Share

Are You Happy With the Shape of Your Bikini Wax?

by: Gloria Feldt, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
"Beauty is an Ugly Business." (Photo: candinski / flickr)

    When my son David was a gangly 14-year-old with a class assignment to research his ancestral roots, we drove 360 flat miles from Odessa, Texas, to Dallas to visit my grandmother. After she'd hugged and pinched us to determine if we'd been eating properly, David pulled out his scribbled questions. "Bubba," he asked, "What did you do for fun when you were a teenager?"
"Fun?" She looked perplexed.

    I'm sure Grandmother found ways to have fun in her youth, as most kids do. But fun is culturally defined. And growing up in Russia during World War I, with far fewer choices than today's teens enjoy, she simply couldn't imagine fun as a goal unto itself.
When I came upon author-consultant Marcus Buckingham's recent Huffington Post article,
whipping up a froth from a longitudinal study of self-assessed happiness, I thought of Grandmother - and how my life experience as an activist persuaded me a quest for happiness - also a cultural construct - without purpose is futile.

    Reading on, I found a misogynist misuse of data that worked me into a froth of my own. In language designed to attract clients to the "personal strengths" guru in perpetuity, Buckingham concludes that liberation makes women increasingly unhappy. The dreaded F-word, feminism, is clearly the culprit for giving us all these nasty new options:

The hard-won rights, opportunities, and advantages were supposed to have netted women more than just another burdensome role to play - "you at work." They were supposed to have fostered in each woman feelings of fulfillment and happiness, and even, for the special few, the sustained thrill of living an authentic life. This hasn't happened ... life is, in most ways we can measure, becoming more draining instead.

    How silly of us. Who would want to be able to make choices, realize her potential in life and perhaps even contribute to society in the bargain?

    But wait. Caryl Rivers, author of "Selling Anxiety: How the News Media Scare Women," alerts us that the authors of the report Buckingham cites cautioned against making such sweeping assumptions about their data because the gender differences are so small as to be negligible:

The researchers, who had no ax to grind, made no bones about the limits of the study. It was only the journalistic commentators who exaggerated the importance of the findings.

    One could as readily attribute the shared slide in reported happiness to men's insecurity about their loss of power over women. But only women are the subject of media speculation. While other experts have debunked Buckingham's metrics as well as his conclusions, even a novice could spy a trope that has relentlessly fostered women's feelings of inadequacy faster than you can holler, "Backlash!"

    After all, unhappiness sells, and not just to Buckingham's readers.

    Women are constantly bombarded by media images that scream out: You must be buffed up, dressed up, made up and sexed up at all times. The covers of popular women's magazines suggest that the shape of one's bikini wax is the single most pressing issue facing womankind today - even those of us who've already learned their 38 new positions to pleasure our man.

    Not surprisingly, women are treated as the uber-consumers we are, responsible for 80 percent of consumer spending. Now, I actually became happier (and saved about $1,500 a year) when I decided to stop coloring my hair. My stylist only half joked, "Well that doesn't help me pay my rent." American women each spend an average of $12,000 a year on beauty products and salon grooming; the beauty industry has a lot to lose if we all suddenly become happy with ourselves.

    And, if we're still not happy, could it be that still earning 78 cents to a man's dollar makes some of us just a tad testy?

    Even if the data supported Buckingham's theories, happiness itself isn't all it's cracked up to be. Certainly not when we seek it for its own sake. Rather, happiness comes from the satisfaction of working toward something larger than oneself, accomplishing things we're told can't be done. Where would a new idea come from if we were all just living in our own bliss? It's the sand in the oyster that creates the pearl.

    Social justice revolutions arise from people who have tasted just enough of a better life to know they want more. And it's a sure bet that women seeking a more just society would be deemed among the unhappy by those content with the status quo.

    And, just as surely, says Rivers, "No matter how many times the myth of the miserable woman is stomped, tromped and hacked to pieces by facts and figures, it always arises, like the Phoenix, from its own ashes. It's just too sexy for the media to ignore."

  

»


Gloria Feldt is a best selling author and leading women's activist who blogs at www.GloriaFeldt.com. Her book, "Woman Unlimited," about women's relationship with power, will be published by Seal next year. gloria@gloriafeldt.com.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Great post, Gloria. Honestly

Great post, Gloria. Honestly -- I feel happiest when three conditions are, generally speaking, being met simultaneously: my kids are happy and doing (at least) well-ish -- meaning everything doesn't have to be perfect and they don't have to be joyful each and every moment of each and every day, but all things being equal, they're enjoying their lives; second, when I am engaged in meaningful, challenging work that pays me well; I love the passion of work and I also love seeing my business account going KaChing! KaChing!; and third, when I'm engaged in staying physically fit; you know, the mind/body thing. So on those days, when the three are in some sort of harmony, I'm most happy. But who says we have to be happy every single day, or we're miserable? That's a misnomer. As you and I and so many of us know, we just get up the next day and select from our many choices and keep on keeping on; that's what makes it so great being a woman today: we can be who we are, on our own terms, and figure it out as we go along according to our own sensibilities. Sincerely, Debra

I so agree! At first, I was

I so agree! At first, I was thrilled that Arianna Huffington cared enough to give women's happiness such a nice platform on HuffPo, but when I took a closer look I was appalled by what I found - reassurances that, no, women aren't happy and here's some self-help. It was ridiculous. Thanks for explaining so clearly why.

