News

After Tumultuous Negotiations, Congress to Vote on Bailout Monday

»

by: Kevin G. Hall, McClatchy Newspapers

photo
Demonstrators in New York's Times Square Saturday, September, 27 participate in one of many protests across the country against the proposed $700 billion bailout of struggling banks. (Photo: Reuters)

    Washington - After a tumultuous week of round-the-clock negotiations, Congress prepared for a difficult vote Monday on a sweeping $700 billion Wall Street rescue plan to stave off a possible global financial meltdown. Racing a self-imposed 6 pm EDT deadline Sunday night ahead of the opening of Asian financial markets, bleary-eyed Democrats in control of Congress released the text of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The plan had GOP support in the Senate, but substantially less Republican support in the House of Representatives.

    Democratic and Republican leaders worked through the night this weekend to modify a plan put forth by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to remove distressed mortgages and similar toxic assets off the books of banks and other financial firms. Paulson had warned that credit markets are on the verge of seizing up, with grave consequences for consumer lending of all sorts.

    "I am confident this legislation gives us the flexibility to unclog our financial markets increase the ability of our financial institutions to deliver the credit that will help create jobs," Paulson said in a statement that praised lawmakers for their tough decision. "We are taking the steps needed to be ready to begin implementing this legislation as soon as it is signed."

    President Bush said in a statement Sunday night, "this plan sends a strong signal to markets around the world that the United States is serious about restoring confidence and stability to our financial system."

    In detailing legislation that grew to more than 100 pages from its original three, lawmakers Sunday afternoon chose their words carefully to let angry American voters know they'd been heard.

    "It's very clear that Americans have some reason to be concerned, even angry about where we find ourselves. We know there has been greed on Wall Street," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada.

    But the cost of doing nothing was greater than what is being proposed, he said.

    "Inaction would paralyze our economy, even now it is difficult for people to get a car loan," Reid said, adding that "the market is frozen in terms of buying homes in many parts of our country."

    House Speak Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., sought to assure Americans that their tax dollars weren't rescuing the well heeled on Wall Street.

    "People have to know this is not a bailout of Wall Street, it's a buy-in," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a Sunday afternoon news conference that touted taxpayer protections and an effort to limit the compensation of some Wall Street executives who might partake in the rescue effort..

    One of the lead GOP negotiators, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-NH, said he was confident the measure would attract enough members of his party in both chambers of Congress to win passage later in the week.

    "I think everybody got what they needed to have," he said.

    Members of both parties supported measures to prevent so-called golden parachutes when a Wall Street executive departs. If a company has had government intervention, the five highest-ranking officials in that company will be denied bonus and incentive pay. And if a company sells as a whole $300 million or more in bad assets, there will be similar restrictions.

    Additionally, companies taken over by the government or receiving significant support will have to give Treasury preferred stock that could be sold later when the company recovers, to the benefit of U.S. taxpayers.

    As lawmakers neared the tentative deal, staff members had their cell phones confiscated to prevent leaks in what had become a heavily politicized negotiation. Lawmakers quickly published a copy of the deal online Sunday as night fell, giving an angry American public a look at the compromise ahead of a congressional vote. But computer servers crashed under the weight of so many requests to access the site.

    A tentative deal had been announced Thursday, but then House Republicans balked. The new compromise gives Democrats more restrictions on the pay of Wall Street execs and a taxpayer stake if the program actually makes money. Republicans tacked on a parallel insurance plan that can work as an alternative to taxpayer funding and killed provisions that would have let federal judges modify distressed mortgages.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson have warned repeatedly that absent an urgent response, credit markets could collapse this week, punishing Wall Street and Main Street alike.

    "The deal should go a long way to stabilizing financial markets and putting the financial system on what will be a long road to recovery," said Mark Zandi, chief economist of economic forecaster Moody's Economy.com.

    The rescue effort won't fix all that is wrong with the slumping U.S. economy, but it seeks to keep things from getting worse fast.

    "It's mostly is a stop-gap to get through the election and let the next president deal with it. You've got to get the housing market stabilized and manage to get the economy growing," said David Wyss, chief economist for rating agency Standard & Poor's in New York. "This makes it more likely that it will be a mild recession, not a deep recession."

    In a statement, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the legislation would provide "meaningful assistance" to financial markets.

