News

"It's Very Complicated"

»

by: Paul Waldie, The Globe and Mail

photo
Neel Kashkari speaks at the free-market conservative think tank The American Enterprise Institute. (Photo: The Washington Times)

    Few people outside Washington have probably ever heard of Neel Kashkari.

    But Mr. Kashkari has just been handed one of the biggest jobs on the planet - managing the U.S. government's $700-billion (U.S.) financial rescue package.

    Yesterday U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson appointed him as interim assistant secretary of the Treasury for financial stability, to run the new Office of Financial Stability and administer the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program.

    The job would be daunting for someone twice Mr. Kashkari's age or with many times more experience. But the 35-year-old - who came to the Treasury from Goldman Sachs and has been there for just over two years - mainly as an adviser to Mr. Paulson, may have to learn as he goes.

    Even before he gets a proper job description, Mr. Kashkari must quickly recruit a team of asset managers to buy billions of dollars worth of distressed mortgage-related assets from banks and brokerage firms.

    He also has to decide which assets to buy at what price, and then figure out how long the government should hang on

    to them before selling to earn taxpayers a possible profit.

    And he has to move quickly because credit markets around the world have seized up, causing problems for companies trying to borrow money.

    Throw in unrelenting oversight from meddling politicians, gyrating stock markets, fretful bankers and fears the program will be rife with conflicts of interest and you have a taste of what Mr. Kashkari is in for.

    "There's a lot of work, it's very complicated," Anthony Ryan, a fellow Treasury official, told reporters yesterday.

    Not everyone thinks Mr. Kashkari has enough experience to handle such a demanding assignment.

    "Working at Goldman Sachs doesn't qualify you for doing this job," said Robert Eisenbeis, a former director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

    Mr. Kashkari, who was not available for comment yesterday, has come a long way in a very short time.

    He grew up in Stow, Ohio, a suburb of Akron, and earned a degree in engineering. He spent a few years working on technology for the NASA space program, including helping to develop the James Webb Space Telescope, the replacement for the Hubble telescope. He changed course, took a Masters of Business Administration at the Wharton School in Pennsylvania and joined Goldman Sachs Group Inc. as an investment banker specializing in computer companies that made security software.

    While at Wharton, Mr. Kashkari's course work included attending a military training exercise. The students participated in a computer simulation that required them to find food, water and shelter for victims of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia. They were divided into 14 groups representing various entities such as aid workers, NATO and the U.S. Army, and each group had to set up a mock refugee camp.

    "We were all taught to play nice," Mr. Kashkari told a reporter at the time. "So who's going to fight in the sandbox?"

    Mr. Paulson, also a former Goldman staffer, recruited Mr. Kashkari to the Treasury department in July, 2006. He joined a small group of ex-Goldman investment bankers who became some of Mr. Paulson's closest advisers.

    At first Mr. Kashkari's work related mainly to promoting trade ties with India (his parents immigrated from India) and working on energy issues.

    However, he quickly changed focus in 2007 when the housing market began to teeter and the credit crunch first began to bite. He became one of Mr. Paulson's leading advisers on mortgage issues and helped develop one of the department's first responses to the crisis, a program called Hope Now.

    It encouraged mortgage lenders to rework loans to stem the wave of foreclosures. While the program received heavy criticism, it was hailed by the administration as an important step and it bolstered Mr. Kashkari's reputation internally. He quickly became Mr. Paulson's lead official on housing and he helped draft the rescue package legislation passed by Congress last week.

    Mr. Kashkari "has been a very important leader in terms of dealing with many of the challenges that we've been facing in terms of the housing market," Mr. Ryan said yesterday.

    His rescue plan was just three-pages long when he first proposed it to politicians a couple of weeks ago. It morphed into a 451-page document, complete with extra spending and oversight measures, by the time politicians passed it into law last Friday.

    Treasury officials said yesterday they are putting the program into action.

    They hope to hire about two dozen additional staff and as many as 10 financial asset management firms, companies such as BlackRock Inc. and Pacific Investment Management Co. (Pimco), to make the purchases.

    One group of managers will deal with purchases of asset-backed securities, such as subprime mortgages and collateralized debt obligations. A second group will handle acquisitions of various loans, such as residential first mortgages and home equity loans. The government hopes to have the managers in place within a month and it has waived some regulations governing the awarding of contracts in order to expedite the hiring process.

    The hard part for both groups will be figuring out which assets to buy and at what price. Another key issue will be the inherent conflicts of interest that will arise among the asset managers, since many of the companies will likely be holding troubled assets of their own. The government tried to tackle that issue yesterday by issuing detailed conflict-of-interest guidelines for the office.

    Mr. Ryan stressed that the asset purchase process will be transparent and he said the government is well aware of the conflict-of-interest issue. He also said the government might buy shares in some financial firms. "There's a lot of flexibility in the legislation," he told reporters after a speech in New York.

