Share

The New Confederacy of Republicans

by: Michael Hittleman, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Photo Illustration: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t, Adapted From: CJ Sorg, publicenergy, flickr)

    South Carolina Sen. Jim Demint travels to Honduras to endorse the military coup. Illinois Congressman Mark Kirk tells China not to believe our government's figures. Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe will tell the upcoming Copenhagen climate summit that global warming is a hoax as he shadows President Obama. South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson shouts, "You lie!" at the president at a joint session of Congress. What do these events have in common? I believe the answer is that the Republican Party's 1968 "Southern Strategy" has morphed into the Southern Democratic Party's 1860 strategy - do not recognize the federal government as a legitimate institution and advocate policies reminiscent of the antebellum South.

    The 1968 Republican "Southern Strategy" was a shrewd political move by Richard Nixon's people to grab blue collar and suburban white voters from the Democratic Party. These voters were fearful of busing and desegregation of residential neighborhoods. George Wallace had shown the strategy could work by running up big percentages among these voters in northern Democratic primaries. He also blamed "pointy-headed intellectuals" and government bureaucrats for government intrusion into working people's lives and homes - charges Republicans would run with for the next four decades.

    However, as time went on, this original strategy played into the hands of ideological small government conservatives whose main motive was to get regulations (and taxes) out of their companies and private lives. When the anti-government campaign of Ronald Reagan succeeded, these ideologues were off and running. Taxes were lowered for the richest individuals and corporations, while government regulators softened up on business. Congress was bypassed or ignored on foreign policy. The result was massive federal deficits for military spending, the stock market crash, the savings and loan scandal and the Iran-Contra affair. Still the ideologues called for more deregulation, more tax cuts and more power for the presidency as opposed to Congress.

    With the disputed election of George W. Bush in 2000, these ideas were put into practice: tax cuts for the wealthy, large corporations circumventing corporate taxes (while complaining about the rate), the theory of the unified executive where the president is the sole voice on foreign policy and war. The politicization of every department of government, spying on the American people, the refusal to testify before Congress or provide documents and vast sums of money unaccounted for became standard practice. Social programs, even including programs for veterans, were cut while every attempt was made to privatize Social Security.

    As the Democratic Party became the only viable antebellum party in the South, the 21st century Republican Party moved to create a "permanent majority." Installing Karl Rove in the White House to vet every decision for its political value, having government departments participate in campaigns, allowing only Republican lobbyists, hiring news stories and fake reporters were some of the new tactics. Focusing on the bogus issue of illegal voters led to attempts to purge voter roles, laws requiring multiple IDs and other measures to restrict voter registration and actual voting.

    The antebellum South was an oligarchy as was the Jim Crow South. This is exactly the type of government favored by today's Republican Party. "Trickle-down" economics so the rich can show us the way to prosperity and job creation is a mirror of the paternalistic plantation owner with his network of good ol' boys at the local courthouse. Enforcing identity laws is a mirror of the poll taxes and tests that kept blacks and poor whites from voting. One of the least known facts about the pre-Civil War South and especially the later Jim Crow South is how few poor whites voted. Racism as a sop for poor whites to feel superior while remaining powerless mirrors everything from Rush Limbaugh's "Barack the Magic Negro" number to all the racist cartoons and comments coming from Republican newspapers, commentators and state party people.

    Today's Republican Party, wrapped in flags, guns and religion, represents the Old South and mountain States - a party becoming geographically isolated and begging to be called racist with one of John McCain's campaign directors saying they were campaigning in the last bastions of "real" America like the Mesabi Range and Western Pennsylvania. There is almost no Republican House representation from the northeast as well as the nation's urban areas.

    It is no accident to have South Carolina's Sen. Jim Demint advocating his own foreign policy abetted by Mitch McConnell from Kentucky and South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson shouting "liar" at the president. These people, like the "birthers," don't see a legitimate government. Like most of the Republican Party, they refuse to work with Democrats - compromise is not in their vocabulary. Like today's California Republican Party, they would rather the government fail than see the Democrats achieve anything. Texas Gov. Rick Perry suggested his state might secede as many of today's Republicans, like their Confederate Democratic forebears, have already ideologically seceded. Perhaps red states and blue states are becoming blue states and gray states.

    ---------

    Michael Hittleman is the owner/director of the Michael Hittleman Gallery - Fine Israeli Art, which was opened in 1976. He is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of UCLA with a B.A. in Philosophy. He is an associate of the Omohundro Institute in Williamsburg, Virginia. www.michaelhittlemangallery.com

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Wouldnt a more appropriate

Wouldnt a more appropriate title be New Confederacy of Dunces?

I say, if the South wants to

I say, if the South wants to secede, this time we let 'em! We don't have slavery to abolish this time around, and with the anti-governmenters out of the way, we might actually get some real reform in healthcare, and be able to get actual governmental regulations and programs back in business.

Not to belabor the obvious,

Not to belabor the obvious, and with apologies to John Kennedy Toole, but the article should've been titled, "A Confederacy of Dunces."

You ask: What do these

You ask: What do these events have in common? KKK mentality!

Isn't it wonderful that

Isn't it wonderful that Comrade Mark informed on us to the largest Communist government on earth? Should he ever need new eyeballs, kidneys, or whatever, I am sure they will speed up the executions of any dissidents that would make suitable "organ donors" in payment for his betraying his country. But then, wasn't the Republican Communist Party the one that handed the Red Chinese the equivalent of an economic "H" bomb during the reign of their Glorious Leader, George W. Bush? So now this budding "Manchurian candidate"is running for the office of senator? Does he hope to inherit a country he helped bring to it's knees economically, and will our government functions then be "privatized" to that major Red Chinese entrepreneur, the Peoples' Liberation Army?

