Share

Politics of Attack

by:   |  The New York Times | Editorial

photo
The McCain campaign's tactics have become increasingly ugly, according to The New York Times. (Photo: Getty Images)

    It is a sorry fact of American political life that campaigns get ugly, often in their final weeks. But Senator John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin have been running one of the most appalling campaigns we can remember.

    They have gone far beyond the usual fare of quotes taken out of context and distortions of an opponent's record - into the dark territory of race-baiting and xenophobia. Senator Barack Obama has taken some cheap shots at Mr. McCain, but there is no comparison.

    Despite the occasional slip (referring to Mr. Obama's "cronies" and calling him "that one"), Mr. McCain tried to take a higher road in Tuesday night's presidential debate. It was hard to keep track of the number of times he referred to his audience as "my friends." But apart from promising to buy up troubled mortgages as president, he offered no real answers for how he plans to solve the country's deep economic crisis. He is unable or unwilling to admit that the Republican assault on regulation was to blame.

    Ninety minutes of forced cordiality did not erase the dismal ugliness of his campaign in recent weeks, nor did it leave us with much hope that he would not just return to the same dismal ugliness on Wednesday.

    Ms. Palin, in particular, revels in the attack. Her campaign rallies have become spectacles of anger and insult. "This is not a man who sees America as you see it and how I see America," Ms. Palin has taken to saying.

    That line follows passages in Ms. Palin's new stump speech in which she twists Mr. Obama's ill-advised but fleeting and long-past association with William Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground and confessed bomber. By the time she's done, she implies that Mr. Obama is right now a close friend of Mr. Ayers - and sympathetic to the violent overthrow of the government. The Democrat, she says, "sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country."

    Her demagoguery has elicited some frightening, intolerable, responses. A recent Washington Post report said at a rally in Florida this week a man yelled "Kill him!" as Ms. Palin delivered that line and others shouted epithets at an African-American member of a TV crew.

    Mr. McCain's aides haven't even tried to hide their cynical tactics, saying they were "going negative" in hopes of shifting attention away from the financial crisis - and by implication Mr. McCain's stumbling response.

    We certainly expected better from Mr. McCain, who once showed withering contempt for win-at-any-cost politics. He was driven out of the 2000 Republican primaries by this sort of smear, orchestrated by some of the same people who are now running his campaign.

    And the tactic of guilt by association is perplexing, since Mr. McCain has his own list of political associates he would rather forget. We were disappointed to see the Obama campaign air an ad (held for just this occasion) reminding voters of Mr. McCain's involvement in the Keating Five savings-and-loan debacle, for which he was reprimanded by the Senate. That episode at least bears on Mr. McCain's claims to be the morally pure candidate and his argument that he alone is capable of doing away with greed, fraud and abuse.

    In a way, we should not be surprised that Mr. McCain has stooped so low, since the debate showed once again that he has little else to talk about. He long ago abandoned his signature issues of immigration reform and global warming; his talk of "victory" in Iraq has little to offer a war-weary nation; and his Reagan-inspired ideology of starving government and shredding regulation lies in tatters on Wall Street.

    But surely, Mr. McCain and his team can come up with a better answer to that problem than inciting more division, anger and hatred.

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The Secret Service is

The Secret Service is investigating the "Kill him" statement from that recent Palin rally.

Way to go, finally an

Way to go, finally an article that does not feign unwarranted equipoise by claiming that both candidates engage in wild mud slinging. Obama has shown amazing restraint in his attacks. I realize this is expedient to appear presidential and well intentioned, but sometimes I really wish he would bring out other conspicuous shadows in Mcsame's past, if not the efforts to hinder investigations and close the lid on POWs left to rot in Vietnam, at least his tangential but significant role in bolstering the Iran-contras group.

"We were disappointed to see

"We were disappointed to see the Obama campaign air an ad (held for just this occasion) reminding voters of Mr. McCain's involvement in the Keating Five savings-and-loan debacle, for which he was reprimanded by the Senate." WHY would such a reminder engender "disappointment" on behalf of the NYT? The FACT that Senator McCain was directly involved with trying to influence regulators to "ease up" on HIS cronies is remarkably salient to the "corruption and greed" we've seen on Wall Street, which McCain so disingenuously claims to find personally abhorrent AND which he snidely and inaccurately tries to pin on Obama. Many people voting in this election DO NOT REMEMBER the Keating Five scandal because they were too young to have it be part of their reality. It's actually about time this was brought up. It doesn't need to be harangued and beaten to death, but it is certainly pertinent to current affairs and making an informed decision about the honesty and integrity of John McCain.