I am a big fan of Marcus

I am a big fan of Marcus Buckingham. His books on how to use strengths in your job have provided me and my whole organization with a new perspective. As a result, we have said goodbye to things like self-sacrifice for the cause, or believing that being more/having more/doing more is what will make us more effective at achieving our mission. Now, we work smarter, more effectively and with much more fun. The benefits of this approach not only applies to our individual wellbeing, and organizational health, we have true, measureable results that demonstrate how our change in perspective has brought us more success than ever before. This makes me happy. I haven't read the new stuff on women and happiness yet, but I've found enough benefits in what he's done so far, that I'm very curious.

In a conversation with Aaron

In a conversation with Aaron Russo, Nicholas Rockefeller said the Rockefeller Foundation paid for women's liberation because they had been unable to tax half of the US population. I assume this refers to inflation, the Federal Reserve's preferred way to tax and control.

Thanks for speaking out

Thanks for speaking out Gloria. I get so frustrated when I read reports or articles published by either the media or so-called 'experts' relating how down and depressed we all are. Do I go about singing and dancing with joy every day? Of course not. If anyone did, they would be either seriously medicated or completely oblivious to the world around them. But, that does not mean that having a loving family, a great career, or meaningful community involvement is so demanding that I will naturally be miserable. My grandmother grew up on a farm and as she would say - horse-hockey! Having the ability to take on challenge and make a difference at home, at work, in the community, or ALL of the above is my choice. I love to work with others on projects that are challenging and rewarding and in the end I feel good about - and when I feel good - I'm happy. I wish people would stop telling me I should not be - or that I only will be if I listen to them AND pay them money!

thank you, I read the same

thank you, I read the same article at HP and had many of the same thoughts. (just not as eloquent) My great grandparents worked hard to immigrate and start farms,my grandparents worked hard to get an education and get off the farms. My parents were always working hard to improve the lives of their children. Were they happy? they must have been because we grew up in a house full of laughter. Who says we have to look a certain way or be a certain weight to be happy? If my kids have a rough day am I a failure as a parent? No, if my kids(or myself) have a rough day it means we are experiencing life.We are alive! And that is enough on a bad day to make me Happy

Thanks, Debra--coming from

Thanks, Debra--coming from you with your expertise as well as the personal experience you've shared, I feel very happy about what you've said :-)

The issue of woman as

The issue of woman as consumer is an issue at the heart of post-modernism and which has become an essential element in much art that came afterwards. This concept of consumerism as identity has been at the heart of the feminist art scene since Cindy Sherman's ‘Film Stills’ and Joan Jonas's 'Organic Honey', both artists were commenting on how the over-saturation of media forced confusing issues of identity onto women. Granted, identity was an issue long before the 70s, however it was the proliferation of media that evolved alongside the feminist movement that created a confusing and even hypocritical dichotomy between the opportunities available for the contemporary woman. One, the opportunity within media, i.e. visual culture, was inevitably reduced to the woman as object, while the opportunities that became available outside of this reduction, such as in the workplace or the home, gave the woman the ability to be something other-than this object. Because of media’s reduction of femaleness to a product of consumerism, women never had the chance to escape that reduction as our culture is completely and irrevocably saturated with imagery; the only way to fight this assumption is to avert our eyes, a precarious proposition. I don’t think it is that women are unhappy about opportunities they gained through feminism, (as I often read in oblivious commentaries online) I think women are unhappy about media’s transparent position that a woman should still have the same absorption with personal presentation and being an object of sexual desire as she should saving the world. We are not blind, women are unhappy because the media is propagating a stereotype that no-one wants, a stereotype that suggests that ‘being’ is only skin deep.

As a happy woman who has

As a happy woman who has perhaps purchased one tube of lipstick and a bottle of hand cream in 70 years, I am quite contented being me, not trying to be someone that media or merchandising tells me to be. Have you noticed the discontented expressions on those super-models' faces? Is that the happiness you seek?

How does one define "happy?"

