Share

Post-Bush Stress Disorder

by: Jonathan Alter  |  Newsweek

photo
With their long-time enemy gone, Democrats risk falling prey to "Post-Bush Stress Disorder." (Photo Illustration: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t, Adapted from: voteprime, elmorsa)

    Democrats have too many hang-ups.

    In The Godfather, Sonny talks about going "to the mattresses," meaning war with rival Mafia families. Now President Obama and the Democrats are holing up together on their Posturepedics as they work out battle plans on health care, banking reform, and Afghanistan. The question is whether they'll be daring soldiers of the future or content to fight the last war.

    That war, when Republicans controlled at least one branch of government, created a mindset where many moderate Democrats now constantly fear giving the other side ammunition. There's some logic in this. Overreaching is always a danger in politics, and House Democrats in particular are to the left of the country as a whole. Appeasing powerful health-care interests, as the White House did early on, was a smart move. By delaying a climactic battle, Obama built momentum for a bill. The same sequencing was true for banks and the U.S. military in Afghanistan. The bleeding had to stop before their treatment could be properly managed.

    But Democrats are now at risk of post-Bush stress disorder (PBSD), a trauma that can cripple their efforts to adjust to everyday life in a new era. Their longtime enemy -- potent Republicans -- is gone, a mere memory of pain. But Republican ways of thinking have infected the minds of too many Democrats. More than a few have fallen into the GOP habit of selling out to corporate interests (the $1.5 million that health-related lobbies contributed to Max Baucus in 2007 -- 08 goes a long way in Montana), pandering to banks, and reflexively assuming that just because the Pentagon recommends escalation in Afghanistan, it must be necessary. These habits will have to be broken if the Democrats are to stay in power.

    The key to a political victory on health care isn't just passing a bill, it's controlling insurance premiums. After much-ballyhooed reform, Massachusetts failed to restrain premiums, which are set to increase another 10 percent next year. If the same thing happens nationally after Obama signs a bill, Americans will take it out on Democrats. So assuring that premiums don't skyrocket should be the No. 1 priority as committee chairs get down to the short strokes.

    The best antidote to premium gouging, of course, is a public option. I thought liberals turned it into a fetish this summer and were insane to hold the whole thing hostage to it. But now that the bill is on track, Democrats should revisit the issue, or at least make sure a public option has a steel-reinforced hair trigger. To show they really mean business, some gutsy Democrats should also threaten to cap premiums. This is a 1993 idea from "Hillarycare" that the White House is afraid of. But that's more fighting the last war. It's too late now for the insurance industry to mobilize and block passage. A cap proposal would focus the debate where it belongs -- on obscene premium hikes. At a minimum, the Leahy-Schumer amendment to end the insurance industry's state-by-state monopolies must be passed.

    The bank bailouts could also prove to be an exploding cigar for Democrats. With the institutions the president just rescued now lobbying against minimal regulation, it's time for Obama to angrily call them out -- or watch Republicans do so. Having already proven their chutzpah by kissing up to the elderly voters whose interests they spurned for 75 years, the GOP will continue to morph next year into the pitchfork party attacking Barack the plutocrat. Democrats need to betray the Wall Street interests now funding their campaigns and get busy saving their own hides with some sensible populism.

    Finally, the deliberations concerning Afghanistan are shadowed by a sense on the part of Democrats that they became too dovish after Vietnam and now need to assert their foreign-policy manhood. It's the same logic that led so many to vote for the Iraq War. But most Americans don't favor a wider war in Afghanistan, and they're right. John McCain lost the election. Charles Kraut-hammer doesn't represent any swing voters. Democrats shouldn't worry about those scary flashbacks where they're called the wimpy mommy party. The real danger for them is a quagmire that both gets people killed and is a political loser.

    It's 2009, not 1994 or 2002. Conservatives are noisy but irrelevant, and moving right to please them is not smart politics. It's time for Democrats to shed their old hang-ups -- and prepare for the new political combat of the 21st century.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

"Conservatives are noisy but

"Conservatives are noisy but irrelevant, and moving right to please them is not smart politics." Bravo Jonathan Alter of Newsweek. And while we are at it, let's get those BlueDog Democrats out of the way - Good Riddance.

Are we all grown up now and

Are we all grown up now and ready to move into the future? Are we finally over that fit of trickle-down, supply-side nonsense we endured these past 30 or so years? And can we finally, please, recognize the T-Rex in the living room called the Military-Industrial Complex. Can Democrats with cajones finally understand the damage it has caused? Can they finally recognize what a Republican named Ike did all those years ago and begin to tame the beast? Once Dems finally figure out that they really are in the driver's seat and can stop kissing up to the corporate bullies maybe we can evolve into the great society we could have been all these years. It may not even be an option once the realities of fossil fuel depletion, climate change and the falling dollar, conspire to put an end to the "perpetual expansion" that has been our business model all these years. Call it a wake-up call or sobering up after years of denial. If the Dems manage to alienate the populace into voting in the Repugnicans again they can expect to see a nation really come unhinged and kiss the Constitution goodbye.

It took America a LONG time

It took America a LONG time to get over our blunder known as Vietnam. It makes me wonder if WE can even survive our Greatest Blunder of All---- BuSh-Cheney...

What makes anyone think the

What makes anyone think the country is OVER the Vietnam syndrome? We are no more over it than Germany was by 1939. The sense of being "victimized" is still strong with many voters and politicians and military alike, and it is a dangerous sentiment.

There is no way Democrats

There is no way Democrats will become progressive. And the energy bill, which wasn't mentioned here, is slowly morphing into a fossil fuel industry welfare bill. Health care, energy, global warming with its Wall Street cap & trade, financial reform, and Afghanistan policy - all magnificent triumphs of backward, corporate welfare thinking.

I don't think the Democrats

I don't think the Democrats in the House are to the left of the majority of Americans, at least not when it comes to health care reform. (Maybe to the left of Jonathan Alter?) After all, many polls have shown that most Americans want Medicare for All (single payer), but the Democratic House did not come up with that for their healthcare reform plan. They chose a much more conservative (and expensive and complicated) plan instead.

The blue dogs get more bribe

The blue dogs get more bribe money from Republicansthan Democrats because they are bribed to vote with Republicans. That's why they are blue dogs, and its a long standing tradition.

Sometimes, I think Obama is

Sometimes, I think Obama is really really smart. Other times, I'm sure he's sold us out. I'm definitely suffering from "post-traumatic Bush Syndrome".