Sarah Palin is McCain's

Sarah Palin is McCain's mouthpiece for uttering what even he wouldn't want to say. Here is, in part, what Deepak Chopra has to say about Palin: "She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and turning negativity into a cause for pride. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of β€œthe other.” For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don’t want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin’s message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision" I hope that America can rise above this.

I don't understand how

I don't understand how anyone can be blamed for our country's decline except the republican party! They are THE ONES that have been in control for the last 8 years. They had their chance and blew it... 9/11... a murderous and costly war... our financial meltdown... job drain... etc. Only a complete moron would still vote republican! May God help us all because our country is full of them.

This pretty much sums up

This pretty much sums up what happened...

Ugly, division, anger and

Ugly, division, anger and hatred is Republican "playbook." In terms of a football analogy, McCain/Palin make "The Longest Yard" more laughable that it was previously. In terms of hockey? The movie "Slapshot" is a "nicey nicey" film of teams who are having a friendly game of pick-up. If I hear McCain say, "My Friends" one more time *and* he gets elected, I see Mao-style Pajama's and reading McCain's Little book of daily Republican affirmations, all done up in the colors of the McCain Tartan. God help us all!

The repeated phrase "my

The repeated phrase "my friends" was nearly as irritating as Palin repeating "Charlie" in her interview. As for the brazen lies and inflammatory rallies, I think (and hope) they will regret their tactics come Nov. 4th.

"Ms. Palin, in particular,

"Ms. Palin, in particular, revels in the attack. Her campaign rallies have become spectacles of anger and insult. "This is not a man who sees America as you see it and how I see America," Ms. Palin has taken to saying. ... By the time she's done, she implies that Mr. Obama is right now a close friend of Mr. Ayers - and sympathetic to the violent overthrow of the government. The Democrat, she says, "sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country." ...Her demagoguery has elicited some frightening, intolerable, responses. A recent Washington Post report said at a rally in Florida this week a man yelled "Kill him!" as Ms. Palin delivered that line and others shouted epithets at an African-American member of a TV crew." This is so dangerous. There has to be some sort of bottom line/parameters around how far they can go, particularly when it is being said, no doubt, to elicit exactly this type of response. Or is Palin so ignorant she can't see the harm in her words. I don't think responding in attack ads is the way to go at this point, but taking this head on and demanding it be stopped - and that her statements be retracted. Of course, it just goes to show how low Palin/McCain will stoop -- at any cost -- to try and get elected, they don't really care about humanity (and who gets hurt in the process.)

Pardon me, but this dummy

Pardon me, but this dummy needs some help with the following passage: "We were disappointed to see the Obama campaign air an ad (held for just this occasion) reminding voters of Mr. McCain's involvement in the Keating Five savings-and-loan debacle, for which he was reprimanded by the Senate. That episode at least bears on Mr. McCain's claims to be the morally pure candidate and his argument that he alone is capable of doing away with greed, fraud and abuse." How is it disappointing that Obama has an ad pointing to an incident in McCain's past which you admit bears on his suitability as economic crisis manager? Surely it isn't that candidates should do nothing but make nice to one another. Criticism of political opponents is surely not in itself inappropriate. The problem with the current Republican campaign is that most of their "criticisms" are lies, sleazy innuendo, obvious misrepresentations, and/or more or less subtle racist appeals. It ain't what you do, it's how you do it.

When they said Sarah Palin

When they said Sarah Palin was selected to "activate the base," they weren't kidding. A key part of the Republican playbook is to activate the basest of political instincts -- fear, prejudice and arrogant ignorance. The Bush Administration has taken America to the brink of fascism (and some would say over the brink) based on the formula of manipulated fear, bold-faced lies and intimidation of opponents. It's time for America to overwhelmingly reject the moral midgets who have wrestled control of the party that once boasted Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower and Barry Goldwater. All of them are flippin' in their crypts.

Could somebody please

Could somebody please explain to me what is so "Christian" about Sarah Palin and her method of using negative emotions and thinly stretched truths to incite voters? What kind of "Christian" example is she setting? This is simply more of the same hypocrisy.

