Share

Foreign Policy Hawks Launch New Campaign Against Obama

by: Jim Lobe  |  Inter Press Service

photo
Neo-conservative William Kristol is behind a new group that is attempting to paint President Obama as weak on defense. (Photo: Center for Strategic and International Studies / flickr)

    Washington - Just days after the Nobel Committee in Oslo awarded Barack Obama its coveted peace prize, two of Washington's most prominent foreign policy hawks launched a new group and ad campaign designed to depict the president as weak and defend the more aggressive policies of his predecessor, George W. Bush.

    The new group, Keep America Safe, was co-founded by neo-conservative heavyweight William Kristol, who also edits The Weekly Standard; and Elisabeth (Liz) Cheney, the outspoken daughter of Bush's vice president, Dick Cheney, who is believed to harbour political ambitions of her own.

    "Amidst the great challenges to America's security and prosperity, the current administration too often seems uncertain, wishful, irresolute, and unwilling to stand up for America, our allies and our interests," according to the mission statement of the new group, whose third founder-director, Debra Burlingame, is also co-founder of 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America.

    "Keep America Safe believes the United States can only defeat our adversaries and defend our interests from a position of strengh [sic]," the statement says.

    "We know that America has, for 233 years, been an unparalleled force for good in the world, that our fighting forces are the best the world has ever known, and that the world is a safer place when America is trusted by our allies and feared and respected by our enemies."

    "Keep America Safe will make the case for an unapologetic approach to fighting terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is needed in the dangerous world in which we live," it says.

    The new group, which, under the rules of its incorporation, will be permitted to lobby Congress and endorse political candidates, will focus initially on raising money to help disseminate its video ads, the first of which is currently featured on its website.

    "The Left has dozens of organisations and tens of millions of dollars dedicated to undercutting the war on terror," Kristol told "Politico" Tuesday. "The good guys need some help, too."

    Earlier this year, Kristol co-founded with his long-time collaborator, Robert Kagan, another hawkish group, the neo-conservative Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), which has published open letters urging Obama to promote democracy in Russia, send tens of thousands more troops to Afghanistan, and reassure Washington's Central European allies about its defence commitment.

    The two men were also co-founders and directors of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a number of whose 1997 charter members, including the elder Cheney, former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld, and their two top aides - I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Paul Wolfowitz, respectively - played key roles in promoting the 2003 invasion of Iraq and Bush's other first-term policies when the hawks exercised their greatest influence.

    Kristol and Cheney, who are also commentators for the far-right Fox News, have been among the sharpest right-wing critics of Obama's efforts to court foreign opinion, especially in Europe and the Muslim world whose publics were most alienated by the Bush administration's policies, according to public opinion surveys.

    They have been particularly scornful of the Nobel Committee's decision to honour Obama.

    Cheney, a lawyer who headed the State Department's Middle East democracy-promotion programmes from 2002 to 2004 and is reportedly considering running for Congress next year, called the award a "farce" and suggested that Obama send a "mother of a fallen American soldier to accept the prize on behalf of the U.S. military... to remind the Nobel committee that each one of them sleeps soundly at night because the U.S. military is the greatest peacekeeping force in the world today."

    Kristol called the committee "anti-American".

    Like most other far-right and neo-conservative commentators, they have tried to paint Obama's foreign policy as designed to weaken and constrain U.S. power in a dangerous world by abandoning policies championed by Cheney's father, whose memoirs she is reportedly helping to write.

    "By turning away from the policies that have kept us safe, by treating terrorism as a law enforcement matter, giving foreign terrorists the same rights as American citizens, launching investigations of CIA agents, cutting defense spending, breaking faith with our allies and attempting to appease our adversaries, the current administration is weakening the nation, and making it more difficult for us to defend our security and our interests," the new group's mission statement reads.

    The developing right-wing narrative against Obama has been most comprehensively laid out by neo-conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer, in an article entitled "Decline Is a Choice: The New Liberalism and the End of American Ascendancy" published this week by Kristol's Weekly Standard and featured on the Keep America Safe website.

    "The current foreign policy of the United States is an exercise in contraction," according to the article, which goes on to argue that Obama's acknowledgement in various major speeches that Washington's conduct abroad has not always lived up to its principles "effectively undermine[s] any moral claim that America might have to world leadership".

    "[T]he new left-liberal internationalism goes far beyond its earlier Clintonian incarnation in its distrust and distaste for American dominance," according to Krauthammer, an unabashed promoter of global U.S. dominance since 1990 when he penned a famous essay in Foreign Affairs entitled "The Unipolar Moment".

