Share

After Bailout, AIG Execs Head to California Resort

by: Brian Ross and Tom Shine  |  ABC News

photo
Shortly after the US government commited $85 billion to bail out AIG, company executives went for a week-long retreat at St. Regis Resort, Monarch Beach, California. (Photo: anaheimoc.org)

    Rescued by taxpayers, $440,000 for retreat including "pedicures, manicures."

    Less than a week after the federal government committed $85 billion to bail out AIG, executives of the giant AIG insurance company headed for a week-long retreat at a luxury resort and spa, the St. Regis Resort in Monarch Beach, California, Congressional investigators revealed today.

    "Rooms at this resort can cost over $1,000 a night," Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) said this morning as his committee continued its investigation of Wall Street and its CEOs.

    AIG documents obtained by Waxman's investigators show the company paid more than $440,000 for the retreat, including nearly $200,000 for rooms, $150,000 for meals and $23,000 in spa charges.

    "Their getting their pedicures and their manicures and the American people are paying for that," said Cong. Elijah Cummings (D-MD).

    "This unbridled greed," said Cong. Mark Souder (R-IN), "it's an insensitivity to how people are spending our dollars."

    Appearing before the committee, Martin Sullivan, the AIG CEO until June, said the company was overwhelmed by a "financial global tsunami," and that "no simple or single cause" was to blame.

    "I am heartbroken at what has happened," Sullivan said.

    Robert Willumstad, the CEO from June to September, 2008, maintained AIG was a victim of a "crisis in confidence" and an "unprecedented global catastrophe." "Through the first week of September we were confident AIG could weather the crisis," Willumstad testified. He said the federal government offered its $85 million bail out on the afternoon it prepared for bankruptcy. Willumstad said the Federal Reserve demanded he resign, and will turn down his AIG retirement package of several million dollars.

    But Congressional investigators raised question of "mismanagement" and whether AIG executives sought to "cook the books" and hide negative information from outside auditors.

    On Dec. 5, 2007, Waxman said, CEO Sullivan told investors, "We are confident in our marks and the reasonableness of our valuation methods."

    Documents obtained by the committee show that one week earlier, auditors Pricewaterhouse Cooper had "raise their concerns with Mr. Sullivan&informing him that PWC believed that AIG could have a material weakness relating to the risk management of these areas."

    In March, 2008, the Office of Thrift Supervision wrote AIG, "We are concerned that the corporate oversight of AIG Financial Products&lacks critical elements of independence, transparency, and granularity."

    Asked about the letter by the committee, the SEC's former chief accountant, Lynn Turner, said the letter reflects "a serious problem from the top down of management, that can bring an organization down."

    Former AIG CEO Sullivan said accounting rules required AIG to mark down the value of its holdings, even though it had no plans to sell them, the "mark to market" provision.

    AIG had to sell at "fire sale prices," he told skeptical members of Congress. "Suddenly a company with a trillion dollars in assets" was in trouble, said Sullivan.

    Waxman questioned both former CEOs about a former AIG auditor who claimed he had been blocked from reviewing the books of a London-based division that has since been blamed for a large share of the company's downfall.

    Former CEO Willumstad, chairman of the AIG board at the time, said "I honestly don't remember" the concerns raised by the former auditor.

    "I find that very disturbing," said Congressman Waxman.

    Waxman also said there is evidence the two men changed the bonus schedule once the company began to post losses, so that executives under the "Senior Partners Plan" would continue to make multi-million dollar salaries.

    "Mr. Sullivan and the other top executives should have had their bonuses slashed due to poor performance," said Waxman.

    Sullivan said it was "substantially reduced" by the board in 2007 due to poor performance.

    Sullivan was given a $15 million "golden parachute" payment after being replaced as CEO in June.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

As I watch our retirement

As I watch our retirement funds shrink and shrink, my reaction to this news is not publishable. Unanswered by the report is how this slap in the face of the taxpayers who b ailed out AIG is going to be reactified!!!!

Pretty expensive welfare.

Pretty expensive welfare. If they're spending all this money on a retreat, how come they needed a bailout from Congress?

wow. have fun. have one on

wow. have fun. have one on me. oh yea. you already know that.

I thought this was one of

I thought this was one of the stipulations - oversight that the bailout would not be misused. Well...what's new. Rich get richer and the poor get poorer. We should all take to the streets and demand the money back.

Market to Market...hey

Market to Market...hey did'nt ENRON create some complex financial mechanisms using this market strategy. Amazing over 60 years of post Depression prosperity wiped out in just under a decade (e.g., after repealing Glass Steagal Act). The only way through this is to become communists, build a wall, tear it down and then become Capitalist 2.0's. George and Dick should should be kept in office and they are not allowed to touch their blind trusts or collect a salary until they have fixed the mess they more than helped to create. Sounds like there was more scrutiny in "for testing whether are [sic] a human visitor" than in 85% of loan under writing and AIG's risk distribution calculations. I want a bail out too! How about three nights at the Four Seasons in Santa Barbara.

And you're voting for Obama?

And you're voting for Obama? That's not a slap in the face if you're voting for one of the people who made the bailouts possible! It's a slap in the face to those of us who are voting out conscience, and NOT supporting the corporate candidates who BROUGHT you this mess!!! You deserve it! Change your vote for someone who fought the bailout, THEN you can say it's a slap!!! If you vote to give them continued power over your life, then YOU DON'T GET TO COMPLAIN!!

Typical executive level

Typical executive level attitude... a self righteous sense of entitlement. They think they can do whatever they want, while the "little people" slave away at their work stations. I think they should have to payback all non essential-frivolous spending.