Dear Senator McCain: I

Dear Senator McCain: I implore you-not as a Republican or Democrat-but as a human being, to cease and desist immediately your horrible decent into the worst and most despicable and frighteningly dangerous personal character assassination of any opponent in the history of any campaign EVER! If this is your desparate attempt to appeal the the outrageous religious right wing fanatics who have taken the Republican party hostage, I would remind you that your fanning the flames of the most hate filled, dangerous and bigoted constituents is not only way beneath your own dignity but is the exact opposite of any Christian ideology or behavior. Insighting memebers of your rallies to yell out the words "terrorist" and "kill him", referring to Senator Obama, is frightening and criminally irresponsible-you should be sued for liable! The hypocrisy is obvious, Senator McCain! It is YOUR behavior that is exactly that of a terrorist. Shame on you and shame on those ill responsible Republicans who do not put a stop to your tactics. What has hasppend to you John McCain? Where is the John McCain of five or ten yers ago who had my utmost respect and perhaps would have had my vote? You have turned to the crimimally pathological dark side doctrines of the Bush-Cheney-Rove criminals and have now proven beyond any doubt by your own fear mongering and hateful rhetoric that any vote for you is indeed a vote for the continuation of the same horribly divisive and destructive lies of the last eight years of George Bush.

One looks for a historical

One looks for a historical or literary analogy for Sarah Palin. The nearest thing I can think of is an amalgam of Shakespear's Katharena in the Taming of The Shrew and Lucrecia Borgia; however, a retired historian friend takes me to task indicating that Ms. Borgia did have some redeaming features ! Really, humor aside, it is sad that the United States of America can produce a side show as degrading as to what the Republicans have produced. My educated friends from abroad are aghast at our nation demeaning ourselves by permitting such a degrading display. Obviously the Republicans are trying to appeal to the lowest intellects available in the population. It recalls the old quote from H.L. Mencken;"There's no underestimating the intelligence of the American public".

The McPain duo should be

The McPain duo should be hauled into federal court for attempting to incite a riot and for the wreckless endangerment of human life. How appalling, idiotic, immature, racist, and arrogrant of Palin and McCainto carelessly and purposely slander Senator Obama's name and jeopardize not only his safety but his family's safety. Freedom of speech has its limits under the law.

NYT says that they

NYT says that they "certainly expected better from Mr. McCain, who once showed withering contempt for win-at-any-cost politics". If you read Tom Dickinson's Rolling Stone article of 16 Oct: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain, you would not even give him this past fig leaf to cover his abhorrent style.

KEATING FIVE, KEATING FIVE,

KEATING FIVE, KEATING FIVE, KEATING FIVE!!! and dumb as a post, dumb as a post, dumb as a post...............................................and LIAR, LIAR, pants on fire (both Mc and Palin) The Keating Five Scandal goes to the heart of the current reverberations in our banking system right now. How in the hell did McBu$h ever win the GOP nomination; by being tarnished, corrupt, stupid goods? Truly astounding! The Puppet Masters must be really happy, don'tcha think? p.s. The NYTimes is wrong on one point. The Keating Five is more than fair game as ammo in this dispicable election.

"We were disappointed to see

"We were disappointed to see the Obama campaign air an ad (held for just this occasion) reminding voters of Mr. McCain's involvement in the Keating Five savings-and-loan debacle, for which he was reprimanded by the Senate." What a bunch of crap! This makes me question the neutrality of the NY Times. McCain was up to his ass in this: political influence in support of a criminal fraud in response to financial support for his campaigns and favors/"cronyism" to his family. He's lucky he got off with a reprimand for poor judgement. And, really, is poor judgment acceptable for a US President? I think we've seen what that can do (I'm being charitable) in the past 7-1/2 years. Perhaps "stupidity" is a better term. Do ethics investigations ever reprimand senators for stupidity?

Entertain, even suppose,

Entertain, even suppose, that this all is planned. Do you want democratic culture? If not the autocrats have a place for you.

"This is not a man who sees

"This is not a man who sees America as you see it and how I see America," Ms. Palin has taken to saying. Now, what exactly is wrong with that??

The American dilemma is that

The American dilemma is that most workers once were willing to go 'on the line' for other workers, that the new 'prosperity that a consumer society bred has castrated our social ideals. In a land where one person one vote is not the reality, in a confederation rather than a nation no election is democratic. I await the day when we understand that until the demos, the people recognize all other people in the world as mirrors of themselves, no truly ethical society can develop. McCain is an example of success in our society, a winner even when he loses and as such he reflects the true values of today, it is the bottom line, the profit that counts. My fear is that the election is no longer about values but about which candidate will help their personal finances most. In a land where the idea of 'legal' lobbies is acceptable, where the elected officials are owned by those who paid enormous sums to their campaigns it is naive to expect them to be representatives of all the people. We are watching enormous sums being spent to warp the truth by both candidates yet that is considered normal politics, how much good could have been done with all of those millions spent I wonder.............

McCain and Palin need

McCain and Palin need reexamine what they stand for! I am so dissapointed at their American values!