    "For what might be called the New Liberalism the renunciation of power is rooted not in the fear that we are essentially good but subject to the corruptions of power - the old Clintonian view - but rooted in the conviction that America is so intrinsically flawed, so inherently and congenitally sinful that it cannot be trusted with, and does not merit, the possession of overarching world power."

    Under Obama, Washington is engaged in "strategic retreat", according to Krauthammer.

    He cites as evidence, among other things, the administration's abandonment of the phrase "Global War on Terror"; the "unilateral abrogation" of missile defence systems in Poland and the Czech Republic; "indecision on Afghanistan"; the failure to treat Iraq as a "prize... of great strategic significance that the administration seems to have no intention of exploiting"; support for a "Chavista caudillo" in Honduras; and "heavy and gratuitous America pressure on Israel".

    The notion that such measures, which he sees as futile efforts to regain the moral high ground, will "lead to reciprocal gestures from the likes of Iran and North Korea is simply childish".

    "In a word, it is a foreign policy designed to produce American decline - to make America essentially one nation among many," a process furthered by domestic policies that are social democratic and European in their privileging of butter over guns, according to Krauthammer.

    "(W)hile globalization has produced in some the illusion that human nature has changed, it has not," he went on. "The international arena remains a Hobbesian state of nature in which countries naturally strive for power... Do we really want to live under unknown, untested, shifting multipolarity? Or even worse, under the gauzy internationalism of the New Liberalism with its self-enforcing norms?"

    The point was echoed by Cheney in her critique on Fox News of the Nobel's decision.

    "What the committee believes is, they'd like to live in a world in which America's not dominant," she said. "They may believe that President Obama also doesn't believe in American dominance and they may have been trying to affirm that belief with the prize. I think, unfortunately, they may be right, and I think it's a concern."

    --------

    Jim Lobe's blog on U.S. foreign policy can be read at http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/.

  

»


Ips_logo
Visit IPS news for fresh perspectives on development and globalization.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Let me get this straight.

Let me get this straight. These poor, deluded souls give credit to the illegitimate 'administration' for 'keeping us safe.' This despite the fact that they ignored numerous specific warnings about an imminent attack, did nothing to stop the hijacked planes, and exploited the attacks to justify slaughtering huge numbers of people in certain energy rich countries, thereby making us much less safe. For these folks, coddling American war criminals and killing people hand over fist is the one and only tenet of foreign policy. My proposal: Anyone who believes that this is the way to go must go, gun in hand, to the front lines. No exceptions or excuses. Then watch the rise in born-again peaceniks.

These neo-cons seem to have

These neo-cons seem to have missed the point entirely that the policies of world domination as in PNAC are what has destroyed this nation's ability and will to take care of its own people. We are bankrupt because our treasure has been wasted in the desert to defend the big oil interests in the name of national security. All the economic troubles we are now having have their roots in the (non)policies of George Bush, as he ignored bank regulation, health care, environment, etc., in order to focus on destroying the Arab world. It was already evident before Obama took office that the rest of the world was laughing at the United States futile attempts to control the planet's peoples. Our country is in far more danger of being destroyed from within by our own efforts than hurt from any force outside it. What history are Kristol and Kagen reading that they think that military force can make the world do what they want. It is already failed.

Amazing. Even more amazing

Amazing.

Even more amazing is that Kristol has some degree of credibility in America. Lynn Cheney, Kristol, Krauthammer, and their ilk should never again be taken with any credibility. One can imagine that they would lead the US and indeed, the world into another disaster like Iraq.

Is this Kristol making

Is this Kristol making jokes? Does the ignorant Cheney's daughter has any idea what she is putting her name on? Sad that are still people who pay attention to those lunatics.

Anyone who would believe the

Anyone who would believe the architects of the debacle called the Bush Administration have anything worthwhile to offer should go buy a bridge somewhere. Their credibility was lost within the first week after the bombing of Baghdad when Rumsfeld said that Democracy is sometimes a little messy. He watched as mobs looted government offices. There was no plan to provide required security for arms caches, government and police buildings with information inside and most importantly for the people. It was no wonder after all the military and police were disbanded that the country fell into chaos. And here is the US left with a debt going on to a trillion dollars for the wars. The economic situation can not be laid at the doorstep of the present administration but squarely at the feet of the previous one. A responsible GOP supporter should think less of putting the same inept people back into power and more of working with the present administration to rebuild the country for the people that had no part in it. I hope nobody listens to these people and I hope they are ignored by the responsible media and only appear on Fox News which I don't waste my time watching.

