Health Insurers Threaten Rate Hikes
Friday 09 October 2009
by: Robert Parry | Consortium News

(Photo: twinysam / Flickr)
Though looking forward to millions of new customers who would be compelled by the U.S. government to buy health insurance, the insurance industry is threatening to raise premiums across the board if more of its demands are not met.
Industry representatives put Congress and the Obama administration on notice that if health-reform legislation doesn’t send even more new customers the industry’s way or if a windfall profits tax is included, the industry would hit businesses, individuals and the government with higher premiums, effectively defeating one of the initiative’s top goals, reining in ever-rising costs.
The industry’s chief complaint, which was raised in connection with an already-industry-friendly bill cobbled together by Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus, is that the legislation would push 29 million more Americans into the insurance market, but that they might be the sickest and thus costliest people.
The industry wants more of the estimated 25 million still uninsured – especially healthy, young people – to be compelled to buy policies, too. Without more healthy customers added to the mix, the industry says it will have no choice but to raise rates.
"The consequences of this would be an upward spiral; rate shock to everyone who stays in," Karen Ignagni, president of the industry group America's Health Insurance Plans, told the Washington Post. "This legislation will fail the test of affordability for individuals." [Washington Post, Oct. 9, 2009] The industry’s warning comes after its lobbyists won an important victory in the Senate Finance Committee, defeating amendments that would have added a public option, a government-run program that would compete with private insurers to hold down costs.
Private insurers also bristled at an idea floated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a windfall profits tax on extra money the industry might make from the influx of millions of new customers, many qualifying for government subsidies.
Robert E. Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, told the New York Times that a tax on windfall profits "would lead to higher premiums for families and businesses" because the added expense would be passed through to customers. [NYT, Oct. 9, 2009]
However, it was not clear why insurers would worry about a windfall profits tax if they were also concerned that new customers would be a financial burden.
Still, by the industry throwing its weight around with threats of higher premiums, it may be risking a backlash from Congress, which could still turn to the public option as the only feasible method for constraining ever-rising health insurance costs.
The industry fears the public option because it could piggyback on the existing Medicare bureaucracy and thus save substantial money, which the insurance industry spends on administrative expenses, executive pay and profits.
Those costs eat up 20 percent or more of an average dollar that businesses and individuals spend on health insurance premiums, compared to about 2 percent for Medicare.
The latest threats suggest that industry lobbyists believe they have enough senators lined up to back a Republican filibuster and block the public option, although some congressional liberals contend that some form of the public option, which is contained in four other committee-approved bills, still has a decent chance of winning final congressional approval.
But Democrats especially have reason to worry, because if they enact a reform package without the public option – and insurers then jack up rates – Democrats could be blamed for the unintended consequence of higher costs and thus pay a steep political price at the polls.
[For more on the Democrats' dilemma, see Consortiumnews.com's "Democrats Ponder Health-Care Suicide."]
---- Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth' are also available there. Or go to Amazon.com.



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Â It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
That's an open admission by
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 17:50 — Anonymous (not verified)"if health-reform
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 18:23 — Joan Denoo (not verified)Single payer is the
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 18:31 — George Powell (not verified)These companies need to be
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 18:43 — Anonymous (not verified)We must not accept extortion
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 18:49 — Anonymous (not verified)Dear Mr President: Forget
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:05 — kiwiphile (not verified)Without the public option
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:24 — Frances Pryor (not verified)We have a problem if private
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:25 — Michael Durisseau (not verified)The insurance industry is
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:29 — Anonymous (not verified)Am I reading this correctly?
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:34 — An (not verified)Attempts to work with
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:42 — Anonymous (not verified)I am shocked- an industry
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 19:43 — An (not verified)Just had a minor medical
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 20:05 — Anonarcmous (not verified)I say get rid of the
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 20:19 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm not shocked at all.
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 20:27 — Joan T. (not verified)Now Obama is urging Congress to hurry up and get it done, but I think a little more time might actually help the cause. As insurance companies whine and Republicans obstruct, Americans are slowly coming to the conclusion that they do not have the public interest at heart. It will take a tsunami of public support to overcome the lobbies and pass a public option. A bit more time, please...just enough to build that big wave.
Is Extorting the Public for
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 20:32 — Peter Lott Heppner (not verified)Like this is a surprise. The
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 20:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Our President needs to take
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 21:53 — Anonymous (not verified)What did you expect?
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 22:15 — Anonymous (not verified)Now that President Obama has
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 22:56 — The Wise Bard (not verified)This is a ready-made script
Sat, 10/10/2009 - 23:42 — Jacqueline48 (not verified)How is this any different
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 02:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Who or what is more of a
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 03:20 — Anonymous (not verified)What is the legal definition
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 03:21 — Anonymous (not verified)"... it may be risking a
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 03:30 — Texas Aggie (not verified)The public option works in
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 03:55 — eee_eff (not verified)What money grubbing
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 04:34 — Collage707 (not verified)I'm surprised at all the
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 05:39 — Ken Hall (not verified)This outrageous threat is a
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 07:55 — Regina (not verified)SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 11:59 — James Lascko (not verified)It seems like it has to be
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 14:02 — Steve in Maine (not verified)Single-payer is the only
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 14:45 — issy (not verified)Where is Teddy Roosevelt
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 15:32 — Anonymous (not verified)The health insurance
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 15:35 — Anonymous (not verified)We must DO SOMETHING TO
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 15:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Not that I want to pay more,
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 15:55 — John in Cincinnati (not verified)We are making a grave
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 16:00 — hark (not verified)They will raise the rates
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 16:27 — Sallyport (not verified)Health insurance companies
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 22:39 — Anonymous (not verified)This isn't a business
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 22:57 — Anonymous (not verified)I was pleased that these
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 23:24 — Anonymous (not verified)This is such a no-brainer.
Sun, 10/11/2009 - 23:54 — HG (not verified)I believe that the CEO's of
Mon, 10/12/2009 - 12:54 — Anonymous (not verified)If this doesn't prove the
Mon, 10/12/2009 - 16:00 — Anonymous (not verified)They finally said it - they
Mon, 10/12/2009 - 20:01 — Brend Wiggins (not verified)Of course they will, the
Tue, 10/13/2009 - 00:13 — Anonymous (not verified)Wow! Only 1 quasi defender
Wed, 10/14/2009 - 16:06 — Yossarian_22 (not verified)