How does one define "happy?" Is it being content with one's situation, or having"fun" all the time? I have raised three successful children, worked in the career of my choice, left a husband when he found my success threatening (though I was not nearly as successful as he was, but maybe he defined happiness differently). When I retired, I switched from engineering/management to music, and find fulfillment in playing in an orchestra, a band, and a string quartet. I'm not "happy" with my performance sometimes, but I am "happy", read "content" with my trying. I also ice-dance three times a week, and try to get to higher levels there. I compete with myself. As I approach the end of my 8th decade, and review my life, I find times when I was "unhappy", but luckily able to make the changes to get out of it. I think happiness is having control of one's life.

When women -- and men --

When women -- and men -- allow the purveyors of runaway consumption, or the Church, Temple or Mosque, or their employers, or even their famiiies to define who they should be and what "ideal" standards of personality they should strive to meet, they will feel inadequate and miserable. It's the greatest personal choice to craft oneself with dignity and respect for one's talents. Surrender freedom and the quest for understanding oneself to others and the psyche will always incur a painful deficit.

I been happiest in my life

I been happiest in my life the past 15 or so years, since I've not worn make-up, worried about "fashion" or pursued an intimate relationship with a man (nor woman either just to clarify the point). I do color my hair occasionally, but I'm not retentive about it since I keep my hair on the short side and it would just cost too much and be a general pain in the arse to keep it up. Vanity is not one of my strong suits. I'm neat, clean and if you don't like the way I look then just don't look at me. What someone thinks how I look is not something I care very much about. Is my life perfect? Far from it; but since I've not expended vast amounts of energy trying "to please my man" I find I have more peace of mind; energy to take care of an elder parent; time to enjoy what I love and all around generally being myself and doing what I want to do without concerning myself about a partner's feelings, bullcrap and insufferable ego...usually, only dreams are made of that kind of freedom.

My prescription for

My prescription for happiness--be the master of your own life and never become a slave to anyone or anything. Know what you really want and pursue that, trends and fashions be damned. Fight the coercion of advertising. It's difficult, I know, because advertising plays on peoples' vulnerabilities, insecurities and weak spots in order to get you to part with your hard-earned money. The 'latest things' in clothing, makeup, plastic surgery, New Age spirituality, how-to books on making a fortune, etc. will not give you bliss, they will only make you depressed when the novelty wears off. Surround yourself with emotionally healthy, supportive people, stretch your talents as far as they will go, and accept the fact that everyone's life will contain some hard knocks and sadness. Don't expect life to be ecstatic like a drug high, just do what you can to achieve contentment.

As far as I can tell the

As far as I can tell the reason noone is completely and utterly 'happy' from the 'liberation' movement is because this is only the beginning...there is so much healing to do for both men and women that we need to go through the pains of discovering ourselves outside of a culturally enforced paradigm that you can't expect the results to come about in 20 years, 30 years, 200 years. We're using knowledge and intuitiveness fighting against 5000 years of dominator society, by now incredibly well entrenched. You can't expect men or women to make the transition without going through wrenching emotional experiences. But, we're all better for it. Nothing we advocate will bear fruition in our lifetimes, but we must press on.

Fascinating comments here.

Fascinating comments here. Stephanie, your thoughts about the arts and media images really hits the nail. It's hard to judge oneself in a positive light when the world around us is judging us as objects rather than actors. Aspen, I'm glad to know that Buckingham's theories have helped you. Too bad he's so far off base when it comes to women and happiness. I don't doubt he's a good person, but you know, sometimes injustice is so pervasive in the culture around us that we can't see it. I'm betting that's what's going on with him. Joan, I would have liked your grandmother. And probably Julie's!

great column. i have sent

great column. i have sent it to 6 of my close women friends in case they overlook it in the hurry and flurry of the week-end.

I read the Buckingham piece

I read the Buckingham piece on HP, and found it to be facile and disingenuous, and Gloria and Joan Koerber-Walker captured, I think, the commercial motivation behind it. Others commenting here have offered heart-warming testimonials to rebut the general Buckingham conclusion -- for that I thank all of you. I helped raise 3 daughters and 2 sons, and would hate to think that my teaching my girls to be self-directed, ego-sufficient women, fully capable AND ENTITLED to pursue their dreams, ambitions, talents and goals in life would lead to their "unhappiness." So far as I can tell, it hasn't. Also, so far as I can tell, my sons learned the intended lesson that women are to be respected for who they are as persons, and treated as equals (at least) in relationships and in the world. They, too, seem to have learned the lesson well. I think Anonymous @ 02:04 (duplicated @ 02:25) also captured at least one of the essential factors that we all have to guard against: allowing so-called "authorities" or advertising "idols" to define who we are or should be. To permit that is to abrogate one's core humanity, and to sacrifice ANY hope of achieving anything like "happiness," which is, after all, a purely dynamic rather than static state of being.