Share

Wall Street Bailout Won't Do Much to Help Ailing Economy

by: Mark Weisbrot  |  The Center for Economic and Policy Research

photo
Mark Weisbrot writes that in order to overcome "crony capitalism" and the serious financial crisis that has resulted, "Americans will have to fight for measures that protect the public interest, not the interests of those who made this mess." (Photo: Richard Drew / AP)

    It is now clear the approval by Congress of President Bush's $700 bailout package on Friday October 3rd has done nothing to ease the current financial crisis. Credit markets have worsened for several days after the bill passed the Congress. The stock market also plummeted to nearly ten-year lows.

    So much for dire warnings from the Bush Administration that Congress was risking a Great Depression if it did not quickly fork over the dough. The bailout's supporters said Congress had to do something to unfreeze the credit markets. It didn't work.

    There is a basic misunderstanding of the current financial crisis and economic recession that is widespread. Most people think that the current economic downturn - which will be officially designated a recession some time in the near future - is the result of the financial crisis. But this is not true. The current recession is mainly the result of a collapsing housing bubble. This bubble of more than $8 trillion dollars accumulated between 1996-2006, and it is only about 60 percent deflated so far. This means that even if all the problems in the financial system were miraculously solved tomorrow, the United States would still be facing a serious recession.

Also see below:     
Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot | Statement on the Need for Coordinated Stimulus    â€¢

    Of course the financial crisis can make this worse, as financial institutions cut back on lending and short-term interest rates for commercial borrowing rise. And we are indeed facing a serious financial crisis. But the bailout package is a wasteful and inefficient way of dealing with the problem of banks holding bad debt, mostly related to mortgages gone sour in the housing bust. It enables the U.S. Treasury Department to buy up "troubled assets" - mostly mortgage-related securities - from financial institutions, at prices that will likely be much higher than they are worth.

    Economists across the political spectrum saw this as a wasteful and inefficient way to fill holes in banks' balance sheets. Ordinary citizens and taxpayers saw the bailout as an enormous rip-off, and flooded Congress with phone calls, defeating the bailout on its first vote.

    Indeed, the most important ways that our government is currently holding the financial crisis in check do not involve overpaying banks for bad assets. The Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury have intervened repeatedly to pour liquidity into the banking system. They have agreed to federally insure $3.4 trillion of money market mutual funds held by millions of Americans. This week the Fed created a new facility to buy commercial paper, the short-term debt issued by banks and corporations, where lending has been shrinking. The Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the nation's largest insurer, were also necessary to preserve the stability of the financial system.

    All this is just the beginning of cleaning up the mess that has resulted from a de-regulated and un-regulated financial system gone wild. The government will have to take over more insolvent financial institutions and provide capital to others. It will have to take steps to help homeowners, to minimize foreclosures and evictions. And it will need to provide the largest fiscal stimulus package since the Great Depression, to prevent this recession from dragging on for years. The worst part about the bailout is that some politicians will say we can't afford the necessary stimulus because we just added $700 billion to the national debt.

    Americans will have to fight for measures that protect the public interest, not the interests of those who made this mess. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made $163 million as CEO of Goldman Sachs in 2006. Now he and his former colleagues at Goldman are running the Wall Street bailout.

    During the Asian financial crisis ten years ago, there was an expression for this kind of system: "crony capitalism."

    This op-ed was distributed by McClatchy Tribune Information Services on October 8, 2008, and published in the Modesto Bee and other newspapers.

    Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, DC. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of "Social Security: The Phony Crisis" (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Statement on the Need for Coordinated Stimulus

»

by: Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot, The Center for Economic and Policy Research

    The current economic crisis is the result of an extraordinary period of extreme economic mismanagement. The world's central banks, most importantly the Federal Reserve Board in the United States, made the decision to ignore, if not actively cultivate, the growth of asset bubbles. This was the case with stock market bubbles in the 90s and housing bubbles in the current decade.

    They compounded this mistake by ignoring the explosive growth of credit and new complex derivative instruments. They allowed financial institutions to become hugely over-leveraged, ensuring that the collapse of the bubble would lead to major financial disruptions.

    Finally, they failed to recognize the seriousness of the problem, understating the size of the problem at every step. This has slowed efforts to muster an adequate response to the situation. President Bush and other political leaders markedly worsened the situation when they raised the specter of the Great Depression and otherwise sought to raise fears in order to gain public support for the bank bailout package.

