News

Facebook DIGG

Satellite-Surveillance Program to Begin Despite Privacy Concerns

by: Siobhan Gorman  |  Visit article original @ The Wall Street Journal

photo
A controversial Homeland Security satellite-surveillance program is proceeding to its first phase, despite an independent review's findings that the program will not ensure privacy laws. (Photo: newlaunches.com)

    Washington - The Department of Homeland Security will proceed with the first phase of a controversial satellite-surveillance program, even though an independent review found the department hasn't yet ensured the program will comply with privacy laws.

    Congress provided partial funding for the program in a little-debated $634 billion spending measure that will fund the government until early March. For the past year, the Bush administration had been fighting Democratic lawmakers over the spy program, known as the National Applications Office.

    The program is designed to provide federal, state and local officials with extensive access to spy-satellite imagery -- but no eavesdropping -- to assist with emergency response and other domestic-security needs, such as identifying where ports or border areas are vulnerable to terrorism.

    Since the department proposed the program a year ago, several Democratic lawmakers have said that turning the spy lens on America could violate Americans' privacy and civil liberties unless adequate safeguards were required.

    A new 60-page Government Accountability Office report said the department "lacks assurance that NAO operations will comply with applicable laws and privacy and civil liberties standards," according to a person familiar with the document. The report, which is unclassified but considered sensitive, hasn't been publicly released, but was described and quoted by several people who have read it.

    The report cites gaps in privacy safeguards. The department, it found, lacks controls to prevent improper use of domestic-intelligence data by other agencies and provided insufficient assurance that requests for classified information will be fully reviewed to ensure it can be legally provided.

    A senior homeland-security official took issue with the GAO's broad conclusion, saying the department has worked hard to include many layers of privacy protection. Program activities have "an unprecedented amount of legal review," he said, adding that the GAO is seeking a level of proof that can't be demonstrated until the program is launched.

    Homeland Security spokeswoman Laura Keehner said department officials concluded that the program "complies with all existing laws" because the GAO report didn't say the program doesn't.

    Addressing the gaps the agency cited, Ms. Keehner said current laws already govern the use of intelligence data and the department has an additional procedure to monitor its use. The department will also work with other intelligence agencies to "ensure that legal reviews and protection of classified information will be effective," she said.

    In response to the GAO report, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi and other Democrats asked Congress to freeze the money for the program until after the November election so the next administration could examine it.

    But the bill Congress approved, which President George W. Bush signed into law Tuesday, allows the department to launch a limited version, focused only on emergency response and scientific needs. The department must meet additional requirements before it can expand operations to include homeland-security and law-enforcement surveillance.

    The restrictions were "the most we could have required without a complete prohibition," said Darek Newby, an aide to Democratic Rep. David Price of North Carolina, who heads the House homeland-security spending panel.

    But California Rep. Jane Harman, who heads a homeland-security subcommittee on intelligence, said that even limited funding allows the department to launch the program, providing a platform to expand its surveillance whether or not privacy requirements are met.

    "Having learned my lesson" with the National Security Agency's warrantless-surveillance program, she said, "I don't want to go there again unless and until the legal framework for the entire program is entirely spelled out."

    Rep. Thompson vowed to fight expansion of the program until privacy issues are further addressed.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Will they point the

Will they point the satellites at the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan? You know, where "Enemy Number 1" lives? Oh, right, I forgot, he's been dead for the past six years.

In response to "Will they

In response to "Will they point the satelites at.. 'enemy number 1'": My hunch is that he probably lives in his parent's basement in Saudi Arabia. I lost faith in our glorious leader once bush gave bin laden's family exclusive rights to fly the day after he attacked us, enabling them, for some yet unexplained reason, to flee the country. Since then, I've realized that they consider "the enemy" of the Fatherland to be liberal voters poking their noses where they don't belong. Oh well, Nixon had an enemies list. PNAC's list just happens to have over a million people on it. As the survellance state becomes ever more powerful in the years to come, can Fibber McCain be trusted with control over the new guard tower in space? Every inch we give them regarding our freedom and liberties is gone forever. I still hope it doesn't get any worse, even though the army is now puting a permanent post in the U.S. just to keep us in line (um, I mean to help us with emergencies - since the National Guard is preoccupied in Iraq). Check out these links: http://www.alternet.org/rights/100069/?page=entire http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/

Of course, to this US

Of course, to this US Government, the 'enemy' is the American People. We are the ones that must be surveiled. ( We have met the enemy and it is us.) This Administration knows that we are all that stands between them and their plan to control the world. The only way to do that is to Spy on us, weaken us from within by stealing our wealth and taking away any good jobs that would make it possible for us to have the ability to Think and See what they are doing to us. In other words, too busy trying to earn enough to feed our families to have time or energy left over to Resist.

The issue is WHO gets to use

The issue is WHO gets to use this new information. There's an unstated but widely-accepted assumption that the policing apparatuses of the military or of civilian bodies will be the customers. I don't doubt that possibility, but I also suspect the main customers will be the richest monopolies that put the government of the day in office. Their interest is to spy on competitors' activities and projects on the ground and then prepare to wipe them out or take them over. Why the public should have to pay for this cops and robbers scam among the monopolies beats me.

This smells like the

This smells like the panopticon. war against people everywhere.Wednesday

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.