    Both Democrats and Republicans won language that they will trumpet on the campaign trail in weeks ahead, and the White House can breathe easier that a financial collapse may be averted, for now at least.

    Specifically, the proposed legislation would provide:

  • $700 billion to help Treasury buy bad assets from banks and other financial firms, with $250 billion available immediately, another $100 billion upon report to Congress and the final $350 billion available only upon action by Congress.

  • Money to be used to buy mortgage-backed securities and other troubled assets, taking them from investment banks, commercial banks, smaller community banks, pension plans and even local governments.

  • Government the power as the owner of the troubled mortgage bonds to facilitate modifications for the mortgages themselves.

  • A bipartisan oversight commission to monitor the program. If after five years there is a net loss to taxpayers, president will have to submit legislative proposals to recoup funds from beneficiaries.

  • New restrictions on CEO pay and executive compensation for some participating companies, a point demanded by Democrats.

  • A parallel insurance program that companies can voluntarily choose instead of giving up their bad assets, a point demanded by House Republicans.

  • Creation of warrants, which allows any windfall coming to participating companies to be shared with the government, thus the taxpayers.

  • Actions by Treasury will be posted online in real time.

  • Judicial review of Treasury's actions.
  •     The presidential campaigns welcomed the legislation and took credit for it - even though Senate staffers say neither candidate was instrumental in getting a deal done.

        In a statement, Democrat Barack Obama said it met the four core principles he laid out - independent oversight, treatment of taxpayers as investors, measures to keep homeowners in their homes, and rules to prevent rewarding Wall Street CEOs from cashing in on the rescue.

        "While I look forward to reviewing the language of the legislation, it appears that the tentative deal embraces these principles," said Obama. He later echoed that in an appearance on CBS's Face the Nation.

        Republican John McCain, speaking on ABC's "This Week," said, "This is something that all of us will swallow hard and go forward with." His running mate Sarah Palin credited McCain for the leadership that made a deal possible.

        "I'm glad that John McCain's voice was heard," she said.

        While House Republicans do not have enough votes to scuttle the package -Democrats have a majority of House seats - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said she wants about 100 GOP members to vote for it. Not only would that give the plan a bipartisan sheen, it would also give the Democrats political protection.

        Should the financial market meltdown worsen despite passage of the rescue plan, Pelosi does not want Republicans pointing fingers and saying the Democratic plan sought by the White House was responsible.

        Rep. Frank acknowledged the House vote may be close, since lawmakers will get little reward for doing the right thing.

        "In politics, if you keep something from getting worse, you don't get a lot of credit for it," he said in a C-Span cable interview.

        --------

        David Lightman and Lisa Zagaroli in Washington contributed.

    »


    IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

    "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

    Comments

    This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

    CEOs of companies that are

    CEOs of companies that are bailed out should forfeit a years salary so as to "feel our pain." when they have to sell their yachts, planes, third homes, etc.

    This is not a bailout for

    This is not a bailout for banks, This is a rescue plan for the PEOPLE and the ECONOMY! This subject is so complex that very few people really understand it. Those who do not understand it should leave the discussion to those who do understand, like Warren Buffet. I was an Investment banker for 20 years and left Wall Street because people who have been telling the truth were unable to do their jobs. Economists who didn't see the crisis coming are now saying that there is no crisis. Believe me there is a huge crisis! I am on record here on truthout over 2 months ago that the ultimate rescue will top at least 1 trillion dollars. If the fall of the dominoes is not being stopped now then the ripples will get bigger and the ultimate damage will be much higher. It will spread from housing to commercial real estate and the overall economy. It will affect YOUR job. It will affect YOUR housing value because every additional foreclosure will depress YOUR home value further. This is a rescue plan for YOU!!! So far all rescue measures were designed to insulate the ordinary investor. If this rescue plan fails then the men/woman in the street can no longer be insulated and will increasingly start to feel the effects/increasing pain. The mortgage papers that will be bought will be bought for 40 or 30 cents on the $. So the holders (banks etc.) will have lost already at least 60%. This can hardly be a bailout. The losses for the banks will still be huge. The rescue package is only an attempt to unfreeze the credit markets. There is no guarantee that it will work in the long run. If energy/oil will continue to rise and the energy problem is not addressed then we will have much bigger problems down the road. Lets all pray that this, huge, but necessary, rescue program passes and that it will stop the fall. If the rescue fails then the fall will accelerate from here!

    curious - notice protesters

    curious - notice protesters are NOT corralled into free speech zones or being arrested? hmmm... what's the criteria for that? just the fact that 'powers that be' can decide when, where, and what for our protests can be about says what about free speech? it's all over, folks. this is just for show.

