Share

The Crisis Is Beginning

by: HervĂ© Kempf  |  Le Monde

photo
"There will be no emergence from the crisis," argues Hervé Kempf. Either humans adapt to the biosphere's limits or phenomena like this dust storm over China will impose limits on us. (Photo: Jacques Descloitres / MODIS Rapid Response Team, NASA/GSFC)

    In the phantasmagoric world of officials and economic analysts, good and evil boil down to the quivering of a totem: gross domestic product (GDP). It falls 2 percent; that's a catastrophe; it climbs - trembling - some 0.3 percent; the recovery is brewing. And the obsession is to return to the "normal" 2-3-4 percent rates of growth, so that life may revert to its former splendor. This is no caricature: Dozens of statements and articles in The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, The Economist, Les Echos, La Tribune - and, of course, our own dear Monde - ratiocinate around this theme.

    Let's talk about the real economy, the one that centers around societies' sustainable subsistence.
The 2008-2009 recession arose from the bursting of a financial bubble swollen from excessive debt. The pieces were glued back together through the public authorities' strong and swift intervention. On top of that, massive budgetary recovery projects were launched to avoid the collapse of the economy. Consequently, public indebtedness - already significant before the recession - has grown still further. As there are limits to debt, in the future, it will hardly be possible to artificially support the economy.

    Then, there's ... energy. Growth in GDP depends on its being lost cost. Yet, Peak Oil - which we are nearing today - means that the price of fossil fuels is on the rise, even as it will remain the reference price for all energy over the next decade. Consequently, if a "recovery" should occur, it will increase the demand for oil, the price of which will rise, which will once again cool down the fires of GDP.

    Climate change is another essential element. It is urgent that we reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. Rich countries - even the United States - proclaim they want to decrease these by 80 percent between now and 2050: Roughly speaking, that represents an annual reduction of 3 percent. We're far from there. Either we really commit to that goal and our reduction in energy consumption transforms the economic system - but not towards "growth" - or we wait and climate disturbances will make life very difficult. China and India are beginning to feel what that's about: among water shortages, wild monsoons, floods etc. China's days of 10 percent growth rates are over!

    The third forgotten element: agriculture. A billion humans are hungry every day. With rising global population and ever more severe environmental constraints, agriculture is once again becoming a question of the utmost importance. That's what we must invest in, not in supporting the lifestyle of United States' residents.

    There will be no "emergence from the crisis." The crisis is beginning. In fact, it's not a crisis, but the beginning of a great transformation: the one that will either lead us to a human society adapted to the biosphere's limits, or, if we remain in the old "growthist" schema ... to the explosion.

    --------

    Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Sure there will be an

Sure there will be an emergence. The burning of oil and coal is causing the extinction of many species. Our species will experience a big die off when fossil fuels are gone. The biosphere can go back to its normal state, defined over eons, once fossil fuels are gone. The author of this article suffers from the same lack of patience of the people of whom he writes. In context of life on earth, the catastrophe of man is significant, but short lived. Ten thousand years from now there will be men, but oh so few, and a flourishing of other species. Ah, elbow room. Again senior Kempf, patience!

Start at here and now. Part

Start at here and now. Part of the inadvertently suicidal growth path is artificial stimulation of Want. Humans want enough all on their own, a small step toward rationalizing reality is removal of all subsidies supporting artificial stimulation of Want.

growth for growth's sake is

growth for growth's sake is known as cancer.

Succinctly put. "The

Succinctly put. "The reality is that business is in fact, a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment".

The thing that amazes me is

The thing that amazes me is that everyone talks about increasing agriculture to feed hungry people, but no-one talks about educating women globally and really enforcing their rights over how many children they have. Young girls are forced to be baby machines when many (not all) would rather delay it and first get an education and a job. I heard an interview on the bbc today with child labourers in Bolivia, with an 11 yr old boy and his mother, both with bleeding hands. And the shift boss now 35 who started at 10 yrs old and is still working the sugar cane. The mother said the 11 yr old boy had to help her support his 6 siblings. But the interviewer never asked her if she had wanted such a large family, or if she had real;ly had the choice, without disrespecting her family, what would she have done? The interviewer did not ask her or the shift boss what would happen if there were fewer children?

... and yet, by writing this

... and yet, by writing this article you've made the first step towards resolving the problem. While there are over a billion people chronically hungry (with this forecast to worsen) there are also over a billion people active on the Internet more able to help than ever before (with enormous power at the tips of their fingers). The World Food Program recently launched a campaign calling on that online billion to help the hungry billion: http://wfp.org/1billion Note: if you're reading this, then you're someone who can do something :=) seriously, check it out!

growth is necessitated by

growth is necessitated by loaning money at interest. money is created by loan generation, but the interest is not. the interest can only be paid by growth, bankruptcy, or inflation, and the latter 2 things are not acceptable. the only way off the growth treadmill is to end loaning money at interest.