News

Negotiators Reach Breakthrough on Bailout

»

by: J. Taylor Rushing and Michael O'Brien, The Hill

photo
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) speaks to the press. Reid called the bipartisan agreement over a federal bailout of Wall Street a "breakthrough." (Photo: Win McNamee / Getty Images)

    Following marathon talks, congressional negotiators early Sunday announced that a framework had been established for a $700 billion Wall Street rescue plan.

    Emerging at 12:28 a.m. from a nine-hour meeting in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) office, principal negotiators said they expect to put the finishing touches on a deal later in the day.

    The breakthrough was announced in a mostly-deserted Capitol and accompanied by smiles, handshakes and hugs.

    "We've made great progress toward a deal which will work in the marketplace and be effective," said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, flanked by Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). "We've still got more to do to finalize it, but I think we're there. So far, so good."

    House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who is representing House Republicans in the talks, expressed similar optimism.

    "We'll be looking at the final wording tomorrow, but I think we"re going to be able to have an announcement," Blunt said.

    Reid called the agreement a "breakthrough" and noted that the last stages of talks were "extremely difficult."

    Turning to Paulson, Reid said, "Mr. Secretary, we've had a lot of pleasant words and some that haven't always been pleasant."

    Afterwards, turning away from reporters and strolling through the ornate hallways, Reid and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) had an emotional exchange, with Dodd putting his hand on Reid's face and saying, "We did it."

    The White House confirmed that President Bush spoke with Pelosi earlier in the evening to nudge negotiators toward closure.

    "We're pleased with the progress tonight and appreciate the bipartisan effort to stabilize our financial markets and protect our economy," according to White House spokesman Tony Fratto.

    The final product appears to be a genuine compromise stitched together from competing ideas, with House Republicans getting some - but not all - of their insurance-based proposals, which had nearly knocked talks off course, into the deal.

    Dodd and Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said all major issues among the competing sides in the talks have been resolved.

    "This is an agreement in principle, subject to the legislative drafting," Conrad said. "People have to take it back to their caucuses, and now it's got to be turned over to the lawyers to be turned into final language."

    Dodd said, "Like any other process, now you want to make sure you see the words on paper that reflect what you believe in."

    Details of the deal include:

    - The $700 billion total would be broken into stages, with an immediate $250 billion made available to Wall Street, followed by an additional $100 billion released anytime at the request of the president, followed by a remaining $350 billion made available by Congress.

    - Congress could disapprove the last $350 billion, but only through a disapproval resolution that would be subject to a presidential veto. There is no timetable for the remaining $350 billion, meaning that the entire $700 billion could be made available quickly and simultaneously.

    - House Republicans' idea for an insurance pool to protect mortgage-backed securities = expanded to include other troubled assets - and funded by premiums on financial institutions is in the plan, supervised by Treasury officials who will set premiums. The program would be voluntary for companies.

    - Taxpayer equity in the companies, intended to let taxpayers recover their investment as the companies recover.

    - Executive pay limits intended to prevent "golden parachute" scenarios for the executives of failed companies.

    - An oversight board would be established, with seats for the Treasury Department secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, Commerce Department secretary and Federal Reserve chairman.

    - Bankruptcy provisions for which Democrats had fought hard are not in the plan. Known as "cram-downs," the provisions would have allowed bankruptcy judges authority to revise the terms of mortgages.

    The deal is based on a Bush administration proposal that called for using taxpayer funds to buy up high-risk assets from teetering financial institutions in an effort to wall them off from the excessive risk and restore the free flow of credit that keeps the economy running.

    Dodd said in the end, negotiators sensed the weight of the moment.

    "We realized we had to get to something here," Dodd said. "There was a common determination recognizing we had to make a decision, either to vote or not to vote. You can't sit around for nine days, and so that helped tremendously.

    "It was really down to a few issues where we agreed something had to be done, but there were some differences on how," Dodd said.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

I am leaving the country and

I am leaving the country and never coming back. The stench is making me puke.