    John Hussman's weekly

    John Hussman's weekly column oh his fund's website advances an analysis critical of the bailout legislation: http://hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc080929.htm

    There are several problems

    There are several problems with the proposed bailout: 1st, Wall Street and the Bush administration have been lying to us for more than 7 years. Why would a rational person believe them now? 2nd, what is to prevent Bush from inserting another of his hundreds of unconstitutional (perhaps even secret) signing statements deleting the oversight provisions from the legislation? 3rd, why should Americans trust legislative oversight to work when at this very moment numerous Bush and Palin administration officials are successfully defying legislative subpoenas? 4th, the proposed bill requires super-majorities of 2/3 of both Houses to prevent the theft of the second $350 billion even if the first $350 billion is "lost" in the same way that Bush "lost" $11 billion of cash in Iraq. 5th, even Bloomberg writes that the rstrictions on executive compensation are largely illusory. This bailout of the wealthy imposed upon an unwilling middle class is "undeniable" proof that the plutocratic masters of America now own the United States government. The nation's future is bleak.

    Pull your money out of the

    Pull your money out of the bank. Run on cash. And since we no longer have representation in Washington, I think it's pretty clear we don't need to pay taxes either.

    Of course it will pass.

    Of course it will pass. From whom do you think all the congressmen and senators get their campaign money to continue to run for office. Again and again and again and again and........

    Thank goodness the actions

    Thank goodness the actions of the treasury can at least come under judicial review. This massive bailout is going to be inflationary. That is the last thing that America's struggling workers need. The complete text can be found online as a pdf file. The voting will be a matter of record. It should make a good picture of just where your lawmakers are really at. Under a different administration and cabinet, some of the added provisions COULD be used to help people or set the way back to a more realistic economy. Making the gov the de-facto landlord of such vast amounts of properties COULD be the only way. It is still wrong that the gov should pay the pigs so much (actually undetermined amounts) for such. I think without the bailout, things would straighten out sooner. The primary application of this act, while this congress and president remain is to keep housing prices sky high and to loot the public trust at a record pace. Default of all Local government debts and currency collapse are still just around the corner. These will make this last 'crisis' pale in significence. Politicians beware. You are biblically obligated to provide for the peasantry your policies have created, or be swept from power. Maybe congress won't pass this bill........... A New Deal is in order here. Can we elect an administration and congress that is up to this vital work? If not, expect the US to go much the way the Soviet did.

    bailout of people

    bailout of people AUTOMATICALLY bails out the banks. bailout of the banks DOES NOT help the people that much:+trickle..

    The People don't need any

    The People don't need any more "sheens." We've had quite enough of backroom deals that only wildly increasing benefit to those already in the back rooms and friends- complete with "sheens" of all types.... 911, the Patriot Act, the "WMD" and Iraq - all the spun "sheens" telling us that complete domination by a digustingly rich few is good for us. We're done with sheens and spin and disconnecting us from the government WE own. There must a PUBLIC PROCESS to THIS trillion. The House should vote NO on the plan...and vote NO on any plan that is not shown in full to The People, and approved by The People first.

    We cannot clean up the mess

    We cannot clean up the mess unless we let the market work in this case. After the bad actors fail and drop out, the Congress can go back in and establish a regulatory system that protects the people. Further as the smaller get eaten by the larger, risk is once again magnified. Let Congress stand up and break up the increasingly larger financial institutions. In ecology, we know that when there is a single system, we are increasingly vulnerable. Nature is complex and has survived to this point despite the stupidity of H. sapiens; let's learn from Nature. We could also treat her more kindly for our own benefit.

    I find it difficult to

    I find it difficult to believe anything we are told by the FEDS or the MEDIA. It seems to me, no matter how it is phrased, that once again the taxpayer is bailing out the rich. Where's the help for those of us who've watched our houses devalue again and again? I'd like a bit of bail out, too. Oh, wait! I forgot- responsible citizens are the ones who get screwed in America today. There's your "government for the people." It's a shame.