Isn't it wonderful that

Isn't it wonderful that congress, even though polls showed Americans didn't want the bail out, decided to listen to the pleading of the bankers who make hundreds of millions a year. So, we have representatives and senators (who know so much more than us) - shoveling money to the people who's idiocy and mismanagement got us into this mess. My solution is for everyone to write in the names of Mickey Mouse, Babe Ruth or the biggest drooling goofball you knew in high school on election day. Guess what? They couldn't do any worse than these clowns we sent to Washington.

Actually, Arika, everybody

Actually, Arika, everybody has the right to complain, no matter who they voted for. You might look it up, it's somewhere there in the 1st Amendment.......................................and remember, those who fail to remember history are doomed to vote for Nader.

I live in New York. Last

I live in New York. Last week I was physically at the corner of Wall and Broad Streets. The NYSE is festooned with a gargantuan American flag. I don't think I have EVER been so angry in my life. In fact, I wandered around like a fool, almost chanting: "That is an enormous insult to America" Remember 1789 and don't vote for ANYONE who voted for the bailout. EVER

Why don't we find the

Why don't we find the individuals who treated themselves at our expense and sue them? or? DO SOMETHING!

"The Revolution Will NOT be

"The Revolution Will NOT be televised"

Everyone in every state

Everyone in every state needs to vote OUT of congress and house the thieves that is there and lets start with a clean (if there is such a thing as a clean politician)slate.If they do not prosecute these liers and theives. As far as the president we might do as good with Pee Wee Herman

This gross use of our tax

This gross use of our tax dollars is unacceptable! This resort is certainly for the spoiled rich. These people have no conscience and must be held accountable. How can we make them repay the American Tax dollars that have bailed them out of their financial disaster? Dismayed in Cali!

They ought to be issued

They ought to be issued combat boots, and an army helmet, dressed in PINK DRESSES, and given a stick and a shovel, one small bottle of water, and air lifted then dropped right in the middle with Afganistan with a permanent SIGN that they can NEVER REMOVE that says: "I am responsible for the BEGINNING economic decline of your country and the failure of all global markets. What would you have me do first?" And the only way we would rescue them and pick them and return them, would be on the condition that they gave the money....ALL OF IT BACK!!!!! They then would have to sign a legal document stating and agreeing that they could NEVER BECOME employed anywhere in the financial industry, not here, not globally, and if they did not obey that, they would go directly to jail. Yes, I think that would appease everybody!!!! Don't you agree?

I say make them pay the

I say make them pay the money back, and kick them permanently out of the country. WHY NOT???

It is a huge SLAP in the

It is a huge SLAP in the FACE, and they should be made to pay back all of it and never be allowed to work in the financial industry here or abroad.

Now here is the perfect

Now here is the perfect place to start : get the list of the AIG executives responsible for the pedicure spree and commence criminal proceedings! The charge would be acts of betrayal, treasonous conduct and failure to perform duties hired for by their new bosses : the american tax payer!

One way to recoup and begin

One way to recoup and begin paying the taxpayers back for the bailout is to seize all the assets of all the CEOs whose companies were bailed out, and make each of them live on the kinds of pensions teachers make. Another, smaller, step is to make each of the folks who went to the retreat repay all that was spent on him (and maybe her). It's time they learned the hard lessons the rest of us have learned over many years.

Yeah, I'd like to "retreat",

Yeah, I'd like to "retreat", too. Gotta agree with Genklag. We should really pay attention to the attention this gets from Congress. This will be a prime opportunity to get a clear picture of whether good oversight intentions will actually be back with appropriate action. If not, we gotta put up a major outcry.

I'm pretty sure this junket

I'm pretty sure this junket was planned long before the financial fiasco began. BUT, it should have been canceled to show good faith and good judgment considering all that was going on around them at the time. These people just don't get it, do they.

i'm going to deduct that

i'm going to deduct that from my 2008 taxes as charity donation and since we don't know which one of us actually did pay for this.. all taxpayers all make that deduction.

Perhaps the St. Regis Resort

Perhaps the St. Regis Resort would like to receive a few letters from the tax payers? That we are not going to pay this bill, so they should kick them out. And I wonder if there is some way to initiate some sort of class action law suit against these people? If they want to be welfare recipients, then they should live like welfare recipients.

Discussing it is not the

Discussing it is not the answer. Ethics classes should be a mandatory condition of the bail out. All executive salaries must be cut. Bonuses should not even be in the vocabulary! People are paid bonuses when an exemplary job is completed. The last time I looked at Wall Street, I didn't see anything close to exemplary. All resort bills should be paid out of the previous corporate bonuses and all executives should be warned that the next step is jail. I think it called "misuse of funds" and "embezzlement."

If I deducted this bailout

If I deducted this bailout from my income tax, how much would my share be ? Oh well, I`ll just make up a really big number like congress did.

It's only fitting that we,

It's only fitting that we, the american people, deserve to see the names and faces of the people from AIG that used our tax dollars to go to the spa. Also, a list of services and a copy of each person's bill from the establishments they patronized. Next, all of the above information must be blasted all over the world. Billboards, public transportation, front page stories on every news stand. Always including pictures of the individuals involved. Since congress wont stand up to these people, why don't we, the american taxpayer, do it ourselves. They can be prisoners in their own HOMES.

Everyone who treated

Everyone who treated themselves to this luxury should be jailed and fined and made to pay back what was stolen from us as taxpayers. I can't imagine how anyone could be that evil and greedy. If we decide to "bail" them out again, there needs to be an agreement that the top executives are fired and some type of auditor/investigator needs to approve and sign off on every dollar going out the door. No one should get any bonuses. If these terms are not met, then, no further funds should be issued to AIG.