Share

Obama's DOJ May Appeal Ruling Ordering Release of Cheney's CIA Leak Transcript

by: Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
Former Vice President Dick Cheney. (Photo Illustration: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted From: talk radio news / flickr)

    The Obama administration indicated in court papers it may appeal a federal judge's ruling ordering the Justice Department to release portions of the transcribed interview between former Vice President Dick Cheney and Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor appointed to probe the roles Bush administration officials played in the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson six years ago.

    Last week, Jeffrey M. Smith, an attorney in the Justice Department's civil division, filed an emergency motion in US District Court in Washington, DC, requesting a 30-day stay of the court's October 1 order that called for the parts of the Cheney interview to be released by October 9.

    Smith said the stay, which US District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan granted, was needed "in order to allow the Solicitor General [Elena Kagan] sufficient time in which to exercise her statutory authority to determine whether the [Department of Justice] will file an appeal in this action."

    "This case involves an important issue that will require consultations at high levels of Government," Smith said, adding that the stay "is necessary to avoid the irreparable harm that would result if the Government is forced to disclose its documents to the public before it has the opportunity to consider whether to pursue its appellate rights."

    The case stems from a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed last year by the public interest group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). The organization has been trying to gain access to Cheney's interview transcript and has found its efforts thwarted first by Justice Department attorneys in the Bush administration, who had said the interview transcript was being withheld on national security grounds, and now by the Obama administration, whose attorneys said the material, if released, could become "fodder for The Daily Show."

    The resistance from the Obama administration has left some of its supporters shaking their heads. Not only does the obstruction go against President Obama's pledge of government openness, but it is protecting the reputation of Cheney, one of Obama's most vocal critics.

    It was Smith who argued in July that the transcript of Cheney's 2004 interview with Fitzgerald about the CIA leak should remain secret for as long as ten more years to protect Cheney from any political embarrassment that would result from the transcript being released.

    As previously reported by Truthout, Sullivan rejected Smith's argument as well as others that claimed releasing the contents of the transcript would derail law enforcement efforts to obtain the cooperation of sitting vice presidents in future criminal probes.

    "Any attempt to predict the harm that disclosure of these records could have ... is therefore inherently, incurably speculative," Sullivan wrote in his ruling. "Accordingly, the Court concludes that DOJ has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the records were properly withheld."

    Sullivan, however, did agree that the Justice Department can keep under wraps, on national security grounds, statements Cheney had made to Fitzgerald about declassification discussions he had with George W. Bush, conversations Cheney had with former CIA Director George Tenet about Ambassador Joseph Wilson's February 2002 trip to Niger to investigate allegations that Iraq was seeking to purchase yellowcake uranium, discussions surrounding the 16 words in Bush's January 2003 State of the Union address that asserted Iraq had attempted to purchase the uranium, talks between Cheney and then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and conversations between Cheney and other Bush officials about how to respond to media inquiries about the Plame Wilson leak.

    Senior Bush administration officials disclosed Plame Wilson's identity to several journalists in June and July of 2003 amid White House efforts to discredit her husband, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, for challenging Bush's use of bogus intelligence to justify invading Iraq.

    Plame Wilson's CIA employment was revealed in a July 14, 2003, article by the late right-wing columnist Robert Novak, effectively destroying her career. Two months later, a CIA complaint to the Justice Department sparked a criminal probe into the identity of the leakers.

    Initially, Bush professed not to know anything about the matter, and several of his senior aides, including political adviser Karl Rove and the vice president's chief of staff I. Lewis Libby, followed suit.

    However, it later became clear that Rove and Libby had a hand in the Plame leak and that Bush and Cheney had helped organize a campaign to disparage Wilson by giving critical information to friendly journalists.

    On June 24, 2004, Bush was interviewed by Fitzgerald for 70 minutes about the Plame leak. The only other member of the Bush team in the room during the meeting was Jim Sharp, the private lawyer that Bush hired, according to a press briefing by then press secretary Scott McClellan.

    "The President ... was pleased to do his part to help the investigation move forward," McClellan said. "No one wants to get to the bottom of this matter more than the President of the United States."

