeR'! 'tHe' SeCoND 'CoMiNg'... Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. Surely some revelation is at hand; Surely the Second Coming is at hand. The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert A shape with lion body and the head of a man, A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun, Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds. The darkness drops again; but now I know That twenty centuries of stony sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? THE !?'END'?! ...(I)...'SuReLy'... ...!HOPE!...Nottt... ];@~

Since the current

Since the current Bush/McCain/Obama agenda is basically the same on military, civil rights, economic corporate interest policies, no national single payer health insurance program, etc., I'm looking at the Nader/Gonzalez ticket for another alternative. I cannot in good conscience vote for McCain or Obama largely due to their continuation of Bush's governance policies.

Time for Sarah to head back

Time for Sarah to head back north to Alaska...

Winship has summed it up

Winship has summed it up with this article. we need to depend on ourselves to resolve this problem, not the government. we help our neighbors and keep our communities safe and intact. We support our local banks and work to help our governmental agencies put localized programs into place that can create local safeguards for the economy. This includes local incentives for businesses to come there or to start up there, with banks helping. The credit markets may be locked up, but people who are willing to help their neighbors can open new avenues of credit - barter, personal loans, co-signing on small loans that do not require local banks to borrow from other banks. These are the kinds of things that built this nation, and they are the kinds of things that helped it stay strong. Now it is time for us to forget the feds and start to work together again. Help your neighbor should once again be our rallying cry, and government will follow or it will be replaced. It is our choice, and we can make the right one if we want to survive.

Winship writes: "But in the

Winship writes: "But in the next five weeks, if one of the candidates can discover how to articulate that hope without pandering, can define our national trauma and tell us how to try to make it better without terrifying us, can give us something to believe in without false expectations, he will be our next President." One of the presidential candidates has already done what Winship describes. His name is Ralph Nader and he is on the ballot in 45 states and the District of Columbia - more than enough potential electoral votes to win the presidency. Unlike both Obama and McCain, Nader has no financial or adviser ties to the investment banking and subprime lending industries. He has devoted his entire life to fighting tirelessly for consumers and workers and ordinary people. Nader, and his running mate, Matt Gonzales, have been battling corporate crime, fraud and abuse all their adult lives. They owe nothing to the plutocrats who got America into this credit crisis and once in power, will do everything in their power to deal with this crisis in a manner which represents the interests of the large majority of Americans. See votenader.org for more details on the Nader/Gonzales plan.

It may be true that there is

It may be true that there is little truth telling and leadership coming from the two major political parties , but from the progressive end , The Green Party , Truth and Peace ARE the agenda . It's a hip-hop revolution . The rest of the nation could do U.S. justice by taking a harder , closer look at what they are saying -there's a "white-out " on the Cynthia McKinney campaign . The white -owned media is not getting the word out to our citizens that they actually have a real choice . Where is Truthout's leadership on this issue ? ..part of the great white out !

I have faced combat, been

I have faced combat, been bombed, mortared, rocketed. I have faced grizzly bears face to face, and mountain lions, tigers, and even an African lion(but he was a docile pet). I've gone into forest fires and burning buildings to rescue folks. I've pulled people from burning cars, and plucked them off cliffs thousands of feet above the "ground". I did it all while in the service of MY COUNTRY. We MUST have a sound resolve to our minor economic problems where the cure can easily come out more dangerous than the disease. We must select "doctors" very carefully and get far more than a mere "second opinion" and be ready to jail folks for malpractice, not just sue them or slap them on the hand. But in this turmoil, and back to my beginning, I have faced many dangers, and NOT ONE OF THEM HAS LEFT ME WITH HALF THE SENSE OF TERROR AND FOREBODING as a single name potentially on our horizon to doom: Sarah Palin. In combat, a fool for a commander will get you killed. I shudder at the mere thought of this person being allowed within 1,000 miles of Washington D.C. and the White House. It isn't Wasilla, but the WHOLE WORLD at risk. Listen to your heart beating, and think again that at age 72, it can stop at any moment.