The author must have dropped

The author must have dropped the "S" as the first letter of his last name. I guess you have to eventually spew it when you are this full of it.

Notice how some people don't

Notice how some people don't actually produce any facts? See how they just call people names? This playground mentality has been substituted for cogent fact-based discussion, to our detriment.

I think America is in the

I think America is in the middle of a "Cold Civil War" right now. Think about it.

What has been said, in this

What has been said, in this article, is unfortunate, because it is true. Has this "cold civil war" always been in the history of our country? There has always been a division in our country, beginning with 13 colonies trying to become a United States. Despite the battle we have been blessed with prominent and ordinary people speaking against this division. The propagandist, who have fostered this this have been rejected because of those who opposed the division. It is my prayer that we continue to have people who will advocate for solidarity of the people.

Any time liberals can accuse

Any time liberals can accuse their opponents of racism, they will do it. Without the racism card, they don't have a whole lot to stand on. Ironic, isn't it, that during the Bush administration we kept hearing from Democrats about how he was not a legitimate president. And many racist slurs were made by liberals against Condi Rice and Collin Powell.

Democrats are doing a lot of

Democrats are doing a lot of talking about "calling out" Repuglicans these days. It's a good sign. I'm calling out "anonymous 13:06". Defend your comment. Back it up with something. I read the same article and agreed with it wholeheartedly. Rather than resorting to hit and run insults with no substance, tell us what you disagreed with and verify your arguments. Otherwise, you're doing your own political agenda no good.

Most of what is described in

Most of what is described in tis Article only occurs because of the nature of American Media today. Before Reagan, All of American Media, Cable, broadcast, Print, Radio, etc.., was owned and operated by hundreds of separate, different and diverse entities, AND.., because of Regulations (More Government Of the People) this situation was maintained and monopoly-like power was impossible to achieve in Media. There was a Fairness Doctrine in Media which required Media Owners to grant equal time to opposing political viewpoints and so, americans were much more exposed to a broader spectrum of ideas and it was not so easy to tune out everything other than what one wants to hear politically like it is today... Since Reagan, the Fairness Doctrine has been done away with and Media Ownership Regulations have also largely been done away with until now, ALMOST ALL MEDIA IN AMERICA IS OWNED OPERATED AND EXPLOITED BY JUST A FEW GLOBAL CORPORATIONS... Some of which is used specifically for Ranting, Divisive Political Nonsense and Preaching to the political 'Choir' (or HOODWINKING the Choir.., whichever you prefer)... And in all of that, somehow, someway, WE have allowed what was once likened to INFAMY to become equated to Political FAME... And the Division Of Americans and the Pitting of US against each other as regular, hourly ENTERTAINMENT with Corporate Sponsored Commercial breaks in between.... And worst of ALL, We now have a Government driven far more by Whacky Media Talking Heads and 24 hour Global Corporate Newzz Psycholls than anything Pragmatic and FOR THE PEOPLE...

Ditto 01:24; what racist

Ditto 01:24; what racist comments were made by "liberals" regarding Rice and Powell?

The legitimacy of Bush II's

The legitimacy of Bush II's presidency was open to serious questions given the fraudulent election returns primarily as a result of the rigged Diebold voting machines, but also by the voter intimidation and fraudulent removal of minority voters from the voting rolls. These machines are no longer used in the majority of states, thereby producing the first honest election in at least eight years. I would like the writer to produce any racist slurs made by a liberal against Condi Rice or Colin Powell. Disagreement with policy is neither a slur nor racist. Referring to a minority as being "uppity" as one Republican Congresswoman did, given its historical context is. When Republican spokesman Rush Limbaugh diseeminates "Barack the Magic Negro" and suggests he should take the bone out of his nose, that is racist.

Folks, What I saw growing

Folks, What I saw growing up in 50's and 60's Alabama was that racism against African-Americans morphed into discrimination against women and lower class whites. The script for this control by upper class whites and corporations is laid out in "The Mind of The South," written by W. J. Cash in 1941. Another powerful view of the Jim Crow South is seen in "You have Seen their Faces,' written by Erskin Caldwell with photos by Margaret Bourke-White. These books provide the context for what we're seeing in recent public discourse, with its inchoate shouting by "birthers" and "tea baggers," as their rail against change and yearn to "regain" their country. These are fear driven rants that will subside only with an improvement in the national unemployment situation.

The South should secede.

The South should secede. Maybe it isn't too late.

And take Texas with it.

And take Texas with it.

Well Texas seems to be

Well Texas seems to be making a lot of noise about seceding again, but I think the bigger picture here is the wish of a lot of people to secede individually from their shared responsibilities for creating and sustaining a just society. Gated communities, private schools and home schooling, opting out of as much having to do with government as they possibly can. Paints a bad portrait of America as a united country despite all the patriotic babble they spew. And I'm including you, Grover Norquist, in this indictment.

7 years in Kentucky - not

7 years in Kentucky - not "southern" by demarcations of latitude - taught me that being "Confederate" is a state of mind (thank you, Anonymous on 10/16 at 00:43). The phony White sense of superiority and entitlement is like a disease all over this country. Every time some supposed authority figure makes noises like tightening the Police-State stranglehold on America, and calling it patriotism, not only do I want to puke, but I have second thoughts about remaining south of the Canadian border, or allowing my only son to remain in - Dear God! Tennessee! After I calm down I realize, the more of us True Blue Americans who leave, the more likely the ofal from the "south" will take over our beautiful America. LET'S NOT LET THEM!