    Whatever happens, Mr. Kashkari may not have his job for long. Many expect him to be replaced, along with Mr. Paulson, when the new president takes office in January. And some observers say that will be just as well.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

cash carry? are they kidding?

cash carry? are they kidding?

Hmm, let's see. "Throw in

Hmm, let's see. "Throw in unrelenting oversight from meddling politicians, gyrating stock markets, fretful bankers and fears the program will be rife with conflicts of interest and you have a taste of what Mr. Kashkari is in for." Why fears of conflict of interest? How can any interests conflict with those of Goldman Sachs, whose former employees (and holder of stocks and options therein) will apparently be the sole employees of the Office of Financial Stability? Bankers may be fretful, but a bonus here or there will relax them into their usual greedy doze. Wildly fluctuating stock markets are playgrounds of the rich and daring: buy low, sell high. But how are " meddlesome" politicians a problem? Even the rightist wingnuts who got us into this disaster during the past 8 (and many more) yeears have reluctantly accepted that a bit more oversight might have been a good idea. Methinks the only folks who worry about oversight are folks looking to pull a lot of fast ones. $700 billion of other folks' money is an awfully tempting pot from which to dole out some goodies for Kashkari's buddies. Unrelenting oversight? You betcha!

The bailout is not

The bailout is not complicated. The rich get rich and the poor get poor.

Things are going along

Things are going along according to plan. You betya ! This whole bailout scheme smells to high heaven to anyone that takes the time to look at it in the clear light of day. This whole Administration means us Peons no good, you can believe it. Martial law is right over the horizon and fastly approaching, once the people wake up to the injustice that has been done to them. The truth of this farce of a bailout will soon be apparent even to the most unobservant. Paulson putting his understudy underling in charge is an Insult to what is left of the intelligence of the American people. I am embarrassed at the lack of outrage by the victims of this calamity---the American People.

Put someone like me in

Put someone like me in charge,disabled 10 years now I started out at 237% BELOW POVERTY LEVEL on $512/mo today I exist at 350% BELOW POVERTY LEVEL on $634/mo regardless I have never been late or short once on non subsidized rent or utilities the one exception being Winter LEAP plus the utility companies are CO-OP owned meaning they have opted to be completely unregulated by PUC thus if you can imagine that it`s possible they engage in even crookeder book cooking than Wall Street!

I like the transparency of

I like the transparency of this bailout. Paulson and G/S are stealing the 700 billion right out there in front of the American people! You gotta love it! I am just waiting for the "collapse" of the financial system that will usher in the rule of Martial Law to control the angry swarms of destitute and jobless peons that will pour into the streets in search of food. The only question is when...........

The bandits are now in

The bandits are now in complete control. They got their hands on the money... er.. excuse me... we haven't the money. They are doling out promises to pay money that we and our descendants will have to pay. This present population of Americans, by it's civil actions, does not deserve the legacy it has inherited, and so lost it to the bandits. Sad, sad.

During our last financial

During our last financial crisis and bailout, this guy was in high school. He's never experienced this sort of problem. There should now be no doubt that the purpose of this thing is to give money to Paulson's friends.

So the former head of the

So the former head of the Dillinger gang hired one of his junior capos to hand out rewards to his fellow bank robbers. Recovery accomplished!!!

What revolution? Most

What revolution? Most people don't even care about who is running what, let alone reading about them. It will be "business as usual". And no surprise.

When the full scope and

When the full scope and depth of the financial crisis broke, tsunami-like, across the bow of capitalism, engulfing free-marketeers, violently knocking their ideological lens from their eyes, and revealing the full force and magnitude of the storm’s fury. Watching from higher ground, the lords of the realm quivered as the flood waters approached threatening the Big House on the Hill. It was then, and then only, that Bearnake and Paulson gathered the minions and voiced what was already clear to observes unobstructed by the delusional-rosy glint of ideological blinders: the empire was entirely underwater. The commander-and-chief judiciously sounded the alarm and commanded subordinates to start bailing, and to throw 700 billion buckets of water out of the house and on the fire that had begun in the barn. As the water continued to rise and the flames consumed the remainder of the barn, the subordinates worked furiously. Quietly the commander-and-chief slipped away and turned his eyes to the heavens, and said, “forgive us Father.”

What is implied by the fact

What is implied by the fact that our country requires an Office of Financial Stability???

This is the last straw ...

This is the last straw ... some friend/flunky/gofer for Paulson who already has been promoted past his level of incompetence will now "oversee" this proposed bailout!!!! Why not recruit some respected venture capitalist, or former secretary of the treasury, or investor like Warren Buffett, or ask Michael Bloomberg to volunteer in this time of national crisis. Anybody but this nobody. How much did he have to do with the bad investments that caused Goldman Sachs to go down. What does he know about credit default swaps and when did he know it? If this is how the bailout is to be administered by Paulson, there will be a revolution in this country, and it won't be very nice, because the gloves WILL be off.