Share

EPA Proposes Curbs on Industrial Greenhouse Gases

by: Jim Tankersley  |  The Los Angeles Times

photo
A Texas oil refinery. (Photo: Morguefile)

    The agency's plan would target the sources of 70% of U.S. emissions. It sends a timely message to foreign allies in the fight against climate change -- and to lawmakers in Congress.

    Reporting from Washington - The Environmental Protection Agency unveiled a detailed proposal Wednesday for using the government's regulatory powers to curb greenhouse gas emissions -- reassuring foreign allies of the U.S. commitment to fight climate change and warning Congress that the administration will act on its own if lawmakers fail to address the issue.

    The proposed regulations would apply to large-scale industrial sources of heat-trapping gases, including power plants, factories and refineries, but not to smaller sources such as new schools, as some critics of EPA action had feared.

    The rules would force new or substantially modified industrial plants emitting at least 25,000 tons of greenhouse gases a year to employ "best available control technologies and energy-efficiency measures" to minimize emissions. That would cover the sources responsible for 70% of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S., the EPA said -- primarily carbon dioxide created by burning fossil fuels.

    To read more about the EPA's newest plan to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, click here.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Other Greenhouse Gases are

Other Greenhouse Gases are getting a little play in the press now - unfortunately, other mounting scientific opinion gets very little, as Anthropogenic Global Warming is now a religion and not science. For a sample of what the silent majority of scientists in this area really think, visit icecap.us or watch The Great Global Warming Swindle - the BBC documentary - can be downloaded. The money behind getting cap and trade and the new 'carbon credit' based currency dwarfs the oil companies - we've been duped and once again well meaning people are used to promote the most wretched and regressive policies ever invented.

It is undemocratic for an

It is undemocratic for an unelected regulatory body to impose such a sweeping regulation with no backing from lawmakers.

@"it is undemocratic

@"it is undemocratic for:" The driving force behind functioning democracy is a body of vocal, educated citizens -- citizens who read, listen, examine, and analyze. Since you clearly didn't read the article - not even the first paragraph - you failed to notice that the EPA has made a PROPOSAL, not a law. In advising Congress, the EPA is fulfilling the functions for which it was established. Please take the time to read before leaping to conclusions about our "undemocratic" country. Please try to be a good citizen.