Share

Senate Panel Extends Controversial Patriot Act Provisions

by: Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
(Photo Illustration: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t)

    The Senate Judiciary Committee narrowly passed a bill Thursday to extend several controversial provisions of the USA Patriot Act, the counterterrorism law hastily drafted in the aftermath of 9/11.

    The parts of the Patriot Act set to expire December 31 that the panel voted to extend until 2013 included roving wiretaps, which authorizes the FBI to target individuals using multiple phone numbers; the "lone wolf" provision, which targets individuals who are not connected to terrorist groups and has thus far never been used; and, perhaps the most controversial, section 215 orders , otherwise known as the "library records" provision, which allows the FBI to access individuals' personal records via National Security Letters (NSLs).

    In March 2007, Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine issued a 200-page report documenting FBI abuses of National Security Letters. Fine testified before Congress during the time that the FBI may have violated the law 3,000 times since 2003 by improperly using NSLs to collect information on US citizens.

    The bill - the USA Patriot Act Sunset Extension Act - was co-sponsored by Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and committee member Dianne Feinstein, who also chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, and passed was passed by a vote of 11 to 8. It will now be sent to the full Senate for consideration and will likely be the subject of fierce debate by conservative lawmakers, who believe it does not go far enough in allowing law enforcement to combat terrorism, and liberal Democrats, who say it tramples on privacy rights.

    Civil liberties' advocates and some Democratic lawmakers were sharply critical of the legislation as it currently stands and criticized their colleagues for supporting it.

    "What was most upsetting was the apparent willingness of too many members to defer completely to behind the scenes complaints from the FBI and the Justice Department, even though the [Obama] administration has yet to take a public position on any of the improvements that I and other senators have proposed," said Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin). "I am left scratching my head trying to understand how a committee controlled by a wide Democratic margin could support the bill it approved today ..."

    Michael Macleod-Ball, acting director of the ACLU Washington legislative office, said the bill "was a missed opportunity for the Senate Judiciary Committee to right the wrongs of the Patriot Act and stand up for Americans' Fourth Amendment rights."

    "We are disappointed that further changes were not made to ensure Americans' civil liberties would be adequately protected by this Patriot Act legislation," Macleod-Ball added. "The meager improvements made during this markup will certainly be overshadowed by allowing so many horrible amendments to be added to an already weak bill. Congress cannot continue to make this mistake with the Patriot Act again and again. We urge the Senate to adopt amendments on the floor that will bring this bill in line with the Constitution."

    The Advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation said, "instead of adding more protections to the bill, [the Judiciary Committee] voted to accept seven Republican amendments [and removed] the few civil liberties protections left in the bill after it was already watered down at last Thursday's Committee meeting. Surprisingly and disappointingly, most of those amendments were recommended to their Republican sponsors by the Obama Administration."

    Indeed. One Republican Senator, Jeff Sessions, of Alabama, the Washington Post reported "won approval for a package of amendments, intended to meet the concerns of intelligence officials and the administration, that would limit the scope of newly crafted privacy protections for library records, preserve the government's ability to maintain secrecy concerning NSLs in sensitive investigations, and keep current law in place by not imposing unprecedented minimization requirements on information."

    Senators who voted in favor of the bill are:

    Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont
     Herb Kohl, D-Wisconsin
     Dianne Feinstein, D-California
     Chuck Schumer, D-New York
     Benjamin Cardin, D-Maryland
     Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island
     Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota
     Ted Kaufman, D-Delaware
     Al Franken, D-Minnesota
     Jon Kyl, R-Arizona
     John Cornyn, R-Texas

    Those who voted no:

    Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin
     Dick Durbin, D-Illinois
     Arlen Specter, D-Pennsylvania
     Jeff Sessions, R-Alabama
     Orin Hatch, R-Utah
     Charles Grassley, R-Iowa
     Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina
     Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma

  

»


Jason Leopold is the Deputy Managing Editor at Truthout. He is the author of the Los Angeles Times bestseller, News Junkie, a memoir. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Isn't it obvious? It is

Isn't it obvious? It is what the conservatives have said all along. The liberal Dumbocrats in Congress don't care about doing what is best for the people and our country, they just want to control everything they can.

We continue down a slippery

We continue down a slippery slope toward Orwell's vision of the future.

Notice how all the

Notice how all the Republicans who voted NO did so for the wrong reason, except Feingold, the Democrat, who knew this bill did not go far enough. Isn't it odd, though, when you see one Democrat alone like this - one conscience voting WITH 7 conscienceless Republicans? Don't you hate this kind of "unity?"

So much for Al Franken!

So much for Al Franken!

Al Franken, the great radio

Al Franken, the great radio progressive, hah!?:( A true clown. I expected as much from Feinstein, she who i aware of her role in the "We don't torture" debacle. Aahh, yes. Amerika, land of sheep and insatiable wolves...

To 20:08. A word about

To 20:08. A word about Feinstein. She's a neoliberal devil right to the core. She's come through for the Republicans (again and again) on hot button issues where her vote is the deciding one - stabbing more liberal Democrats in the back. Watch her stand up for conservatives in the future as she will NO DOUBT do. When the health care bill came up, her first reaction - in an email from her office to me - was to opposes health care reform that would add to the national debt. That was the overriding issue for her - the national debt, not the uninsured. Then a few minutes later her office sent out a second, "corrective" email with this sentence about opposing national debt removed. Her husband is a big war profiteer and has been since the Iraq escapade began. At the same time, never a peep out of her on multi-trillion-trillon dollar war budgets that literally bury us alive in federal debt. Thanks for mentioning her in this context.

i live in new york. in the

i live in new york. in the democratic clubs in the metro nyc area we have been trying to figure out a way to get rid of schumer. he has turned into his predecessor alphons damotto . chuck has gotten into bed with wall st. and everyone else who has campaign money. he is a walking atm and maybe we can run a primary against now with this as a wedge issue. there ought to be term limits or we will always have people who become too powerful and serve those who don't elect them only bribed them. chuck has really become that and so have the rest of thesens who voted on this. jeff sessions is a typical southern wingnut goober who doesn't care about america unless it is bank of america but wants to derail obama at any cost. maybe leahy is having a senior moment here and simply forgot which side of the issue he's fighting for.the rest of these clowns deserve yo have us mail their opponent a check in their next election cycle. chuck schumer beat one of the most powerful senators in washington al damatto because it was time maybe you are in the same situation and can knock one of these bozos off and help america get off her hands and knees and stand up again!

Funny, the library and

Funny, the library and roving wiretaps have already been struck down by the courts. This essentially does nothing. And, Truthout reported it earlier... http://www.truthout.org/article/judge-rules-provisions-patriot-act-be-illegal http://www.truthout.org/article/appeals-court-says-some-patriot-act-provisions-unconstitutional

Simply Treasonous. These

Simply Treasonous. These people swore to uphold the Constitution. They obviously have lost touch, and are breaking the law which has given them the power to do so.

Ever see the video whereas

Ever see the video whereas Aaron Russo tells the behind the scenes behind the Patriot Act and why it is a bunch of nonsense as for protecting anyone? See the google vidoe online: http://ow.ly/u9lD