Ms LynnCheney [ state

Ms LynnCheney [ state department official] is being prepped to accomplish what Sen Hillary Clinton & Gov Sara Palin did not, in the pattern of Bush family. Once again, when we stand at attention as the television brings the evening of those uniformed dead--I notice not the Cheney or Kristol surnames. These are armchair warriors who can talk well & convince others, & they have the more to gain by it & their. they gather support by promising a share of what they have. Ha! Once again, if serving their domestic divide & conquer routine. If country is such a priority, they need to take the IMMEDIATE route of action, rather than sit in the soft chairs of WDC! If americans are so complacent or dumb to be repeatedly duped by those smarter & richer than them--then maybe they deserve it.

When the Bush Administration

When the Bush Administration deliberately spent the budget surplus and handed our economic future to the Red Chinese, was that a patriotic act? If so, to whom? By putting us into debt to them to furnish the money to keep our government financed, was that "keeping America strong?" What happens if Red China demands Taiwan? Will they then finance our military in defending it? How will our military function once the Republican furnished economic plug gets pulled by the Red Chinese? Who's calling the shots here? Will Comrade Mark Kirk succeed in his Manchurian mission? Tune in to William Kristol and find out how the US will be delivered to his communist masters!

Hey, I've got an idea!!

Hey, I've got an idea!! Let's pour tens of thousands of fresh troops into a country where the President just tried to steal the election so he can continue his corrupt government. That'll work!

Whats the penalty for

Whats the penalty for sedition/treason again? and specifically sedition/treason during wartime? ...because we're currently at war in Iraq and Afganistan... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The defintion of SEDITION; se⋅di⋅tion –noun 1. incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government. 2. any action, esp. in speech or writing, promoting such discontent or rebellion. 3. Archaic. rebellious disorder. Synonyms: 1. insurrection, mutiny. See treason. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The defintion of TREASON; –noun 1. the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign. 2. a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state. 3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery. Origin: 1175–1225; ME tre(i)so(u)n < AF; OF traïson < L trāditiōn- (s. of trāditiō) a handing over, betrayal. Synonyms: 1. Treason, sedition mean disloyalty or treachery to one's country or its government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's government. Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection; it does not amount to treason and therefore is not a capital offense. 2. See disloyalty. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I'm so tired of these neo-con racist's that i thought i should post the definitions for others to compare them to... we have enough external enemies atm, but these neo-con traitors/seditionists need a firm boot planted up there asses and more then a few sent to jail for more then just treason, but also to include formenting hate and assassination.

Considering that these

Considering that these people had their chance to show what they could do in Afghanistan and Iraq and failed miserably, why should anyone be stupid enough to listen to them now? A major result of their program then and now is the complete disengagement of our "allies" from the "war on terror." Because the techniques that these bozos were using were so counterproductive, the rest of the world just sort of shut us off. So much for "trusted by our allies." The way the neocons conducted their wonderful war was so beyond the pale that the recruitment of soldiers to fight us was never a problem for the insurgency. So much for "feared by our enemies." These rightwing idiots are just so enamored with their own megalomania that they really are completely and totally clueless of what motivates people. If they go on killing randomly, they will go on filling the recruitment lines of people willing to fight us. Suicide bombers really aren't afraid of us, and when our methods reduce people to the point that they are willing to kill themselves for the possibility of taking some of us out, what more can you do to make them afraid? How stupid can one person be let alone so many of them?

"effectively undermine[s]

"effectively undermine[s] any moral claim that America might have to world leadership". Idiot child, any moral claim to world leadership went down the tubes with Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. As soon as Bush's minions wrote their memos justifying breaking international law, we lost our moral leadership. From that moment on the world considered us a pariah. One of the reasons that Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize is that he has started bringing us back from that point. Now these dopes want us to return to being despised by civilized nations. How the blazes do they expect any cooperation from people who consider us to be vicious killers on par with Stalin?

I agree with everyone of the

I agree with everyone of the above,except the comment about Obama "bringing us back..."....no! he is continuing down the same dark street as his predecessor! I have watched the steep descent of the US for the past ten years with awe at the sheer power of the psychological propaganda war being conducted on the US citizens and how absolutely affective the mass media has been in delivering these weapons of the mind! America is undone and everyone would be well advised to consider preparation for the final downfall of the empire!

Why do you people keep

Why do you people keep giving these cretins publicity? Their names should never be mentioned again. Please stop giving them a platform to spew their stupidity. Have they been correct once in the last eight years?