    A couple of weeks earlier, Cheney was interviewed by Fitzgerald. Cheney retained a private attorney, Terrence O'Donnell, to represent him in the matter.

    Fitzgerald's criminal investigation led to Libby's indictment in October 2005 and his subsequent conviction in March 2007 on four counts of perjury and obstruction of justice, which Bush later commuted.

    During closing arguments at Libby's trial, Cheney was implicated in the leak, as Fitzgerald acknowledged that Cheney was intimately involved in the scandal and may have told Libby to leak Plame's status to the media.

    Court papers filed by Obama's Justice Department in July revealed that Bush and Cheney were in contact about the scandal, including what is described as "a confidential conversation" and "an apparent communication between the Vice President and the President."

    That court filing also revealed that Fitzgerald questioned Cheney about his participation in the decision to declassify parts of a 2002 National Intelligence Estimate regarding Iraq's alleged WMD. It ultimately fell to Bush to clear selected parts of the NIE so they could be leaked as part of the White House campaign to disparage Wilson.

  

»


Jason Leopold is the Deputy Managing Editor at Truthout. He is the author of the Los Angeles Times bestseller, News Junkie, a memoir. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Since when is the

Since when is the speculative concern for how transcripts might be used a legal defense. Additionally, Cheney is an embarrassment, so I fail to see how protecting him from himself serves anyone or the fact that it could be any worse than what has has done to this point. Perhaps if had followed the law in the first place the government wouldn't have to be concerned how he is portrayed on the "Daily Show".

Cheney wants the reports

Cheney wants the reports held for ten years to protect him from embarrassment, But what about the "embarrassment" he caused Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame? What about the "embarrassment" he caused to Colin Powell when he maneuvered him into lying to the world about Iraq's supposed WMDs? What about the "embarrassment" to this country when it attacked Iraq without justification and mired the military and the national budget in eight years of death and destruction? What about the "embarrassment" to the many men and women maimed for life, physically, psychologically, maritally, etc? Embarrass the big Dick. Reveal his high crimes and misdemeanors. Then put him on trial, stick him in jail (or, better, Gitmo), and let him rot there in his well-deserved "embarrassment."

Silly me, when I first saw a

Silly me, when I first saw a picture of Lady Justice, with her blindfold and scales, I thought "How wonderful that in my country the application of justice is blind to the accused's status. Justice was equally applied to all," I thought. But now I know the true meaning of the blindfold: it's to make sure Lady Justice cannot see the entrenched criminals so ubiquitous in our government. Lady Justice wears a blindfold so she can only apply her Justice to the "little people." Our government makes sure of this. The "big people" can do anything they wish. No crimes are too heinous, as our former Idiot in Chief has so clearly demonstrated.

Which part of Obama's

Which part of Obama's anatomy does the minions of the Bush Crime Family have in the squeeze?

For the last few months,

For the last few months, Cheney has taken every opportunity to criticize the decisions and direction of the Obama administration on its foreign policy. Effectively attempting to "embarass" Obama. Why in the world would becoming "fodder for the Daily Show" be a reason for not releasing the transcript? We're not pursuing justice because late night comics might poke fun at the former vice president? Now that's scary. The more I hear about the goings-on at the highest level of our government, the more embarassed I become. And disgusted.

This is more proof that

This is more proof that Obama is just the new face on the same old criminal conspiracy that is the US government.

I say, perhaps we could all

I say, perhaps we could all pray there is Divine Justice, 'cause we don't have time for all this crap.

Really everyone! WHO

Really everyone! WHO CARES??? What you say or do here or in any blog seems to matter NOT!! The (there) 'status quo' goes on. Prepare your own lives and live them as best YOU can. Change only comes when it comes when least expected!

Obama is of the same ilk,

Obama is of the same ilk, apparently. Too bad.

I'm beginning to suspect I

I'm beginning to suspect I should have wrote in Mickey Mouse when I voted last year for President.

I hope for some other

I hope for some other explanation, such as: Obama doesn't know, and no one is going to tell him, the idiocies of his own DOJ lower level officers. I also hope that news stories like this one will "embarrass" him to do the right thing and order all the transcripts to be released.