Weapons of mass destruction

Weapons of mass destruction turn out to made of paper. The common bond of Islam and Christianity was at one time - money paid for the use of money. The only people left to deal with such insidious stuff were people of the Jewish faith. Maybe all we need to do to obtain world peace and financial stability is swear off interest. We could have 12 step programs and everything.

This really bites. $700B

This really bites. $700B doesn't prevent a meltdown. It just delays it until after the election. The Democrats have sold us out -- AGAIN! They want us to believe how hard they fought, and how many "unfriendly words" they had with Paulson (give me a break, Harry!), but the bottom line is that when all is said & done, we got Paulson's idiotic plan. I say, "Let the banks die, and bail out people!" Bailing out banks didn't work for Hoover in 1931, and it didn't work for Japan in the 90's. Either these Democrats in Congress are completely and willfully ignorant of both history and the Constitution, or they are far more in line with the Cheney/Bush agenda than we thought possible. Feedback from constituents has been running 100 to 1 against this bailout, yet the Dems don't even have the courage to throw a bone to taxpayers who go through bankruptcy. Call your reps and demand that they vote AGAINST this Cash for Trash plan!

God help us

God help us

Breath deep and relax. It's

Breath deep and relax. It's just paper under the bridge to nowhere. The rush is to fill pockets of those who always need more and don't have the foggiest idea how few big fish are left in the sea. We can't stop the crazies who need war as much as they need money, concentrate on what really matters. Life is short, learn to ignore the piggies; grow a new and better culture, externalize profits, cooperate and, most of all, make time for fun. Cordially, Garrett

No matter what happens, the

No matter what happens, the system is going to playout. The question really is, can we (human beings on planet earth) cope with what is on the other end of this bailout and future downfalls of the world economy? Whether you support the system or not, we all live in it. If the economy turned to cow patties tomorrow, that's what we would be collecting. It's all relative. The consciousness that created the problem is not the consciousness that is going to fix it.

I agree with Jen, any

I agree with Jen, any bailout should be put to a National Ballot Referendum, since it will be taxpayers who end up paying for the rest of their lives and their children's lives and their great grand children's children's lives for decades of generations.

As a long-term campaigner

As a long-term campaigner against corporate capitalism, I've also had the benefit of having worked for almost 15 years in the investment business. Although I don't like this deal, I wouldn't characterize it as only a bailout of Wall St. crooks. With the institutional collapses we've already had, it's a good bet that a really big collapse was imminent - and it still might be. If a sustained crash happens, we shoot ourselves in the foot or maybe the gut if we focus only on punishing the financial geniuses who outsmarted themselves with their too-complicated-to-understand-and-evaluate financial products. A crash will punish all of us. Paulson said at least one true thing -- we're all already on the hook. The job now is to get some real oversight and reinvent a regulatory system that works. I hope this deal is adequate in that respect. And that enough anger has been generated to produce an energetic populist anti-corporate movement. Taking away corporate personhood is first on my agenda.

This is the economic

This is the economic equivalent of the 9/11 blastdown.

I'm afraid this is not in

I'm afraid this is not in the best interest of the American people. Credit card debt will be next and the banks, which have solicited even children and pets in their efforts to entice people into debt beyond their capabilites to repay, will make out like the bandits they are.

For most of us this

For most of us this "compromise" is a "compromise" to nowhere-where are the new regulations to stop this from happening again? The S&L debacle should have been a wake-up call, but then Enron reared its parasitical head and now this! What next? Plenty of blame for the people who bought houses at adjustable rate mortgages but precious little, if anything, is said regarding their falling wages, the climate of pro-business laws at the expense of unions, the escalating food and fuel prices, 47 million human beings uninsured-if these folks were payed union wages they would not have needed to buy a house with an "adjustable" mortgage rate while the rest of us might actually be able to afford to rent affordable housing. This bailout is for the Wall Street crooks. Just like Bush who should be arrested and sent to prison for lies and mass murder instead of continuing to cause harm as president, so should the Wall Street crooks pay. Democrats and Republicans are simply variations of the same tune. Time to put the "social"-the folks who actually create the wealth before the predators in the corporations wedded to the government. Let's join hands in massive civil disobedience for ourselves, for our planet and for our children's future!

