Share

Senators Unveil New Climate Change Bill

by: Renee Schoof   |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
Sen. John Kerry speaks at the rally for the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act at the Capitol Building in Washington, DC. (Photo: Sierra Club / flickr)

    Washington - On a stage in front of the Capitol with a giant American flag behind them, a group of senators Wednesday unveiled a new climate bill that they say will increase jobs and reduce the billions spent on foreign oil.

    The bill's framework is similar to one that squeaked through the House in June. It orders mandatory reductions of heat-trapping gases by large companies and provides incentives and support for clean energy. It goes further, however, with more support for continued use of coal but with the emissions greatly reduced, and for increased reliance on nuclear power and natural gas.

    Those provisions are intended to pull in more support from fence-sitting or opposing senators. Details in the bill remain to be filled in, and supporters face an uphill fight getting enough votes to clear the Senate's 60-vote requirement. Democratic supporters argue that the bill - which they're calling the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act - puts American interests first.

    "We know clean energy is the ticket to strong economic growth," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, who cited a recent University of California study that found the House version of the bill would create 1.9 million new jobs and increase household income.

    Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who wrote the bill, said a transition to cleaner energy would reduce the billions of dollars spent on oil, some of which supports terrorists.

    "Washington is used to letting Big Oil and special interests stand between us and the goals of everyday citizens," Kerry said. "Our security and our economy will both be strengthened and we cannot afford not to act."

    Kerry said the bill supports all forms of energy - including coal, natural gas and nuclear energy - but makes them cleaner and more efficient.

    Emissions reductions would be required only by large companies that emit 25,000 tons of carbon or more per year. Farms, homes and small businesses are exempt, Kerry said.

    Even so, the bill would cover three-quarters of the nation's emissions of heat-trapping gases. The required reductions would reduce global warming pollution by 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, slightly more than the 17 percent in the House bill, and 83 percent by 2050, the level consistent with what scientific studies say will be necessary to prevent destructive warming that brings coastal inundation, more frequent heat waves, extinction of species and other results of a climate shift.

    The new measure also adds a provision to keep the cost of the measure down - a ceiling on the price of the allowances that companies would pay for the right to emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. It also contains stronger oversight of the market in which companies would buy and sell those allowances.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Without a safe method of

Without a safe method of disposing of nuclear waste, nuclear power will remain a dangerous source of energy (even if not contributing to global warming) and a drain on taxpayers obliged to insure its hazardous existence since insurance companies will not. Its expense cuts into the cost for the better solution: renewable energy sources. Big utility firms (like for-profit medical insurers) hate to relinquish their control over our ability to pay for a needed service like electricity (or healthcare); but solar, wind, etc. can liberate householders from excessive electric bills as well as the U.S. from foreign oil (and the wars over it) PLUS provide jobs and avoid global warming--a win/win solution that the politicians seem to ignore.

Coal, natural gas, and

Coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants are not carbon neutral, and feed the existing polluting powerful energy interests. Backed by to powerful corporations that now control Washington politics. There is a real clean energy route that would only fund wind, solar, geothermal, and perhaps tidal/wave, and algae power generation. This would be done on a local decentralized economic plan that would create millions of local green energy jobs.

Well well well. Not letting

Well well well. Not letting Big Oil stand in the way of whats best for the citizens. It sounds like a government that is vindicating some of our conspiracy theories about energy and Fat Cats running the show. HA!! So thats good, and it is also good that a short term goal for emissions reductions is in the works. It remains to be seen if the bill passes without getting watered down somehow.

We also need a huge push for

We also need a huge push for conservation and recycling and new technologies for those. Using more and more energy is NOT a winning plan. Right now in our area we are fighting utility plans for more and more huge powerlines scarring the landscape. This has to stop.

The economy is more

The economy is more important than the global warming scare, at least until the anthropomorphic global warming team prove their case. They could start by increasing their transparency. Currently, the raw data on which climate theories rest is typically withheld and only the "enhanced" data is released. Just recently, Steve McIntyre has found evidence that Briffa, a lead author for the IPCC's fourth annual report, may have been very irresponsible in his use of data. We'll see how it plays out, but right now it's not looking good for Briffa.

Pollution Reduction Is A

Pollution Reduction Is A Fine Goal and would go a great way toward improving public health, but CO2 is not a pollutant - read what the silent majority of Scientists have to say about the rampant fraud in the alarmist camp - go to icecap.us And as for where to spend the money - reducing CO2 is a waste of funds - while there is some overlap with the other pollutants, such as particulates, it is very expensive to remove CO2 and delivers no benefit. We have been bamboozled, and for those focused on 'big oil climate deniers' it is time to turn your attention to the heavyweights - the International Bankers who are scheming the most brilliant and biggest fraud ever attempted - to tax carbon and turn it into a fiat currency, thus gaining (finally) true worldwide hegemony - that leaves you and I as the Serfs. We are building our own shackles here - don't be a fool, don't take the bait. Snuff out Cap and Trade. If you need more convincing than observed weather, watch The Great Global Warming Swindle, a BBC documentary available online.

It's true that CO2 is not

It's true that CO2 is not like conventional pollution. Without any CO2 or other greenhouse gases our planet would be very cold. But if there is too much, the planet gets hotter. This is simple physics, and no sane scientist disputes it. We also know how hot the earth was in the past when CO2 levels were lower and higher than now, and we know many other things about those past times. We are already beginning to see so many changes caused by the high CO2 levels, and this is only the beginning. 300,000 people die per year now from global warming according to the U.N. Global warming will cause millions or billions of deaths in the future, depending on how far we let it go. Read or watch "Six Degrees" if you want a taste of what will happen. And do all you can to prevent it. Don't listen to the fossil-fuel-funded global warming deniers and the simple-minded people they have fooled.