    The meeting this weekend of the G-7 provides an extraordinary opportunity to begin the reversal of this dismal record. First, it is necessary to have a coordinated financial and monetary policy to stem the immediate financial crisis. This will require bank bailouts that focus on the direct injection of capital into the banking system, following the example of the United Kingdom earlier this week.

    The financial system will also benefit from further cuts in overnight lending rates, especially by the European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB's focus on concerns over inflation at this economic junction is almost as foolish and potentially more harmful than the decision to ignore the growth of the housing bubble.

    The other key component of an economic recovery package should be a coordinated fiscal stimulus. In the United States, this stimulus should be on the order of $300 billion to $400 billion (2.0-2.7 percent of GDP). This stimulus is essential for counteracting the sharp falloff in consumption that is following the loss of $5 trillion in housing wealth and President Bush's scare tactics for promoting his bank bailout.

    The stimulus should be designed to quickly boost demand. In the United States, this can best be done by aiding state and local governments, extending unemployment benefits, tax rebates to low income individuals, accelerating infrastructure spending and support for energy conserving retrofits of homes and businesses. It is also essential that the dollar fall against other major currencies in order to bring the trade deficit back to a manageable level.

    It is possible that even larger boosts to spending may be necessary to restore normal economic activity. The federal government must be prepared to spend whatever amount is needed to keep the economy creating jobs. This was the main lesson that we learned from the Great Depression. Concerns over deficits prevented the government from taking sufficient measures to boost the economy out of its slump until World War II left the government no choice. It would be an enormous tragedy for the country and the world if the United States were to repeat the same mistakes almost 80 years later.

--------    

    Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of "The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer." He also has a blog on the American Prospect, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues.

    Mark Weisbrot is also the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, DC. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of "Social Security: The Phony Crisis" (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I'm willing to bet that many

I'm willing to bet that many economists knew this was coming and gave the appropriate warnings, but the financiers making the money still couldn't control their desire to make more money. It's like lemmings going over the cliff, only it's not them that is going to die, it's the investors. The investors knew it was coming also, but as long as they were making money, they still wanted in. Now they want to fix the problem, not by taking their medicine and starting from scratch, but they want the government to intervene and pay off all their bad debt so they can go back to their corrupt ways. As it turns out, the WMD were not in Iraq and they weren't biological, chemical, or nuclear, they were financial "derivatives". From wikipedia: "On the use of "derivatives" "The possibility that this could lead to a chain reaction ensuing in an economic crisis, has been pointed out by legendary investor Warren Buffett in Berkshire Hathaway's annual report. Buffett called them 'financial weapons of mass destruction.' " And there are 531 trillion dollars tied up in "derivatives".

How many republican senators

How many republican senators does it take to fix the economy? 39, if there were 40 they would just filibuster.

What we build with money for

What we build with money for infrastructure is very important. We must build clean energy sources, carbon free energy sources such as wind and solar electric systems, mass transit systems. We also need to revitalize our local based agriculture and heal ecosystems. And stop building weapons.

Artificial stimulation of

Artificial stimulation of consumption is nonsense. Planetary health includes human health, both respond to decreased consumption. The vector toward a sustainable and fun culture which is reaching for the stars is a shrinking GDP and increasing quality of life. Cordially, Garrett

What did anyone expect- this

What did anyone expect- this is a top down solution. More trickle down voodoo economics will fix this catastrophe! Ya sure ya bet 'cha. My rep switched their vote to aye the second time and to this moment doesn't have a clue about the situation. It really still is business as usual on Capitol Hill. Total failure of all our institutions in the face of this disaster.

"$531 trillion tied up in

"$531 trillion tied up in derivatives"? What on earth does this mean? The number is so enormous its absurd and demonstrates a total disconnect from the real world. How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? And how many hundreds of trillions of worthless obligations can Wall Street toss about insisting the public must PAY ATTENTION and pay the bill. Obviously we are dealing with a collective insanity here. The curing of it is in letting the whole thing collapse and wiping out these obligations. After all they not really real but are obligations that exist as fictions in the minds of a demented and hopelessly insane financial class.

The history books will be

The history books will be sadly etched with the blood of the poor and starving by the seemingly limitless audacity of the ultra-rich who delve not only in other peoples' monies, but lives. This game they play is surely a calculated one as they continue to eat from our skulls and fertilize their gardens with the rising piles of rotting plebes they collect in their wake.