This is Paulson's proposal.

This is Paulson's proposal. More words on paper but it's basically the same thing he proposed a week ago. Oversight by a board appointed by Bush? That's an insult. And Congress is going to control the funds by letting Bush decide when he gets the money. Give me a break! Nobody in Congress is asking the real question: if we have $700 billion to toss around (we don't but never mind), is a bankers' bailout the best use for the money?

Compromise? This is

Compromise? This is capitulation. Imagine that policy makers can force-feed taxpayers 700 billion in toxic waste despite overwhelming disapproval on the part of constituents. Democratic capitalism? Is that what this is? Why doesn’t Truthout or anyone else take the temperature of this issue by conducting a poll? This is pathetic.

The fact that Bush, Blunt,

The fact that Bush, Blunt, and Paulson could say they were pleased with the progress is a red flag that the Democrats have again sold US out. The breakthrough, it seems to me, is about successfully packaging a $700 billion giveaway to corrupt investment firms that taxpayers either don't fully understand, or involves so many future decisions (read: capitulations)that one is incapable of evaluating the result at this time. Sounds like kicking the can down the road, while hoping few pay attention, has become a trusted Democratic strategy. For example, the caveat of agreement in principle vs. actual legislative language. Won't it be too late, politically, after the self-congratulation is over with to forcefully reject legislative language that cancels or renders toothless any oversight, or rejection of appropriation? Methinks we've been had, again. Could Dodd have possibly been more vague with his comment: "We realized we had to get to something here"? How about, "we knew we had to protect the Constitution and the American taxpayers' interests"?

This is a massive

This is a massive Enron-esque 700 billion dollar ponzi scheme. There is nothing to prevent the same thing from happening again in a few years. I could go online today and get a high interest, high risk mortgage with little money down and minimal income right now. The United States Congress has deliberately and unconstitutionally transferred it's power of the purse to the Executive branch and unelected Wall Street insiders. The wealthy class has their deregulated cake and, not ever satisfied, are eating the American middle class up too. Socialize Wall Street for private profit. This is why neither the Democratic or the Republican party can be trusted with protecting or ensuring the nation's or the taxpayers' economic, international or social welfare. The immoral and greed blinded crooks are running the WTO, the banks, Wall Street AND all three branches of the federal government! This is Bush, Cheney & Rove's finest hour. America will soon be a third rate, third world nation with just a few more preplanned catastrophes by the one world power brokers.

Some timetable. What took

Some timetable. What took them so long to work that out: half the money now; the other half now. I think the taxpayers are going to have to bail ourselves out of this one, come April 15.

Sounds like a rush job with

Sounds like a rush job with very little to protect the predator's prey. The entire idea is ludicrous. to borrow money and to give that money to lenders so they will lend to you a interest. Talk about a con. This is bailing with a sieve. I don't have a 401 K and while I think there should be regulatory protection for these and other non high risk investments. I don't see why I should be on the hook for this or why there should be any effort to shore up institutions that have utterly broken trust with their investors. Also jail is not the answer for these creeps. Only one lesson will teach them and others to mind their manners. Empty their assets. Let them lose everything along with those they stole from.

'Canada's Harper Joins G-7

'Canada's Harper Joins G-7 Chorus, Pins Crisis on US Policies by TheoArgitis:"Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper said US policies helped CREATE the crisis in financial markets..poor oversight, cheap credit & a tax structure that may encourage housing bubbles..& BY THE WAY THERE WERE A LOT OF WARNING SIGNS..CERTAINLY EXPRESSED MY CONCERN..TO MY AMERICAN COUNTERPARTS. Sarcozy: MAD SYSTEM'..German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck 'ANGLO-SAXON MODEL OF BANKING HAS AND 'EXAGGERATED FIXATION ON RETURNS'... [all caps mine]. so our usa experts are not: greenspan, bernanke, paulson, et al. now, maybe this same pattern of overconfidence appears elsewhere in our government???

Any bailout whatsoever

Any bailout whatsoever should be added to the national ballot as a referendum. It is the taxpayers', not the wealthy wannabe rulers', decision to make.